Background Surgical wound is any wound inicted during surgical process and infection of surgical wound is a relevant complication with an incidence of 1% to 3%. Many factors are responsible for the occurrence of surgical site infections, like age, presence of comorbidities, type of procedure, wound closure method, level of contamination etc. Surgical Site Infection or SSI is associated with a signicant economic burden in terms of extended length of stay and increased costs of treatment. Objectives- To determine whether the incidence of surgical site infections differed after wound closure with non-absorbable suture material vs skin stapler, in elective abdominal surgeries. Methods- A comparative study to determine the incidence of surgical site infections after elective abdominal surgery was conducted in a tertiary care setup for a duration of one year. The study population was divided by random computer method in two arms, consisting of 30 patients each. In one arm the abdominal wound after elective surgery was closed with non-absorbable sutures while in the other with skin staplers. Outcomes were noted in terms of Surgical site infection, i.e, presence of wound gape, burst abdomen, closure duration, duration of hospital stay and interventions like secondary suturing, daily cleaning and dressing (CnD) Results- A total of 60 patients who underwent elective abdominal surgeries were divided into two arms of 30 patients each. Wound closure in one group done by non-absorbable suture material while in the other group with skin stapler. The groups were comparable in demographics, ASA (American society of Anaesthesiologist) grading and CDC (Centre for disease control) class of surgical wound. In our study, Surgical site infections were detected in 33.3 % (10 patients) in the sutured arm of closure of abdominal incision, while SSI were detected in 26.6 % (8 patients) of stapled arm of closure of abdominal incision. No signicant difference encountered in the incidence of SSI in sutured and stapled closure of abdominal wound. 76.7% (23 patients) underwent wound closure within 10 minutes in the stapled arm, while only 20 % (6 patients) in the sutured arm had surgical time duration of wound closure less than 10 minutes (p value < 0.001), the wound closure duration in the stapled arm was signicantly less compared to the sutured arm. Conclusions- There was no signicant difference in the incidence of surgical site infections in both the groups, but the surgical time duration of wound closure was signicantly lower in the stapled group.