Dear Sir, We thank Dr. Koranda for his comment and questions [1] regarding our article aimed at defining the best image acquisition protocols and interpretation criteria for white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy with Tc-HMPAO-labelled leucocytes in musculoskeletal infections [2]. As a conclusion of our retrospective study, we recommend using a dual acquisition protocol with acquisition times of 3–4 h and 20–24 h after reinjection. Acquisition times for the scans have to be corrected for decay of the radionuclide and the images should be displayed with the number of counts and the same intensity scale, making comparisons between images possible without observer bias. Visual analysis, in the majority of cases, is sufficient for diagnosis. Increased uptake or enlargement of area of uptake over time is considered positive for an infection, whereas a decreased or stable uptake over time is considered negative for an infection. In all major subgroups of patients (suspected infected hip prosthesis, suspected infected knee prosthesis, suspected osteomyelitis, suspected infected osteosynthesis), visual analysis showed better sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy compared to semiquantitative analysis. However, in cases where visual analysis does not allow an easy interpretation and diagnosis, there is an added value of applying a semiquantitative analysis. Increase of a lesion to reference tissue (L/R) ratio over time is considered positive for an infection. Dr. Koranda questioned the reference sites that were used for the semiquantitative analysis. In our study we compared four different reference regions: contralateral tissue, ipsilateral bone marrow, contralateral bone marrow and the anterior superior iliac crest. However, calculation of background in all regions was not always possible. In some cases the anterior superior iliac crest was not in the field of view, and sometimes also bone marrow (ipsior contralateral) was not visible. We were able to calculate (in a total of 297 patients) L/R ratios in 285 patients for contralateral tissue, in 169 patients for ipsilateral bone marrow, in 177 patients for contralateral bone marrow and in 73 patients only for the anterior superior iliac crest. Overall, the diagnostic accuracy for the contralateral tissue was the best (84.2 %) as compared to 81.7 % for ipsilateral bone marrow, 76.8 % for contralateral bone marrow and 82.2 % for the anterior superior iliac crest. Dr. Koranda states that the diagnostic accuracy of the method using the anterior superior iliac crest as a reference region was determined in the subgroup of patients with infected hip prosthesis only and that the diagnostic accuracy of all other methods was calculated for larger groups of patients [1]. Indeed, in the infected hip prosthesis subgroup all four reference regions were calculated and, of course, in this group we were able to calculate a relatively high number of anterior superior iliac crests as reference tissue compared to the other groups, since this reference region was mostly included in the field of view. However, even in eight patients with a suspected infected hip prosthesis, the anterior superior iliac crest was not in the field of view or was only visible with superimposed bowel uptake. A. W. J. M. Glaudemans (*) : E. F. J. de Vries :R. H. J. A. Slart : R. A. J. O. Dierckx :A. Signore Department of Nuclear Medicine andMolecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands e-mail: a.w.j.m.glaudemans@umcg.nl