Influence Bank Performance Research Articles

Do financial technology firms influence bank performance? A reverse engineered pitch

Do financial technology firms influence bank performance? A reverse engineered pitch

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND POST-MERGER PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM US BANKS

Mergers operations has currently become one of the key strategies for many firms. It becomes a tool to increase firm value when firm has reached its peak performance. This critical decision expects business performance to improve. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of various governance variables, like managerial ownership, the percentage of shares held by outside directors, the board size, the audit committee size and the percentage of stock options granted to managers, on post merger banks performance and to investigate how the firm size can influence bank performance following mergers operations. It also tends to test the existence of the phenomenon of Empire building which is defined as a primary motivation for mergers operations. Empirical analysis is based on a panel data model applied to a sample of 54 banks come from the list of U.S. bank mergers over a period of 6 years from 2009 to 2015. Our results show that the increase in managerial ownership decreases the value of the deficit, therefore, improves the bank performance following mergers operations. The introduction of firm size shows that this variable is positively correlated with the value of the deficit that is used as a performance measure in this study. Our results converge with previous studies that show an improvement in the performance following bank mergers.

Do nominee directors influence bank performance?

The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of board characteristics on the performance of Indian commercial banks. The study differs from the earlier studies as it analyses the impact of Government official nominee directors and Reserve Bank of India (RBI) nominee directors on the bank performance. A panel data approach has been used in this study. Particularly, the fixed effect estimation technique is used to examine the relationship between board characteristics, and bank performance during the period 2009–2010 to 2016–2017. The authors find that board size, female directors, and the average number of directorships held by outside directors are inversely related to performance. The central government official directors and RBI nominee directors negatively and significantly affect the performance of public sector banks. The results are robust across the various proxies of bank performance, and sub-samples classified on the basis of ownership, size of the bank, and bank capitalization. This study provides insights to policy regulators and policymakers who are entrusted with the appointment of the board of directors in the banks in light of the ongoing regulatory reforms

Human capital, income diversification and bank performance–an empirical study of East African banks

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine whether income diversification moderates the relationship between human capital and bank performance.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses a sample of 53 banks and panel data for the years 2010–2018. The hypotheses are tested through hierarchical multiple regression and the choice between fixed effect and random effect estimation is based on the results of the Hausman test.FindingsThe study finds that human capital and income diversification significantly influence bank performance; however, the direction of the causality varies. While human capital has a positive effect, income diversification has a negative effect. Additionally, the interaction term has a negative and significant effect on bank performance, inferring that income diversification has an antagonistic effect on the human capital and bank performance relationship. For the control variable, liquidity and asset quality negatively affects bank performance while capitalization has a positive effect.Research limitations/implicationsHuman capital was measured as human capital efficiency (HCE), which is a quantitative measure of human capital, hence future studies can use qualitative measures. Also, the study focused on commercial banks in East Africa, future researcher may possibly consider other regions and industries, which would shed more insights.Practical implicationsThe results of this paper provide valuable insights. Bank managers can get a better understanding of the impact of human capital on bank performance, and the need to invest more in human capital development. Further, the study cautions bank managers that engaging in non-lending activities might destroy the economic value of human capital and ultimately lower performance. The study also recommends that policymakers should address the obstacles to banks' income diversification, for instance relaxing regulations restricting diversification; this might enable banks to leverage related financial service activities for optimal utilization of human capital and improve banks' profitability.Originality/valueWhile a good number of previous studies investigated the direct effect of human capital and income diversification on the performance of banks, this study examines the moderating role of income diversification on the relationship between human capital and performance of banks in East Africa.

Do financial technology firms influence bank performance?

We develop a hypothesis that the growth of financial technology (FinTech) negatively influences bank performance. We study the Indonesia market, where FinTech growth has been impressive. Using a sample of 41 banks and data on FinTech firms, we show that the growth of FinTech firms negatively influences bank performance. We test our hypothesis through multiple additional tests and robustness tests, such as sensitivity to bank characteristics, effects of the Global Financial Crisis, and the use of alternative estimators. Our main conclusion that FinTech negatively predicts bank performance holds.

Customer Relationship Management Dimensions and Nigerian Banks’ Performance: Evidence from Zenith Bank Plc

Today, customers are looking for benefits from the bank, better service, lower transaction fees, higher interest rates, a sign of prestige, new products access from different channels. This study evaluates the influence of CRM dimensions on bank performance. Zenith Bank Plc was selected through purposive method, while judgmental sampling technique was also used to select Head of Operation, Accountant, Auditor, and Branch Manager from its 35 branches in Lagos, Nigeria, totaling 140 respondents as a sample size for the study. Multiple regression analysis, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) method of estimation was employed to analyze the data. Results revealed that CRM dimensions (customer involvement, long-term relationship with customers, joint problem-solving and information sharing) jointly and independently influence bank performance measured by customer satisfaction, deposit mobilization and profit level. Subsequently, the study recommended that management of Nigerian banks should be actively involved in changes in organization in order to spread positive vision of CRM concept and to support organizational change.

Influence of rewards and recognition on employees� motivation and job performance: path analysis approach

Objectives: To study the influence of rewards and recognition on employees’ motivation. To identify the influence of employees’ motivation on job performance. Methods/Statistical Analysis: Descriptive research design is adapted for this study. Convenient sampling technique was applied and data was collected from 114 respondents. As 4 responses had flaws 110 response was considered for analysis. The sample considered for the study was 110, excluding the 4 questionnaire with flaws. Path analysis was adopted for primary data analysis. Findings: It was found that rewards and recognition has influence on employees ‘motivation. This has achieved support from earlier studies and few others. The research also found that there is influence of employees’ motivation on job performance and this supports the findings. It was also found that there is relationship between reward and recognition, this result is supported. Bank management provides updated rewards and recognition which the employees like and in turn this may help to increase employee motivation and its influences employees’ performance and its influences bank performance. Application/Improvements: Thus to improve the performance of the employees the rewards and recognition need to be updated according to the requirement of the employees. Continuous research must be conducted to identify the type of reward that motivates the employees and the reward system need to be reframed in organization. Keywords: Employees’ Motivation and Job Performance, Recognition, Rewards

Does Ownership Structure Influence Bank Performance?: Evidence from an Emerging Economy

Banks’ ownership and their performance form two important dimensions of the entire gamut of banking function. This article strives to establish a link between the two by studying commercial banks in India. Conducting a panel data analysis of 89 commercial banks over the period from 2008–2009 to 2012–2013, one could observe that ownership indeed mattered when net interest margin (NIM) or per-employee profitability was considered, but when return on assets (ROA) was considered, there was not much of a difference among banks when differentiated on ownership basis.

Positive contribution of the good corporate governance rating to stability and performance: evidence from Indonesia

This paper aims to examine the impact of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) practice on bank stability and performance. Governance is measured using the GCG rating that covers eleven aspects. The authors apply instrumental regression to link governance to performance and stability. The study covers a sample of 150 banks. The result shows that bank stability can mediate bank governance and bank performance. On the determinant of bank performance, it can be concluded that the GCG rating is positive and directly influences bank performance. Bank stability is also positive for bank performance indicating the indirect contribution of the GCG rating to bank performance. NPL, LDR, CAR and bank’s size (LASSET) are all negative and significant. The aim of this paper is to provide strong empirical evidence on the importance of governance and stability for performance. The limitations of this paper are the size of the sample and that it only covers public banks which are theoretically required to apply better governance in all aspects of their business by the Capital Market Authority.

Age diversity, directors' personal values, and bank performance

This study examines the effects of board diversity on bank profitability and risk. Using a sample of 97 Chinese banks over a period from 2009 to 2013, we find that board age diversity is negatively associated with bank profitability. To further investigate why age-diverse boards influence bank performance, we decompose board age diversity into diversity of directors' personal values, utilizing the World Values Survey. Our findings suggest that the heterogeneity among directors' views on risk, prudence, and wealth is more likely to spark intragroup conflicts in the decision-making process. This prevents the board from functioning effectively and ultimately weakens bank profitability. Our results are robust with respect to alternative measures of diversity and bank performance.

Bank performance and board of directors attributes by Islamic banks

Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between board structure (consisting of board size, board composition, CEO role duality and chairman composition), investment account holders (IAHs) and social contribution and the bank performance in one of the fastest-growing industries, Islamic banking.Design/methodology/approach– A generalized least square (GLS) regression model was used to investigate such relationship applying data from a sample of 40 Islamic banks operating in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries over the period of 2008 until 2011.Findings– The results show that both size and composition of the board have a negative effect on bank performance. On the other hand, the separation of CEO and chairman roles and the IAHs have no effect, while the chairman independence has a positive impact. As for the control variables, bank size positively influences bank performance whereas leverage has a negative effect. Zakah and gross domestic product produce no significant effect on bank performance.Research limitations/implications– Even though the model has explained the significant part of the variation in performance, there are other factors considered as noise in the model which are unexplained due to the lack of data. As such, other mechanisms of corporate governance (CG) comprising attributes of the remuneration and nominating committees and ownership structure may be used in future research. The sample size is also limited; thus, in future research, the sample size could be increased by including Islamic banks operating in all Middle East countries.Practical implications– The results suggest that to yield a better bank performance, Islamic banks should enhance the effectiveness of CG through the board of directors (BODs), whereby any decisions made by the BODs would lead to greater investors’ confidence in the market. The results suggest that policymakers should impose new mechanisms that could impact the effectiveness and compliance of BODs on the code of CG and guidelines of micro-finance, in general, and among Islamic banks, in particular. The community also has the right to know up to what extent are the Islamic banks are in compliance withShariahprinciples and rules and the impact of their transactions on the society’s welfare.Originality/value– BODs’ failures are the primary reason for the recent financial collapses, and Islamic banks are not spared from these events. Even though many studies have examined the influence of BODs effectiveness on the performance of conventional banking industry over time, studies on the Islamic financial institutions are quite scarce. In addition, the results obtained by the studies on conventional banks may not be applicable to Islamic banks. This is because the BODs of Islamic banks discharge their responsibilities and duties along with the existence of the Shariah supervisory board (a multi-layer structure), which is quite different from the CG structure in conventional banks that is dependent on the BODs (a single-layer). Therefore, this research attempts to fill the gap in the literature by addressing this issue in the Islamic banking industry by using a stakeholder theory based on Islamic perspective which has not been used yet in previous studies.

The relationship between board characteristics and performance of bank holding companies: before and during the financial crisis

We examine the relationship between performance of the bank holding company and several board characteristics. We find that board size, CEO tenure and board tenure enhance bank performance. However, we find no evidence that board structure or CEO power influences bank performance. More importantly, we show that the effect of board characteristics during the crisis is quite different. During the crisis, board size has a negative effect on Tobin’s Q and the non-performing asset ratio, which supports Jensen’s (1993) argument that large boards are less likely to function effectively. Further, we report that the non-performing asset ratio decreases with board independence during the crisis.

Bank efficiency and shareholder value in Asia Pacific

This paper uses dynamic panel estimation approaches to investigate the relationship between shareholder value and efficiency for a large sample of commercial banks in 14 Asia-Pacific economies between 2003 and 2010. In general, the results indicate that shareholder value is positively linked to improvements in both cost and profit efficiency, and the influence varies over time. The findings also suggest that bank size, credit losses, and market risk significantly influence bank performance. These results are robust to various model specifications.

Financial Supervision and Bank Profitability: Evidence from East Asia

The growing fragility of the financial system has led to the increasing importance of financial supervision's role. In particular, the financial supervision regime is expected to promote bank performance and maintain financial stability. Unfortunately, studies on the relationship between banking supervisory regimes and bank performance are still limited. To address this issue, this paper focuses on the following four aspects of banking supervision:(i) the structure of supervisory frameworks, (ii) the independence of supervisory institutions (iii) the scope of supervisory role; and (iv) the authority of central banks in the banking sector. We use country-specific data for seven East-Asian countries and data for 39 individual banks in those countries over the period of 2006–2011 to examine how different financial supervision regimes in the region influence bank performance. The results show strong evidence that the existence of a single bank supervisor, instead of multiple, will enhance bank profitability. Mean while, there is a mixed result regarding the role of central bank independence in improving bank profitability. Furthermore, the authority of central banks in the banking sector and the scope of bank supervision do not show strong relationship with bank performance.

The determinants of shareholder value in European banking

This paper examines the determinants of shareholder value creation for a large sample of European banks between 1998 and 2005. As the recent turmoil in global banking systems has illustrated, bank performance can have a substantial influence on efficient capital allocation, company growth and economic development. We use a dynamic panel data model where the bank’s shareholder value is a linear function of various bank-specific, industry-specific and macroeconomic variables. We show that shareholder value has a positive relationship with cost efficiency changes, while economic profits are linked to revenue efficiency changes. Credit losses, market and liquidity risk and leverage are also found to substantially influence bank performance. These results are robust to a variety of different model specifications.