In-hospital Cardiac Arrest Research Articles

Physiological deterioration prior to in-hospital cardiac arrest: What does the National Early Warning Score-2 miss?

AimTo determine the frequency with which the National Early Warning Score-2 (NEWS-2) fails to detect physiological deterioration preceding in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of all adult patients (age ≥ 18) who had suffered an IHCA between 1st July 2019 and 31st December 2021 in two large acute hospitals located in an urban centre (Nottingham, UK). Clinical observations and case notes were examined for the period leading up to IHCA events to determine if there was evidence of physiological deterioration which warranted an urgent patient assessment, whether NEWS-2 was triggered, and whether an urgent assessment actually took place. ResultsUrgent assessment was indicated in the lead-up to 126/374 (33.7 %) IHCA cases, and NEWS-2 failed to trigger in 20 of these cases (15.9 %). An urgent assessment took place in 89/106 (84.0 %) cases where NEWS-2 was triggered, and 13/20 (65.0 %) cases where NEWS-2 was not triggered, with the difference in proportions being statistically significant (p = 0.048). Half of cases in which NEWS-2 missed a physiological deterioration were related to a new or rising oxygen requirement. ConclusionsA significant proportion of IHCA events are preceded by clinically important abnormalities in vital signs which are not detected by NEWS-2. This may be a causative factor in some failure-to-rescue events.

Goals of Care Discussions Among Patients Who Suffer Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest remain poor despite advances in resuscitation techniques. Establishing “goals of care” is crucial to optimizing patient care and avoiding burdensome interventions in those who are unlikely to benefit from resuscitation. Doctors often avoid discussions regarding ‘goals of care’ with patients in whom cardiac arrest is not deemed likely at the time of admission. Methods All cardiac arrest team activations for non-pregnant, adult inpatients on medical and surgical wards at our institution from December 2022 – June 2023 were prospectively analysed. Qualitative analysis of inpatient charts was performed to assess; incidence of cardiac arrest, demographic and clinical data, and the degree to which discussions regarding escalation of care had taken place. Results 66 cardiac arrest team activations were screened, of which 23 calls were included for analysis. The estimated incidence of cardiac arrest was 1.11-1.67 events per 1,000 patient discharges. 18 patients (78.2%) were under the care of general medicine or geriatric teams at the time of arrest call. 12 (52%) patients were older than 70 and 4 (17%) were older than 80. Falls were the most common reason for admission (22.7%) among patients for whom the cardiac arrest team was activated. 2 patients (12.5%) with confirmed cardiac arrest survived to hospital discharge. Discussions regarding goals of care were documented for 8/23 patients (34.7%). Conclusion Cardiac arrests were uncommon in our institution. Discussions regarding goals of care were documented in only a third of cases, possibly because many patients presented with issues not typically associated with a risk of subsequent arrest. Given the low survival rates to discharge, routine discussion of goals of care should be considered at the point of admission in all patients who are unlikely to benefit from resuscitation, regardless of the presenting complaint.

Prediction model of in-hospital cardiac arrest using machine learning in the early phase of hospitalization.

In hospitals, the deterioration of a patient's condition leading to death is often preceded by physiological abnormalities in the hours to days beforehand. Several risk-scoring systems have been developed to identify patients at risk of major adverse events; however, such systems often exhibit low sensitivity and specificity. To identify the risk factors associated with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), we conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan. Four machine learning algorithms were employed to identify the factors most predictive of IHCA. The support vector machine model was discovered to be the most effective at predicting IHCA. The ten most critical physiological parameters at 8 h prior to the event were pulse rate, age, white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, body temperature, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, platelet count, and use of central nervous system-active medication. Using these parameters, we can enhance early warning and rapid response systems in our hospital, potentially reducing the incidence of IHCA in clinical practice.

The Association between Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Profiles and Neurologic Outcome in Patients with In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

The relationship between disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) profiles and survival or neurological outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients is well known. In contrast, the relationship between DIC profiles and neurological outcomes in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) remains unclear. This study sought to examine the correlation between DIC profiles and neurological outcomes in IHCA patients. A retrospective observational study was conducted on comatose adult IHCA patients treated with targeted temperature management between January 2017 and December 2022. DIC profiles were used to calculate the DIC score, and were measured immediately after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The primary endpoint was a poor neurological outcome at six months, defined by cerebral performance in categories 3, 4, or 5. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the association between DIC profiles and poor neurological outcomes. The study included 136 patients, of which 107 (78.7%) patients demonstrated poor neurological outcomes. These patients had higher fibrinogen (3.2 g/L vs. 2.3 g/L) and fibrin degradation product levels (50.7 mg/L vs. 30.1 mg/L) and lower anti-thrombin III (ATIII) levels (65.7% vs. 82.3%). The DIC score did not differ between the good and poor outcome groups. In multivariable analysis, fibrinogen (odds ratio [OR], 1.009; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.003-1.016) and ATIII levels (OR, 0.965; 95% CI, 0.942-0.989) were independently associated with poor neurological outcomes. Decreased fibrinogen and ATIII levels after ROSC were an independent risk factor for unfavorable neurological outcomes in IHCA. The DIC score is unlikely to play a significant role in IHCA prognosis in contrast to OHCA.

Outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest managed with and without a specialized code team: A retrospective observational study

Background In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) still has a poor prognosis despite medical advancements in recent decades. Early and high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), as well as good teamwork, are important prognostic factors. There are no clear guidelines regarding the composition of a dedicated hospital CPR team. We compared outcomes of IHCA treated by a dedicated hospital CPR team compared to ward medical staff with advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training. Methods A single-center retrospective observational study based on the cardiopulmonary resuscitation database of Soroka University Medical Center from January 2016 until December 2019. We compared the results of resuscitations conducted by regular ward medical staff, certified in ACLS, versus those conducted by the dedicated hospital’s CPR team. Results Of the 360 CPR events analyzed, 141 (39.1%) ended in return of spontaneous circulation, 70 (19.4%) patients were alive after 24 hours, 23 (6.4%) survived for 30 days, and 18 (5%) survived to discharge. Of those who survived to discharge, 11 (61.1%) had a cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 1–2, and 7 (38.9%) had a score of 3–4 (mean 2.09). Survival-to-discharge was significantly higher in the CPR-team group compared to the ward-team group (7.6% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.013). However, with propensity score analysis the difference in survival became insignificant (RR = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.40–9.63, p = 0.40). Conclusion We found no difference in survival between IHCA treated by a dedicated hospital CPR team compared to a standard ward team, both trained with biennial ACLS training. Nevertheless, crude survival-to-discharge was significantly higher in the CPR-team group.

Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study: Erratum.

Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study: Erratum.

In-hospital cardiac arrest in middle-income settings: A comprehensive analysis of clinical profiles and outcomes of both adults and pediatrics

BackgroundIn hospital cardiac arrest is associated with poor survival despite basic and advanced life support measures. This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics and outcomes of cardiac arrests occurring during in-hospital admission to the tertiary care center in Pakistan. MethodA retrospective, cross-sectional study at Aga Khan University Hospital from 2021 to 2023 analyzed 230 cardiac arrest cases. Data included demographics, arrest type, timing, initial rhythm, resuscitation duration, and arrest location. American Heart Association guidelines were adhered to for life support. The main outcomes focused on the return of spontaneous circulation survival to hospital discharge. ResultsDuring the study, 230 cardiac arrests were observed: 152 in adults (mean age 57.8, 142 shockable cases, ROSC 52.6 %, alive at discharge 28.3 %) and 78 in pediatric patients (mean age 4.99, non-shockable rhythm 85.9 %, ROSC 51.3 %, alive at discharge 17.9 %). Adult Charles comorbidity index: 2.88 (SD±2.08), pediatric index: 0.610 (SD±0.88). Survival rates were lower with a high comorbidity index and code duration > 20 min. ConclusionThe study provides valuable observational data that challenges global survival rates for in-hospital cardiac arrest. It highlights how factors like being in monitored units and the presence of rapid response teams can lead to higher survival rates. The research underscores the influence of comorbidities, initial rhythms, and the duration of resuscitation efforts on patient outcomes, emphasizing the need for more research, especially in settings with limited resources.

Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patient outcomes in Imam Reza General Hospital Tabriz, Iran

Introduction: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a life-saving procedure for patients experiencing cardiac arrest. The success rate of in-hospital arrests varies from 2% to 27% according to different studies. Aim of our study was an investigation on in-hospital cardiac arrest in a tertiary hospital in north-west of Iran. Methods: We included all in-hospital cardiac arrests over a three-month period of time. Data related to age and sex of patients, cause of hospitalization, length of stay, cause of cardiac arrest, and outcome of CPR has been studied. Results: Sixty-six patients with cardiac arrest were recorded. Mean age was 62.59 (±20.7) years. Cardiovascular disease, neurological diseases, and lung diseases were the most common causes of hospitalization. The median length of hospitalization prior to arrest was seven days. CPR was initiated within 30 seconds of arrest detection in all cases. The initial cardiac arrest rhythm was asystole in majority of cases (80.3%) followed by ventricular tachycardia in 10.6 % and pulseless electrical activity (PEA) in 9.1% of cases. Five patients could survive to discharge in which two patients had a good neurologic outcome. Conclusion: This study indicates that in-hospital cardiac arrest has a poor prognosis, with asystole being the most prevalent initial rhythm.

Manual mastery vs. mechanized magic: current opinions on manual vs. mechanical chest compressions.

Mechanical chest compression devices are increasingly deployed during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We discuss the data supporting the use of mechanical chest compression devices during cardiac arrest and provide an opinion about the future of the technology. Multiple randomized trials investigating the use of mechanical chest compression devices for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have not demonstrated improved outcomes. There is little prospective evidence to support the use of mechanical chest compression devices in other settings. Data from observational studies do not support the routine use of mechanical chest compression devices for in-hospital cardiac arrest, but there may be a role for mechanical chest compressions for cardiac arrest in procedural areas and cardiac arrest prior to cannulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Mechanical chest compression devices offer a solution to some of the human limiting factors of resuscitation, but have failed to demonstrate meaningful improvement in outcomes from cardiac arrest. Routine use of mechanical chest compression devices during cardiac arrest is not supported by evidence.

Sustained Performance of Cardiac Arrest Prevention in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Units.

The Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium (PC4) cardiac arrest prevention (CAP) quality improvement (QI) project facilitated a decreased in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) incidence rate across multiple hospitals. The sustainability of this outcome has not been determined. To examine the IHCA incidence rate at participating hospitals after the QI project ended and discern which factors best aligned with sustained improvement. This observational cohort study compared IHCA data from the CAP era (July 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019) with data from the 2-year follow-up era (March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2022). Data were obtained from pediatric cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) from 17 PC4 CAP-participating hospitals. The CAP practice bundle was designed to facilitate local practice integration, with the intention to implement, adapt, and continue CAP processes beyond the CAP era. A web-based survey was administered 2 years after the end of the project to estimate CAP-specific QI work. Risk-adjusted IHCA incidence rates across all admissions were compared between study eras. The survey generated a novel hospital-specific QI sustainability score, which is generally reflective of the sum of local CAP work performed. There were no clinically important differences in demographic and admission characteristics between the 13 082 CAP era admissions and 16 284 follow-up admissions (total mean [SD] age, 5.1 [8.4] years; 56.1% male). Risk-adjusted IHCA incidences were not different between the CAP vs follow-up eras (2.8% vs 2.8%; odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.89-1.19), suggesting sustained prevention improvement. There was also no difference between eras in risk-adjusted IHCA incidence within medical, surgical, or high-risk subgroups. A lower hospital QI sustainability score was correlated with higher odds for IHCA in the follow-up vs CAP era (correlation coefficient, -0.58; P = .02). Five hospitals had increases of 1% or greater in risk-adjusted IHCA rates in the follow-up era; these hospitals had significantly lower QI sustainability scores and were less likely to have adopted sustainability elements during the CAP era or report persistent engagement for CAP-related QI processes during follow-up. In this cohort study of all CICU admissions across 17 hospitals, IHCA prevention was feasible and sustainable; the established reduction in risk-adjusted IHCA rate was maintained for at least 2 years after the end of the CAP project. Both implementation strategies and continued engagement in CAP processes during the follow-up era were associated with sustained improvement.

In-hospital cardiac arrest characteristics, causes and outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease across different departments: a retrospective study

BackgroundCardiac etiologies arrest accounts for almost half of all in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), and previous studies have shown that the location of IHCA is an important factor affecting patient outcomes. The aim was to compare the characteristics, causes and outcomes of cardiovascular disease in patients suffering IHCA from different departments of Fuwai hospital in Beijing, China.MethodsWe included patients who were resuscitated after IHCA at Fuwai hospital between March 2017 and August 2022. We categorized the departments where cardiac arrest occurred as cardiac surgical or non-surgical units. Independent predictors of in-hospital survival were assessed by logistic regression.ResultsA total of 119 patients with IHCA were analysed, 58 (48.7%) patients with cardiac arrest were in non-surgical units, and 61 (51.3%) were in cardiac surgical units. In non-surgical units, acute myocardial infarction/cardiogenic shock (48.3%) was the main cause of IHCA. Cardiac arrest in cardiac surgical units occurred mainly in patients who were planning or had undergone complex aortic replacement (32.8%). Shockable rhythms (ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia) were observed in approximately one-third of all initial rhythms in both units. Patients who suffered cardiac arrest in cardiac surgical units were more likely to return to spontaneous circulation (59.0% vs. 24.1%) and survive to hospital discharge (40.0% vs. 10.2%). On multivariable regression analysis, IHCA in cardiac surgical units (OR 5.39, 95% CI 1.90-15.26) and a shorter duration of resuscitation efforts (≤ 30 min) (OR 6.76, 95% CI 2.27–20.09) were associated with greater survival rate at discharge.ConclusionIHCA occurring in cardiac surgical units and a duration of resuscitation efforts less than 30 min were associated with potentially increased rates of survival to discharge.

Defibrillator Training in the Virtual Setting is Feasible and Improves Medical Student Self-Efficacy; A Pilot Study

Background Management of in-hospital cardiac arrest includes many component skills that require considerable training in order to gain mastery. Practicing defibrillation skills in a simulated setting improves performance and time to shock delivery but is cumbersome and costly. Virtual reality (VR) simulation training may provide an alternative platform to help medical students learn and build confidence in the critical steps required to operate a manual defibrillator. Intervention We performed a pilot study to implement a VR simulation that trains learners on the stepwise operation of a manual defibrillator. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey that measured the feasibility, usability, and likeability of a VR simulation among fourth-year medical students at a large urban academic medical center. Secondary outcomes included self-efficacy with operating a defibrillator before and after the VR simulation, and time to defibrillation within the simulation. Results Twenty-six participants completed the VR simulation. The majority of participants found the VR simulation easy to use (71% agreed), liked the experience (96% agreed), found it realistic (87.5% agreed), and would recommend it to their peers (96% agreed). Most students (96%) agreed that the training improved their knowledge of how to use a defibrillator, and all (100%) students agreed that they were more confident than beforehand in using the defibrillator to defibrillate a patient with cardiac arrest. Self-reported knowledge and comfort with using the defibrillator significantly improved from before to after the VR training, as did average time to defibrillation. Discussion VR simulation for defibrillator training is feasible and well-liked by senior medical students and is associated with improved self-perceived knowledge and comfort with using a manual defibrillator.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Pathway for Management of Refractory Cardiac Arrest: a Retrospective Study From a National Center of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Cardiac arrest remains a critical condition with high mortality and catastrophic neurological impact. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has been introduced as an adjunct in cardiopulmonary resuscitation modalities. However, survival with good neurological outcomes remains a major concern. This study aims to explore our early experience with ECPR and identify the factors associated with survival in patients presenting with refractory cardiac arrest. This is a retrospective cohort study analyzing 6-year data from a tertiary center, the country reference for ECPR. This study was conducted at a national center of ECPR. Participants of this study were adult patients who experienced witnessed refractory cardiopulmonary arrest and were supported by ECPR. ECPR was performed for eligible patients as per the local service protocols. Data from 87 patients were analyzed; of this cohort, 62/87 patients presented with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and 25/87 presented with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Overall survival to decannulation and hospital discharge rates were 26.4% and 25.3%, respectively. Among survivors (n = 22), 19 presented with IHCA (30.6%), while only 3 survivors presented with OHCA (12%). A total of 15/87 (17%) patients were alive at 6-month follow-up. All survivors had good neurological function assessed as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2. Multivariate logistic regression to predict survival to hospital discharge showed that IHCA was the only independent predictor (odds ratio: 5.8, P = 0.042); however, this positive association disappeared after adjusting for the first left ventricular ejection fraction after resuscitation. In this study, the use of ECPR for IHCA was associated with a higher survival to discharge compared to OHCA. This study demonstrated a comparable survival rate to other established centers, particularly for IHCA. Neurological outcomes were comparable in both IHCA and OHCA survivors. However, large multicenter studies are warranted for better understanding and improving the outcomes.

The Discover In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (Discover IHCA) Study: An Investigation of Hospital Practices After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a significant public health burden. Rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) have been improving, but the best way to care for patients after the initial resuscitation remains poorly understood, and improvements in survival to discharge are stagnant. Existing North American cardiac arrest databases lack comprehensive data on the post-resuscitation period, and we do not know current post-IHCA practice patterns. To address this gap, we developed the Discover In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (Discover IHCA) study, which will thoroughly evaluate current post-IHCA care practices across a diverse cohort. Our study collects granular data on post-IHCA treatment practices, focusing on temperature control and prognostication, with the objective of describing variation in current post-IHCA practice. This is a multicenter, prospectively collected, observational cohort study of patients who have suffered IHCA and have been successfully resuscitated (achieved ROSC). There are 24 enrolling hospital systems (23 in the United States) with 69 individual enrolling hospitals (39 in the United States). We developed a standardized data dictionary, and data collection began in October 2023, with a projected 1000 total enrollments. Discover IHCA is endorsed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. The study collects data on patient characteristics including pre-arrest frailty, arrest characteristics, and detailed information on post-arrest practices and outcomes. Data collection on post-IHCA practice was structured around current American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council guidelines. Among other data elements, the study captures post-arrest temperature control interventions and post-arrest prognostication methods. Analysis will evaluate variations in practice and their association with mortality and neurologic function. We expect this study, Discover IHCA, to identify variability in practice and outcomes following IHCA, and be a vital resource for future investigations into best-practice for managing patients after IHCA.

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Use Among Children With Cardiac Disease in the ICU: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Data Through March 2024.

Epidemiologic data on extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) use in children with cardiac disease after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) are lacking. We aimed to investigate trends in ECPR use over time in critically ill children with cardiac disease. We performed a secondary analysis of a recent systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020156247) to investigate trends in ECPR use in children with cardiac disease. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were screened (inception to September 2021). For completeness of this secondary analysis, PubMed was also rescreened (September 2021 to March 2024). Observational studies including epidemiologic data on ECPR use in children with cardiac disease admitted to an ICU. Data were extracted by two independent investigators. The risk of bias was assessed using the National Heart Lung and Blood Institutes Quality Assessment Tools. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compute a pooled proportion of subjects undergoing ECPR; meta-regression was used to assess trends in ECPR use over time. Of the 2664 studies identified, 9 (17,669 patients) included data on ECPR use in children with cardiac disease. Eight were cohort studies, 1 was a case-control, 8 were retrospective, 1 was prospective, 6 were single-center, and 3 were multicenter. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis; all were judged of good quality. By meta-analysis, we found that a pooled proportion of 21% (95% CI, 15-29%) of pediatric patients with cardiac disease experiencing IHCA were supported with ECPR. By meta-regression adjusted for category of patients (surgical vs. general cardiac), we found that the use of ECPR in critically ill children with cardiac disease significantly increased over time ( p = 0 .026). About one-fifth of critically ill pediatric cardiac patients experiencing IHCA were supported with ECPR, and its use significantly increased over time. This may partially explain the increased trends in survival demonstrated for this population.

Improved Code Team Performance and Outcomes After Implementation of Moderate Fidelity In Situ Simulation in a Pediatric Cardiac Acute Care Unit.

Children with cardiac disease suffer higher rates of in-hospital cardiac arrest. Cardiac arrest outside of the intensive care unit (ICU) is an infrequent event, which is a threat for suboptimal code team performance. Shorter time to the first epinephrine dose during cardiac arrest has been associated with improved survival and neurologic outcomes. Moderate fidelity in situ simulation training was implemented in the pediatric cardiac acute care unit (PCACU) to improve code team performance in August 2015. A small interprofessional team of simulation facilitators was developed that included nurses, physicians, and advanced practice providers. The primary outcome was time to first epinephrine dose in pulseless electrical activity (PEA) scenarios. Time to epinephrine of all simulation exercises, and actual cardiac arrests, that occurred in the PCACU were reviewed through May 2022. A total of 72 simulations were performed and 42 (58%) were PEA scenarios. A center line shift was observed for time to epinephrine for simulated PEA cardiac arrests (from 5 to 3min). After implementation of simulation exercises, a center line shift was observed for time to epinephrine for actual cardiac arrests in the PCACU (from 8 to 2min). Survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest improved after implementation of the training (0% vs. 64%, p = 0.02). Code team performance, as measured by time to epinephrine, can be improved following implementation of in situ simulation exercises in a pediatric cardiac acute care unit. Optimizing code team performance may contribute to improved patient outcomes.

In-hospital cardiac arrest survival before and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Have higher performing hospitals stayed high-performing?

BackgroundSurvival for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) has declined since the COVID-19 pandemic. Because the burden of COVID-19 was uneven throughout the U.S., it remains unknown if top-performer hospitals in IHCA survival have remained top-performers since the pandemic. MethodsWithin Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation, we identified hospitals with at least 2 years of registry participation pre-pandemic (2017–2019) and post-pandemic (July 2020–2022) and with at least 20 IHCA cases in both periods. Using multivariable hierarchical models with hospital as a random effect and adjusting for patient and arrest characteristics, we calculated risk-standardized survival rates to discharge (RSSR) for IHCA at each hospital during the pre- and post-pandemic periods. We then assessed the correlation between a hospital’s pre-pandemic and post-pandemic RSSR for IHCA, and whether the correlation differed by the proportion of Black or Hispanic IHCA patients at each hospital. ResultsA total of 243 hospitals were included, comprising 122,561 IHCAs (pre-pandemic: 57,601; post-pandemic: 64,960). Pre-pandemic, the mean RSSR was 26.8% (SD, 5.2%) whereas the mean RSSR post-pandemic was 21.7% (SD, 5.5%). There was good correlation between a hospital’s pre- and post-pandemic RSSR: correlation of 0.55. When hospitals were categorized into tertiles based on the proportion of their IHCA patients who were Black or Hispanic, this correlation remained similar: 0.48, 0.68, and 0.45 (interaction P-value: 0.69) for hospitals in the upper, middle and lower tertiles, respectively. ConclusionAlthough the COVID-19 pandemic affected the U.S. unevenly, there was good correlation in a hospital’s performance for IHCA survival before and after the pandemic, even at hospitals caring for a larger proportion of Black and Hispanic patients. Future studies are needed to understand what characteristics of high-performing hospitals pre-pandemic allowed many to continue to excel in the post-pandemic period.

Knowledge, practice, and factors associated with electrocardiography interpretation among nurses working in adult emergency and critical care units at selected governmental hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2023: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundElectrocardiography (ECG) is a noninvasive diagnostic method used to examine electrical and muscular cardiac activity. It is usually the first-line diagnostic tool for patients with chest pain. Late recognition of electrocardiography abnormalities can cause in-hospital cardiac arrest, further complicate care, increase the cost of health care, and prolong admission. Hence, the objective of this study was to determine the knowledge, practice, and associated factors of nurses regarding the interpretation of electrocardiography.MethodsA cross-sectional study was carried out on 334 nurses working at randomly selected public hospitals from March 06, 2023, to April 05, 2023. Since our study populations were less than the calculated sample size, all nurses who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. The collected data were coded and cleaned using EpiData version 4.2 and analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was run to find an association between dependent and independent variables. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence levels were used to measure the strength of associations.ResultsA total of 334 nurses responded to the survey, yielding a 93% response rate. Only 15.4% and 9% of them had satisfactory knowledge and good practice, respectively. Nurses who had 2–4 years of experience in the current unit were 3.13 times more likely (AOR = 3.13 (1.23, 7.92) to have sufficient knowledge. Nurses working in cardiac care units were 3.45 times more likely to have good practices than those working in intensive care units (AOR = 3.45 (1.02, 13.73)).ConclusionThe study revealed that educational qualifications, in-service training, and current working units were significantly associated with nurses’ knowledge and practice of electrocardiography interpretation. The concerned body must provide continuous on-the-job training related to ECG interpretation to all nurses working in adult emergency and critical care unit.

Outcomes and relevance of emergency percutaneous coronary angiography and intervention after resuscitated cardiac arrest: a retrospective study

BackgroundIn patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest and displaying no ST-segment elevation on initial electrocardiogram (ECG), recent randomized trials indicated no benefits from early coronary angiography. How the results of such randomized studies apply to a real-world clinical context remains to be established.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed a clinical database including all patients 18 yo or older admitted to our tertiary University Hospital from January 2017 to August 2020 after successful resuscitation of out-of-Hospital (OHCA) or In-Hospital (IHCA) cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac origin, and undergoing immediate coronary angiography, regardless of the initial rhythm and post-resuscitation ECG. The primary outcome of the study was survival at day 90 after cardiac arrest. Demographic data, characteristics of cardiac arrest, duration of resuscitation, laboratory values at admission, angiographic data and revascularization status were collected. Comparisons were performed according to the initial ECG (ST-segment elevation or not), and between survivors and non-survivors. Variables associated with the primary outcome were evaluated by univariate and multivariate regression analyses.ResultsWe analyzed 147 patients (130 OHCA and 17 IHCA), including 67 with STEMI and 80 without STEMI (No STEMI). Immediate revascularization was performed in 65/67 (97%) STEMI and 15/80 (19%) no STEMI. Day 90 survival was significantly higher in STEMI (48/67, 72%) than no STEMI (44/80, 55%). In the latter patients, survival was not influenced by the revascularization status. In univariate and multivariate analyses, lower age, a shockable rhythm, shorter durations of no flow and low flow, and a lower initial blood lactate were associated with survival in both STEMI and no STEMI. In contrast, metabolic abnormalities, including lower initial plasma sodium and higher potassium were significantly associated with mortality only in the subgroup of no STEMI patients.ConclusionsOur results, obtained in a real-world clinical setting, indicate that an immediate coronary angiography is not associated with any survival advantage in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac etiology without ST-segment elevation on initial ECG. Furthermore, we found that some early metabolic abnormalities may be associated with mortality in this population, which should deserve further investigation.

Pericardiocentesis, Chest Tube Insertion, and Needle Thoracostomy During Resuscitation of Nontraumatic Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is a significant public health burden. Rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) have been improving, but the best way to care for patients after the initial resuscitation remains poorly understood, and improvements in survival to discharge are stagnant. Existing North American cardiac arrest databases lack comprehensive data on the postresuscitation period, and we do not know current post-IHCA practice patterns. To address this gap, we developed the Discover IHCA study, which will thoroughly evaluate current post-IHCA care practices across a diverse cohort. Our study collects granular data on post-IHCA treatment practices, focusing on temperature control and prognostication, with the objective of describing variation in current post-IHCA practices. This is a multicenter, prospectively collected, observational cohort study of patients who have suffered IHCA and have been successfully resuscitated (achieved ROSC). There are 24 enrolling hospital systems (23 in the United States) with 69 individuals enrolling in hospitals (39 in the United States). We developed a standardized data dictionary, and data collection began in October 2023, with a projected 1000 total enrollments. Discover IHCA is endorsed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine. The study collects data on patient characteristics, including prearrest frailty, arrest characteristics, and detailed information on postarrest practices and outcomes. Data collection on post-IHCA practice was structured around current American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council guidelines. Among other data elements, the study captures postarrest temperature control interventions and postarrest prognostication methods. The majority of participating hospital systems are large, academic, tertiary care centers serving urban populations. The analysis will evaluate variations in practice and their association with mortality and neurologic function. We expect this study, Discover IHCA, to identify variability in practice and outcomes following IHCA and be a vital resource for future investigations into best practices for managing patients after IHCA.