Inhibitor SN-38 Research Articles

Chk1 signaling pathways that mediated G 2M checkpoint in relation to the cellular resistance to the novel topoisomerase I poison BNP1350

A novel karenitecin, BNP1350, is a topoisomerase I-targeting anticancer agent with significant antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo. A BNP1350-resistant human head and neck carcinoma A253 cell line, denoted A253/BNPR, was developed. The A253/BNPR cell line was approximately 9-fold resistant to BNP1350 and 4-fold cross-resistant to another topoisomerase I inhibitor SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. After drug treatment with equimolar concentrations of BNP1350 (0.7 μM) for 2 h, activation of the DNA double-strand break repair protein complexes was similar in the two cell lines, suggesting that DNA dsb repair is not attributable to resistance to BNP1350 in the A253/BNPR cells. Cell cycle analysis indicates that the A253 cell line accumulated primarily in S phase, but G 2 phase accumulation was observed in the A253/BNPR cell line at 48 h after drug removal. Elevated chk1 phosphorylation at Ser 345 following DNA damage induced by BNP1350 was accompanied by G 2 accumulation in the A253/BNPR cell line, while exposure to equimolar concentrations of BNP1350 (0.7 μM) induced S-phase arrest and no increased phosphorylation of chk1 at Ser 345 in the A253 cell line. Under the same conditions, increased chk1 activity was observed in the A253/BNPR cell line, but not in the A253 cell line. Moreover, stimulated binding of 14-3-3 proteins to chk1 was observed in BNP1350-treated A253/BNPR cells. To confirm relationship between chk1 expression/phosphorylation and drug resistance to topo I poisons, we examined the effects of chk1 or chk2 antisense oligonucleotides on the cellular growth inhibition. Chk1 antisense oligonucleotide can sensitize the A253/BNPR cells to killing by topo I inhibitor BNP1350, but no significant sensitization of BNP1350-induced growth inhibition was observed in the drug-sensitive cell line. Chk2 antisense oligonucleotide has only a small sensitization effect on BNP1350-induced growth inhibition in both cell lines. The data indicate that the chk1 signaling pathways that mediate cell cycle checkpoint are associated with cellular resistance to BNP1350 in the A253/BNPR cell line.

Abrogation of the S Phase DNA Damage Checkpoint Results in S Phase Progression or Premature Mitosis Depending on the Concentration of 7-Hydroxystaurosporine and the Kinetics of Cdc25C Activation

DNA damage causes cell cycle arrest in G(1), S, or G(2) to prevent replication on damaged DNA or to prevent aberrant mitosis. The G(1) arrest requires the p53 tumor suppressor, yet the topoisomerase I inhibitor SN38 induces p53 after the G(1) checkpoint such that the cells only arrest in S or G(2). Hence, SN38 facilitates comparison of p53 wild-type and mutant cells with regard to the efficacy of drugs such as 7-hydroxystaurosporine (UCN-01) that abrogate S and G(2) arrest. UCN-01 abrogated S and G(2) arrest in the p53 mutant breast tumor cell line MDA-MB-231 but not in the p53 wild-type breast line, MCF10a. This resistance to UCN-01 in the p53 wild-type cells correlated with suppression of cyclins A and B. In the p53 mutant cells, low concentrations of UCN-01 caused S phase cells to progress to G(2) before undergoing mitosis and death, whereas high concentrations caused rapid premature mitosis and death of S phase cells. UCN-01 inhibits Chk1/2, which should activate the mitosis-inducing phosphatase Cdc25C, yet this phosphatase remained inactive during S phase progression induced by low concentrations of UCN-01, probably because Cdc25C is also inhibited by the constitutive kinase, C-TAK1. High concentrations of UCN-01 caused rapid activation of Cdc25C, which is attributed to inhibition of C-TAK1, as well as Chk1/2. Hence, UCN-01 has multiple effects depending on concentration and cell phenotype that must be considered when investigating mechanisms of checkpoint regulation.

Cross-resistance in the 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine)-resistant human ovarian cancer cell line AG6000 to standard and investigational drugs

Gemcitabine (2′-2′-difluorodeoxycytidine; dFdC) is a deoxycytidine analogue which is effective against solid tumours, including lung cancer and ovarian cancer. dFdC requires phosphorylation by deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) for activation. In the human ovarian cancer cell line A2780 and its 30 000-fold dFdC-resistant variant AG6000 ( P<0.001), we investigated the cross-resistance profile to several drugs. AG6000, which has a complete dCK deficiency, was approximately 1000–10 000-fold resistant to other deoxynucleoside analogues such as 1-β- d-arabinofuranosyl cytosine, 2-chloro-deoxyadenosine, aza-deoxycytidine and 2′,2′-difluorodeoxyguanosine (dFdG) ( P<0.001). dFdG can be activated by dCK and deoxyguanosine kinase (dGK), but the latter enzyme was not altered in AG6000 cells. Thus dFdG resistance was only due to dCK deficiency. AG6000 was 1.6- and 46.7-fold resistant to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and ZD1694, respectively (the latter was significant; P<0.01), which may be due to the 1.7-fold higher thymidylate synthase (TS) activity, but AG6000 cells were also 2.7-fold resistant to the lipophilic TS inhibitor AG337 ( P<0.05). Remarkably, AG6000 cells were 2.5-fold more sensitive to methotrexate (MTX) ( P<0.01) than A2780 cells, but 1.6-fold more resistant to trimetrexate (TMQ) ( P<0.10). However, no differences in reduced folate carrier activity, folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS) activity and polyglutamation of MTX were found between the cell lines. AG6000 cells were approximately 2 to 7.5-fold more resistant to doxorubicin (DOX), daunorubicin (DAU), epirubicin and vincristine (VCR) (the latter was significant; P<0.02) and approximately 4-fold more resistant to the microtubule inhibitors paclitaxel and docetaxel ( P<0.001). Fluorescent activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis revealed no P-glycoprotein (Pgp) or multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) expression, but less fluorescence of intercalated DAU in AG6000 cells. An approximately 2-fold resistance to the topoisomerase I and II inhibitors etoposide, CPT-11 and SN38 was found in AG6000 cells. Topoisomerase I and IIα RNA expression was decreased in AG6000 cells. AG6000 was 2.4, 2.4, 2.3 and 3.7-fold more resistant to EO9 ( P<0.02), mitomycin-C (MMC) ( P<0.05), cisplatin (CDDP) ( P<0.10) and maphosphamide (MAPH), respectively. DT-diaphorase (DTD), which activates EO9, was 2.2-fold lower in AG6000 cells. CDDP resistance might be related to a reduced retention of DNA adducts in AG6000. However, glutathione levels were equal in A2780 and AG6000 cells. A 24 h exposure to DOX, VCR and paclitaxel at equimolar and equitoxic concentrations, resulted in more double-strand breaks (1.5- to 2-fold) in A2780 than in AG6000 cells. MAPH at 1120 nM and 17 nM of EO9 did not cause DNA damage in either cell line. In conclusion, AG6000 is a cell line highly cross-resistant to a wide variety of drugs. This cross-resistance might be related to altered enzyme activities and/or increased DNA repair.

Combination effects of TAS-103, a novel dual topoisomerase I and II inhibitor, with other anticancer agents on human small cell lung cancer cells.

TAS-103 [6-((2-(dimethylamino) ethyl)amino)-3-hydroxy-7H-iindeno(2,1-c)quinolin-7-one dihydrochloride] is a newly synthesized dual inhibitor of topoisomerase I and II. Since anticancer drugs are used in combination with other drugs for effective chemotherapy, we investigated the cytotoxic effect of TAS-103 in combination with other conventional anticancer agents, such as cisplatin, vindesine, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and the antitopoisomerase inhibitors SN-38 and etoposide in vitro. Inhibition of the growth of the human small-cell lung cancer cell line SBC-3 was evaluated using the tetrazolium dye (MTT) assay. Drug interactions were evaluated by isobologram analysis and the determination of combination indices supplemented by a three-dimensional model. Simultaneous use of TAS-103 and cisplatin had a supraadditive effect, but combinations of TAS-103 with other drugs had an additive or marginally subadditive effect. Three-dimensional model analysis added more information about the synergistic concentration ranges of two drugs (cisplatin 200-400 nM and TAS-103 7 10 nM). Sequential use of TAS-103 and cisplatin had only an additive effect. These results suggest that the concomitant use of TAS-103 and cisplatin has a greater cytotoxic effect on cancer cells than single drug use, and may provide a beneficial effect in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer.