Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapy Research Articles

Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium probiotics outperform synbiotics and FMT in inflammatory bowel disease therapy: Current evidence from meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Lactobacillus and bifidobacterium probiotics outperform synbiotics and FMT in inflammatory bowel disease therapy: Current evidence from meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Gastrointestinal Self-Adaptive and Nutrient Self-Sufficient Akkermansia muciniphila-Gelatin Porous Microgels for Synergistic Therapy of Ulcerative Colitis.

To realize effective and long-term synergistic therapy of ulcerative colitis (UC) with probiotics, we developed gastrointestinal self-adaptive and nutrient self-sufficient Akkermansia muciniphila (AKK)-gelatin porous microgels (AKK@GPMGs). In AKK@GPMGs, AKK was covered with sequential layers of proanthocyanidins (PAs), mucin (MUC), and phosphatidylcholine (PC) to obtain AKK@PAs-MUC-PC (AKK@PMP), and then encapsulated within the methacrylate-modified gelatin porous microgels. AKK@GPMGs provide sufficient mucus as a nutrition source for AKK and boost resistance to stomach acid by 30.49-fold, and colonization in the intestines is enhanced by 83.46 times. The microgels can be dissociated by matrix metalloproteinase at the inflammatory sites of the intestine, and release AKK@PMP, which acts as "band-aid" that adheres to the inflamed colon for a long time and offers improved synergistic therapy for UC. Compared to uncoated AKK, AKK@GPMGs increase reactive oxygen species scavenging capacity by 26.47 times, improve the intestinal mucus layer thickness by 5.63 times, increase the goblet cells abundance by 3.93 times, reduce intestinal permeability by 5.60 times and significantly enhance beneficial gut microbiota while repressing harmful microbiota. These results indicate that AKK@GPMGs can restore mucus layer and tight junction integrity, reduce inflammation and oxidative stress, and regulate gut microbiota homeostasis to effectively treat intestinal inflammation.

Biological therapy, surgery, and hospitalization rates for inflammatory bowel disease: An observational Latin American comparative study between adults and pediatric patients

ObjectiveCompare the proportions of use of biological therapy, surgeries, and hospitalizations between adults and pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)—Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)—patients. Patients and methodsObservational, retrospective, and multicenter study. Data were collected from all consecutive IBD patients seen as outpatients or admitted to hospital, during 2015–2021, in two IBD tertiary centers in a South Brazilian capital. Patients with unclassified colitis diagnosis were excluded from this study. Patients were classified as having CD or UC and sub-categorized as adult or pediatric according to age. Data were analyzed using frequency, proportion, Fisher's exact test, and Chi-square test. ResultsA total of 829 patients were included: 509 with CD (378 adults/131 pediatric) and 320 with UC (225/95). Among patients with CD, no differences were observed for proportions of use of biological therapy (80.2% in pediatric vs. 73.3% in adults; P=0.129), surgery (46.6% vs. 50.8%; P=0.419), or hospitalization (64.9% vs. 56.9%; P=0.122). In UC, significant differences were observed for biological therapy (40.0% vs. 28.0%; P=0.048) and hospitalization (47.4% vs. 24.0%; P<0.001). No significant difference was observed in surgery rates (17.9% vs. 12.4%; P=0.219). ConclusionsBiological therapy and incidence of hospitalization were greater among pediatric patients with UC, compared with adults; no difference was observed in the need for abdominal surgery. In CD, no significant difference was observed in the three main outcomes between the age groups.

S1469 Understanding Gastroenterologist Preferences at the Time of Treatment Escalation to First-Line Advanced Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Five European Countries

S1469 Understanding Gastroenterologist Preferences at the Time of Treatment Escalation to First-Line Advanced Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Five European Countries

S1468 Understanding Patient Preferences at the Time of Treatment Escalation to First Line Advanced Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Five European Countries

S1468 Understanding Patient Preferences at the Time of Treatment Escalation to First Line Advanced Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Five European Countries

Lipopolysaccharide-regulated RNF31/NRF2 axis in colonic epithelial cells mediates homeostasis of the intestinal barrier in ulcerative colitis

BackgroundAlthough previous studies have shown that the Ring Finger Protein 31 (RNF31) gene confers susceptibility to inflammatory disease and colorectal cancer, the exact function of this protein in ulcerative colitis (UC) has not been determined. MethodsA mouse dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced experimental colitis model was used to study RNF31 and NRF2 in colitis. RNF31 silencing or overexpression in vitro was applied to address the role of RNF31 in colonic mucosal barrier damage. Immunohistochemistry and silico analysis was performed to investigate the expression of RNF31 via taking advantage of UC tissue samples and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data, respectively. The cycloheximide (CHX)-chase experiment and Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assays were conducted to explore the association of RNF31 protein with NRF2 and P62. ResultsRNF31 is highly expressed in UC patients, in inflamed murine colon induced DSS and Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated epithelial cells, while the express of NRF2 was Tabdecreased. RNF31-knockdown mice in the DSS-induced colitis model had a less severe phenotype, which was associated with a more integrated barrier of colon epithelial cells. While depletion of NRF2 in colitis model exacerbated intestinal inflammation. Mechanistically, RNF31 promoted the degradation of NRF2 by regulating its ubiquitination. Upon stimulation by RNF31, NRF2 is K63 ubiquitinated, which is associated with the C871 residue of RNF31. Moreover, downregulated NRF2 mediates inflammation by promoting the secretion of IL1β and IL18, leading to damage of the intestinal barrier. Upon LPS stimulation, the interaction of the PUB domain of RNF31 with the UBA domain of P62 increased, resulting in decreased degradation of the RNF31 protein via autophagy. ConclusionOverall, depletion of RNF31 effectively relieves DSS-induced colitis in mice by inhibiting NRF2 degradation, suggesting that RNF31 may be a potential therapy for human ulcerative colitis.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib vs. Vedolizumab, Ustekinumab, and Tofacitinib After Induction and Maintenance for Ulcerative Colitis: Three Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons.

Evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of approved therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) during induction and maintenance, including upadacitinib (UPA), vedolizumab (VEDO), ustekinumab (UST), and tofacitinib (TOFA), is limited. Using data from phase 3 trials, three placebo (PBO)-anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of the efficacy and safety of UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA (U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH, GEMINI-1, UNIFI, and OCTAVE induction and maintenance trials) have been conducted. Baseline characteristics from UPA trials were weighted separately to match each comparator trial. Induction responders were re-randomized to oral UPA 15 or 30mg, VEDO 300mg intravenously every 8weeks (Q8W), UST 90mg SC Q8W, or oral TOFA 5mg, or PBO in maintenance. Treat-through efficacy outcomes at weeks 44(UST)/46(VEDO)/52(UPA/TOFA) were adjusted by the likelihood of induction response and included clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic improvement. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to discontinuation (except UPA vs. VEDO). Benefit-risk was assessed by numbers needed to treat (NNT)/harm, calculated as the inverse of the difference in proportions of patients achieving each efficacy/safety outcome for UPA versus comparator. The proportions of patients who demonstrated clinical response or endoscopic improvement was greater with UPA 15mg versus VEDO and TOFA (p<0.05). The proportions of patients demonstrating all treat-through efficacy outcomes were significantly greater with UPA 30mg versus VEDO, UST, or TOFA with NNTs 3.2-8.7. No significant differences in proportions of AEs, SAEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were observed between the two doses of UPA and comparators. In patients with active UC, greater clinical efficacy, and similar safety after 1year of maintenance were observed with UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA, suggesting a favorable benefit-risk profile for UPA. Despite matched baseline characteristics, differences in trial design and endpoints may persist.

S1409 Mirikizumab as an Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials

S1409 Mirikizumab as an Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials

Immunometabolism and mitochondria in inflammatory bowel disease: a role for therapeutic intervention?

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), incurable conditions characterised by recurrent episodes of immune-mediated gut inflammation and damage of unknown aetiology, are common. Current advanced therapies target key leukocyte-trafficking and cytokine-signalling hubs but are only effective in 50% of patients. With growing evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction in IBD and advances in our understanding of the role of metabolism in inflammation, we provide an overview of novel metabolic approaches to IBD therapy, challenging the current 'therapeutic ceiling', identifying critical pathways for intervention and re-imagining metabolic biomarkers for the 21st century.

S1149 Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Vedolizumab versus Other Targeted Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapies in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Network Meta-Analysis

S1149 Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Vedolizumab versus Other Targeted Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapies in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Network Meta-Analysis

Real-World Treatment Outcomes Associated With Early Versus Delayed Vedolizumab Initiation in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) typically receive a targeted inflammatory bowel disease therapy after treatment with conventional therapies and after the development of significant morbidity. Evidence suggests that early biologic treatment after diagnosis could improve treatment response and prevent disease complications compared with delayed biologic treatment after conventional therapy. RALEE was a retrospective study using claims data from IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019. Adults with UC and at least one claim for vedolizumab were categorized into Early or Delayed Vedolizumab groups according to whether they had received vedolizumab within 30 days of diagnosis or after conventional therapy (5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators), respectively. Treatment response was assessed at 2, 6, and 12 months after vedolizumab treatment initiation and was analyzed with logistic regression (bivariate). At 2 months, Delayed Vedolizumab was associated with significantly higher odds of nonresponse than Early Vedolizumab (odds ratio [OR], 2.509; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-4.90). Delayed Vedolizumab was not significantly associated with odds of nonresponse at 6 months (OR, 1.173; 95% CI, 0.72-1.90) or at 12 months (OR, 0.872; 95% CI, 0.55-1.37). Mean total healthcare costs were similar in the Early Vedolizumab ($6492) and Delayed Vedolizumab ($5897) groups, although there were small differences in costs from different types of claims. Patients who received vedolizumab early after UC diagnosis were less likely to experience nonresponse at 2 months and incurred similar healthcare costs at 12 months compared with patients who received delayed vedolizumab.

Management and outcomes of histoplasmosis in youth with inflammatory bowel disease in an endemic area.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prescribed immunosuppressive therapies including antitumor necrosis factor (aTNF) therapies are at increased risk of histoplasmosis. We aim to evaluate the presentation, management, and outcomes of youth with IBD and concurrent histoplasmosis. Single center, retrospective review of youth with IBD diagnosed with histoplasmosis from January 12, 2007 to January 1, 2022. Management and outcomes were followed for up to 2 years after diagnosis. Nineteen patients (10 male, median age 16 years, range 8-22) with IBD were diagnosed with histoplasmosis: disseminated (N = 15/19; 79%), pulmonary (N = 3/19; 16%), lymph node (N = 1/19; 5%). At the time of histoplasmosis diagnosis, patients were predominantly receiving aTNF therapy (N = 17/19; 89%, median duration 21.9 months (interquartile range 8.5-52.0). Thirteen (13/19, 68%) patients required hospitalization and 2/19 (11%) required intensive care. All achieved antigen clearance with no recurrences. At the time of histoplasmosis diagnosis, aTNF was stopped in 15/17 (88%) patients and the following IBD therapies were initiated: 5-aminosalicylates (N = 4/19; 21%), 6-mercaptopurine (N = 3/19; 16%), enteral therapy (N = 2/19; 11%), and vedolizumab (N = 2/19; 11%); 6 of 19 (32%) received no IBD therapy and 2 of 19 (11%) patients continued aTNF. During follow-up, 6 of 19 (32%) patients had an emergency department (ED) visit and/or hospitalization for symptoms attributed to active IBD, all of whom had discontinued aTNF; one patient required colectomy. Severe histoplasmosis infection in youth with IBD was rare. IBD treatment was modified by reducing immunosuppression. Histoplasmosis outcomes were favorable, but multiple patients required hospitalization or ED visits for IBD symptoms. The optimal approach to managing IBD during histoplasmosis treatment is challenging and requires further study.

Phase 2 Trial of Anti-TL1A Monoclonal Antibody Tulisokibart for Ulcerative Colitis

BackgroundTulisokibart is a tumor necrosis factor–like cytokine 1A (TL1A) monoclonal antibody in development for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. A genetic-based diagnostic test was designed to identify patients with an increased likelihood of response.MethodsWe randomly assigned patients with glucocorticoid dependence or failure of conventional or advanced therapies for ulcerative colitis to receive intravenous tulisokibart (1000 mg on day 1 and 500 mg at weeks 2, 6, and 10) or placebo. Cohort 1 included patients regardless of status with respect to the test for likelihood of response. Cohort 2 included only patients with a positive test for likelihood of response. The primary analysis was performed in cohort 1; the primary end point was clinical remission at week 12. Patients with a positive test for likelihood of response from cohorts 1 and 2 were combined in prespecified analyses.ResultsIn cohort 1, a total of 135 patients underwent randomization. A significantly higher percentage of patients who received tulisokibart had clinical remission than those who received placebo (26% vs. 1%; difference, 25 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14 to 37; P<0.001). In cohort 2, a total of 43 patients underwent randomization. A total of 75 patients with a positive test for likelihood of response underwent randomization across both cohorts. Among patients with a positive test for likelihood of response (cohorts 1 and 2 combined), clinical remission occurred in a higher percentage of patients who received tulisokibart than in those who received placebo (32% vs. 11%; difference, 21 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 38; P=0.02). Among all the enrolled patients, the incidence of adverse events was similar in the tulisokibart and placebo groups; most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity.ConclusionsIn this short-term trial, tulisokibart was more effective than placebo in inducing clinical remission in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. (Funded by Prometheus Biosciences, a subsidiary of Merck; ARTEMIS-UC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04996797.)

Healthcare Utilization and Geographic Distribution of Advanced Therapy in Minority Race and Ethnic Groups With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Biases in healthcare pose challenges for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients from underrepresented races and ethnicities. Our study aimed to assess the quality of and access to care among underrepresented racial and ethnic populations using a diverse database. We used the OneFlorida Data Trust, representing over half of Florida's population. We performed a retrospective study from 2012 to 2020. Advanced IBD therapies included a prescription of at least 1 biologic agent or tofacitinib. Disease activity markers included C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin (Hgb), albumin, and white blood cell (WBC). Regression analyses compared the rates of medication use, healthcare utilization, and disease severity by race and ethnicity. Geographic distribution of advanced IBD therapy was analyzed at the county level. Our study included 10 578 patients. Hispanic patients utilized more biologics than non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (odds ratio [OR]: 1.3, P<.0001). Non-Hispanic Black patients utilized more steroids than NHW (OR: 1.2, P=.0004). Hispanics had fewer visits to emergency departments (EDs) and fewer admissions compared with NHW (OR: 0.7 and 0.6, respectively; P<.0001). Non-Hispanic Black patients visited ED more frequently than NHW patients (OR: 1.3, P<.0001). Hispanics had lower disease activity markers than NHW based on CRP (OR: 0.5, P=.005), Hgb (OR: 0.4, P<.0001), albumin (OR: 0.7, P<.0001), and WBC (OR: 0.5, P<.0001). Geographic distribution of advanced IBD therapy showed clustered areas in southern and northern Florida. Our data show an improved access to care pattern in Hispanic patients. However, disparities still exist, and this is evident in the healthcare utilization trends observed among non-Hispanic Black patients.

Diagnosis and Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Spondyloarthritis.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated spondyloarthritis (SpA) is common but remains poorly understood. In this review article, we aimed to provide guidance regarding the diagnosis and management of this condition. For diagnosis of IBD-associated peripheral SpA (IBD-pSpA), we recommend collaboration with rheumatology for incorporation of clinical symptoms, physical examination findings, joint imaging if applicable, and available diagnostic criteria. For the management of IBD-pSpA, we first recommend assessment and treatment of underlying luminal IBD disease activity. We provide guidance regarding positioning of advanced therapies for IBD in patients with IBD-pSpA based on the limited available literature. For diagnosis of IBD-associated axial SpA, we recommend rheumatology referral to make the diagnosis based on incorporation of symptoms, laboratory data, imaging findings (sacroiliitis), and available diagnostic criteria. For the management of axial SpA, we recommend comanagement with rheumatology and use of either antitumor necrosis factor agents or Janus kinase inhibitors, when applicable.

Negatively Charged Thermosensitive Hydrogel Loaded with Pectin Microspheres to Recover the Mucosal Barrier for Ulcerative Colitis Therapy.

Ulcerative colitis (UC), a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, poses a heightened colorectal cancer risk due to persistent mucosal inflammation and barrier dysfunction. In this article, a negatively charged thermosensitive hydrogel loaded with pectin microspheres was used as the enema for UC treatment. Succinic acid was immobilized on poly(ε-caprolactone-co-glycolide)-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(ε-caprolactone-co-glycolide) (PCLGA-PEG-PCLGA) triblock copolymers to preferentially coat on cationic-inflamed sites via electrostatic interaction for reconstructing the mucosal barrier. Anti-inflammation drug 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and curcumin-loaded pectin microspheres (Pec@Cur) were dispersed in the hydrogel for the inflammatory treatment of UC. The thermally sensitive hydrogels were rectally injected into UC model mice. The hydrogel effectively adhered to ulcers and prolonged colon retention, enabling sustained drug release and remarkably relieving the symptoms of colitis. The negatively charged hydrogel exhibited excellent significance in the UC treatment.

Harms with placebo in trials of biological therapies and small molecules as induction therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Randomised placebo-controlled trials are the gold standard to assess novel drugs in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. However, there might be risks associated with receiving placebo. We aimed to examine the harms associated with receiving placebo in trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for the induction of remission in ulcerative colitis and luminal Crohn's disease in a meta-analysis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Embase Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to May 30, 2024, for randomised placebo-controlled trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for induction of remission in adults (≥18 years) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis or luminal Crohn's disease reporting data on adverse events over a minimum treatment period of 4 weeks. There were no prespecified study exclusion criteria. We extracted summary data and pooled data using a random-effects model for any treatment-emergent adverse event, any drug-related adverse event, infection, worsening of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity, withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infection, serious worsening of IBD activity, or venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), reporting relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024527341). The search identified 10 826 citations, of which 47 trials including 20 987 patients (14 267 [68·0%] receiving active drug and 6720 [32·0%] receiving placebo) were eligible. The risk of any treatment-emergent adverse event was no different with active drug than with placebo (7660/14 267 [53·7%] patients on active drug vs 3758/6720 [55·9%] on placebo; RR 0·97, 95% CI 0·94-1·00; I2 =36%). However, the risks of worsening of IBD activity (563/13 473 [4·2%] vs 530/6252 [8·5%]; 0·48, 0·40-0·59; I2 =54%), withdrawal due to adverse event (401/13 363 [3·0%] vs 299/6267 [4·8%]; 0·62, 0·48-0·79; I2 =46%), serious adverse event (682/14 267 [4·8%] vs 483/6720 [7·2%]; 0·69, 0·59-0·80; I2 =30%), serious infection (140/14 194 [1·0%] vs 91/6647 [1·4%]; 0·67, 0·50-0·89; I2 =0%), serious worsening of IBD activity (187/11 271 [1·7%] vs 189/5056 [3·7%]; 0·45, 0·34-0·60; I2 =27%), or VTEs (13/7542 [0·2%] vs 12/2981 [0·4%]; 0·45, 0·21-0·94; I2 =0%) were all significantly lower with active drug than placebo. Numbers needed to treat with active drug to avoid these potentially serious adverse events ranged from 23 for worsening of IBD activity to 452 for VTEs. 27 randomised controlled trials were judged as low risk of bias across all domains. Patients with moderately to severely active IBD receiving placebo are more likely to experience significant worsening of IBD activity and some serious adverse events, which might relate to a reduction in risk of these events with active drug. Patients should be counselled about these potential harms, and alternative trial designs to mitigate these harms should be considered. None.

Harms with placebo in trials of biological therapies and small molecules as maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Randomised placebo-controlled trials for the induction of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remission involve potential harms to those receiving placebo. Whether these harms are also apparent with placebo during maintenance of remission trials in IBD is unclear. We aimed to examine the potential harms associated with receiving placebo in trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis and luminal Crohn's disease in a meta-analysis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched several medical literature databases including MEDLINE (from Jan 1, 1946, to May 31, 2024), Embase and Embase Classic (Jan 1, 1947, to May 31, 2024), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to May 31, 2024, for randomised placebo-controlled trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission in adults with IBD reporting data on adverse events over a period of 20 weeks or more. There were no language restrictions or prespecified exclusion criteria. We extracted summary data and pooled data using a random-effects model for any treatment-emergent adverse event, drug-related adverse event, infection, worsening of IBD activity, withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infection, serious worsening of IBD activity, or venous thromboembolic events, reporting relative risks (RRs) for placebo versus active drug with 95% CIs for each outcomes. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024542624). Our search identified 10 826 citations, of which 45 trials including 16 562 patients (10 319 [62·3%] receiving active drug and 6243 [37·7%] placebo) were eligible. The risks of any treatment-emergent adverse event (7297/9546 [76·4%] patients on active drug vs 4415/5850 [75·5%] on placebo; RR 1·01, 95% CI 0·99-1·04; I2 =47%), serious infection (260/10 242 [2·5%] vs 155/6149 [2·5%]; 0·97, 0·79-1·19; I2 =0%), or venous thromboembolic event (12/4729 [0·3%] vs 9/2691 [0·3%]; 0·72, 0·31-1·66; I2 =0%) were not significantly lower with active drug than placebo. The risks of any infection (3208/8038 [39·9%] vs 1713/4809 [35·6%]; 1·14, 1·05-1·23; I2 =60%) or any drug-related adverse event (1094/2997 [36·5%] vs 609/1950 [31·2%]; 1·24, 1·02-1·50; I2 =75%) were higher with active drug than placebo. However, the risks of any worsening of IBD activity (1038/8090 [12·8%] vs 1181/5191 [22·8%]; 0·58, 0·52-0·64; I2 =40%), any withdrawal due to adverse events (610/10 282 [5·9%] vs 561/6207 [9·0%]; 0·71, 0·60-0·84; I2 =43%), any serious adverse events (1066/10 292 [10·4%] vs 742/6198 [12·0%]; 0·85, 0·77-0·94; I2 =17%), or any serious worsening of IBD activity (101/5707 [1·8%] vs 143/3640 [3·9%]; 0·55, 0·42-0·71; I2 =0%) were lower with active drug than placebo. 21 randomised controlled trials were judged as low risk of bias across all domains. In maintenance of remission trials in IBD, placebo was associated with some clinically significant potential harms. Patients should be counselled about these before participating in clinical trials and consideration given to alternative designs to test novel drugs in IBD. None.

Functional Ginger-Derived Extracellular Vesicles-Coated ZIF-8 Containing TNF-α siRNA for Ulcerative Colitis Therapy by Modulating Gut Microbiota.

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) plays a causal role in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC), and anti-TNF-α siRNA shows great promise in UC therapy. However, delivering siRNA with site-targeted stability and therapeutic efficacy is still challenging due to the complex and dynamic intestinal microenvironment. Here, based on the functional plant-derived ginger extracellular vesicles (EVs) and porous ZIF-8 nanoparticles, we propose a novel TNF-α siRNA delivery strategy (EVs@ZIF-8@siRNA) for UC targeted therapy. Ginger EVs show strong colon and macrophage targeting, as well as robust resistance to acidic degradation in the stomach. Moreover, 6-shogaol in ginger-derived EVs displays anti-inflammatory effects, which enhance the treatment efficiency by cooperation with TNF-α siRNA. In vitro experiments reveal that ZIF-8 nanoparticles have high TNF-α siRNA loading capacity and promote siRNA escape from cellular lysosomes. In vivo experiments show that the TNF-α level is reduced more significantly in colonic tissue than other nontargeted inflammation related factors, showing a good targeting of this composite nanoparticle. Furthermore, gut microbiota sequencing results demonstrate that the nanoparticles can promote intestinal barrier repair by regulating the intestinal microbial balance and restoring the intestinal health of UC mice. Therefore, the developed EVs@ZIF-8@siRNA nanoparticles may represent a novel colon-targeted oral drug, providing a promising therapeutic strategy for UC therapy.

Christensenella minuta protects and restores intestinal barrier in a colitis mouse model by regulating inflammation

Christensenella minuta DSM 22607 has recently been suggested as a potential microbiome-based therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) because it displays strong anti-inflammatory effects both in vitro and in vivo. Here, we aimed to decipher the mechanism(s) underlying the DSM 22607-mediated beneficial effects on the host in a mouse model of chemically induced acute colitis. We observed that C. minuta plays a key role in the preservation of the epithelial barrier and the management of DNBS-induced inflammation by inhibiting interleukin (IL)-33 and Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 8 (Tnfrsf8) gene expression. We also showed that DSM 22607 abundance was positively correlated with Akkermansia sp. and Dubosiella sp. and modulated microbial metabolites in the cecum. These results offer new insights into the biological and molecular mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of C. minuta DSM 22607 by protecting the intestinal barrier integrity and regulating inflammation.