Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Research Articles

A review of the anatomy and a step-by-step visual guide to performing an ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block

Background: The aim of this description is to provide step-by-step guidelines for performing an ultrasound guided infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve block. Methods: The brachial plexus in the infraclavicular fossa of sixty healthy volunteers was scanned in the horizontal/transverse plane. The relevant regional anatomy was studied to identify the muscular and vascular structures seen on the ultrasound screen. Results: The entire process was documented and a standard, step-by-step guide to performing ultrasound guided vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks was developed. Conclusion: The development of high-resolution ultrasound guidance has allowed for the direct visualisation of the brachial plexus when performing nerve blocks. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus nerve blocks are becoming more popular. This description aimed to provide step-by-step guidelines on how to perform this block safely and efficiently.

Electron microscopic examination of needles used in infraclavicular brachial plexus block

Aim: The application of peripheral block is frequently used in anesthesia practice. One of the most significant complications of this procedure is peripheral nerve damage that can develop due to the needles used. The aim of this study was to determine the presence of tissue residue on the needle and to obtain information about damage to surrounding tissues during this procedure by examining the needles used in brachial plexus block with electron microscopy. Methods: This prospective-cohort study included patients who were to undergo forearm or hand surgery in the Orthopedics Clinic under anesthesia with infraclavicular brachial plexus block performed with 2 different techniques: The local anesthetic agent was administered to the subclavian artery at 6 and 9 o’clock levels in Group 1 and 2, 6 and 9 o’clock levels in Group 2. The needles used during the block were preserved in glutaraldehyde solution then examined with electron microscopy. The presence of tissue on the needles was recorded and statistical evaluations were made. Results: The needles used in two different techniques of infraclavicular brachial plexus block were examined under scanning electron microscope. The amount of tissue residue remaining on the needle in Group 1 was significantly less than that in Group 2 (P<0.001). Conclusion: When it is considered that ultrasound provides a 2-dimensional image, the fewer the number of needle manipulations made during the procedure of brachial plexus block application, the less damage will be made to the surrounding tissues, thus reducing the possibility of mechanical nerve damage.

Effect of Added Alpha 2 Agonists with Local Anaesthetic in Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparative Study between Dexmedetomidine and Clonidine.

Background:Many adjuvant drugs are added with local anesthetics to increase the quality of regional blocks.Aim:To compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and clonidine added to bupivacaine in infraclavicular brachial plexus block in prolonging the duration of analgesia in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of forearm or hand and also to compare the duration of sensory and motor block, sedation, and hemodynamic changes like bradycardia and hypotension in two groups.Settings and Design:This was an observational study conducted in a tertiary care hospital.Materials and Methods:A study was conducted among 60 patients admitted for elective upper limb surgeries under ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block. Patients who received bupivacaine 0.5% (20 mL) + Clonidine 1 μg.kg−1 were classified as Group A and those received bupivacaine 0.5% (20 mL) + dexmedetomidine 1 μg.kg−1 were classified as Group B.Statistical Analysis:Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25.Results:Duration of analgesia was significantly higher in Group B as compared to Group A (mean + standard deviation = 764 ± 17.573 min vs. 526 ± 9.958 min, respectively, P = 0.001). The mean time for onset of a sensory block as well as motor block was significantly less in Group B when compared to Group A (P = 0.001). The mean duration of both sensory block and motor block was higher in Group B as compared to Group A (P = 0.001).Conclusions:The dexmedetomidine group (Group B) provides a quicker and prolonged analgesic action without major adverse effects.

Efficacy of multimodal analgesia with perineural buprenorphine or dexmedetomidine for surgeries performed under ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Background and Aims:Perineural adjuvants when used as a part of multimodal analgesia (MMA) will maximize the quality and duration of analgesia of the nerve blocks. In the present study, we compared the duration of postoperative analgesia and other block characteristics of two groups of MMA comprising either perineural buprenorphine or dexmedetomidine in the upper limb surgeries performed under ultrasound-guided (US-guided) infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks.Material and Methods:A total of 100 adult patients undergoing elective upper limb orthopedic surgery under US-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block were randomly divided into two groups. Group I received 150 μg buprenorphine and Group II received 50 μg dexmedetomidine, perineurally added to 30 ml of 0.375% bupivacaine. Both groups also received tramadol 50 mg IV, dexamethasone 4 mg IV, and diclofenac 75 mg infusion as part of MMA. Both groups were compared for the duration of postoperative analgesia, block characteristics, and incidence of adverse effects.Results:The duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly prolonged in Group II (937.6 ± 179.1 min vs 1280.4 ± 288.8 min). The onset of sensory and motor blocks was shorter in Group II (P < 0.05). The duration of sensory and motor blocks was significantly prolonged in Group II (P < 0.05). The number of rescue analgesics required in the first 24 hours was less in Group II (1.98 ± 0.62 vs 0.8 ± 0.64). Although heart rate and blood pressure levels were lower in Group II, all patients were hemodynamically stable.Conclusion:For surgeries under brachial plexus block, perineural dexmedetomidine when used as a part of MMA provided a prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia and improved block characteristics than perineural buprenorphine.

A cadaver study of four approaches of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Background and Aims:The ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (USG ICBPB) is a popular technique for forearm surgeries distal to the elbow. Our study details the ultrasound (US) characteristics of this block and the structures encountered by the needle in four approaches to the infraclavicular area – lateral infraclavicular (LICF), costoclavicular medial to lateral (CML) and lateral to medial (CLM) and retroclavicular (R) by anatomical dissection.Methods:USG ICBPB was performed in 10 cadavers—5 on the right side and 5 on the left side by each of four approaches and with an 18 gauge Tuohy needle kept in situ, and US characteristics were noted. Anatomical dissection was done and important structures were described in detail.Results:Needle tip and shaft visibility were least with LICF approach and best in R approach. Needle angle correlated with chest and neck circumference in LICF and CML groups. During dissection, in all approaches, neurovascular structures have been observed in the near vicinity of the needle, especially the thoracoacromial artery (TAA) or its branches. In the R approach, the 'blind spot' behind the clavicle is an area where neurovascular structures were present.Conclusion:The R approach gives better visibility of needle shaft beyond the clavicle, but the clavicle acts as a 'blind-spot' for the US beam obliterating important neurovascular structures. The various neurovascular structures the needle traverses or in its immediate vicinity, do not necessarily make the CML, CLM or R approach any better than the LICF approach.

Dexmedetomidine on Continuous Infraclavicular Block after Elbow Arthrolysis

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine in the analgesia of contin-uous infraclavicular brachial plexus block after elbow arthrolysis. Methods: Sixty patients who received unilateral elbow arthrolysis and met inclusion criteria were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 30): dexmedetomidine + ropivacaine group (group D) and ropivacaine group (group R). The formulation of analgesic pump was 0.2% ropivacaine 240 mL + 2 ug/kg dexmedetomidine in D group and 0.2% ropivacaine 240 mL in R group. The VAS scores at rest, 4 h (T1), 8 h (T2), 12 h (T3), 24 h (T4), 36 h (T5) and 48 h (T6) after operation were recorded, and NRS scores during functional exercise at 24 h (T4), 36 h (T5) and 48 h (T6) after operation were recorded. The incidence of adverse reactions and satisfactory degree of analgesia in two groups were recorded. Results: The success rate of block during catheterization was 100% in both groups. Compared with group R, VAS score of group D at each time point after operation decreased (p &lt; 0.05); NRS score during functional exercise at each time point after operation decreased (p &lt; 0.05); the additional pressing times of analgesic pump within 48 h decreased (p &lt; 0.05); the incidence of dizziness, nausea and vomiting after operation decreased (p &lt; 0.05); and satisfaction degree of analgesia 48 h after operation was higher in group D (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine can produce effective analgesic and sedative effects, and reduce the incidence of complications in the analgesia of continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block after elbow arthrolysis.

The Effects of Magnesium Sulfate with Lidocaine for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Extremity Surgeries.

Background An addition of analgesic to anesthetic agents is likely to increase the effects of anesthesia and reduce associated adverse outcomes. Several adjuvants are studied in this regard. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of adding a magnesium adjunct to lidocaine for the induction of infraclavicular block. Methods Patients referred to Shohada Ashayer Hospital, Khorramabad, for wrist and hand surgery were enrolled in this study. The intervention/case group included patients who received 18 mL lidocaine (2%) + 2 mL magnesium sulfate (50%), 10 mL normal saline; control group: 18 mL lidocaine (2%) + 12 mL of normal saline. After the induction of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block, parameters such as duration of reach with respect to complete sensory and motor block, hemodynamic parameters (hypotension and bradycardia), and postoperative pain, using visual analogue scale criteria, were measured. The obtained data were analyzed using a Bayesian path analysis model. Results A total of 30 patients were included in each group. In the case group, sensory and motor block was achieved for 12.136 ± 4.96 and 13 ± 3.589 minutes more than those in the control group. The duration of sedation and immobilization was 2.57 ± 0.764 minute and 4.66 ± 0.909 minutes lengthier in the case group. Regarding the hemodynamic parameters, blood pressure was 0.217 ± 5.031 and 1.59 ± 5.14 units lower in the case group, immediately following the block and the surgery. Similarly, heart rate was 0.776 ± 4.548 and 0.39 ± 3.987 units higher in the case group, after 30 minutes and 2 hours of the procedure. A decrease in the pain was seen at 8, 10, and 12 hours after the surgery, as compared with the control group. An addition of magnesium to lidocaine for infraclavicular block resulted in a significantly longer sedation and immobilization period and decreased postoperative pain at 12 hours. Conclusion Heart rate and blood pressure did not decrease significantly in the case group. It can be concluded that addition of magnesium sulfate to lidocaine can produce better anesthetic and analgesic outcomes with low-to-no adverse effects.

Comparative Effects of Supraclavicular Perivascular and Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries

Comparative Effects of Supraclavicular Perivascular and Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries

Thermochromic nail polish as a novel indicator to predict infraclavicular brachial plexus block success: A prospective cohort study.

Skin temperature measurements after peripheral nerve block can be used as an easy and objective method to help predict block success. Thermochromic nail polishes are popular cosmetic products especially among young women. The colour change of nail polish is based on a thermochromic reaction as the temperature changes. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the success of infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (IBPBs) can be predicted by the colour change in thermochromic nail polish, which depends on skin temperature changes. A prospective cohort study. Training and research hospital from December 2018 to March 2019. A total of 50 patients who received IBPB for forearm, wrist or hand surgery were included. Thermochromic nail polish was applied to the nails of both hands of all patients before the block. Reaction of the nail polish in both hands was photographed immediately after application of nail polish and at 30 min after performing the block. The digital photographs of each patient were evaluated by observers. To evaluate the validity of the colour change in nail polish in predicting a successful IBPB, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and positive and negative likelihood ratios were estimated. The positive predictive value for colour change in thermochromic nail polish predicting a successful IBPB was 96% [95% confidence interval (CI) 90 to 98] and sensitivity was 94% (95% CI 87 to 97). Fleiss kappa value showed substantial agreement (0.76; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.93) in the assessment of interobserver agreement. The current study demonstrates that the colour change in thermochromic nail polish is a valid and reliable indicator for the prediction of block success. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03767868.

The Need for Supplemental Blocks in Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks

The Need for Supplemental Blocks in Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks

Randomized comparison between perineural dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block

BackgroundThis randomized trial compared perineural dexamethasone (5 mg) and dexmedetomidine (100 µg) for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. We hypothesized that both adjuvants would result in similar durations of motor...

Comparing Postoperative Analgesic Effect of Dexmedetomidine or Dexamethasone Added to Lidocaine Through Infraclavicular Block in Forearm Surgery.

The objective of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of dexamethasone versus dexmedetomidine added to lidocaine using infraclavicular block in patients undergoing forearm fracture surgery. Seventy-five patients aged 20 to 60 years were recruited for a prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed in 3 groups by injecting 28 mL lidocaine plus 2 mL distilled water (Lido), 28 mL lidocaine plus 2 mL (8 mg) dexamethasone (Dexa), and 28 mL lidocaine plus 2 mL (1 µg/kg) dexmedetomidine (Dexm). Sensory and motor block onset time and the duration, hemodynamic variables, the time for the first analgesic request, and the total analgesic agents consumed within 6 hours after infraclavicular block were assessed. Sensory block duration in the Dexm group was significantly greater than in the Lido (P=0.019) and Dexa (P=0.046) groups. The mean motor block duration in the Dexm group showed to be significantly longer than that in the Lido group (P=0.009). Pain intensity within 4 hours after block significantly increased in the Lido group compared with that in the Dexa and Dexm groups (P=0.001). Analgesic consumption during 6 hours after the procedure was higher in the Lido group when compared with the other 2 groups (P=0.001). The Dexm group showed the highest reduction in the mean arterial pressure (P=0.006) and heart rate (P=0.001) among the 3 groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain intensity between the Dexa and Dexm groups, although DEXm demonstrated a longer sensory block duration in comparison with dexamethasone as a lidocaine adjuvant in infraclavicular block.

Microcirculation and haemodynamics after infraclavicular brachial plexus block using adrenaline as an adjuvant to lidocaine: a randomised, double-blind, crossover study inhealthy volunteers.

We evaluated the effect of adrenaline on human skin microcirculation (nutritive and sub-papillary) and systemic cardiovascular variables after it was added to lidocaine in infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks. Twelve healthy, non-smoking male volunteers were included, each attending two study sessions 2weeks apart, and they were studied using a crossover design. In both sessions, they received an ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block in the non-dominant arm with 0.4ml.kg-1 lidocaine, 15mg.ml-1 with or without adrenaline 5μg.ml-1 . Microcirculation was assessed by laser Doppler fluxmetry (sub-papillary blood flow), capillary video microscopy (nutritive blood flow) and continuous temperature measurements. Heart rate and arterial pressure were recorded continuously and non-invasively. Median (IQR [range]) sub-papillary blood flow increased substantially 30min after the brachial plexus block, from 8.5 (4.4-13.5 [2.9-28.2]) to 162.7 (111.0-197.8 [9.5-206.7]) arbitrary units with adrenaline (p=0.017), and from 6.9 (5.3-28.5 [1.8-42.1] to 133.7 (16.5-216.7 [1.0-445.0] arbitrary units without adrenaline (p=0.036). Nutritive blood flow (functional capillary density, capillaries.mm-2 , measured at the dorsal side of the hand) decreased in the blocked extremity when adrenaline was used as adjuvant, from median (IQR [range]) 45 (36-52 [26-59]) to 38 (29-41 [26-42]), p=0.028, whereas no significant change occurred without adrenaline. Median finger skin temperature (°C) increased by 44% (data pooled) with no significant differences between the groups. No significant changes were found in the systemic cardiovascular variables with or without adrenaline. We conclude that lidocaine infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks caused an increase in skin sub-papillary blood flow. The addition of adrenaline produced stronger and longer lasting blocks, but decreased the nutritive blood flow.

Upper extremity regional anesthesia techniques: A comprehensive review for clinical anesthesiologists.

Surgeries and chronic pain states of the upper extremity are quite common and pose unique challenges for the clinical anesthesiology and pain specialists. Most innervation of the upper extremity involves the brachial plexus. The four most common brachial plexus blocks performed in clinical setting include the interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary brachial plexus blocks. These blocks are most commonly performed with the use of ultrasound-guided techniques, whereby analgesia is achieved by anesthetizing the brachial plexus at different levels such as the roots, divisions, cords, and branches. Additional regional anesthetic techniques for upper extremity surgery include wrist, intercostobrachial, and digital nerve blocks, which are most frequently performed using landmark anatomical techniques. This review provides a comprehensive summary of each of these blocks including anatomy, best practice techniques, and potential complications.

Tissue Oxygen Saturation Change on Upper Extremities After Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade; Prospective Observational Study

Background and Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) is a reliable and objective method for assessing the adequacy of infraclavicular block and to describe the time course of StO2 changes. Materials and Methods: In this prospective observational study, StO2 was measured in 40 patients planned for elective hand surgery under infraclavicular block. Noninvasive StO2 monitoring was used prior to ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block and during the first 30 min of the blockade. Sensory and motor blocks were evaluated every 5 min followed by pinprick testing and Bromage scale. Results: Preanesthetic median StO2 values of the blocked side and nonblocked side were similar (p = 0.532), whereas the postanesthetic values of the blocked side were higher. At the fifth minute and the following minute, measurements compared to the nonblocked side (p < 0.001). The median StO2 values increased significantly, which increased by 4.5% at 5 min, by another 5.5% at 30 min, and by an average of 1% from 5 to 30 min compared to the baseline values in the blocked side. The responses of the patients to the questions probed in the pinprick test and Bromage scale were fully compatible with the data obtained by the near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) method. Conclusions: StO2 monitoring may provide a useful instrument for rapid evaluation of the success of regional anesthesia in the upper extremity.

Infraclavicular brachial plexus block in adults: a comprehensive review based on a unified nomenclature system.

Over the last decade, considerable progress has been made regarding infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICB) in adults, especially since the introduction of ultrasound guidance. The advancements in ICB have been attributed to the development of various approaches to improve the success rate and reduce complications. This has also necessitated a unified nomenclature system to facilitate comparison among different approaches. This review aimed to propose an anatomical nomenclature system by classifying ICB approaches into proximal and distal ones to aid future research and provide practice advisories according to recent updates. We also comprehensively discuss various aspects of this nomenclature system. Our review suggests that ultrasound-guided ICB should be categorized as an advanced technique that should be performed under supervision and dual guidance. For one-shot block, the conventional distal approach is still preferred but should be modified to follow ergonomic practice, with the arm in the proper position. For continuous ICB, the proximal approach is promising for reducing local anesthetic volume and increasing efficacy. Nevertheless, further studies are warranted in this direction. We provide practice advisories to maximize safety and minimize adverse events, and recommend designing future studies on ICB according to these findings based on the unified nomenclature system.

Retrospective Analysis of Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Block: Effect of Experience of Anesthesiologists on Volume of Local Anesthetic Administered.

Performing a block under ultrasound guidance effectively requires skill; however, inexperienced anesthesiologists often use high-dose LA to ensure success. We aimed to share our experience with the ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (USGICB) for upper extremity surgeries and to determine changes in failure rate and local anesthetic dose administered with gaining adequate experience. With approval from the local ethics committee, a retrospective review of records of 2953 patients who underwent USGICB between November 2011 and March 2015 was performed for evaluating the following data: age, sex, height, weight, operation type, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score, local anesthetic volume, complications, and success of USGICB. The patients were divided into 4 groups of 10 months each from November 2011 to March 2015: first 10-month period, 628 cases (group I); second 10-month period, 672 (group II); third 10-month period, 720 (group III); and the fourth 10-month period, 933 cases (group IV). Nine anesthesiologists with the same baseline experience in USG performed the blocks. During the initial period, when anesthesiologists had insufficient experience, local anesthetic (LA) dose, success rate, failed blocks, and complications were investigated. The LA volume administered in group I (33.7 ± 4.2 ml) was significantly higher than that in groups II, III, and IV (p < 0.05). Although a reduction in LA volume administered with increasing anesthesiologist experience was not statistically significant, a volume reduction of over 30 ml was observed in groups II, III, and IV compared with group I. Furthermore, in group I, failure rate (3.2%) was higher than that in groups II, III, and IV (p < 0.05). We concluded that sonographic guidance ensures a high success rate and that increased experience of anesthesiologists is associated with reduced complications and failure rate of blocks, in addition to prevention of LA overdose.

Volume mínimo efetivo de bupivacaína a 0,5% para abordagem retroclavicular guiada por ultrassom no bloqueio do plexo braquial por via infraclavicular

Background and objectivesThe current study aimed to determine the minimum effective volume (MEV) of bupivacaine 0.5% in 50% of patients for an ultrasound‐guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block. MethodsA total of 25 adult patients who were scheduled for upper limb surgery received an ultrasound‐guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block with bupivacaine 0.5%. The needle insertion point was posterior to the clavicle and the needle was advanced from cephalad to caudal. Block success was defined as a composite score of 14 at 30min after local anesthetic (LA) injection. The minimum effective volume in 50% of patients was determined using the Dixon‐Massey up‐and‐down staircase method. Minimum effective volume for a successful block in 95% of the patients was also calculated using logistic regression and probit transformation. ResultsThe minimum effective volume of bupivacaine 0.5% resulting in successful block in 50% of patients (MEV50) according to the up‐and‐down staircase method was found to be 9.6mL (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.7–13.4). The calculated minimum effective volume required for a successful block in 95% of patients (MEV95) using the probit transformation and logistic regression analysis was 23.2mL (95% CI, 18.8–36.7). ConclusionsThe MEV50 of bupivacaine 0.5% for US‐guided retroclavicular approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus block was 9.6mL and the calculated MEV95 was 23.2mL. Future studies are required for infraclavicular brachial plexus block with different approaches, other LA agents and different concentrations of bupivacaine.

Comparison of infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper extremity surgery

Comparison of infraclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper extremity surgery

Comparison of Single-Dose Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block and Continuous Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Applications in the Treatment of Finger Amputations

Introduction The aim of this study is to evaluate the replantation success of single-dose infraclavicular brachial plexus block and continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block (CIBPB) applied with bupivacaine and prilocaine in patients with finger amputation.Materials and Methods This prospective randomized nonblinded study was conducted between January 2012 and September 2017, and 47 patients, all male, were included. Patients were randomly separated into two groups as 23 patients CIBPB applied group (group A) and 24 patients single-dose infraclavicular block applied group (group B). In group B, after the effect of block is ceased, intravenous patient-controlled (PC) opioid analgesia and, where necessary, 1 mg/kg meperidine and 75 mg diclofenac sodium intramuscularly were alternately administered at 4 to 6 hours intervals. The average ages were 30.7 ± 10.06 and 29 ± 9.08, respectively. Replantations were applied as being two venous anastomoses to one artery, where possible. Hourly skin temperatures of fingers of the hands in which both surgeries applied and no surgery applied in both the groups were measured for 3 days with an infrared thermometer. Also, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) evaluations in both the groups were performed in 3-hour intervals for 3 days.Results Replantations were successful in 22 patients in whom CIBPB was applied (95.6%) and in 19 patients in whom single block was applied (79.16%). Regarding the finger temperatures, no significant difference was detected between both the groups for 3 days following the operation. No significant difference was found between the length of hospital stays (4.73 ± 2.21—4.71 ± 1.53) and duration of operations (2.90 ± 0.73—2.83 ± 0.58). There was no significant difference between the temperature values of both the groups. NRS scores of group A were statistically significantly lower than those of group B.Conclusion In this prospective randomized study performed by using bupivacaine and prilocaine on 24 patients, the success rate of finger replantations with CIBPB was found to be higher. CIBPB is a very beneficial method that should be taken in consideration in hand injuries with anastomosis and high risk of vasospasm. Further studies with more number of cases would help reduce the question marks related with the success of this method.