On January 27, 1937, a Pennsylvania Common Pleas decision, Church v. Hackenburg,' emphasized anew the confusion growing out of interstate rendition proceedings in connection with prisoners who have been forcibly brought into the state for service of a Federal sentence and who on release from the Federal Penitentiary are wanted by another state. This decision by an inferior court challenges the legislative ingenuity of the states and of the nation. The facts in the Church case were as follows: On March 29, 1932, the petitioner, Walter Church, pleaded guilty in a criminal court of the State of New York to attempted robbery, on which charge he was sentenced by the New York State court to serve a term of two and a half to five years in the New York State Penitentiary at Ossining, New York. On the 21st of August, 1933, the petitioner was paroled from the New York State Penitentiary by the New York State Parole Commission and required to report from time to time to the proper officer of said Parole Commission. On October 1, 1933, the Parole Commission revoked the parole of Church on the ground that he failed to report. On January 10, 1934, Church was arrested by New York State authorities at White Plains, New York, charged with passing and having in his possession counterfeit money and was then identified as a parole violator. On July 18, 1934, he was indicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the unlawful passing and possessing of counterfeit money. On July 19, 1934, the petitioner was turned over by the New York State authorities at White Plains, New York, to the United States Marshal for the Southern District of New York. While in the custody of the said