Clinical implications of vascular graft infection vary according to the position of the implanted graft. The infected aortic bifurcation graft is associated with a high incidence of therapeutic failure and also a high mortality rate. 1-s In comparison, the mortality rate is low following infection of an infrainguinal bypass graft, but the risk of major amputation approaches 80%. 6'7 The close anatomical relation to the perineal area and the poor vascularisation of the subcutaneous tissue combined with a rich regional lymphatic supply predispose the groin to wound infection. Thus, not only local contamination, but also haematogenous and lymphogenic spread from other infectious sites may contribute to the high incidence of infectious complications in the groin. According to Herbst et al. s one out of three graft infections is caused by microorganisms originating from the patient's ischaemic ulcer, corroborating the observation by Lorentzen et al} that 20% of foot ulcers yield the same microorganism as isolated from the graft. Management of infected vascular prostheses is controversial. One approach is to remove the graft with a new extra-anatomic arterial reconstruction in one or two proceduresg; but it is associated with a high level of complications and bears a high mortality, especially with the involvement of an aortobifemoral graft, s'1°'1~ The other approach involves less extensive procedures in combination with administration of potent antibiotics.S,6,12 ~5 With this approach excellent results have been reported even in patients with aortic graft sepsis} 6 One such antibiotic is gentamicin applied to the region of the infection, e.g. the groin. 12'13 In our first reports on this treatment, results from 14 and 17 patients, respectively, were presented. 12'~3 In this report the number of patients has increased to 38 with a follow-up period of up to 6 years, mean 13 months.