Comparison of Insertional Trauma Between Suprapatellar and Infrapatellar Portals for Tibial Nailing

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine differences in insertional articular trauma in infrapatellar tibial portal and suprapatellar portal intramedullary tibial nail insertion techniques. A cadaveric study was performed on 10 matched pairs of fresh-frozen adult cadaver lower extremities with intact extensor mechanisms. Two study groups with 10 limbs each were created: left lower limbs were treated with a standard medial parapatellar nailing portal and right lower limbs were treated with a suprapatellar tibial nailing portal. Start points were created under fluoroscopic guidance in anteroposterior and mediolateral planes. A start wire was placed and opening reaming was performed on the specimens using instrumentation specific to the nailing portal. Specimens were then dissected by medial parapatellar arthrotomy, revealing the intra-articular condition of the knee structures. The border of the tibial entry reamer hole was measured to the anterior horns of the menisci, anterior cruciate ligament root, and intermeniscal ligament using a digital caliper accurate to 0.02 mm. The structure was considered damaged if the structure was obviously damaged on visual inspection or if a measurement was less than 1 mm. Impact to intra-articular structures was numerically lower in the suprapatellar group (2/10) compared with the infrapatellar group (4/10), but the difference was not statistically significant between the 2 groups (P=.629). The suprapatellar portal approach to the tibial start point demonstrated a lower overall incidence of damage to intra-articular structures, but no significant statistical difference existed between the 2 treatment groups.