Initial Acceptability Research Articles

A pilot randomised controlled trial of the Peer Tree digital intervention targeting loneliness in young people: a study protocol

BackgroundYoung people are vulnerable to experiencing problematic levels of loneliness which can lead to poor mental health outcomes. Loneliness is a malleable treatment target and preliminary evidence has shown that it can be addressed with digital platforms. Peer Tree is a strength-based digital smartphone application aimed at reducing loneliness. The study aim is to reduce loneliness and assess the acceptability, usability, and feasibility of Peer Tree in young people enrolled at university.MethodsThis will be a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing a strength-based digital smartphone application (Peer Tree) with a control condition. Forty-two young people enrolled at university will be recruited for this pilot RCT. Participants with suicidal ideation or behaviours, acute psychiatric symptoms in the past month, or a current diagnosis of a mood or social anxiety disorder will be excluded. Allocation will be made on a 1:1 ratio and will occur after the initial baseline assessment. Assessments are completed at baseline, at post-intervention, and at follow-up. Participants in the control condition complete the same three assessment sessions. The primary outcome of the study will be loneliness. Depression, social anxiety, quality of life, acceptability, usability, feasibility, and safety of Peer Tree will also be measured as secondary outcomes.DiscussionThis trial will report the findings of implementing Peer Tree, a smartphone application aimed at reducing loneliness in university students. Findings from this trial will highlight the initial efficacy, acceptability, and feasibility of using digital positive psychology interventions to reduce subthreshold mental health concerns. Findings from this trial will also describe the safety of Peer Tree as a digital tool. Results will contribute evidence for positive psychology interventions to address mental ill-health.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12619000350123. Registered on 6 March 2020

P390: Health system direct contact of relatives for cascade testing: Reach and initial acceptability in a prospective intervention study*

P390: Health system direct contact of relatives for cascade testing: Reach and initial acceptability in a prospective intervention study*

Dialectical behavior therapy for justice-involved veterans (DBT-J): Feasibility and acceptability.

Justice-involved veterans are a high-risk, high-need subgroup serviced by behavioral health services within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system. Justice-involved veterans often have complex mental health and substance use difficulties, a myriad of case management needs, and a range of criminogenic needs that are difficult to treat with traditional outpatient VHA services. The present study represents an initial evaluation of dialectical behavior therapy for justice-involved veterans (DBT-J), a novel psychotherapy program providing 16 weeks of skills-based group therapy and individualized case management services to veterans with current or recent involvement with the criminal justice system. A total of 13 veterans were successfully enrolled into this initial acceptability and feasibility trial. Results broadly suggested DBT-J to be characterized by high ease of implementation, successful recruitment efforts, strong participant attendance and retention, high treatment fidelity, and high acceptability by veteran participants, DBT-J providers, and adjunctive care providers alike. Although continued research using comparison conditions is necessary, veterans who completed participation in DBT-J tended to show reductions in criminogenic risk across the course of treatment. Cumulatively, these findings suggest DBT-J holds potential as a VHA-based intervention to address the various needs of justice-involved veterans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The Development and Initial Feasibility of a Cognitive-Behavioural Group Intervention for COVID-19-Related Anxiety and Depression

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in adverse psychological outcomes for many people in the general public globally. Aim: This paper discusses the development and initial feasibility testing of a novel manualised online group cognitive behavioural therapy intervention targeting the maintenance factors of COVID-19-related anxiety and depression. The paper is in two sections describing: (i) the development of the intervention and (ii) a pilot study examined initial acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. Methods: Section 1 used the Six Steps in Quality Intervention Development methodology to systematically develop the intervention. Section 2 used a mixed-method design to assess feasibility and acceptability. The quantitative assessment examined uptake, completion, and pre–post intervention changes in psychological distress (N=8). A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews measured subjective acceptability. Results: A theoretically coherent, novel intervention that did not replicate existing treatment designs was developed. Low levels of engagement in online data-gathering did not allow for an assessment of effectiveness. However, there was a high level of participant retention, and qualitative data highlighted a high level of treatment appropriateness, positive post-intervention change and acceptability for those who took part. Conclusion: This initial feasibility study indicated that the intervention was feasible and acceptable and warranted further investigation.

Development of a brief cognitive-behavioral treatment for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in the context of disorders of gut-brain interaction: Initial feasibility, acceptability, and clinical outcomes.

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) symptoms are common (up to 40%) among adults with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), but treatments for this population (DGBI + ARFID) have yet to be evaluated. We aimed to identify initial feasibility, acceptability, and clinical effects of an exposure-based cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for adults with DGBI + ARFID. Patients (N=14) received CBT as part of routine care in an outpatient gastroenterology clinic. A two-part investigation of the CBT included a retrospective evaluation of patients who were offered a flexible (8-10) session length and an observational prospective study of patients who were offered eight sessions. Feasibility benchmarks were ≥75% completion of sessions, quantitative measures (for treatment completers), and qualitative interviews. Acceptability was assessed with a benchmark of ≥70% patients reporting a posttreatment satisfaction scores ≥3 on 1-4 scale and with posttreatment qualitative interviews. Mixed model analysis explored signals of improvement in clinical outcomes. All feasibility and acceptability benchmarks were achieved (and qualitative feedback revealed high satisfaction with the treatment and outcomes). There were improvements in clinical outcomes across treatment (all p's < .0001) with large effects for ARFID fear (-52%; Hedge's g=1.5; 95% CI=0.6, 2.5) and gastrointestinal-specific anxiety (-42%; Hedge's g=1.0; 95% CI=0.5, 16). Among those who needed to gain weight (n=10), 94%-103% of expected weight gain goals were achieved. Initial development and testing of a brief 8-session CBT protocol for DGBI + ARFID showed high feasibility, acceptability, and promising clinical improvements. Findings will inform an NIH Stage 1B randomized control trial. While cognitive-behavioral treatments (CBTs) for ARFID have been created in outpatient feeding and eating disorder clinics, they have yet to be developed and refined for other clinic settings or populations. In line with the recommendations for behavioral treatment development, we conducted a two-part investigation of an exposure-based CBT for a patient population with high rates of ARFID-adults with disorders of gut-brain interaction (also known as functional gastrointestinal disorders). We found patients had high satisfaction with treatment and there were promising improvements for both gastrointestinal and ARFID outcomes. The refined treatment includes eight sessions delivered by a behavioral health care provider and the findings reported in this article will be studied next in an NIH Stage 1B randomized controlled trial.

Intervention development to improve foster youth mental health by targeting coping self-efficacy and help-seeking

This study articulates the iterative development of an intervention called Strengthening Youth Networks and Coping (SYNC), which is designed to target coping self-efficacy and help-seeking intentions and behaviors among youth in foster care. The overarching goal is to design an intervention that will be a feasible and acceptable enhancement to existing child welfare services, and that will address modifiable determinants among adolescents involved in child welfare system that are related to elevated risk for mental health challenges, limited support network capacity, and service disengagement after exiting foster care. In this paper, we describe our initial needs assessment, explain how we selected proximal intervention mechanisms (i.e., intermediate outcomes) to target, and outline the preliminary intervention development process, including ongoing insights we received from a research advisory group including members with lived experience. Next, we report and discuss the initial acceptability pre-testing data collected from youth (N = 30) as well as feasibility data collected from providers (N = 82), results from which were used to refine the SYNC intervention framework prior to robust efficacy testing. Findings highlight the need and importance of targeting youth coping and help-seeking, integrating programming within existing transition services, delivering this content in a group-based format that includes near-peer mentors and facilitators with lived experience, and developing options that work for the heterogeneous population of young people in foster care. The results also highlight the key objective of capturing youth’s interests prior to enrolling in the program (e.g., language used in recruitment materials), holding their interest throughout the program (e.g., creating opportunities for youth to engage with other youth with similar experiences), and suggestions to encourage youth’s engagement and participation. This paper articulates the value of this intervention development approach, and the sequential phases of this intervention development process as well as the results, which may be useful to applied researchers and practitioners working with youth in foster care and other priority populations.

Early feasibility testing of a web-based mind-body resiliency program for adults with neurofibromatosis: The NF-Web study.

We aimed to test early feasibility, acceptability, and signals of improvement after the 8-week individually delivered asynchronous, web-based mind-body program (NF-Web) modeled after the synchronous group-based live video program (Relaxation Response Resiliency Program for NF; 3RP-NF). Two cohorts (cohort 1 n = 14, cohort 2 n = 14) completed baseline and posttest (feasibility markers, t-tests). Enrolled participants (N = 28; 80% of those eligible) completed baseline (N = 28; 100% of sample) and posttests (N = 25; 89.3%). Video lesson (58.0%) and homework (70.9%) completion were fair to good. Satisfaction (M = 8.85/10; SD = 2.35), credibility (M = 7.07/10; SD = 1.44), and expectancy (M = 6.68/10; SD = 2.10) were good to excellent. Participation was associated with statistically significant pre-to-post positive changes in quality of life (QoL; Physical, Psychological, Social, and Environmental,; p < 0.05) and emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and stress; p < 0.05). Pain intensity and interference did not improve significantly (p > 0.05) after participation. NF-Web demonstrates initial feasibility, acceptability, and signals of improvement. Results support future trials to ascertain efficacy. Web-based programs may be valuable for individuals with rare illness who prefer to learn skills on their own timeline, have barriers to live video participation, and who also have apprehensions about interacting with others during treatment.

Exploration of a community pharmacy delivered mobile health intervention to support medication taking for patients with multiple long-term conditions

Abstract Introduction Up to half of people with long-term conditions (LTCs) do not take their medicines as prescribed. Mobile health interventions, such as text messaging, have been shown to have positive impact on medication adherence.1 However, interventions for patients with multiple LTCs are lacking, and there are limited examples of their delivery from community pharmacy settings. We have developed a new intervention which combines a pharmacist consultation and automated two-way text messaging to support medicines taking. This has been developed using peer-reviewed literature and focus groups with patients and healthcare professionals (GPs, pharmacists, nurses). The intervention is tailored to the individual using a questionnaire and delivers content for up to eight LTCs. Aim To explore the acceptability of our new intervention with patients. Methods The new intervention was delivered to patients in a simulated environment, including a consultation with a pharmacist and two weeks of text messaging. Diary-interviews were used to gather feedback from eight patients, recruited through a public, patient and carer involvement group based at a university. Patients kept a diary during the period of text messaging and follow-up semi-structured interviews were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim for analysis. Transcripts were coded for aspects of the intervention that the patients liked and ideas on how the intervention could be changed, including the impact of delivering the intervention from community pharmacies. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the University of Sunderland Research Ethics Committee. Results The intervention had good acceptability with patients. Patients were happy to interact with the text messaging content, including providing information about symptoms of their long-term condition and result of home monitoring. Patients liked that the intervention was linked to a pharmacist consultation, where there were opportunities to identify medication issues which text messaging could not solve. Delivering the intervention from a community pharmacy setting was felt to promote stronger engagement with the text messaging component, including the opportunity to build rapport with the pharmacist who would be overseeing the intervention. The mechanism to monitor medication adherence using two-way text messaging was suggested to be made more streamlined, and patients also wanted more examples of text message responses included in the patient information leaflet for the intervention. Discussion/Conclusion We found that our intervention to support medication taking from community pharmacies has initial acceptability with patients. Whilst others have trialled similar technologies from community pharmacies2 our intervention focussed solely on medication taking, and this seemed to result in positive attitudes towards its delivery from community pharmacies. The consultation was found to be an important component alongside the text messaging, how combining digital and non-digital components work together to support medication adherence was a gap highlighted in our previous review of similar interventions.3 Our intervention now requires changes based on the feedback gathered in this study and further testing in a larger and more diverse group.

P095Let's chat: Initial feasibility, usability, and acceptability of a novel adolescent-centered sexual and reproductive care web-based app

<h3>Objectives</h3> We conducted an evaluation study of the Let's Chat app to assess its usability, efficacy, and accessibility. Patients and clinicians were surveyed to determine if the app facilitated nonjudgmental sexual and reproductive health conversations. <h3>Methods</h3> Participants aged 13–21 (n=40) were recruited from four obstetrician gynecologists and one internal medicine clinic from Chicago-based hospitals. Before their visit, adolescents gave consent and completed a baseline survey on their sociodemographics and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) knowledge. Next, they were invited to use Let's Chat. A post-survey was administered to assess the adolescent-centered quality of care, efficacy, and satisfaction of the app by participants. Following the study, key informant interviews were conducted with clinicians to provide further feedback on the app. <h3>Results</h3> Participants were 42% Black/African American, 35% White, and 15% Hispanic/Latinx (mean age, 17). 95% of the participants identified as female and the majority (77%) identified as heterosexual. 97% of the adolescents mentioned that the app made it easier to ask questions. Participants asked their clinicians about birth control (78%), puberty (30%), and sexually transmitted infections (STIs, 23%). Results showed that the adolescents liked that the app allowed them to ask a variety of questions about diverse topics (80%) and that it allowed them to understand the range of questions they could ask their clinician (92.5%). <h3>Conclusions</h3> The Let's Chat app facilitates question asking between adolescents and clinicians, supporting conversations about sexual and reproductive health. As a patient-facing intervention, Let's Chat allows adolescents to exercise agency over their SRH care at an important developmental moment.

Development and initial testing of TOGETHER-YA: an eHealth-delivered and group-based psychosocial intervention for young adult cancer survivors.

This study aimed to (1) develop TOGETHER-YA, an e-Health-delivered and group-based health-related quality of life (HRQOL) intervention for young adult (YA) cancer survivors aged 18-39 (Part 1), and (2) determine its initial feasibility and acceptability in a single-arm pilot trial (Part 2). TOGETHER-YA is a manualized, 10-week intervention for YA survivors that includes elements of relaxation training, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and health education. In Part 1, content was adapted from existing evidence-based interventions with feedback from YAs (N = 22) in four iterative focus groups. In Part 2, YA survivors (N = 11) participated in a single-arm pilot trial of TOGETHER-YA. Intervention groups were led by a trained facilitator over videoconference. Primary outcomes were feasibility (i.e., recruitment, session attendance, retention) and acceptability (i.e., participant satisfaction). Focus groups reacted positively to TOGETHER-YA and provided actionable recommendations for enhancing its relevance and acceptability, which were implemented. In initial testing, all feasibility and acceptability benchmarks were met; 58% of eligible YAs were recruited, participants attended M = 6 intervention sessions (SD = 3), and 82% of participants were retained post-intervention. On average, participants "agreed" to "strongly agreed" with positive statements about the weekly sessions and the overall program. TOGETHER-YA was developed in collaboration with YA cancer survivors and found to be feasible and acceptable in initial testing. TOGETHER-YA is the first HRQOL intervention for a broad range of YA survivors that is eHealth-delivered for convenience and group-based for peer support. Future large-scale trials should test its efficacy for improving HRQOL. NCT05048316, September 17, 2021; NCT05054569, September 23, 2021.

Impact of WHO Labor Care Guide on reducing cesarean sections at a tertiary center: an open-label randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUNDThe World Health Organization Labor Care Guide was introduced in December 2020 to implement World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience.OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to determine the effect of the WHO Labor Care Guide on labor outcomes, especially in reducing primary cesarean deliveries, and its acceptability by healthcare providers.STUDY DESIGNThis open-label randomized control trial was conducted from September 2021 to December 2021 on 280 low-risk antenatal women admitted for delivery at a busy tertiary care institute in North India. After informed consent, women were allocated into the study and control groups. Labor monitoring was performed using the WHO Labor Care Guide in the study group and the World Health Organization–modified partograph in the control group. Women who had a cesarean delivery in the latent phase of labor were excluded from the study. The primary outcome was mode of delivery, whereas the secondary outcomes were duration of active labor, maternal complications (postpartum hemorrhage and puerperal sepsis), duration of hospital stay, Apgar score at 5 minutes, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. The labor outcomes in both groups were compared. In the study group, the acceptability, difficulty, and satisfaction levels of the users were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. The “learning curve” for the use of the Labor Care Guide (LCG) was determined. SPSS software (version 21.0; IBM Corporation, Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis.RESULTSAfter excluding women who underwent cesarean delivery in the latent phase, 136 women in the study group and 135 women in the control group were observed for labor outcomes. The cesarean delivery rate was 1.5% in the study group vs 17.8% in the control group (P=.0001). The duration of the active phase of labor was significantly shorter in the study group than in the control group (P<.001). The 2 groups were similar in terms of maternal complications, duration of hospital stay, and Apgar score. The learning curve took average levels of 6.50 and 2.25 Labor Care Guide plots to shift from “very difficult” to “neutral” and “neutral” to “easy,” respectively. After an initial learning curve, acceptability and satisfaction levels were found to be high in the WHO Labor Care Guide users.CONCLUSIONThe WHO Labor Care Guide is a simple labor monitoring tool for the reducing primary cesarean delivery rate without increasing the duration of hospital stay and fetomaternal complications.

Setting Families Up for Success: A Pilot Study of a Toolkit to Enhance the Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnostic Evaluation Process.

Families of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) face challenges engaging in services following diagnosis. This study: (1) developed and implemented a toolkit to tailor ASD evaluation feedback to families' needs, and (2) evaluated caregiver and provider perceptions of the toolkit. Focus groups with providers (N = 11) informed toolkit development. Seven providers participated in pilot training and implementation. Provider and caregiver toolkit perceptions were assessed using interviews, surveys, and a fidelity checklist. Toolkit strategies reflect focus group themes. Provider and caregiver ratings suggest the initial feasibility, acceptability, and utility of the toolkit. This toolkit may be feasible to implement in community settings and may increase caregiver satisfaction, though further refinements are needed to support service connection.

Development and Initial Feasibility of a Hospital-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention to Improve Retention in Care for Out-of-Care Persons with HIV: Lessons Learned from an Open Pilot Trial.

Roughly 40% of persons with HIV (PWH) are not consistently involved in HIV care in the US. Finding out-of-care PWH is difficult, but hospitalization is common and presents an opportunity to re-engage PWH in outpatient care. The aims of this study were to (1) develop an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)-based intervention for hospitalized, out-of-care PWH who endorse avoidance-coping to improve HIV treatment engagement; (2) examine the intervention’s initial feasibility and acceptability; and (3) to revise the study protocol (including the intervention), based on stakeholder feedback, in preparation for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ACT to treatment as usual. Therapists and HIV care experts developed a four-session ACT-based intervention to be delivered during hospitalization. Fifteen hospitalized patients with poorly controlled HIV enrolled in the open trial, eight completed four sessions, two completed three sessions, and seven provided qualitative feedback. Patients universally liked the intervention and the holistic approach to mental health and HIV care. Refinements included repeating key concepts, including representative graphics, and translating to Spanish. Among the patients who attended ≥3 ACT sessions, 5/10 attended a HIV-care follow-up visit and 5/7 who had labs had a viral load <20 2-months post-intervention. Next steps include conducting a randomized clinical trial exploring the impact of the refined intervention to treatment as usual on retention in care and viral load. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04481373.

Live Video Mind-Body Program for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis, Comorbid Depression, and Obesity: Development and Feasibility Pilot Study.

BackgroundKnee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most common joint disorder in the United States and a leading cause of disability. Depression and obesity are highly comorbid with KOA and accelerate knee degeneration and disability through biopsychosocial mechanisms. Mind-body physical activity programs can engage biological, mechanical, and psychological mechanisms to improve outcomes in KOA, but such programs are not currently available.ObjectiveThis mixed methods study aims to adapt a mind-body activity program for the unique needs of patients with KOA, depression, and obesity (GetActive-OA) delivered via live video.MethodsParticipants were adults (aged ≥45 years) from rural Kentucky with obesity (BMI≥30 kg/m2), idiopathic KOA with mild to moderate radiographic changes, and elevated depressive symptoms (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire ≥10) recruited from 2 orthopedic centers. In phase 1, we developed GetActive-OA and the study protocol using qualitative focus group feedback from the study population (N=9; 2 focus groups, 90 minutes) and multidisciplinary expertise from clinical psychologists and orthopedic researchers. In phase 2, we explored the initial feasibility, credibility, and acceptability of GetActive-OA, live video delivery, and study procedures via an open pilot with exit interviews (N=5; 1 group). This research was guided by National Institutes of Health (NIH) model stage IA.ResultsPhase 1 qualitative analyses revealed nuanced information about challenges with coping and increasing activity, high interest in a mind-body activity program, program participation facilitators (flexibility with technology) and barriers (amotivation and forgetfulness), and perceived challenges with data collection procedures (blood and urine samples and homework). Phase 2 quantitative analyses showed that GetActive-OA met most a priori feasibility markers: acceptability (80%), expectancy (100%), credibility (100%), clinician adherence (90%), homework adherence (80%), questionnaire data collection (100%), program satisfaction (100%), and safety (100%). Adherence to ActiGraph wear (80% baseline, 20% posttest) and collection of blood samples (60%) were low. Participation in GetActive-OA was associated with signals of improvements in general coping (Cohen d=2.41), pain catastrophizing (Cohen d=1.24), depression (Cohen d=0.88), anxiety (Cohen d=0.78), self-efficacy (Cohen d=0.73), pain (Cohen d=0.39), and KOA symptoms (Cohen d=0.36). Qualitative exit interviews confirmed quantitative findings and provided valuable information to optimize the program and protocol.ConclusionsPatients with KOA, depression, and obesity from rural Kentucky were interested in a live video mind-body activity program. GetActive-OA shows promise; however, the program and protocol require further NIH stage I refinement before formal efficacy testing (NIH model stage II).International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100720

Development of Goal Management Training+ for Methamphetamine Use Disorder Through Collaborative Design.

BackgroundMethamphetamine use disorder (MUD) is associated with executive dysfunctions, which are linked with poorer treatment outcomes including earlier drop out and relapse. However, current treatments for MUD do not address executive functions. Goal Management Training (GMT) is an evidence-based cognitive remediation program for executive dysfunction, although required modifications to enhance its relevance and application within addiction treatment settings. This study aimed to (1) tailor GMT to the key cognitive deficits and typical treatment duration of MUD; (2) explore consumers' (people with MUD) engagement with the revised program; (3) implement a prototype of the program with consumers; and (4) present the manualized standard administration to clinical service providers.MethodsWe followed the Medical Research Council Complex Interventions Framework and employed an evidence- and person-based intervention development process. We used a four-phased approach and collaborated with neuropsychology experts, design researchers in healthcare, consumers with MUD, and clinical service providers. Each aim was addressed in a separate study phase; including content refinement and review with neuropsychology experts (phase 1), intervention design and collaboration with consumers (phase 2), prototype development and review with consumers (phase 3), and final program modifications and review with clinical stakeholders (phase 4).ResultsFindings from phase 1 indicated support for targeting four cognitive processes (attention, impulse control, goal setting, and decision-making). Key feedback included the need to help habitualize cognitive strategies and to guide consumers in applying these strategies in emotionally salient situations. Findings from phases 2 and 3 indicated consumer support for the program strategies and materials but highlighted the need to further enhance the personal relevance of specific content and journal activities. Findings from phase 4 provided clinicians support for the revised program but indicated an opportunity to minimize unintended effects. We present the intervention materials for the final revised program, Goal Management Training+ (GMT+), in line with TIDieR guidelines.ConclusionsGMT+ targets key cognitive processes and is sensitive to the clinical needs of people with MUD. Our intervention development process was important for informing the active ingredients and materials for GMT+, and indicated initial consumer and provider acceptability prior to conducting a clinical trial.

Black Kin Caregivers: Acceptability and Cultural Adaptation of the Family Check-Up/Everyday Parenting Program.

Black children join kinship care disproportionately and black kin caregivers often face financial, housing, mental health, and parenting challenges when caring for relative children. Few interventions have been developed specifically for kin caregivers, let alone Black kin caregivers. This study evaluated the initial acceptability of an evidence based parenting intervention and worked to culturally adapt it for Black kin caregivers. The intervention was delivered in a family camp format. Feedback from participant interviews were analyzed for this study. Participants felt that overall the intervention was culturally appropriate. However, they also proposed changes to the curriculum, as well as to the process and format of the intervention. This study experienced challenges in terms of participant recruitment and sample size, which was exacerbated by COVID-19-related safety concerns. Future steps regarding recruitment, content, and format are discussed. Implications for child welfare practice, policy, and research are also provided.

Acceptability of a Game-Based Intervention to Prevent Adolescent Prescription Opioid Misuse.

Objective: This study assessed the initial acceptability of SafeUse, a game-based opioid misuse prevention intervention for delivery via smartphone among adolescents. Evidence-based educational and refusal skills training materials were adapted, and game design elements were applied to clinically and scientifically informed scenarios in which opioids are typically introduced to adolescents using standard product development methods to create the SafeUse prototype. Materials and Methods: In a mixed-methods study, 14 adolescents were assessed on their knowledge and perceptions of opioids before and following 5-7 days of access to SafeUse. Participants provided feedback in focus groups on the acceptability, relevance, and understandability of SafeUse and made suggestions for its improvement. Feedback was coded and summarized as to playability, acceptability, appropriateness, content development, and knowledge transfer. Pre- and post-access quantitative data were analyzed using Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank tests. Results: Overall, participants liked SafeUse, its characters, graphics, and approach, finding it more appealing than lectures/reading materials and appropriate for school settings. They moderately to extremely "liked the game," "would like to play more game modules," "liked playing through the decisions," thought the game was realistic/relevant and fun, and they learned new information about opioids. Participants reported increased confidence to refuse opioids and decreased likelihood of accepting opioids from someone they know. Knowledge about opioids increased (P < 0.006), and adolescent perception that prescription drugs are safer than illegal drugs decreased (P < 0.003) after playing SafeUse. Conclusion: Findings suggest that SafeUse is acceptable and likely educational to adolescents and worthy of further development and research.

Understanding Acceptability, Barriers, and Facilitators to Clinical Implementation of the on Track Developmental Monitoring System for Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Qualitative Study

Aims On Track Developmental Monitoring System (DMS) is a novel series of tools to assist in shared-decision making, guide rehabilitation intervention based on functional ability levels, and promote episodic care service models. Further understanding of the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of On Track DMS in clinical settings is critical. The purpose of this study was to understand clinician perspectives of the acceptability of On Track DMS and to identify potential implementation barriers and facilitators within pediatric physical therapist practice. Methods Three, day-long training workshops were conducted with 32 pediatric physical therapists across the US. Focus groups with 21 workshop participants were conducted following training. Results were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded into themes. Results Three themes emerged from the data: (1) Valuing the On Track Approach to Intervention; (2) Setting-Specific Needs and Challenges to Implementation; and (3) Training Material/Tool Strengths and Limitations. Conclusions On Track DMS appears to have initial value and acceptability for pediatric physical therapists across practice settings. Perceived benefits include facilitation of data-driven practice and therapist/family collaboration to improve health outcomes for children with CP. Using this data to understand and assess barriers and facilitators to knowledge use are first steps in successfully implementing On Track DMS.

Implementation and Feasibility of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Patient-Reported Outcomes Symptom and Needs Monitoring Pilot in Ambulatory Oncology.

PURPOSE:Describe the feasibility and implementation of an electronic health record (EHR)–integrated symptom and needs screening and referral system in a diverse racial/ethnic patient population in ambulatory oncology.METHODS:Data were collected from an ambulatory oncology clinic at the University of Miami Health System from October 2019 to January 2021. Guided by a Patient Advisory Board and the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment model, My Wellness Check was developed to assess physical and psychologic symptoms and needs of ambulatory oncology patients before appointments to triage them to supportive services when elevated symptoms (eg, depression), barriers to care (eg, transportation and childcare), and nutritional needs were identified. Patients were assigned assessments at each appointment no more than once in a 30-day period starting at the second visit. Assessments were available in English and Spanish to serve the needs of the predominantly Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latino population.RESULTS:From 1,232 assigned assessments, more than half (n = 739 assessments; 60.0%) were initiated by 506 unique patients. A total of 65.4% of English and 49.9% of Spanish assessments were initiated. Among all initiated assessments, the majority (85.1%) were completed at home via the patient portal. The most common endorsed items were nutritional needs (32.9%), followed by emotional symptoms (ie, depression and anxiety; 27.8%), practical needs (eg, financial concerns; 21.7%), and physical symptoms (17.6%). Across the physical symptom, social work, and nutrition-related alerts, 77.1%, 99.7%, and 78.8%, were addressed, respectively, by the corresponding oncology health professional, social work team member, or nutritionist.CONCLUSION:The results demonstrate encouraging feasibility and initial acceptability of implementing an EHR-integrated symptom and needs screening and referral system among diverse oncology patients. To our knowledge, this is the first EHR-integrated symptom and needs screening system implemented in routine oncology care for Spanish-speaking Hispanics/Latinos.

Learn, Engage, Act, Dedicate (LEAD): development and feasibility testing of a task-shifted intervention to improve alcohol use, depression and family engagement for fathers

BackgroundMen’s depression, alcohol use, and family problems commonly co-occur to create of cluster of mental health problems. Yet, few treatments exist to address these problems, especially in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper describes the development and initial feasibility and acceptability of a novel task-shifted intervention to address this cluster of men’s mental health problems with a focus on engaging and retaining men in treatment.MethodsThe intervention, Learn, Engage, Act, Dedicate (LEAD), is based in behavioral activation blended with motivational interviewing and was pilot tested in Kenya. To develop LEAD, we engaged in a community-engaged multi-step, collaborative process with local Kenyan stakeholders. LEAD was piloted with nine fathers reporting problem drinking. To assess initial feasibility and acceptability, recruitment and participation were tracked and descriptive statistics were generated given engagement of men was key for proof of concept. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants and analyzed using thematic content analysis.ResultsThe development process resulted in a weekly 5-session intervention rooted in behavioral activation, motivational interviewing, and masculinity discussion strategies. These approaches were combined and adapted to fit contextually salient constructs, such as the importance of the man as provider, and streamlined for lay providers. Feasibility and acceptability results were promising with high attendance, acceptability of delivery and intervention content, and perceived intervention helpfulness.ConclusionResults describe an acceptable task-shifted treatment that may engage men in care and addresses a cluster of common mental health problems among men in ways that consider social determinants like masculinity. Findings set the stage for a larger trial.Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN130380278. Registered 7 October 2019—Retrospectively registered, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13038027