According to Beck's original theory, depressives make unwarranted negatively biased personal inferences. Specifically, Beck suggested that depressives ignore current positive situational information and are unduly influenced by current negative situational information in making inferences. To test Beck's theory, we used Kelley's normative model of causal inference to examine the utilization of causally relevant situational information by dysphoric, nondepressed, and very nondepressed subjects in making causal attributions for personal success and failure. We used Stevens and Jones' classic method from social psychology and embedded the relevant causal information in the natural flow of events. Results showed that dysphoric, nondepressed, and very nondepressed subjects did, to an equal degree, use such information to make causal attributions. Although dysphoric and both groups of nondepressed subjects used current situational information consistently with Kelley's model, clear-cut baseline differences in the content of their causal attributions existed. Thus, the results supported the reformulations of Beck's theory that emphasize content, rather than process, differences between depressive and nondepressive cognition for dysphoria.