Inflatable Belt Research Articles

Assessment of Abdominal Constrictor's Forces for Informing Computational Models of Orthostatic Hypotension.

Orthostatic hypotension is defined as a sudden drop in blood pressure upon standing from a sitting or supine position. The prevalence of this condition increases exponentially with age. Nonpharmacological treatments are always the first step in the management of this condition, such as the use of an abdominal constriction belt to optimize the blood volume in the abdomen. A multitude of clinical trials have shown the efficacy of elastic abdominal compression as well as compression using an inflatable bladder; however, there are currently few accessible consumer products that can provide abdominal compression by using an inflatable bladder that ensures the correct amount of pressure is being exerted on the subject. This study serves to quantitatively analyze forces exerted in inflatable abdominal binders, a novel treatment that fits the criterion for a first-line intervention for orthostatic hypotension. Quantitative values aim to indicate both the anatomic regions of the body subjected to the highest pressure by abdominal binding. Quantitative values will also create a model that can correlate the amount of compression on the subject with varying levels of pressure in the inflatable bladder. Inflatable binders of varying levels of inflation are used and localized pressure values are recorded at 5 different vertical points along the abdomen in the midsternal line and midclavicular line, at the locations of the splanchnic veins. These findings indicate both the differences in the compressive force applied through elastic and inflatable binding, as well the regions on the abdomen subject to the highest force load during compression by an abdominal binder. A medical manikin called the iStan Manikin was used to collect data. The pressure values on a manikin were sensed by the JUZO pressure monitor, a special device created for the purpose of measuring the force under compressive garments. The pressure inside the inflatable bladder was extrapolated from a pressure gauge and the pressure was recorded at different degrees of inflation of the belt (mmHG) along two different areas of the abdomen, the midsternal line and the midclavicular line, to discern differences in force exerted on the patient (mmHG). Computational studies on the data from the JUZO pressure monitor as well as the data from the pressure gauge on the inflatable bladder allow us to create a model that can correlate the amount of pressure in the inflatable bladder to the amount of pressure exerted on the belt, thus making sure that the patient is not being harmed by the compressive force. The results of our study indicate that there is no significant difference between the pressures exerted on the midsternal and midclavicular lines of the body by the abdominal binder and that no significant difference exists between the external pressure measured by the inflatable belt and the pressure sensed on the human body by the JUZO sensor; however, we were able to extrapolate an equation that can tell the user the amount of pressure that is actually being exerted on them based on the pressure in the inflatable bladder as recorded by the gauge.

Optimizing Seat Belt and Airbag Designs for Rear Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes.

Recent field data have shown that the occupant protection in vehicle rear seats failed to keep pace with advances in the front seats likely due to the lack of advanced safety technologies. The objective of this study was to optimize advanced restraint systems for protecting rear seat occupants with a range of body sizes under different frontal crash pulses. Three series of sled tests (baseline tests, advanced restraint trial tests, and final tests), MADYMO model validations against a subset of the sled tests, and design optimizations using the validated models were conducted to investigate rear seat occupant protection with 4 Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) and 2 crash pulses. The sled tests and computer simulations were conducted with a variety of restraint systems including the baseline rear-seat 3-point belt, 3-point belts with a pre-tensioner, load limiter, dynamic locking tongue, 4-point belts, inflatable belts, Bag in Roof (BiR) concept, and Self Conforming Rear seat Air Bag (SCaRAB) concept. The results of the first two sled series demonstrated that the baseline 3-point belt system are associated with many injury measures exceeding injury assessment reference values (IARVs); showed the significance of crash pulse and occupant size in predicting injury risks; and verified the potential need of advanced restraint features for better protecting the rear-seat occupants. Good correlations between the tests and simulations were achieved through a combination of optimization and manual fine-tuning, as determined by a correlation method. Parametric simulations showed that optimized belt-only designs (3-point belt with pre-tensioner and load limiter) met all of the IARVs under the soft crash pulse but not the severe crash pulse, while the optimized belt and SCaRAB design met all the IARVs under both the soft and severe crash pulses. Two physical prototype restraint systems, namely an "advanced-belt only" design and an "advanced-belt and SCaRAB" design, were then tested in the final sled series. With the soft crash pulse, both advanced restraint systems were able to reduce all the injury measures below the IARVs for all four ATDs. Both advanced restraint systems also effectively reduced almost all the injury measures for all ATDs under the severe crash pulse, except for the THOR. The design with the advanced-belt and SCaRAB generally provided lower injury measures than those using the advanced belt-only design. This study highlighted the potential benefit of using advanced seatbelt and airbag systems for rear-seat occupant protection in frontal crashes.

Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour.

Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour.

Effect of physical countermaneuvers on orthostatic hypotension in familial dysautonomia

Familial dysautonomia (FD) patients frequently experience debilitating orthostatic hypotension. Since physical countermaneuvers can increase blood pressure (BP) in other groups of patients with orthostatic hypotension, we evaluated the effectiveness of countermaneuvers in FD patients. In 17 FD patients (26.4 +/- 12.4 years, eight female), we monitored heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), cardiac output (CO), total peripheral resistance (TPR) and calf volume while supine, during standing and during application of four countermaneuvers: bending forward, squatting, leg crossing, and abdominal compression using an inflatable belt. Countermaneuvers were initiated after standing up,when systolic BP had fallen by 40mmHg or diastolic BP by 30mmHg or presyncope had occurred. During active standing, blood pressure and TPR decreased, calf volume increased but CO remained stable. Mean BP increased significantly during bending forward (by 20.0 (17 - 28.5) mmHg; P = 0.005) (median (25(th) - 75(th) quartile)), squatting (by 50.8 (33.5 - 56) mmHg; P = 0.002), and abdominal compression (by 5.8 (-1 - 34.7) mmHg; P = 0.04) - but not during leg-crossing. Squatting and abdominal compression also induced a significant increase in CO (by 18.1 (-1.3 - 47.9) % during squatting (P = 0.02) and by 7.6 (0.4 - 19.6) % during abdominal compression (P=0.014)). HR did not change significantly during the countermaneuvers. TPR increased significantly only during squatting (by 37.2 (11.8 - 48.2) %; P = 0.01). However, orthopedic problems or ataxia prevented several patients from performing some of the countermaneuvers. Additionally, many patients required assistance with the maneuvers. Squatting, bending forward and abdominal compression can improve orthostatic BP in FD patients, which is achieved mainly by an increased cardiac output. Squatting has the greatest effect on orthostatic blood pressure in FD patients. Suitability and effectiveness of a specific countermaneuver depends on the orthopedic or neurological complications of each FD patient and must be individually tested before a therapeutic recommendation can be given.

Inflatable belt for the application of electrode arrays

A prototype device for application of a multiple electrode array to the human abdomen is described and assessed. The device consists of a segmented pneumatic (PVC) belt that, upon inflation, presses electrodes onto the skin simultaneously and with predetermined relative spacings. A single belt can fit a wide range of subject sizes and is comfortable for subjects to wear. It may be useful under conditions where the time taken to attach electrodes is crucial—as in hospital emergency ward applications, and where the maintenance of constant relative electrode spacings is important. The noise performance of these electrodes was only slightly poorer than that obtained using adhesive ECG electrodes.

Exsufflation belt. Use with intermittent positive-pressure breathing evice in treatment of pulmonary emphysema.

An apparatus for use in treating pulmonary emphysema was designed to assist respiration in both the inspiratory and the expiratory phases. Air was supplied by an intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) device in such a way that it flowed alternately into the patient's airways (inspiratory phase) and into an inflatable belt strapped about his body at the level of the diaphragm (expiratory phase). The apparatus was used initially on 27 patients with obstructive emphysema secondary to anthracosilicosis. Measurements of minute ventilation, tidal volume, expiratory flow rate, carbon dioxide excretion, arterial oxygen saturation, and the pCO2and pH of the blood showed that little, if any, objective improvement in the patients could be ascribed to the addition of the inflatable belt. Subjective improvement was reported by most patients, who thought they could breathe better.