Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index Research Articles

Estimating the usefulness of inferior vena cava collapsibility index and caval aorta index to predict hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in adult patients undergoing elective surgery in a tertiary care hospital

Abstract Background and Aims: Post-spinal anaesthesia hypotension (PSAH) can occur in 25–75% of patients. The preload or volume status of a patient is an important contributor to PSAH, and coloading with fluids is advocated to prevent PSAH. Instead of blind volume loading, prediction of volume status using inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility index (IVCCI) and caval aorta index (IVC:Ao index) may be used to guide fluid administration. Material and Methods: In our study, we used ultrasound in the immediate pre-operative period to calculate IVCCI and IVC:Ao index in patients scheduled for elective surgery in the supine position, under spinal anaesthesia. Spinal anaesthesia was given in the lateral position with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Patients were placed supine thereafter, sensory blockade level was ascertained, and blood pressure (BP) was measured every 2 min for 30 min. Episodes of hypotension were treated with fluids or vasopressors as per the discretion of the treating anaesthesiologist. In the study, 73 patients were screened, out of which 69 were included. Results: Totally, 23 participants out of 69 developed PSAH. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was made and the area under the curve analysis was done on our collected data. We found that IVC:Ao index has better sensitivity (0.696 for IVC:Ao index ≤0.810) and specificity (0.717 for IVC:Ao index ≤0.810) than IVCCI (sensitivity 0.522 and specificity 0.630 for IVCCI ≥33.32%) to predict PSAH. Conclusion: IVC:Ao index is a better predictor of PSAH than IVCCI. Thus, it may be used to predict volume status and guide in coloading with fluids during spinal anaesthesia.

#1784 The potential impact of chronic subclinical hypervolemia on left ventricular hypertrophy in children on dialysis: a prospective longitudinal study

Abstract Background and Aims Hypervolemia poses a significant challenge in pediatric patients undergoing dialysis, potentially leading to severe complications such as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and cardiac dysfunction. Accurately assessing fluid status in growing children on dialysis could be particularly difficult, and although several non-invasive methods are emerging, each individual measurement has its own strengths and diagnostic limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity. To date, only a few studies in children have compared the use of different methods simultaneously to detect fluid status, and none of these have evaluated the potential cardiovascular impact of a prolonged subclinical hypervolemia. The latter can be defined as a condition of euvolemia at clinical assessment but hypervolemia at technical evaluation. We evaluated the role of three methods—lung ultrasound (LUS), bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), and ultrasound assessment of inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI)—in detecting subclinical hypervolemia and examined the cardiac implications. Method In this prospective observational longitudinal study, we included 23 children (<18 years) who were receiving chronic hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis at the regional pediatric nephrology center of Meyer University Children's Hospital IRCSS, Florence, Italy, between 01/06/2018 and 01/11/2020. We excluded patients with clinical signs of fluid overload. Each patient underwent a multiparametric evaluation of their fluid status (physical examination, LUS, IVC-CI, BIS) every 2 months, and an echocardiography every six months starting from a baseline evaluation. The LVH was defined as a left ventricular mass index (LVMI) of ≥ 95th percentile or a left ventricular wall-thickness z-score > 2 z-score. We divided the patients into two groups and arbitrarily assigned them to the subclinical hypervolemia (SH) group if they had at least two out of three parameters of fluid overload at different methods (≥5 B-lines at LUS, overhydration normalized to extracellular water “OH/ECW” > 7% at BIS, and/or IVC-CI < 40%) in the absence of clinical signs of fluid overload. The others were included in the euvolemic (EU) group. The overload rate by weight (clinical OH), prescribed by the physician clinically, was calculated as the proportional increase from the dry weight (kg of fluid overload / dry weight in kg × 100). Results The two analyzed groups did not differ regarding gender, age and BSA (Table). The clinical OH was significantly higher in the SH population than in the EU group (2.2 ± 1.84 vs 1.30 ± 2.16%, p < 0.01). In the correlation analysis, we found that clinical OH positively correlated with the number of B-lines by LUS (R = 0.2923, p < 0.001) and OH/ECW by BIS (R = 0.4144, p < 0.001), while there was a negative correlation with IVC-CI (R = −0.2597, p = 0.019). However, each method taken individually (LUS, BIS, and IVC-CI) appeared to be inaccurate in predicting fluid status in several individual cases. Although the frequency of hypertension did not differ between the SH and EU groups, uncontrolled hypertension, treatment-resistant hypertension, and hospital admission for hypertensive crises were more frequent in the SH group, with the latter being statistically significant (67% vs 0%, p < 0.01). Furthermore, in the entire cohort, we observed a significant linear correlation between LVMI values and the average values of pre-HD systolic blood pressure recorded in the prior six months (R2 = 0.16, p = 0.002). It is worth noting that the presence of LVH at the last follow-up was significantly more prevalent in the SH group (75% vs 27%, p = 0.04). Conclusion Chronic subclinical hypervolemia, detected with a multi-method evaluation (including LUS, BIS, and IVC-CI), was significantly correlated with clinical OH and associated with a higher risk of LVH. To mitigate the intrinsic limitations of each technique, adopting two or more methods simultaneously can bypass and minimize the risk of evaluative error in assessing fluid status, and help reduce cardiovascular risk.

Preoperative Ultrasound for the Prediction of Postinduction Hypotension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Postinduction hypotension (PIH) is closely associated with postoperative adverse outcomes. Preoperative hypovolemia is a key risk factor, and many parameters are available from ultrasound to detect hypovolemia, but the accuracy of PIH from ultrasound remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the commonly used measurements from ultrasound to predict PIH. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, and Web of Science databases from their inception to December 2023. Thirty-six studies were included for quantitative analysis. The pooled sensitivities for the inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI), maximum inferior vena cava diameter (DIVCmax), minimum inferior vena cava diameter (DIVCmin), and carotid artery corrected flow time (FTc) were 0.73 (95% CI = 0.65, 0.79), 0.66 (95% CI = 0.54, 0.77), 0.74 (95% CI = 0.60, 0.85), and 0.81 (95% CI = 0.72, 0.88). The pooled specificities for the IVC-CI, DIVCmax, DIVCmin, and carotid artery FTc were 0.82 (95% CI = 0.75, 0.87), 0.75 (95% CI = 0.66, 0.82), 0.76 (95% CI = 0.65, 0.84), and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.77, 0.93). The AUC for the IVC-CI, DIVCmax, DIVCmin, and carotid artery FTc were 0.84 (95% CI = 0.81, 0.87), 0.77 (95% CI = 0.73, 0.81), 0.82 (95% CI = 0.78, 0.85), and 0.91 (95% CI = 0.88, 0.93). Our study demonstrated that ultrasound indices are reliable predictors for PIH. The carotid artery FTc is probably the optimal ultrasound measurement for identifying patients who will develop PIH in our study.

Role of inferior vena cava assessment in volume management in acute kidney injury patients

BackgroundIntravascular volume assessment is critical to guiding volume management in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). This study aimed to compare the impact of using inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and collapsibility index (IVC-CI) measurements versus clinical assessment on the management of volume status and improvement of renal function in patients with AKI.MethodsThis prospective comparative study included 88 patients with AKI or AKI on top of chronic kidney disease (CKD) who were randomly allocated into two groups: In group 1, volume status was managed according to IVC assessment, while in group 2, volume status was managed according to clinical assessment. In addition, group 1 patients were assessed clinically and compared with IVC measurements in the same group.ResultsThere was moderate agreement between the IVC and clinical methods in diagnosing 86.4% of patients (P < 0.001) within group 1. The percentage of patients with edema increased post-treatment in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding renal recovery and survival.ConclusionBedside ultrasonographic IVC assessment is a non-invasive method that can facilitate volume management in AKI patients, helping to administer fluids more wisely without unintended excess fluid administration.

INFERIOR VENA CAVA COLLAPSIBILITY INDEX AS A NON-INVASIVE METHOD OF ASSESSING THE VOLEMIC STATUS OF PATIENTS DURING SPINE INTERVENTIONS

Objective. To prove the possibility of using non-invasive diagnostics of the volemic state of postoperative patients using ultrasound assessment of inferior vena cava collapsibility index. Methods. The study included 67 patients who underwent transpedicular fixation of the spine with laminectomy. Volemiс status was determined for all participants in two ways: by catheterization of the central vein and determination of central venous pressure, as well as by ultrasound examination of the inferior vena cava and calculation of inferior vena cava collapsibility index. Results. According to the results of the invasive assessment of central venous pressure, patients were divided into 3 groups: group I (patients in hypovolemic state, n = 31), group II (patients in euvolemic state, n = 25) and group III (patients in hypervolemic state, n = 11 ). The average values of central venous pressure indicators in patients of these groups were statistically significantly different from each other (p &lt; 0.01). The difference between the mean values of the inferior vena cava collapse index in the respective groups was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.01). A reliable inverse correlation of very high strength was found between the indicators of inferior vena cava collapsibility index and central venous pressure (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions. Determination of the patient's volemic state is an extremely important tool for the correct selection of the fluid volume management. Ultrasound assessment of volemic status has a number of advantages, such as the non-invasiveness of the method, wide availability, low price and speed of execution. According to the results of our study, the possibility of using inferior vena cava collapsibility index to assess the volemic status of patients has been demonstrated.

Accuracy of Pocket-sized Ultrasound Devices to Evaluate Inferior Vena Cava Diameter and Variability in Critically Ill Patients.

By using inferior vena cava (IVC) measurements, clinicians can detect fluid status and responsiveness and find out the etiology of hypotension, acute heart failure, and sepsis easier. Pocket-sized ultrasound devices (PSUD) may take this advantage a few steps further by their lower costs, user-friendly interface, and easily applicable structure.In this study, we aimed to determine the diagnostic value of a PSUD compared with a standard ultrasound device (SD) for the measurement of IVC diameter (IVCD) and its respiratory variability. We measured the inspiratory, expiratory diameters of IVC, and calculated the inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI). We investigated 42 intensive care unit (ICU) patients. There was no difference in inspiratory (PSUD: 1.34 ± 0.67 cm; SD: 1.35 ± 0.68 cm) and expiratory (PSUD: 1.98 ± 0.53 cm; SD: 2.01 ± 0.49 cm) IVCD among measurements with PSUD and SD (p > 0.05). There was also no difference between IVCCI's measured with PSUD (39 ± 20%) and SD (39 ± 20%) (p > 0.05). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the width of 95% limits of agreement were similar for both devices. There was a good inter-device agreement among PSUD and SD for measurements of IVCD, and there was no difference between IVCCI's measured using both ultrasound devices. We support that the idea of a PSUD is as reliable as a SD for IVC measurements. Inci K, Gürsel G. Accuracy of Pocket-sized Ultrasound Devices to Evaluate Inferior Vena Cava Diameter and Variability in Critically Ill Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(4):369-374.

Prevention of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia using point-of-care ultrasound to guide fluid management: a randomized controlled trial.

Hypotension after induction of general anesthesia (GAIH) is common and is associated with postoperative complications including increased mortality. Collapsibility of the inferior vena cava (IVC) has good performance in predicting GAIH; however, there is limited evidence whether a preoperative fluid bolus in patients with a collapsible IVC can prevent this drop in blood pressure. We conducted a single-centre randomized controlled trial with adult patients scheduled to undergo elective noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia (GA). Patients underwent a preoperative point-of-care ultrasound scan (POCUS) to identify those with a collapsible IVC (IVC collapsibility index ≥ 43%). Individuals with a collapsible IVC were randomized to receive a preoperative 500mL fluid bolus or routine care (control group). Surgical and anesthesia teams were blinded to the results of the scan and group allocation. Hypotension after induction of GA was defined as the use of vasopressors/inotropes or a decrease in mean arterial pressure < 65mm Hg or > 25% from baseline within 20min of induction of GA. Forty patients (20 in each group) were included. The rate of hypotension after induction of GA was significantly reduced in those receiving preoperative fluids (9/20, 45% vs 17/20, 85%; relative risk, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.89; P = 0.02). The mean (standard deviation) time to complete POCUS was 4 (2) min, and the duration of fluid bolus administration was 14 (5) min. Neither surgical delays nor adverse events occurred as a result of the study intervention. A preoperative fluid bolus in patients with a collapsible IVC reduced the incidence of GAIH without associated adverse effects. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05424510); first submitted 15 June 2022.

The use of lung ultrasound in evaluation of extravascular lung water in hemodialysis patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Determining dry weight is crucial for optimizing hemodialysis, influencing efficacy, cardiovascular outcomes, and overall survival. Traditional clinical assessment methods for dry weight, relying on factors such as blood pressure and edema, frequently lack reliability. Lung ultrasound stands out as a promising tool for assessing volume status, given its non-invasiveness and reproducibility. This study aims to explore the role of Lung ultrasound in evaluating the impact of hemodialysis and ultrafiltration on extravascular lung water, with a specific focus on changes in B-lines post-hemodialysis compared to pre-hemodialysis. The research encompassed searches across PubMed, WOS, and Scopus databases for studies related to lung ultrasound and hemodialysis. A meta-analysis was then performed to determine the mean differences in various parameters before compared to after, hemodialysis, including the number of B-lines, indexed end-inspiratory and end-expiratory inferior vena cava diameters, inferior vena cava collapsibility index, weight, blood pressure, and serum levels of NT-pro-BNP. Our meta-analysis, included 33 studies with 2301 hemodialysis patients, revealed a significant decrease in the number of B-lines post-hemodialysis (mean difference = 8.30, 95% CI [3.55 to 13.05]). Furthermore, there was a noteworthy reduction in inspiratory and expiratory inferior vena cava diameters post-hemodialysis (mean difference = 2.32, 95% CI [0.31 to 4.33]; mean difference = 4.05, 95% CI [2.44 to 5.65], respectively). Additionally, a significant positive correlation was observed between B-lines and the maximum inferior vena cava diameter both pre- and post-hemodialysis (correlation coefficient = 0.39; correlation coefficient = 0.32, respectively). These findings indicate the effectiveness of lung ultrasound in detection of volume overload and assessment of response to ultrafiltration in hemodialysis patients.

Diagnostic accuracy of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral versus inferior vena cava collapsibility index in predicting post-induction hypotension during general anesthesia: an observational study.

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is being explored for dynamic measurements like inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) and left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) to guide anesthesiologists in predicting fluid responsiveness in the preoperative period and in treating post-induction hypotension (PIH) with varying accuracy. In this prospective, observational study on included 100 adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, the LVOT-VTI and IVC-CI measurements were performed in the preoperative room 15 minutes prior to surgery, and PIH was measured for 20 minutes in the post-induction period. The incidence of PIH was 24%. The area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of the two techniques at 95% confidence interval was 0.613, 30.4%, 93.3%, 58.3%, 81.4%, 73.6% for IVC-CI and 0.853, 83.3%, 80.3%, 57.1%, 93.8%, 77.4% for LVOT-VTI, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the cutoff value for IVC-CI was >51.5 and for LVOT-VTI it was ≤17.45 for predicting PIH with odd ratio [OR] of 8.491 (P=0.025) for IVCCI and OR of 17.427 (P<0.001) for LVOT. LVOT-VTI assessment was possible in all the patients, while 10% of patients were having poor window for IVC measurements. We recommend the use of POCUS using LVOT-VTI or IVC-CI to predict PIH, to decrease the morbidity of patients undergoing surgery. Out of these, we recommend LVOT-VTI measurements as it has showed a better diagnostic accuracy (77.4%) with no failure rate.

The usefulness of point-of-care ultrasound in dehydrated patients in a pediatric emergency department

BackgroundsDehydration is among the most common causes of Pediatric Emergency Department admission; however, no clinical signs, symptoms, or biomarkers have demonstrated sufficient sensitivity, specificity, or reliability to predict dehydration.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, monocentric, observational study at Giannina Gaslini Hospital, a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Our study aimed to compare inferior vena cava ultrasound measurement with volume depletion biomarkers to understand if point-of-care ultrasound could help grade, evaluate, and better manage dehydration in children presenting to the pediatric emergency department. We enrolled patients under the age of 14 who required blood tests in the suspect of dehydration; for each patient, we collected values of venous pH, natremia, bicarbonatemia, uric acid, chloremia, and blood urea nitrogen. For each patient, we performed two ultrasound scans to calculate the Inferior Vena Cava/Aorta area ratio and to assess the IVC collapsibility index; moreover, we described the presence of the “kiss sign” (100% IVC walls collapsing during the inspiratory phase).ResultsPatients with the “kiss sign” (25/65 patients, 38.5% of the total) showed worse blood tests, in particular, uric acid levels (p = 0.0003), bicarbonatemia (p = 0.001) and natriemia (p = 0.0003). Moreover, patients with the “kiss sign” showed a high frequency of ≥ 2 pathological blood tests (p = 0.0002). We found no statistical significant difference when comparing the IVC/Ao ratio and IVC-CI with the considered blood tests.ConclusionsThe “kiss sign” seems to be related to worse hydration state, whereas IVC/Ao and IVC-CI are not. In an emergency setting, where physicians must take diagnostic-therapeutic decisions quickly, the presence of the “kiss sign” in patients suspected to be dehydrated can be a helpful tool in their management.

Effect of Preoperative Accurate Evaluation and Intervention on Prognosis and Outcome in Elderly Patients with Painless Gastroenteroscopy: Protocol for A Single-Centre Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Factors such as abstinence from drinking, fasting, intestinal preparation, and stress responses can contribute to issues like inadequate blood volume, hypoglycemia, and electrolyte imbalances. The ASA classification presently serves as a primary assessment standard globally. In response to prevailing clinical challenges, we propose enhancing the preoperative assessment for elderly patients undergoing painless gastroenteroscopy. This enhancement involves incorporating the Frailty score, bedside ultrasound, and bedside laboratory results alongside the ASA classification, to establish a comprehensive assessment system. This holistic approach aims to monitor patients’ fluid balance, electrolyte levels, and blood glucose changes, facilitating precise interventions and optimized anesthesia strategies. The ultimate goal is to diminish perioperative adverse events, especially those related to the cardiovascular system, thereby enhancing prognosis, outcomes, and patient satisfaction among the elderly. Methods: This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted at a single center. It includes 204 patients scheduled for painless gastroenteroscopy. Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned to either Group A or Group B. Pre-anesthesia assessments will be conducted twice – during the preoperative visit and upon entry to the endoscopy center on the examination day. Evaluation parameters will encompass the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS), bedside ultrasound measurements including inspiratory IVCDmax, expiratory IVCDmin, and calculation of the inferior vena cava collapse index (IVC-CI). Additionally, serum electrolyte (potassium) and blood glucose levels will be measured. Patients in Group A will receive specific interventions based on predetermined criteria. The primary endpoint is anesthesia-related adverse events. The measurements will be performed perioperatively, post-treatment, and at 1 day, 3 days, and 7 days after the end of treatment.

Inferior vena cava collapsibility index and stroke volume as predictors of blood transfusion in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department

AbstractBackground and AimThis study investigates the effectiveness of bedside ultrasonography in predicting blood transfusion requirements in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). It focuses on evaluating the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter, IVC collapsibility index (CI), and stroke volume (SV) as ultrasonographic measures.MethodsA hundred adult patients enrolled in this prospective clinical study. The patients were divided into two groups (group 1: only saline administered group, group 2: saline and blood administered group). IVC diameter, IVC CI, and SV were measured at the time of admission and after treatment.ResultsAt the initial admission, group 1 exhibited an IVC CI of 20.4% and an SV of 65.0 mL, whereas group 2 displayed an IVC CI of 26.6% and an SV of 58.0 mL. Upon analyzing the relationship between the Glasgow–Blatchford score (GBS) and SV, we identified a significant negative correlation (r = −0.7350; P &lt; 0.001). Similarly, a weak negative correlation was observed between the Rockall score (RS) and SV (r = −0.4718; P &lt; 0.001). It is worth noting that patients with UGIB require blood transfusion if their SV falls below 62.5 mL, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 89.1% and a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 82.8% to 95.4%.ConclusionIVC CI and SV can be used as parameters to predict the need for blood transfusion in the ED in patients with UGIB.

Correlation of Ultrasound Guided Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index with Central Venous Pressure to Assess the Volume Status in Postoperative Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Prospective Observational Study

Background: Accurate assessment of intravascular volume status is a vital aspect of management of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and IVC collapsibility index have surfaced as promising methods to accurately predict hypovolemia. But no such study has evaluated it’s their utility in postoperative patients.&#x0D; Methods: The study aimed to assess the correlation between ultrasound guided IVC collapsibility index (IVC CI) and CVP for volume status in intensive care unit patients. Hundred spontaneously breathing patients receiving postoperative care in our surgical ICU between November 2019 to march 2021were enrolled into the study. Maximum IVC diameter (IVCdmax) at end-expiration, minimum IVC diameter at end-inspiration (IVCdmin) and IVC CI were measured. Simultaneous CVP recordings were obtained.&#x0D; Results: A positive correlation was noted between IVC maximum diameter and CVP (p = &lt;0.001) and between IVC Minimum Diameter and CVP. (p = &lt;0.001) A negative correlation between IVC CI and CVP was seen (p = &lt;0.001). Mean IVC CI was highest in the hypovolemic group. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for IVC CI predicting hypovolemia was 0.943 (95% CI: 0.9 - 0.986), thus demonstrating excellent diagnostic performance. At a cut off of ≥58.416%, IVC CI predicts hypovolemia with a sensitivity of 93.8%, and a specificity of 84%.&#x0D; Conclusion: IVC CI can be used to guide fluid therapy due to its excellent diagnostic accuracy in predicting hypovolemia in postoperative patients in ICU.

Correlation Study of Inferior Venacava Collapsibility Index And Perfusion Index as Predictors of Fluid Responsiveness in Critically ill Patients

Introduction: Fluid responsiveness assessment is crucial in managing critically ill patients. This study evaluates the correlation and efficacy of Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index (IVCCI) and Perfusion Index (PI) in predicting fluid responsiveness.&#x0D; Objectives: The primary objective was to evaluate the correlation between the IVCCI and PI as predictors fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Secondary objectives involved studying the individual accuracy of the IVCCI and PI in predicting of fluid responsiveness and exploring whether their combined use improves overall accuracy in predicting fluid responsiveness in this patient population.&#x0D; Methodology: This prospective study enrolled 80 critically ill patients requiring hemodynamic monitoring and fluid resuscitation. IVCCI was measured using bedside ultrasonography, and PI was derived from pulseoximetry. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded before and after a standardized fluid bolus. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to assess the predictive performance of IVCCI and PI.&#x0D; Results: Among 80 enrolled patients, responders (N=35) demonstrated significantly lower baseline cardiac output (4.5 ± 0.23 vs 4.76 ± 0.22, p&lt;0.01) and higher IVCCI (35.13 ± 13.41 vs 28.53 ± 10.17, p=0.015) compared to non-responders. After a standardized fluid bolus, responders exhibited higher cardiac output (5.31 ± 0.24 vs 4.9 ± 0.27, p&lt;0.01) and lower IVCCI (22.01 ± 15.84 vs 28.88 ± 11.71, p=0.029). IVCCI and PI before fluid bolus showed a very weak positive correlation (r = 0.080, p = 0.478). Moreover, IVCCI before fluid bolus had better sensitivity (0.745) and specificity (0.727) than PI before fluid bolus (sensitivity: 0.574, specificity: 0.485), with AUC values of 0.693 and 0.455, respectively.&#x0D; Conclusion: IVCCI demonstrates efficacy in predicting fluid responsiveness, with a very weak positive correlation to PI. Notably, IVCCI before fluid bolus outperforms PI before fluid bolus in sensitivity and specificity, highlighting its superior predictive accuracy in critically ill patients.

The diagnostic accuracy of preoperative perfusion index as a predictor of postspinal anesthesia hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery: A prospective non-blinded observational study.

Spinal anesthesia is the technique of choice for elective cesarean section with a prominent side effect of postspinal anesthesia hypotension (PSH). This needs an early prediction to avoid feto-maternal complication. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of perfusion index (PI) and inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) in the prediction of PSH. Thirty parturients of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) 1 and two undergoing cesarean delivery participated in the study. IVCCI, PI, baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), and heart rate (HR) were noted in the preoperative period. The fall of MBP by 20% from baseline or below 65 mm Hg was considered PSH. After spinal anesthesia, SBP, DBP, MBP, and HR were noted again for diagnosing PSH. It did not show any statistical difference when comparing the PI between the PSH and non-PSH groups in both the PSH definition groups. IVCCI was significantly higher when PSH was considered MBP <65 mm Hg (P = 0.01). However, IVCCI was found to be statistically insignificant if PSH was considered a 20% reduction in baseline MBP. The correlation matrix between IVCCI and PI showed Pearson's r-value of 0.525, indicating a substantial relationship between the two (P = 0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis had shown that neither IVCCI nor PI was a good predictor of PSH in parturients for both definition groups for PSH. Although there is a modest correlation between PI and IVCCI, both cannot be used to predict postspinal hypotension in parturients undergoing elective lower-segment cesarean section (LSCS).

Comparing preoperative fasting and ultrasound-measured intravascular volume status in elective surgery, enhanced recovery patients versus inpatient, urgent surgery patients and the ability of IVC collapsibility to predict post-induction hypotension.

Hypotension following induction of general anaesthesia has been shown to result in increased complications and mortality postoperatively. Patients admitted to the hospital undergoing urgent surgery are often fasted from fluids for significant periods compared to elective patients subject to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols despite guidelines stating that a two-hour fast is sufficient. The aim of this prospective, observational study was to compare fasting times and intravascular volume status between elective surgery patients subject to enhanced recovery protocols and inpatient, urgent surgery patients and to assess differences in the incidence of post-induction hypotension. Fasting data was obtained by questionnaire in the preoperative area in addition to inferior vena cava collapsibility index, a non-invasive measure of intravascular volume. Blood pressure readings and drug administration for the ten minutes following induction were obtained from patients' charts. Inpatients undergoing urgent surgery were fasted significantly longer than enhanced recovery patients and had lower intravascular volume. However, no difference was found in the incidence of post-induction hypotension.

Use of POCUS for the assessment of dehydration in pediatric patients-a narrative review.

In pediatric practice, POCUS (point-of-care ultrasound) has been mostly implemented to recognize lung conditions and pleural and pericardial effusions, but less to evaluate fluid depletion. The main aim of this review is to analyze the current literature on the assessment of dehydration in pediatric patients by using POCUS. The size of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and its change in diameter in response to respiration have been investigated as a tool to screen for hypovolemia. A dilated IVC with decreased collapsibility (< 50%) is a sign of increased right atrial pressure. On the contrary, a collapsed IVC may be indicative of hypovolemia. The IVC collapsibility index (cIVC) reflects the decrease in the diameter upon inspiration. Altogether the IVC diameter and collapsibility index can be easily determined, but their role in children has not been fully demonstrated, and an estimation of volume status solely by assessing the IVC should thus be interpreted with caution. The inferior vena cava/abdominal aorta (IVC/AO) ratio may be a suitable parameter to assess the volume status in pediatric patients even though there is a need to define age-based thresholds. A combination of vascular, lung, and cardiac POCUS could be a valuable supplementary tool in the assessment of dehydration in several clinical scenarios, enabling rapid identification of life-threatening primary etiologies and helping physicians avoid inappropriate therapeutic interventions. Conclusion: POCUS can provide important information in the assessment of intravascular fluid status in emergency scenarios, but measurements may be confounded by a number of other clinical variables. The inclusion of lung and cardiac views may assist in better understanding the patient's physiology and etiology regarding volume status. What is Known: • In pediatric practice, POCUS (point-of-care ultrasound) has been mostly implemented to recognize lung conditions (like pneumonia and bronchiolitis) and pleural and pericardial effusions, but less to evaluate fluid depletion. • The size of the IVC (inferior vena cava) and its change in diameter in response to respiration have been studied as a possible screening tool to assess the volume status, predict fluid responsiveness, and assess potential intolerance to fluid loading. What is New: • The IVC diameter and collapsibility index can be easily assessed, but their role in predicting dehydration in pediatric age has not been fully demonstrated, and an estimation of volume status only by assessing the IVC should be interpreted carefully. • The IVC /AO(inferior vena cava/abdominal aorta) ratio may be a suitable parameter to assess the volume status in pediatric patients even though there is a need to define age-based thresholds.A combination of vascular, lung, and cardiac POCUS can be a valuable supplementary tool in the assessment of intravascular volume in several clinical scenarios.

Inferior vena cava collapsibility index as a predictor of hypotension after induction of general anesthesia in hypertensive patients

BackgroundHypertensive patients are more susceptible to develop hypotension after the induction of general anesthesia (GA), most likely due to hypovolemia. An inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) > 40–50% can predict hypotension after the induction of GA in the general population by variable accuracies. The current study aimed to investigate IVCCI% as a predictor of postinduction hypotension in hypertensive patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.MethodsUltrasound IVCCI % was assessed for all controlled hypertensive patients immediately before induction of GA. After induction of GA, patients were diagnosed with postinduction hypotension if their systolic arterial pressure (SAP) dropped by ≥ 30% of the baseline value and/or mean arterial pressure (MAP) dropped to < 65 mmHg up to 15 min after intubation. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of IVCCI% was compared to patients’ classification either developing hypotension after induction of GA or not as a gold standard.ResultsOf the 153 patients who completed the study, 62 (40.5%) developed hypotension after the induction of GA, and 91 (59.5%) did not. An IVCCI > 39% predicted the occurrence of postinduction hypotension with high accuracy (84%) (AUC 0.908, P < 0.001). The area of uncertainty (by gray zone analysis) of IVCCI lies at values from 39 to 45%. This gray zone included 21 patients (13.7% of all patients).ConclusionAn inferior vena cava collapsibility index > 39% before anesthetic induction can be a simple noninvasive reliable predictor of hypotension after the induction of GA for hypertensive patients not treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and undergoing noncardiac surgery.Trial registrationThis clinical trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Zagazig University (ZUIRB #9424 dated 03/04/2022), and patients’ informed consent for participation in the study was obtained during the period from May 2022 to May 2023. All study procedures were carried out in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of 2013.

Cardiac Evaluation and its Correlation with Volume Status in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

Introduction: Fluid overload (FO) in hemodialysis (HD) patients can result in increase in left atrial volume (LAV) and left ventricular mass (LVM). Here, we correlated volume status with cardiac outcome in these patients over a period of 6 months. Methodology: Consecutive clinically euvolumic end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on thrice weekly maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) for at least 6 months were included. Inferior vena cava (IVC) Collapsibility Index of ≤40% by IVC or B-Line score of ≥15 by lung ultrasound (LUS) or over hydration/extracellular water (OH/ECW) by bioimpedence spectroscopy (BIS) ≥15% were defined as FO. A cut-off of left ventricular mass index (LVMI) ≥115 gm/m2 and LAV index (LAVI) ≥34 mL/m2 on echocardiography were used for defining left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and left atrial dilatation (LAD), respectively. The diagnostic value of LUS for OH, considering BIS as the gold standard and correlation between LVMI and LAVI with OH/ECW and LUS score was studied. Results: Among 100 MHD patients, 29% had OH at baseline. Baseline FO was significantly associated with LAD but not LVH. The specificity of LUS in diagnosing FO at 3rd and 6th months was 98% and 95.1%, respectively. OH/ECW on BIS showed a correlation with both LAVI at baseline ( p-value of .03, R2 0.71). B line score determined by LUS did not show a correlation with LAVI at baseline ( p-value of .07, R2 0.49). Conclusion: Routine ultrasound use in HD unit for determining OH and echocardiography screening for LAD would assess and reduce early cardiovascular events.

Value of inferior vena cava collapsibility index as marker of heart failure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation

IntroductionInferior vena cava (IVC) diameter variability with respiration measured by ultrasound was found to be useful for the diagnosis of heart failure (HF) in ED patients with acute dyspnea. Its value in identifying HF in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation (AECOPD) was not specifically demonstrated.ObjectiveTo determine the value of ΔIVC in the diagnosis of HF patients with AECOPD.MethodsThis is a prospective study conducted in the ED of three Tunisian university hospitals including patients with AECOPD. During this period, 401 patients met the inclusion criteria. The final diagnosis of HF is based on the opinion of two emergency experts after consulting the data from clinical examination, cardiac echocardiography, and BNP level. The ΔIVC was calculated by two experienced emergency physicians who were blinded from the patient’s clinical and laboratory data. A cut off of 15% was used to define the presence (< 15%) or absence of HF (≥ 15%). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was also measured. The area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated to determine the diagnostic and predictive accuracy of the ΔIVC in predicting HF.ResultsThe study population included 401 patients with AECOPD, mean age 67.2 years with male (68.9%) predominance. HF was diagnosed in 165 (41.1%) patients (HF group) and in 236 patients (58.9%) HF was excluded (non HF group). The assessment of the performance of the ΔIVC in the diagnosis of HF showed a sensitivity of 37.4% and a specificity of 89.7% using the threshold of 15%. The positive predictive value was 70.9% and the negative predictive value was 66.7%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.71(95%, CI 0.65–0.76). ΔIVC values were not different between HF patients with reduced LVEF and those with preserved LVEF.ConclusionOur results showed that ΔIVC has a good value for ruling out HF in ED patients consulting for AECOPD.