Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Research Articles

Results of the Italian Collaborators for Evar Registry on Acute Kidney Injury After Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

To analyze the incidence and predictive factors of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after elective standard endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in a large recent, multicenter cohort. This is a multicenter, retrospective, financially unsupported physician-initiated observational cohort study. Between January 2018 and March 2021, only patients treated with elective standard EVAR for infrarenal non-infected abdominal aortic aneurysm were analyzed. Patients already on hemodialysis (HD) were excluded. AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (sCr) ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or an increase in sCr to ≥1.5 times baseline known or presumed to have occurred within 7 days, or a urine volume of <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours. Primary outcomes of interest were AKI incidence at 30 days and freedom from HD at 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were freedom from severe postoperative complication, and freedom from aorta-related mortality (ARM) at 1 year. The final cohort analyzed 526 (29.8%). There were 489 (93%) males and 37 (7%) females: the median age was 76 years (interquartile range [IQR], 71-81). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was present in 86 (16.3%) patients. Early mortality was observed in 8 (1.5%) patients, none was aorta-related. Complication rate was 17.1% (n=89). AKI was observed in 17 (3.2%). Renal replacement therapy was needed in 4 (0.8%). HD was transitory in 2 cases and definitive in 1. Binary logistic regression analysis identified CKD (odds ratio [OR]: 4.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.10-10.45, p<0.001), and the presence of renal artery stenosis (OR: 3.80, 95% CI: 1.35-10.66, p=0.011) to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative AKI. Estimated freedom from ARM was 94.9% at 1 year. Estimated freedom from HD rate at 1 year was 94%: This was significantly different between patients with preoperative CKD and those who did not have preoperative CKD (log-rank, p=0.042). AKI after elective standard EVAR still occurs but with an acceptably low incidence rate. Preoperative CKD is the most important predictor for postoperative AKI, which was not associated with the need for HD at 1-year follow-up but with a higher propensity of mortality. This "real world" experience confirm that EVAR performed with standard contrats agent protocol remains safe for acute kidney injury development. Therefore, only patients presenting with preoperative borderline or ascertained chronic kidney disease will take the most advantage from the use of carbon dioxide contrast.

Insight from an Italian Delphi Consensus on EVAR feasibility outside the instruction for use: the SAFE EVAR Study.

The SAfety and FEasibility of standard EVAR outside the instruction for use (SAFE-EVAR) Study was designed to define the attitude of Italian vascular surgeons towards the use of standard endovascular repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) outside the instruction for use (IFU) through a Delphi consensus endorsed by the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Vascolare ed Endovascolare - SICVE). A questionnaire consisting of 26 statements was developed, validated by an 18-member Advisory Board, and then sent to 600 Italian vascular surgeons. The Delphi process was structured in three subsequent rounds which took place between April and June 2023. In the first two rounds, respondents could indicate one of the following five degrees of agreement: 1) strongly agree; 2) partially agree; 3) neither agree nor disagree; 4) partially disagree; 5) strongly disagree; while in the third round only three different choices were proposed: 1) agree; 2) neither agree nor disagree; 3) disagree. We considered the consensus reached when ≥70% of respondents agreed on one of the options. After the conclusion of each round, a report describing the percentage distribution of the answers was sent to all the participants. Two-hundred-forty-four (40.6%) Italian Vascular Surgeons agreed to participate the first round of the Delphi Consensus; the second and the third rounds of the Delphi collected 230 responders (94.3% of the first-round responders). Four statements (15.4%) reached a consensus in the first rounds. Among the 22 remaining statements, one more consensus (3.8%) was achieved in the second round. Finally, seven more statements (26.9%) reached a consensus in the simplified last round. Globally, a consensus was reached for almost half of the proposed statements (46.1%). The relatively low consensus rate obtained in this Delphi seems to confirm the discrepancy between Guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice. The data collected could represent the source for a possible guidelines' revision and the proposal of specific Good Practice Points in all those aspects with only little evidence available.

Wound healing and hernia after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair - Onlay self-gripping polyester mesh reinforcement compared with small bite sutured closure.

Prophylactic mesh implantation following open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is a debatable subject. To assess the efficacy of a self-gripping polyester mesh used in on-lay technique to prevent incisional hernia after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 495 patients who underwent aortic surgery between May 2017 and May 2021. Patients included in the study underwent open surgical repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with closure of the abdominal wall with either small bite suture technique or prophylactic mesh reinforcement. Primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of incisional hernia during a two-year follow-up period. Secondary endpoints were mesh-related complications. Mesh implantation with the on-lay technique was successful in all cases. No patient in the mesh group developed an incisional hernia during the 24-month follow-up period. Two patients in the non-mesh group developed a symptomatic incisional hernia during the follow-up period at 6 months. Three cases of post-operative access site complications were observed in the mesh group. Application of a self-gripping polyester mesh using the on-lay technique demonstrates acceptable early-durability after open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. However, it appears to be associated with a number of post-operative access site complications.

Results of elective endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic and common iliac artery aneurysms

Bevezetés: Napjainkban az infrarenalis aorta aneurysmák miatt végzett beavatkozások háromnegyede endovascularisan történik, melynél a nyitott műtéthez képest alacsonyabb perioperatív morbiditással és mortalitással, rövidebb kórházi tartózkodással, kevesebb korai szövődménnyel, de több hosszú távú komplikációval számolhatunk. Célkitűzés: A Pécsi Tudományegyetem Érsebészeti Klinikáján 2010 és 2020 között infrarenalis aorta és/vagy arteria iliaca communis aneurysma miatt végzett elektív sztentgraftbeültetések eredményeit vizsgáltuk. Módszer: Retrospektív analízisünkben a betegek demográfiai adatai, társbetegségei, a halálozás, a hospitalizációs idő és a posztoperatív intenzív osztályos megfigyelés időtartama mellett vizsgáltuk az intraoperatív, korai és késői szövődményeket, illetve a közöttük fennálló összefüggéseket. Eredmények: 274 eset került beválogatásra. Intraoperatív szövődményt 42 alkalommal (15,33%) észleltünk, 7 esetben (2,56%) endoleaket. A korai időszakban 9 (3,28%), a posztoperatív első évben 14 betegünk hunyt el (5,11%). A korai szövődmények között 3 endoleaket (1,09%) és 1 aneurysmazsák-rupturát (0,36%) detektáltunk. A sztentgraftspecifikus szövődmények közül a leggyakoribbak az endoleak voltak (n = 68, 24,82%). A vizsgálati periódus során az intenzív osztályra helyezett betegek száma és a hospitalizációs idő is szignifikánsan csökkent. Diabetes mellitus mellett szignifikánsan ritkábbak voltak a korai szövődmények, dohányzás mellett közel kétszeres, hyperlipidaemia mellett viszont kétharmadnyi volt a sztentgraftspecifikus szövődmények esélye. Következtetés: A vizsgálati periódusban klinikánkon infrarenalis elektív sztentgraftbeültetéseknél rövidült a hospitalizációs idő, egyre kevesebb beteg került intenzív osztályos posztoperatív megfigyelésre, míg kapcsolatot találtunk a dohányzás, a diabetes és a hyperlipidaemia jelenléte, valamint a szövődmények megjelenési esélye között. Fontos kiemelni azonban, hogy az endovascularis eszközök rapid fejlődése és az alacsony esetszám miatt a speciális szövődmények hatékony követési és kezelési stratégiájának meghatározása sokszor individuális döntést igényel. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(50): 1993–2000.

Iliac tortuosity increases reinterventions but not adverse outcomes following repair of juxtarenal aneurysms using physician-modified endografts

ObjectiveIncreased angulation of the proximal aortic neck has been associated with complications following endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms, including increased incidence of endoleaks, stent migration, secondary interventions, and conversions. However, knowledge on the impact of aortoiliac tortuosity on outcomes following fenestrated repair remains limited. This study aims to quantify the effect of aortoiliac tortuosity on outcomes following fenestrated repair. MethodsA single-center, retrospective review of all patients who underwent a physician-modified endovascular repair for the treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms under a single physician-sponsored investigation device exemption study from 2011 to 2021 was performed. Center luminal lines and geometric distances were obtained using TeraRecon software (San Mateo, CA). A tortuosity index was calculated (tortuosity index = centerline distance/geometric line distance) for each iliac vessel as well as for the infrarenal aorta according to Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards. Aortic and iliac tortuosity were assessed independently and stratified as low and high. Demographics, comorbidities, anatomic and operative details, and outcomes were compared using univariable and multivariable analysis. ResultsA total of 135 patients were identified. Thirty-eight patients (28%) had high aortic tortuosity, and 55 patients (42%) had high iliac tortuosity. Patients with high tortuosity were older (aortic: 78 vs 76 years; P = .04; iliac: 78 vs 75 years; P = .01) and differed by sex. Twenty-two percent of men and 50% of women had high aortic tortuosity (P = .01). Forty-seven percent of men and 20% of women had high iliac tortuosity (P = .01). There were no differences in comorbidities based on aortic tortuosity, but coronary artery disease (high: 58% vs low: 36%; P = .01) and hypertension (high: 69% vs low: 86%; P = .02) differed based on iliac tortuosity. Aneurysm diameter was larger for patients with high iliac tortuosity (72 mm vs 64 mm; P < .01), and fluoroscopy time was longer for patients with high aortic tortuosity (41 vs 31 minutes; P = .02). When outcomes were assessed, high iliac tortuosity was associated with increased rate of reinterventions (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-6.0) and type 1 or 3 endoleak (hazard ratio, 5.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-16); however, all other outcomes were similar. ConclusionsAmong patients treated with physician-modified endovascular repair for juxtarenal aneurysms, iliac tortuosity but not aortic tortuosity, is associated with increased reinterventions and type 1 or type 3 endoleaks. Long-term follow-up is critical for patients with high iliac tortuosity to ensure that high-risk endoleaks are identified and treated early to avoid the risk of rupture.

A Single-Institution Case Series of Total Endovascular Relining for Type 3 Endoleaks in Traditional Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Grafts with Raised Bifurcations

The endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms can be performed with a wide variety of devices. Many of these grafts elevate the aortic bifurcation which can limit future repairs if the graft material fails thereby creating a type III endoleak to aorto-uniliac grafts. Many manufacturers have grafts susceptible to this, but we have seen this in the Medtronic AneuRx graft. Our goal is to provide technical details and outcomes regarding a novel technique to reline these grafts while maintaining inline flow to the iliac arteries. This was a single-institution review of patients who had endoleaks requiring intervention after a previously placed graft with an elevated aortic bifurcation. Primary outcomes included technical success defined as placement of all planned devices, resolution of type III endoleak, aneurysm size at follow-up, and requirement of reintervention. Secondary outcomes included 30-day complications, aneurysm-related mortality, and all-cause mortality. Technical details of the operation include back-table deployment of an Ovation device, modification of the deployment system tether and pre-emptive placement of an up and over 0.014″ wire. The wire is placed up and over and hung outside the contralateral gate. Once the main body is introduced above the old graft, the 0.014" is snared from the contralateral side and externalized. The main body is then able to be seated at the bifurcation as the limb is not fully deployed and then device deployment is completed per instructions for use. Our study consists of 4 individuals, 3 of which had an abdominal aortic aneurysm initially managed with an AneuRx endovascular aneurysm repair and 1 with a combination of Gore and Cook grafts. All 4 patients were male with an average age of 84.5years at time of reline. All patients had at least 10years between initial surgery and reline at our institution. Primary outcomes revealed no type 1 or 3 endoleaks at follow-up, technical success was 100% and 1 patient required reintervention for aneurysm growth and type 2 endoleak. In terms of our secondary outcomes, there was 1 postoperative complication which was cardiac dysfunction secondary to demand ischemia, aneurysm-related mortality was 0% and all-cause mortality was 25% at average follow-up of 2.44years. As individuals continue to age, there are more patients who would benefit from less invasive reinterventions following endovascular aneurysm repair. Whether this is due to aortic degeneration, stent migration, or stent material damage is not always known. In this study, we present an endovascular approach to treating type III endoleak patients with a previous graft and elevated aortic bifurcation using Ovation stent grafts and found no evidence of type 1 or 3 endoleaks on follow-up imaging. This approach may allow patients with type III endoleak the option of a minimally invasive, percutaneous approach where they previously would not have had one.

Cardiac risk after elective endovascular repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: Results from the Italian Collaborators for EVAR multicenter registry

ObjectiveMajor adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were common complications after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) causing significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study was to evaluate the cardiac risk after elective EVAR for uncomplicated noninfected infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm in a large multicenter cohort. MethodsThis is a multicenter, retrospective, financially unsupported physician-initiated observational cohort study conducted by four academic tertiary referral hospitals from January 2018 to March 2021. Baseline, perioperative, and postoperative information of elective EVARs was evaluated. The primary outcome was the incidence of MACEs after EVAR, which was defined as acute coronary syndrome, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, de novo atrial fibrillation, hospitalization for heart failure, and revascularization as well as cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes were 1-year overall survival (all-cause mortality) and freedom from aorta-related mortality. Comparative analysis was conducted between MACE and overall population, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to analyze factors associated with the risk of the MACE occurrence and early 1-year mortality. ResultsThe study has enrolled 497 patients (35 females, 7%) with a mean age of 75.3 ± 7.8 years. The MACE rate was 6.4% (32/497, events/patients), and the majority of the events were recorded in the postoperative period (24/32, 75%; overall 24/497, 4.8%). One-year survival from all-cause mortality was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91-96), and the MACE population showed a significantly lower survival estimation rate (Overall - MACEs, 95.8% [95% CI: 93-97] - 67.9% [95% CI: 47-82], log-rank 41.950, P = .0001). Freedom from aorta-related mortality was 99.3% (95% CI: 98-100). The perioperative need for red blood cell transfusions was strongly related to the MACE occurrence (odds ratio: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.52-4.68, P = .001) and 1-year mortality (hazard ratio: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.48-3.09, P = .0001). ConclusionsMACEs represent a common complication in the postoperative and early period after elective EVAR. Blood loss requiring red blood cell transfusions is associated with increased postoperative MACEs and early mortality, suggesting that all the efforts should be carried out to reduce the bleeding during and after elective interventions.

Combined Endovascular Treatment of Complex Aortic Pathologies.

Multisegmented aortic pathologies present challenging issues independent of the treatment chosen. Whether open or endovascular, staged, or simultaneous, every treatment modality has its own pros and cons. We revealed our patients retrospectively with early and midterm results who had simultaneous endovascular thoracic and abdominal aortic repair for thoracic aortic pathologies and infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (iAAA) as a single-center experience. Between January 2016 and January 2021, 16 patients were diagnosed with thoracic aortic pathology and iAAA was simultaneously repaired in an endovascular manner. All patients were operated on with the same cardiovascular surgeon team. The average age of the patients were 76.9 ± 6.2 (64-86) years. There was no early mortality. The technical success was 100%. In total, 18 thoracic endografts were deployed in 16 patients for thoracic aortic pathologies. Follow-up period was 21.85 ± 8.96 months, and in the follow-up period, two patients had a secondary intervention. One cardiac and one coronavirus disease 2019 mortality was detected in the follow-up period. There was no aneurysm-related mortality. The postoperative first-year survival was 84.6 ± 10.0. Simultaneous endovascular solution for complex multisegmented aortic pathologies provides a rapid, less-invasive approach with successful early and midterm morbidity, mortality with short intensive care unit period, and length of hospital stay. A combination of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and thoracic endovascular aortic repair where anatomic suitability exists is a strong alternative over staged and hybrid therapies. Contrast-induced nephropathy, postimplantation syndrome, and spinal cord ischemia should be carefully monitored with this strategy.

Congenital pelvic kidney perfusion during infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair.

Purpose: This case report describes a patient with a pelvic kidney associated with an aortoiliac aneurysm amenable to open repair. Methods: We chose the selective cold renal perfusion to preserve renal function. Results: Other techniques such as transient or permanent extra-anatomic bypass, extracorporeal circulation and proximal aortic double clamping are also described in this report. Conclusions: Choosing the renal perfusion technique depended on the anatomical evaluations of the kidney and the renal artery location during the preoperative period.

Outcome of different endovascular modalities to treat common iliac artery aneurysms, single center study.

Iliac aneurysms occur in 10% of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). There are three different endovascular approaches to their treatment in the context of infrarenal Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR): occlusion by coiling the internal iliac, incorporation using an iliac branch device, and delaying repair using a bell bottom limb. We sought to determine outcomes associated with these three strategies in our practice. The study was a combined prospective cohort study with a retrospective arm: prospective patient recruitment was done for 1year from September 2019 and ended by September 2020, and retrospective data was collected from 2017 to 2019. Demographic, procedural, and imaging data was collected. SPSS was used to analyze data as patients were classified by limbs in four groups: iliac branched, bell bottom, coil and cover technique, and standard treated limbs. There were 65 male and 4 female patients included in this study incorporating 137 limbs with a mean age of 78years (SD ± 8years). Two patients died after discharge (at 3 and 21months postoperatively, without hospital admission) and five patients were lost to long-term follow-up. Three patients had operations that deviated from the plan: one was an IBD converted to bell bottom, one was an IBD that was converted to coil and cover, and one was a bell bottom that did not seal. Follow-up revealed late type IB endoleak in three bell bottom limbs and one limb treated with coil and cover. Common iliac occlusion occurred in one IBD, three bell bottom limbs, and two limbs treated with coil/cover technique. There were four additional ischemic events (buttock claudication in three and intestinal ischemia in one): all ischemic events occurred in the coil and cover group (p = .001). Given the small population size examined in this study, there is no statistical difference between treatment groups; however, there was a trend toward bell bottom technique being associated with higher incidence of type IB endoleak. Coil and cover technique was associated with decreased IB endoleak; however, Buttock claudication and intestinal ischemia occurred more significantly in this group. Using IBD may be the best strategy to improve short- and long-term outcomes in patients with iliac aneurysms.

Preliminary findings of selective endovascular repair for infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysm at Viet Duc University Hospital

Objectives: To evaluate the early result of EVAR in abdominal aorta aneurysm patients in Viet Duc university hospital from 01/01/2018 to 30/12/2021.&#x0D; Methods: Descriptive and retrospective study with convenience sampling. Data was extracted from patient records.&#x0D; Results: There were 37 patients (30 males and 7 females), the majority of which have hypertension and DeBakey sign. Average age was 72,96 ± 6,58 (61-86) years. The fusiform aortic aneurysm was presented in all patien1,2. The average diameter, neck diameter, and aneurysm neck angle are 52.57mm, 21.26mm, and 47.02°, respectively. Moreover, 97.3% of patients were given bifurcated stent grafts; internal iliac artery was occluded in 5(13.5%) patients; The early results of the study group included the following: hospital mortality was 2,7% (1); in complications: immediately endoleak was 8(21,6%); after 30 days was 3(8,1%); acute renal failure was in 1(2,7%); hematoma in goiter was in 1(2,7%). Hospital stay was 10±4 days.&#x0D; Conclusion: The EVAR at Viet Duc University Hospital for selective abdominal aortic aneurysm is safe, effective with low risk of complication and mortality.

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in detection of endoleak after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm

Objective: To investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in detecting endoleak after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR). Methods: The postoperative follow-up data of 102 patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with EVAR in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital from August 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 79 males and 23 females, aged 50-91 (69.6±7.6) years old. Using CT angiography (CTA) as the gold standard for diagnosing endoleaks, the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and CDUS in detecting endoleaks was evaluated by paired design chi-square test, and the Kappa value was calculated for consistency test. Patients were divided into groups according to body mass index (BMI), and the number of false-negative endoleaks detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in each group was calculated, and its ratio to the actual number of endoleaks was calculated to evaluate whether BMI was related to false-negative ultrasound-enhanced ultrasound. Results: A total of 203 follow-up visits met the inclusion criteria. Endoleaks were detected 36 times (17.7%) by CTA, 31 times (15.3%) by contrast-enhanced ultrasound, 16 times (7.9%) by CDUS, and they all detected type Ⅰ, type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ endoleaks. There was no significant difference between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and CTA in endoleak detection rate and determination of endoleak types (endoleak detection rate: 15.3% vs 17.7%; determination of endoleak types: type Ⅰ 4 vs 4, type Ⅱ 26 vs 31, type Ⅲ 1 vs 1; all P>0.05). CDUS and CTA had statistically significant differences in the detection rate of endoleaks and determination of endoleak types (endoleak detection rate: 7.9% vs 17.7%; determination of endoleak types: type Ⅰ 4 vs 4, type Ⅱ 11 vs 31, type Ⅲ 1 vs 1; all P<0.001). Compared with CTA, contrast-enhanced ultrasound has a sensitivity of 83.3%, a specificity of 99.4%, a Youden index of 0.827, a coincidence rate of 96.6%, a positive predictive value of 96.8%, a negative predictive value of 96.5%, and a Kappa value of 0.875(P<0.001). The two showed excellent diagnostic consistency. All 6 endoleaks not detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasound were type Ⅱ endoleak that did not require treatment, and 3(15.8%) occurred in obese patients with a BMI≥32 kg/m2. Compared with CTA, CDUS had a sensitivity of 38.9%, a specificity of 98.8%, a Youden index of 0.377, a coincidence rate of 88.2%, a positive predictive value of 87.5%, a negative predictive value of 88.2%, and a Kappa value of 0.482 (P<0.001). The two showed moderate diagnostic agreement. The correlation coefficient of the maximum diameter of aneurysms measured by ultrasound and CT was r=0.873(P<0.001). Conclusions: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is accurate in detecting endoleak after infrarenal EVAR, and its sensitivity to endoleak detection in obese patients with BMI≥32 kg/m2 will be reduced. CDUS is not suitable for detection of endoleak after infrarenal EVAR, but it can be used to monitor the change of the largest diameter of aneurysm after EVAR.

Reintervention rate after infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair is lower for open than endovascular repair with aneurysm sac shrinkage: a fifteen-year study.

The aim of this study was to report long-term results of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a single tertiary Hospital. One thousand seven hundred seventy-seven consecutive AAA repairs (2003-2018) were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, AAA-related mortality, reinterventions rate. Open repair (OSR) was offered in case the patient had a functional capacity ≥4 metabolic equivalents (MET), and a predicted >10 year life expectancy. Endovascular repair (EVAR) was offered in case of hostile abdomen, presence of anatomic feasibility for standard endovascular graft, and <4 MET. Sac shrinkage was defined as a reduction of both anterior-posterior and latero-lateral diameter of the sac of at least 5 mm at the last follow-up vs. the first post- operative follow-up imaging. Eight hundred twenty-eight (47%) OSRs and 949 (53%) EVARs were performed 90.6% (N.=1610) were male, mean age was 73.8 years. Mean follow-up was 79 (SD: 51) months. 30-day mortality was 0.7% (N.=6) and 0.6% (N.=6) for OSR and EVAR respectively (P=1). Long-term survival was better for OSR as expected by the selection criteria used (P<0.001), while AAA-related death was similar in the OSR vs. EVAR group (P=0.37); 664 (70%) sac shrinkages occurred at the last follow-up in the EVAR group. Freedom from reintervention was 97% and 96% at 1 year, 96.5% and 88.4% at 5 years, 95.8% vs. 81.7% at 10 years, and 94.6% vs.72.3% at 15 years for OSR and EVAR, respectively (P<0.001). The reintervention rate was significantly lower in the sac shrinkage vs. no-sac shrinkage subgroup and but higher than the OSR (P≤0.001). Any statistical difference was found for the survival outcome in case of sac shrinkage (P=0.1). Open repair of an infrarenal AAA had a lower reintervention rate than EVAR even in case of a shrinked sac at a long-term follow-up. Further studies with greater sample size are needed.

De novo acute type B aortic dissection in two patients with previous infrarenal endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with EndoAnchors

<h2>Abstract</h2> Acute aortic dissections in the immediate postoperative period following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) have been linked to technical factors such as excessive endograft oversizing or aortic wall injuries during the procedure, whereas dissections that occur later are more likely to be de novo. Regardless of their etiology, aortic dissections can extend in the abdominal aorta, causing collapsing and occlusion of the endograft with devastating complications. There have been no reports of aortic dissections in EVAR patients in whom endoanchors were used. We present two cases of de novo type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after EVAR with entry tears in the descending thoracic aorta. Interestingly in both of our cases the dissection flap appeared to stop abruptly at the site of endograft fixation with the endo-anchors, suggesting that end-anchors might prevent propagation of aortic dissections beyond the endoanchor fixation level and thus protect the EVAR from collapsing.

Incidence, reintervention, and survival associated with type II endoleak at hospital discharge after elective endovascular aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative

BackgroundThe longitudinal clinical significance of type II endoleaks (T2ELs) remains controversial. Specifically, the real-world incidence, need for reintervention, and associated mortality referable to T2ELs remain unknown. Moreover, current professional society clinical practice guidelines recommend differing aneurysm sac growth thresholds to prompt intervention. Therefore, the purpose of this analysis was to better quantify the prevalence of early T2ELs after infrarenal endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) and determine its association with reintervention and survival. MethodsAll elective EVARs from the Vascular Quality Initiative (2010-2020) were examined to identify patients with isolated T2ELs vs no endoleak (NONE) at discharge. Procedures with a type I or III endoleak were excluded. A subgroup analysis was performed on patients surviving beyond the first postoperative year with follow-up data available on endoleaks. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included perioperative mortality and reinterventions. Outcomes were assessed by multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression to adjust for covariates. ResultsWe identified 53,697 patients who underwent EVAR. The overall incidence of isolated T2ELs at discharge was 16%. In-hospital mortality was lower for those with isolated T2ELs vs NONE (0.8% vs 1.9%, odds ratio: 0.6, 95% confidence interval: 0.5-0.8, P < .0001). Unadjusted overall survival was marginally higher at 5 years for patients with T2ELs vs NONE (84% vs 82%); however, after risk adjustment, survival was similar (hazard ratio: 0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.9-1.0). Among 44,345 patients with 1-year follow-up, 66% had data on endoleak status for assessment. Survival was similar regardless of endoleak status (NONE, at discharge only, at follow-up only, or at both time points). Among patients with documented T2ELs during follow-up, 6.1% and 2.5% had abdominal aortic aneurysm sac diameter growth ≥5 mm and ≥10 mm, respectively. Reinterventions occurred in 12%. Rupture (1%) and any open reintervention (4%) were rare among patients with 1-year follow-up. For patients with T2ELs, 5-year survival was similar between those with and without reintervention by 1 year (89% vs 91%, log-rank P = .06). ConclusionsT2ELs remain common after EVAR within the Vascular Quality Initiative and are not associated with long-term mortality. Reinterventions for T2ELs were not associated with improved overall survival among patients with T2ELs. Although additional data surrounding the appropriate role of reintervention for T2ELs remain necessary, it appears that the natural history of T2ELs is benign.

Results of the Italian Collaborators for EVAR (ICE) Registry on Acute Kidney Injury After Elective Endovascular Aortic Repair of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and predictive factors of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after elective standard endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in a large recent, multicenter cohort. This is a multicenter, retrospective, financially unsupported physician-initiated observational cohort study. Between January 2018 and March 2021, only patients treated with elective standard EVAR for infrarenal noninfected abdominal aortic aneurysm were analyzed. Patients already on hemodialysis (HD) were excluded. AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or an increase in SCr to ≥1.5 times baseline known or presumed to have occurred within 7 days, or a urine volume of <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours. AKI severity stage was classified according to the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria. Primary outcomes were AKI incidence at 30 days and freedom from HD at 1 year of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were freedom from severe postoperative complication, and freedom from aorta-related mortality (ARM) at 1 year. We analyzed 526 patients (86.5%). There were 489 males (93%) and 37 females (7%): the median age was 76 years (interquartile range, 3-8 years). AKI was observed in 17 patients (3.2%): it was classified as AKIN stage 1 in 12 (2.3%), AKIN stage 2 in three (0.6%), and AKIN stage 3 in two (0.2%). Renal replacement therapy was needed in four (0.8%): HD in three (0.6%, transitory in 2), and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration in one (0.2%). Binary logistic regression analysis identified chronic kidney disease (odds ratio [OR] 4.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.10-10.45; P < .001), and the presence of renal artery stenosis (OR, 3.80; 95% CI, 1.35-10.66; P = .011) to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative AKI. Freedom from ARM was 99.2% at 1 year. Both serum creatinine and estimated glomular filtration rate were significantly different in comparison with preoperative and postoperative level. Of the patients who developed AKI postoperatively, 15 (88.2%) did not require further renal replacement therapy at 1 year; only two patients (0.4%), who already required HD postoperatively, remained on renal replacement therapy by HD at 1 year. Mortality at 1 year was higher in patients who developed postoperative AKI (18.7% vs. 5%; OR, 5.63; P = .051). AKI after elective standard EVAR still occurs but with an acceptably low incidence rate. Preoperative chronic kidney disease is the most important predictor for postoperative AKI, which was not associated with the need of HD at 1-year follow-up but with a higher propensity of mortality.

Early Results of Elective Endovascular Repair of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms With the MinosTM Stent-Graft System.

A variety of last-generation endografts are currently available for standard endovascular repair (EVAR) of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). The purpose of this study is to report the preliminary clinical outcomes of the Minos trimodular stent-graft system, which was recently introduced to the European market. Between February 2020 and 2022, we treated 41 consecutive AAA patients (mean age 72.2±8.5, 37 males) with elective standard EVAR using the Minos. The mean maximum diameter of AAAs was 54.7±6.6 mm, the mean proximal neck's (PN) diameter was 24.8±2.7 mm, while the relevant length and angulation were 16.0 mm and 21.7°, respectively. Overall, 22 (53.6%) patients presented with shorter and angulated PN, according to the stent-graft's instructions of use, and in 6 (14.6%) patients the PN angulation >60° was combined with concomitant iliac angulation >60°. Eleven (26.8%) EVARs were performed with concomitant enormous iliac artery narrowing and tortuosity. Finally, in 19 (46.3%) AAAs, the distal iliac landing zone was aneurysmatic and they were treated with the bell-bottom technique in 17 patients and with limb extension to the external iliac artery in two cases. We evaluated technical and clinical success of the index procedures, which was based on the combination of five factors: freedom from EVAR-related mortality, from graft-related endoleak of any type, from migration at any part of graft as well the absence of notable increase AAA's sac maximum diameter and the patency of bifurcated stent-graft and of access vessels. Primary technical and clinical success of index procedures was 100%. During a median 12-month radiological follow-up the clinical success remained 100%. No type I or III endoleak, stent-graft migration, EVAR-related death, AAA rupture, or graft-related adverse events or reinterventions were documented. Four (9.8%) type II endoleaks were detected with stable AAA sac diameter. The overall incidence of sac regression was 34.1% (n=14). The preliminary results of our series showed that Minos provided excellent feasibility and safety features even through angulated and tortuous iliac vessels and in short and angulated PNs. The overall clinical success at 1 year suggests that performance of Minos follows very high standards. Further validation of these promising results with long-term data is acquired to complete the evaluation of this recently introduced stent-graft system. The current study explored the clinical performance of a new in market ultra-low profile bifurcated abdominal aortic stent-graft, the MINOS. The early and 12-month results of study suggest that implantation of this stent-graft in standard EVAR, even in hostile proximal aortic neck and iliac vessels conditions, follows very high clinical standards and encourage the further clinical use of MINOS.

O029 Adverse renal outcomes following endovascular or open repair of infra-renal and supra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Introduction This study aims to quantify the risk of permanent renal dialysis for AAA repair, with comparison between endovascular (EVAR) and open repair (OAR) techniques for suprarenal (SR) and infrarenal (IR) AAA. Methods Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of post-operative, permanent dialysis outcomes were performed, following PRISMA guidance (Prospero registration: CRD42021272422). Database searches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL using ProQuest Dialog. We included data published after 2011, reporting primary elective AAA repair, for a minimum of 100 patients with &amp;gt;75% of operations undertaken after January 1, 2000. Results Seventy-nine studies (IR AAAs: 54877 EVAR &amp; 7145; SR AAAs: 4241 EVAR &amp; 1723 OAR) were included (n=67986). Overall, low rates of permanent dialysis were reported: 0.35% of IR-EVAR, 0.68% IR-OAR, 0.82% SR-EVAR, and 0.59% SR-OAR. No significant difference in the risk of permanent dialysis for endovascular and open repair was observed (EVAR vs. OAR: odds ratio (OR) 0.52 95% CI[.06, 4.78], for IR, 2.14 [.46, 10.05], for SR). A lower risk of permanent dialysis was observed for IR vs. SR EVAR (OR .05 [0, .46]). Meta-regression indicated that post-operative permanent dialysis decreased over time as determined by study midpoint for IR-EVAR and IR-OAR. For IR-OAR, increased dialysis rates were significantly associated with study participants’ ages. Conclusion The rate of permanent dialysis &amp;lt;1% for all modalities of SR and IR AAA repair. For EVAR, the risk of dialysis was higher for SR compared to IR AAA. The likelihood of permanent dialysis has decreased with modern practice yet increases among older patients.

Why Do Women Stay Longer in Hospital After Elective Endovascular Repair for Infrarenal Aortic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms? A Nationwide Investigation from the United Kingdom

Why Do Women Stay Longer in Hospital After Elective Endovascular Repair for Infrarenal Aortic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms? A Nationwide Investigation from the United Kingdom

Risk factors of type 1A endoleak following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms are the treatment of first choice. However, the proximal sealing of endovascular aneurysm repair is the Achilles' heel of the procedure. Insufficient proximal sealing can lead to endoleak type 1A and therefore expansion of the aneurysm sack and subsequent rupture. We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with an infrarenal abdominal aneurysm treated with endovascular aneurysm repair. We studied whether demographic and anatomical features were risk factors for endoleak type 1A. Also, the results of different treatment strategies were described. 257 Patients were included in the study, most patients were male. In the multivariate analysis, female gender and infrarenal angulation were the most important risk factors for endoleak type 1A. Endoleak type 1A diagnosed at completion angiography disappeared in 77.8%. The occurrence of endoleak type 1A was associated with a higher risk of aneurysm-related mortality (p = 0.01). Conclusions should be drawn with care, since the number of patients included in this study was small and there was a high incidence of patients lost to follow-up. This study suggests that endovascular aneurysm repair in female patients and patients with severe infrarenal angulation is associated with a higher risk of endoleak type 1A.