Infrapatellar Group Research Articles

Comparative Analysis of Infrapatellar and Suprapatellar Nailing Techniques for Tibial Shaft Fractures

Introduction: Tibial shaft fractures pose a significant challenge in orthopaedic practice, often necessitating surgical intervention for optimal recovery. The selection of the entry point for intramedullary nailing, particularly between the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches, remains a debated aspect in fracture management. While both approaches aim to restore stability and function, their nuances influence outcomes and patient experiences. This study aims to comprehensively compare the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches, analyzing surgical techniques, complications, and functional outcomes to inform clinical decision-making. Methodology: A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted on patients undergoing intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures, comparing outcomes between the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches. Data collection included patient demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Result: Operative time was longer in the infrapatellar group (137.8 minutes) compared to the suprapatellar group (114.4 minutes). The mean radiation dose was higher in the infrapatellar group (74.3 cGY/cm2) and lower in the suprapatellar group (48.5 cGY/cm2). Postoperative outcomes showed a mean Lysholm score of 74 in the infrapatellar group and 90 in the suprapatellar group. one case of infection and one case of malunion were reported in the infrapatellar group, while the suprapatellar group had one infection case but no instances of non-union or malunion. Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the surgical and clinical outcomes of the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches for tibial shaft fractures. While both techniques offer viable options, the suprapatellar approach may offer advantages in terms of operative efficiency and functional recovery.

Suprapatellar tibial fracture nailing is associated with lower rate for acute compartment syndrome and the need for fasciotomy compared with the infrapatellar approach

BackgroundIntramedullary tibial nailing (IMN) is the gold standard for stabilizing tibial shaft fractures. IMN can be performed through an infra- or suprapatellar approach.PurposeThe aim of this study is to compare the rate of fasciotomies for acute compartment syndrome between infra- and suprapatellar approaches.MethodsA total of 614 consecutive patients who were treated with IMN for tibial fracture between October 2007 and February 2020 were included in the study. The approach used for IMN was determined by the operating surgeon. Infrapatellar IMN was performed with the knee in deep flexion position, with or without calcaneal traction. Suprapatellar IMN was performed in straight or semiflexed position. The diagnosis of compartment syndrome was based on clinical analysis, but for some patients, a continuous compartment pressure measurement was used. The primary outcome was the rate of peri- and postoperative compartment syndrome treated with fasciotomies.ResultsThe study sample included 513 patients treated with infrapatellar IMN and 101 patients treated with suprapatellar IMN technique. The mean age of the patients was 44.7 years (infrapatellar technique) and 48.4 years (suprapatellar technique). High energy trauma was seen in 138 (27%) patients treated with infrapatellar technique and in 39 (39%) patients treated with suprapatellar technique. In the suprapatellar group (n = 101), there were no cases of peri- or postoperative compartment syndrome treated with fasciotomies. In the infrapatellar group (n = 513), the need for fasciotomies was stated in 67 patients, 31 patients (6.0%) perioperatively and in 36 patients (7.0%) postoperatively. The rate of fasciotomies (0/101 versus 67/513 cases) differed significantly (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the fracture morphology or patient demographics between the study groups.ConclusionsThe suprapatellar technique is recommended over the infrapatellar approach in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures. The rate of peri- and postoperative compartment syndrome and the need for fasciotomies was significantly lower with the suprapatellar technique. The major cause of increased rate of peri- or postoperative acute compartment syndrome with infrapatellar IMN technique is presumably associated with the positioning of the patient during the operation.Level of evidence3.

Outcome Following Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Diaphyseal Fractures: Suprapatellar Nail Insertion Results in Superior Radiographic Parameters But No Difference in Mid-Term Function.

The primary aim of this study was to compare the radiographic parameters (nail insertion-point accuracy [NIPA] and fracture malalignment) of patients who had undergone tibial intramedullary nailing via the suprapatellar (SP) and infrapatellar (IP) approaches. The secondary aims were to compare clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between these approaches. All adult patients with an acute tibial diaphyseal fracture who underwent intramedullary nailing at a single level-I trauma center over a 4-year period (2017 to 2020) were retrospectively identified. The nailing approach (SP or IP) was at the treating surgeon's discretion. Intraoperative and immediate postoperative radiographs were reviewed to assess NIPA (mean distance from the optimal insertion point) and malalignment (≥5°). Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to evaluate the rates of malunion, nonunion, and other postoperative complications. The Oxford and Lysholm Knee Scores (OKS and LKS) and patient satisfaction (0 = completely dissatisfied, 100 = completely satisfied) were obtained via a postal survey at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. The cohort consisted of 219 consecutive patients (mean age, 48 years [range, 16 to 90 years], 51% [112] male). There were 61 patients (27.9%) in the SP group and 158 (72.1%) in the IP group. The groups did not differ in baseline demographic or injury-related variables. SP nailing was associated with superior coronal NIPA (p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI] for IP versus SP, 1.17 to 3.60 mm) and sagittal NIPA (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.97 mm) and with a reduced rate of malalignment (3% [2 of 61] versus 11% [18 of 158] for IP; p = 0.030). PROs were available for 118 of 211 patients (56%; 32 of 58 in the SP group and 86 of 153 in the IP group) at a mean of 3 years (range, 1.2 to 6.5 years). There was no difference between the SP and IP groups in mean OKS (36.5 versus 39.6; p = 0.246), LKS (71.2 versus 73.5; p = 0.696), or satisfaction scores (81.4 versus 79.9; p = 0.725). Compared with IP nailing, SP nailing of tibial shaft fractures was associated with superior NIPA and a reduced rate of intraoperative malalignment but not of malunion at healing. However, the superior NIPA may not be clinically important. Furthermore, there were no differences in PROs at mid-term follow-up. Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of clinical and radiological results after a minimum one-year follow-up of tibial fractures operated via suprapatellar or infrapatellar intramedullary nailing: A retrospective study.

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological results after a minimum one-year follow-up of suprapatellar (SP) and infrapatellar (IP) nail applications for the treatment of tibial fractures. Between September 2019 and September 2021, a total of 80 patients treated for tibial fractures were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two equal groups including 40 patients in each group. The first group (32 males, 8 females; mean age: 36.4±13.2 years; range, 19 to 64 years) consisted of those who were operated using intramedullary nailing (IMN) through the SP approach (SP group). The second group (25 males, 15 females; mean age: 34.4±13.6 years; range, 15 to 64 years) consisted of patients operated with IMN using an IP approach (IP group). Data including the location of the fracture, duration of surgery, need for additional interventions for fracture reduction, union time, duration of follow-up, delayed union, nonunion, malunion, and infection rates were recorded. During the final follow-up, we evaluated the results for range of motion (ROM), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), score, Lysholm score, and Knee Society Score (KSS) postoperative functional outcome measure. The mean duration of follow-up in the SP and IP groups were 17.6±2.3 (range, 13 to 21) and 19.9±1.3 (range, 15 to 41) months, respectively (p=0.236). The mean duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the SP group than in the IP group (73.2±19.9 [45 to 160] min in the SP group and 152.0±28.5 [100 to 240] min in the IP group) (p=0.0001). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding duration of postoperative hospital stay, union time, and decrease in hemoglobin levels. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding Lysholm scores, KSS functional outcome scores, VAS, ROM, and thigh and calf diameter difference measured at the final follow-up. A Poller screw or provisional Kirschner wire was used for 14 (35%) of 16 diametaphyseal fractures in the IP group. No additional technique was used for any patient in SP group (p=0.001). The SP application of an IMN for diaphyseal tibial fractures yields an easy and practical application, having easy reduction with shorter operative time and no need for additional techniques to achieve reduction. However, the clinical and radiological outcomes of both techniques are similar after a one-year follow-up.

Tibial Intramedullary Nailing by Suprapatellar Approach: Is It Quicker and Safer?

Background With the increasingly accepted method of suprapatellar tibial nailing for tibial shaft fractures, we aimed to compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of infrapatellar (IP) vs suprapatellar (SP) tibial nails. Methods This is a retrospective cohort analysis of 34 SP tibial nails over three years vs 24 IP tibial nails over a similar time frame. We comparedtotal radiation dose (TRD), patient positioning time (PPT), fracture healingand follow up time. Knee pain in the SP group was evaluatedutilising the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Results Fifty-eight patients with a mean age of 43 years were included. Mean intraoperative radiation dose for SP nails was 61.78 cGy (range: 11.60-156.01 cGy) vs 121.09 cGy (range: 58.01-18.03 cGy) for IP nails (p < 0.05). Mean PPT for SP nails was 10 minutes vs 18 minutes for IP nails (p < 0.05). All fractures united in the SP group vs one non-union in the IP group. Mean follow up was 5.5 months vs 11 months in the IP and SP groups, respectively. Mean KOOS was 7 (range: 0-22) at six months for the SP group. Conclusion The semi-extended position (SP group) leads to reduced TRD because of ease of imaging. Patients showed improved outcomeswith shorter follow up and fracture union in all patients (SP group). The KOOS revealed that SP nail patients had minimal pain and good knee function. This study establishes a management and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) baseline for ongoing evaluation of SP nails.

Comparison of tibial nailing by suprapatellar approach with a normal bend nail vs infrapatellar approach with a high tibial bend nail

Background Fractures of Diaphysis of tibia are among the most common diaphyseal fractures, with a bimodal age distribution. These are also notorious for going into delyed or non union, the preferred mode of fixation for these is the Intramedulllary nailing. We have compared the two approaches of the same, the supraptellar as well as infrapatellar approach. Methods Patients were divided into 2 groups, randomly, one group undergoing tibial diaphyseal intramedullary nailing via the conventional infrapatellar approach and the other undergoing via the suprapatellar approach. Post operative knee function was assessed using TegnerLysholm Scale. Results Mean TegnerLysholm knee score was 84.80 ±9.829 and 87.07±11.10 in infrapatellar and suprapatellar group respectively. When mean Tegner Lysholm knee score was compared in suprapatellar group and infrapatellar group using t test, it was found to be statistically insignificant. Conclusions we conclude that there was no difference in tibial fracture healing, alignment, knee pain and functional disability. Key Words : Suprapatellar, Infrapatellar, Tegner Lysholm, Intramedullary, Nailing.

A comparison of anterior knee pain, kneeling pain and functional outcomes in suprapatellar versus infrapatellar tibial nailing.

Anterior knee pain and kneeling pain are some of the most common complications following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. With the increased uptake of suprapatellar nailing at our institution, we undertook a service evaluation to assess anterior knee pain and kneeling pain in patients who underwent the suprapatellar tibial nailing technique compared with the infrapatellar approach. Data from all consecutive intramedullary tibial nailing operations between January 2014 and July 2017 were analysed from a prospectively collected database. All acute diaphyseal fracture nailing procedures were included. All patients were reviewed between six-month and four-year post-operation. Each patient was asked to complete a standardised questionnaire with three main outcome measures: pain on kneeling, presence of anterior knee pain and the severity of pain. After exclusions, a total of 148 patients were identified. A total of 102 responses were received, 41 in the infrapatellar group (73.2%) and 61 in the suprapatellar group (66.3%). A longer time from surgery to telephone follow-up response was noted in the infrapatellar group: 32.4months (interquartile range, 16.1) vs. 19.3months (interquartile range, 17.4), p < 0.001. A trend towards lower reported anterior knee pain was noted in the suprapatellar group (67.9% VS 53.7%). Most patients reported mild or no pain on kneeling, with no significant difference between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in severity of knee pain between the two groups and no significant effect on the Kujala score. With the comparable pain outcomes between the two groups, our analysis supports the continued use of the suprapatellar tibial nailing technique for tibial shaft fractures at our institution.

Comparison between infrapatellar and suprapatellar approaches for intramedullary nailing for the fractures of the tibial shaft.

This study aimed to compare the outcomes at the clinical and functional levels of suprapatellar (SP) and infrapatellar (IP) approaches for intramedullary nailing in treating tibial shaft fracture. Patients who underwent tibial shaft fracture intramedullary nailing by the SP approach or IP approach in a trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. The demographics, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operation time, blood loss, irrigation volume, postoperative X-ray alignment, and complications of patients were compared between the two groups under different approaches. Lysholm knee score, visual analog score (VAS), and incidence of anterior knee pain (AKP) were assessed 1year after surgery. The study finally included well-documented 81 patients (38 SP versus 43 IP). The SP group exhibited significantly shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy time than that of the IP group (81.7 ± 14.5s vs. 122.0 ± 24.3s, P < 0.001). Both aspects recorded a precise reduction of the fracture: angulation (2.1 ± 1.2° vs 3.1 ± 1.5°, P < 0.05) and translation (0.6 ± 0.8mm vs 1.4 ± 1.5mm, P < 0.05) in the coronal plane in the SP group. However, the sagittal plane recorded no such change (P > 0.05). The Lysholm knee score was higher in the SP group than that of the IP group (87 ± 8 vs. 80 ± 15, P < 0.05). The SP group displayed an evidently lower average VAS score than that of the IP approach group (0.3 ± 0.8 vs 1.3 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). Six cases (16%) in the SP group and 16 cases (37%) in the IP group experienced AKP 1-year post-operation (P < 0.05). As far as complications are concerned, neither group showed any significant difference (P > 0.05). Compared with the IP approach, the application of intramedullary nailing through the SP approach in treating tibial shaft fractures can effectively shorten the intraoperative fluoroscopy time, correct coronal plane angulation and translation deformity, reduce the incidence of AKP and improve postoperative function.

Intramedullary tibial nailing using infrapatellar and suprapatellar approaches: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionIntramedullary nailing of diaphyseal tibial fractures has become the gold standard method of fixation with high rates of union and low complication rates reported. The suprapatellar (SP) approach may have many advantages over the traditional infrapatellar (IP) approach. Controversy exists due to potential damage to the patellofemoral joint leading to persistent anterior knee pain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the clinical and procedural outcomes of the SP approach in comparison to the traditional IP approach. MethodIn this PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis, five databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and CINAHL were searched from inception until May 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies involving adults with tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nail fixation using either the suprapatellar or infrapatellar approach were included. Data extracted included demographics, functional knee scores, fluoroscopy exposure, insertional accuracy and adverse events. The primary outcome was validated functional knee scores. Risk of bias was calculated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool version 2 (RoB 2) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). ResultsIn total 16 studies were included consisting of 5 RCTs and 11 comparative observational studies. This included 1750 total operations with 810 in the SP group and 940 in the IP group. Meta-analysis was performed on the studies where appropriate data was reported. The SP approach demonstrated superior Lysholm scores (Mean Difference (MD) 5.63 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.81 to 8.44]), reduced fluoroscopy times (MD -38.12 sec [95% CI: -47.96 to -28.28]) and increased entry point accuracy (Standard Mean Difference (SMD) -0.90 [95% CI: -1.22 to –0.59]). No differences in complication rates or blood loss were found. ConclusionBased on the data presented in this review, intramedullary nailing of the tibia using the SP approach demonstrates superior Lysholm knee scores, greater entry point accuracy and reduced fluoroscopy exposure with equivalent risk of developing complications when compared to the IP approach.

Supra-patellar nailing for isolated closed tibial shaft fractures: Medium term functional outcomes from an Academic Level 1 Trauma centre

Aims The aim of this study was to assess functional outcome, at medium-term follow up, in patients undergoing intra-medullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures, using the supra-patellar approach.Materials and methods The study included patients with intra-medullary nailing, for diaphysial tibia fractures, between March 2013 to August 2015. An initial audit compared short-term functional outcomes at 15 months, between the supra and infra-patellar approaches, using a cohort of 20 patients (10 in each group). Subsequently, a larger cohort of 22 patients with supra-patellar nailing, were reviewed for medium term assessment of their functional outcomes at average 60 months (50 – 78 months) and the results between all 3 groups were compared. All patients were assessed using the Kujala and Oxford Knee Scores.Results The mean age of the cohorts was 38 years (18-87years). The mean follow-up was 15 months for the initial audit and 60 months for the medium-term results. The initial audit showed that the supra-patellar group had statistically significantly better Oxford and Kujala scores when compared to infra-patellar group (p < 0.05). At 5 years following supra-patellar nailing, the medium-term cohort showed improved outcome scores compared to the infra-patellar group at 1 year (p < 0.01) but showed no difference with the supra-patellar group at 1 year (p value >0.1).Conclusion Our study suggests that patients undergoing supra-patellar tibial nailing have better outcomes at 15 months compared to traditional infra-patellar nailing and more importantly, they continue to do well even at 5 years, despite perceived risks associated with this technique.

Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches in the treatment of tibia intramedullary nailing: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundTibial shaft fractures are routinely managed with intramedullary nailing (IMN). An increasingly accepted technique is the suprapatellar (SP) approach. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of knee joint after tibia IMN through an suprapatellar (SP) or traditional infrapatellar (IP) approach.MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed in patients with tibial shaft fractures that were treated with IMN through a SP or IP approach between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2016. The clinical and functional outcomes of the knee were assessed with the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score. Secondary outcomes included the operation time and intraoperative blood loss.ResultsA total of 50 patients/fractures (26 IP and 24 SP) with a minimum follow-up of 15 months were evaluated. All fractures were OTA 42. No significant differences were found between the two groups in age, gender, side of fractures, operation time, intra-operative blood loss, and follow-up time. No significant difference was seen in HSS score (P = 0.62) between them. Sub analysis of all the HSS components scores revealed no significant differences between pain (P = 0.57), the stand and walk (P = 0.54), the need for walking stick (P = 0.60) and extension lag (P = 0.60). The other HSS components showed full scores (IP 10 vs. SP 10) in both approaches, including muscle force, flexion deformity and stability components. The range of motion (ROM) component score was superior in the IP group (P = 0.04) suggesting a higher ROM.ConclusionsBoth SP and IP approach results in equivalent overall HSS knee scores. However, for the HSS component, the IP approach was superior to SP approach regarding the ROM.

Suprapatellar tibial nailing: a learning curve analysis.

The suprapatellar approach for intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures is gaining popularity with reported improved patient outcomes when compared to infrapatellar techniques. The aim of this study was to investigate the learning curve of the suprapatellar technique using radiation exposure as an outcome measure. Data were analysed from a prospectively collected database over a 3-year period at a Major Trauma Centre in the UnitedKingdom. 83 study patients with an acute isolated extra-articular fracture of the tibia treated with intramedullary tibial nailing were included. Cases requiring additional intra-operative procedures were excluded. Four consultant trauma surgeons with no previous experience of the suprapatellar technique used this approach for 40 consecutive operations. Six consultant trauma surgeons used the infrapatellar approach for 43 patients and acted as a control group. Patient demographics, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose area product (DAP) were collected for each operation. A segmented linear regression modelling method was employed to analyse learning. Fluoroscopy time and DAP per surgeon showed no evidence of a learning curve when using a suprapatellar tibial nailing technique in group or individual analysis. Fluoroscopy time and DAP were stationary in the infrapatellar group analysis, confirming the absence of time-dependent trends over the study period. Consultant trauma surgeons experienced no significant learning-related increase in radiation exposure when introducing a suprapatellar technique for intramedullary nailing of uncomplicated tibial fractures. Future work is required to investigate the effects of learning on other outcome measures.

Intra-operative fluoroscopy time and radiation dose during suprapatellar tibial nailing versus infrapatellar tibial nailing

BackgroundFractures of the tibial shaft are routinely managed with intramedullary nailing. An increasingly accepted technique is the suprapatellar extended leg method. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the suprapatellar tibial nailing technique offers shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy times and lower radiation doses when compared to the traditional infrapatellar technique. Study design and methodsData from 200 consecutive intramedullary tibial nailing operations in our level 1 Major Trauma Centre were retrospectively collected from a prospective database (January 2014–December 2017). Only acute diaphyseal nailing procedures were included. The operations were performed by seven senior trauma consultants experienced in both suprapatellar and infrapatellar tibial nailing. The operations were divided into two groups: infrapatellar and suprapatellar. Intraoperative radiation time and dose data were collected. ResultsA total of 90 cases were included and analysed. The majority of the patients were male (82%). 37 operations were infrapatellar and 53 were suprapatellar. Independent samples t-test revealed lower radiation time and dose for the suprapatellar group. The infrapatellar group had a mean radiation time of 129.7±56.6s versus 94.4±47.9s for the suprapatellar group. The infrapatellar group had a mean radiation dose (Dose Area Product) 53.6±34.2 cGYcm2 versus 38.2±26.7 cGYcm2 for the suprapatellar group. The difference in mean radiation time and mean radiation dose were both significant (p=0.002 and p=0.02 respectively). ConclusionsSuprapatellar tibial nailing is an increasingly accepted technique in the management of tibial fractures. It is shown here that amongst surgeons experienced in both suprapatellar and infrapatellar nailing techniques, the suprapatellar approach trends towards lower use of intra-operative fluoroscopy as measured by time and dose and thus potentially lower radiation exposure to the operating surgeon, assistants and patient.

Suprapatellar Intramedullary Nail Technique Lowers Rate of Malalignment of Distal Tibia Fractures.

To report on the immediate postoperative alignment of distal tibia fractures (within 5 cm of the tibial plafond) treated with suprapatellar intramedullary nail (IMN) insertion compared with the infrapatellar technique. Primary outcomes include alignment on both the anteroposterior and lateral radiographic views. Retrospective cohort study. Two urban level I trauma centers. A total of 266 skeletally mature patients with a distal tibia fracture were treated with an IMN. One hundred thirty-two patients underwent this procedure through a suprapatellar technique. Intramedullary nail placement. Alignment. The 2 treatment groups were evenly matched with respect to age, gender, fracture grade, and the presence of open fracture. Within the suprapatellar group, the fibula was intact, fixed, and remained fractured in 6 (4.5%), 22 (16.7%), and 104 (78.8%) cases, respectively. The fibula was intact, repaired, and remained fractured in 9 (6.7%), 32 (23.9%), and 93 (69.4%) cases, respectively, in the infrapatellar group. There was no difference in the rate of fibular fixation between the groups (P = 0.2). Primary angular malalignment of ≥5 degrees occurred in 35 (26.1%) patients with infrapatellar IMN insertion and in 5 (3.8%) patients who underwent suprapatellar IMN insertion (P < 0.0001). This is the largest patient series directly comparing the suprapatellar with infrapatellar IMN insertion technique in the treatment of distal tibia fractures. In the treatment of distal tibia fractures, suprapatellar IMN technique results in a significantly lower rate of malalignment compared with the infrapatellar IMN technique. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Supra-patellar versus infra-patellar intramedullary nailing in treatment of tibial shaft fractures

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and prognosis between classical infra-patellar (IP) and supra-patellar (SP) intramedullary nailing in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of the 68 patients with tibial shaft fracture who had been treated from June 2012 to December 2014 and completed follow-ups. They were 59 males and 9 females, 18 to 87 years of age (mean, 43.7 years). Of them, 38 were treated through the SP approach and 30 through the IP approach. The 2 groups were compared in terms of surgery-related indexes, The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee function score and Johner-Wruhs evaluation for clinical efficacy at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months postoperation. The 2 groups showed no significant differences regarding preoperative general data (P>0.05). Results The 68 patients obtained an average follow-up of 6 months (range, from 1 to 9 months). Intra-operative accumulative fluoroscopy time in the IP group (2.1±1.1 s) was significantly less than in the SP group (3.3±1.8 s) (P<0.05). The number of limited open reduction (1) , intra-operative bleeding volume (128.6±164.1 mL) and number of second intra-operative shifting (4) in the SP group were significantly smaller than in the IP group (7, 216.2±195.9 mL and 10, respectively) (P<0.05). The HSS score in the SP group at 9 months (80.8±7.5 points) was significantly higher than in the IP group (74.0±5.4 points) (P<0.05). The clinical good to excellent rate at 9 months for the SP group (97.4%) was significantly higher than for the IP group (70.0%) (P<0.05). There were also significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative adverse events like knee pain (P<0.05). No wound infection, limb shortening, internal fixation loosening or rupture, fracture nonunion or mal-union happened in either of the 2 groups. Conclusions In the treatment of tibial shaft fractures with intramedullary nailing, the supra-patellar surgical approach may effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative knee pain so that it can prevent degenerative changes of the knee joint in the long term. It may also lower the incidence of intraoperative second shifting. It also has the advantages of limited incision, simplicity, and limited scaring. In short, it may be superior to the classical infra-patellar approach. Key words: Tibial fractures; Knee joint; Treatment outcome; Infra-patellar approach; Supra-patellar approach

Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Tibial Nail Insertion: A Prospective Randomized Control Pilot Study.

The purpose of this OTA-approved pilot study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of the knee joint after infrapatellar (IP) versus suprapatellar (SP) tibial nail insertion. Prospective, randomized. Level I trauma center. After institutional review board approval, skeletally mature patients with OTA 42 tibial shaft fractures were randomized into either an IP or SP nail insertion group after informed consent was obtained. The SP also underwent prenail and postnail insertion patella-femoral (PF) joint arthroscopy. Patients underwent follow-up (6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months) with standard radiographs, as well as visual analog score and pain diagram documentation. At the 6-month and 12-month visits, knee function questionnaires (Lysholm knee scale and SF-36) were completed. Magnetic resonance imaging/image (MRI) of the affected knee was obtained at 12 months. Ten patients in each group were required for a power analysis for the anticipated larger randomized control trial, but enrollment in each arm was not limited because of known problems with patient follow-up over a 12-month period. A total of 41 patients/fractures were enrolled in this study. Of those, only 25 patients/fractures (14 IP, 11 SP) fully complied with and completed 12 months of follow-up. Six of 11 SP presented with articular changes (chondromalacia) in the PF joint during the preinsertion arthroscopy. Three patients displayed a change in the articular cartilage based on postnail insertion arthroscopy. At 12 months, all fractures in both groups had proceeded to union. There were no differences between the affected and unaffected knee with respect to range of motion. Functional visual analog score and Lysholm knee scores showed no significant differences between groups (P > 0.05). The SF-36v2 comparison also revealed no significant differences in the overall score, all 4 mental components, and 3/4 physical components (P > 0.05). The bodily pain component score was superior in the SP group (45 vs. 36, P = 0.035). All 11 SP patients obtained MRIs at 1 year. Five of these patients had evidence of chondromalacia on MRI. These findings did not correlate with either the prenail or postnail insertion arthroscopy. Importantly, no patient in the SP group with postnail insertion arthroscopic changes had PF joint pain at 1 year. Overall, there seemed to be no significant differences in pain, disability, or knee range of motion between these 2 tibial intramedullary nail insertion techniques after 12 months of follow-up. Based on this pilot study data, larger prospective trial with long-term follow-up is warranted. Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of Insertional Trauma Between Suprapatellar and Infrapatellar Portals for Tibial Nailing

The purpose of this study was to determine differences in insertional articular trauma in infrapatellar tibial portal and suprapatellar portal intramedullary tibial nail insertion techniques. A cadaveric study was performed on 10 matched pairs of fresh-frozen adult cadaver lower extremities with intact extensor mechanisms. Two study groups with 10 limbs each were created: left lower limbs were treated with a standard medial parapatellar nailing portal and right lower limbs were treated with a suprapatellar tibial nailing portal. Start points were created under fluoroscopic guidance in anteroposterior and mediolateral planes. A start wire was placed and opening reaming was performed on the specimens using instrumentation specific to the nailing portal. Specimens were then dissected by medial parapatellar arthrotomy, revealing the intra-articular condition of the knee structures. The border of the tibial entry reamer hole was measured to the anterior horns of the menisci, anterior cruciate ligament root, and intermeniscal ligament using a digital caliper accurate to 0.02 mm. The structure was considered damaged if the structure was obviously damaged on visual inspection or if a measurement was less than 1 mm. Impact to intra-articular structures was numerically lower in the suprapatellar group (2/10) compared with the infrapatellar group (4/10), but the difference was not statistically significant between the 2 groups (P=.629). The suprapatellar portal approach to the tibial start point demonstrated a lower overall incidence of damage to intra-articular structures, but no significant statistical difference existed between the 2 treatment groups.

Suprapatellar versus Infra-Patellar Intramedullary Nail Insertion of the Tibia: A Cadaveric Model for Comparison of Patellofemoral Contact Pressures and Forces

To quantify patellofemoral contact pressures and forces during infrapatellar (IP) and suprapatellar (SP) intramedullary tibial nail insertion. Fresh-frozen hemicadavers with intact lower extremities and pelves were used for this study. A standard IP entry portal was used on nine tibiae, whereas an SP entry portal was used in eight tibiae. A digital electronic pressure sensor system was used to dynamically measure peak pressures within the patellofemoral joint during each procedure. Data were continuously recorded from the start to completion of each procedure. Mean pressure and force as well as peak contact pressures recorded were then compared between the two techniques. Mean patellofemoral pressures and forces as well as peak contact pressures were higher in the SP group than the IP group. The mean peak contact pressure was 0.90 MPa (range, 0.48-1.26 MPa) during IP nailing. The mean peak contact pressure on the patella and femoral condyles was 1.84 MPa (range, 1.09-2.95 MPa) and 2.13 MPa (range, 1.10-2.86 MPa), respectively, during SP nailing. It is known that structural integrity of articular cartilage is compromised at impact loads exceeding 25 MPa, and chondrocyte apoptosis can occur at sustained loads of as little as 4.5 MPa in immature bovine cartilage. The results of this study indicate that although the patellofemoral contact pressures are higher with SP nail insertion, they remain below the values reported to be detrimental to articular cartilage. Based on these data, we do not believe that the SP entry portal poses a significant risk to the viability or structural integrity of the articular cartilage of the patellofemoral joint. Clinical correlation is needed.