Sir—We have read with interest the correspondence sent by Driessen and Snoeck (1), titled the ‘Duchenne muscular dystrophy: which is the best anesthetic agent’. Sensitivity of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) to sedative, anesthetic and neuromuscular blocking agents may result in life-threatening perioperative complications such as progressive respiratory failure, acute rhabdomyolisis, cardiac arrest, and malign hypertermia-like syndrome (2). The authors emphasize that in children with DMD are predispose to develop serious problems during surgery and anesthesia irrespective of the type of anesthetic agents used too. Anesthetic management of these patients is challenging and may cause serious problems to the anesthesiologist. Is regional anesthesia a safe and reliable alternative to general anesthesia in patients with DMD? Some cases have been reported in which regional anesthesia has been used in literature (3,4). Hereby, we report a pediatric case with DMD, who underwent successful orchidopexy operation under spinal anesthesia. A 3-year-old boy (weight 15 kg, height 95 cm) diagnosed with DMD underwent an orchidopexy operation. There is a muscle biopsy at 1 year in previous anesthetic history. He was medicated with dexametazone, and it was discontinued a week before the operation. Physical examination on cardiovascular and respiratory system was normal, and muscle tone was 5/5. In laboratory evaluation, baseline creatine kinase, alanine aminotransferase and aspartat aminotransferase levels are 36 039 IU·l−1 (normal range 25–170 IU·l−1), 241 IU·l−1 and 450 IU·l−1, respectively. Other laboratory parameters were normal. He was monitored for noninvasive blood pressure using a five-channel EKG, pulse oxymeter in the operating room. The patient was sedated with 0.05 mg·kg−1 midazolam i.v. Oxygen was administered at 2 l·min−1 by facemask. After an additional dose of 20 mg propofol, he was placed in a lateral decubitus position, and lumbar puncture was performed using a midline approach at the L5-S1 intervertebral space with a 26-gauge Atraucan pediatric spinal needle. 1.6 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine was given intrathecally. After the induction of spinal anesthesia, the onset of complete motor block occurred within 5 min, and the sensory block was achieved approaching T6-7 level verified by pin prick test after 5 min. The intraoperative course of patient was comfortable and uneventful throughout the 25 min of surgery. Postoperatively, he was monitored in the recovery room until regression of the sensory block, and he was transferred to the pediatric surgery ward. Sensory and motor function completely recovered 1.5 h after the surgical procedure. Duchenne muscular dystrophy is the most common and severe form of myopathy occurring in pediatric patients (2). Pediatric anesthetists are experienced more of perioperative complications and know how to avoid them during their care for children with DMD undergoing surgery. It is considered that serious problems are associated with general anesthesia (inhalational anesthetic agents or total intravenous anesthesia). The use of regional or local anesthesia seems warranted whenever possible (5). Spinal anesthesia has advantages of reduced drug dosage, avoidance of tracheal intubation and general anesthesia adverse effects, profound sensory and motor block and decreased need for opioid administration (6). In this case, good and rapid recovery and uneventful postoperative period can be achieved with spinal anesthesia. We consider that spinal anesthesia would be a safe and an alternative technique to general anesthesia in children with DMD.