Abstract Background Quality and Fairness: A Health System for You published by the HSE in 2001 stated, as one of its core principles “Access to healthcare should be fair. The system must respond to people’s needs rather than have access dependent on geographic location or ability to pay.”1 Twenty years on, experience at our rehab unit suggests that inequality exists in accessing care in the community for older persons based on their residential address. The aim of our study was to examine and quantify this inequity of access. Methods A retrospective study was designed. Using the local patient information management system, all discharges in 2023 were identified. Baseline demographics, admission and discharge date and residential address were recorded. Delayed discharges were defined as patients for whom their rehabilitation programme is complete as agreed at the multi-disciplinary team meeting. Delayed discharge data was obtained from medical social work department who input this data to the HSE weekly. Patients were assigned a community healthcare organisation (CHO) based on address. CHO ‘A’ included two CHOs with predominantly rural areas whilst CHO ‘B’ comprised of one predominantly urban CHO. Results 167 patients were included. 24 discharges were delayed (14.4%). Median age was 84. Total bed days lost: 935 (mean 40.6, range 3 – 232). All nine CHOs were represented. Patients living in CHO A had increased likelihood of having discharge delayed (OR: 4.82, CI 2.86 – 8.13). Conversely, those living in CHO B were less likely to have had a discharge delayed (OR: 0.39, CI 0.15 – 0.96) Conclusion Our study demonstrates that health inequity does exist. Patients residing in rural communities are 4 times more likely to have their discharge delayed awaiting community supports compared to urban dwellers. Ending of the discrimination of patients based on their postcode and ensuring access based on need is the very essence of Sláintecare.