Relocating Mimesis:New Horizons for the British Regional Novel David James (bio) British regional fiction saw its "golden age" with the Brontës' fascination with the remote moorlands of York, an age that witnessed George Eliot's inquest into the spread of industrialization across the Midlands, and Hardy's estranged yet reflexive attachment both to rural Dorset and a romanticized Oxford. Under the aegis of such writers, the provincial novel, as a genre, entered a volatile arena where selfhood and community destabilized one another under the gathering storm of technological modernity. Such was the "golden age" of regional writing, according to Phyllis Bentley. Yet Bentley's canvass is broader than her favoured line-up of practitioners might suggest. Stretching from 1840–1940, it also takes in what she saw as the capacious "renaissance" of regional writing between the world wars. In the 1930s, a time of "fresh impetus" unprecedented for the novel's orientation toward international upheaval, such figures as Winifred Holtby and Storm Jameson wrote of the socio-economic deprivation and working-class unemployment in Yorkshire—a discrete period of innovation that affected setting as much as style (Bentley 13). By heralding new sociogeographical ventures in terms of location and plot, interwar women writers were interested not simply in directing the genre toward immediate polemical concerns, but also in mining a seam quite distinct from their predecessors. To novelists in the heyday of late-Victorian regionalism, the very idea of westerliness, of journeying out of Wessex, consolidated the [End Page 420] equation of seclusion with civility epitomized by Devon and Cornwell—an equation at the heart of these counties' perceived immunity from the urbanization afflicting England's southeast corner.1 As though countering the way southwestern counties had become idealized as enclaves for vestigial traditions, writers at the latter end of Bentley's spectrum in the 1930s would invert that trajectory: northward they lead us, voyaging past the fortunes of East Anglian agriculture as recorded by Doreen Wallace in the 1936 So Long to Learn; past Walter Greenwood's impoverished Lancashire Cotton mills, and beyond—they convey us to where, "under the hammer-blow of adversity," industrial depression had caused a whole population to become "very conscious," as Bentley describes it, "of the common human occupation on which we all depended, which linked us to our native soil" (Bentley 37–8). So conscious were they of the forces that "linked" regional writers to the upheavals of their "native soil," that by the 1970s British social historians were frequently turning back to novelists of the industrial north as spokespersons for provincial hardship. Citied in empirical research into economic fluctuations, reduced to talking-heads for demographic patterns, apprehended against the backcloth of mining and manufacturing towns at a time when indigenous coal and steel industries were coming under increasing threat—regional realists doubtlessly sounded prophetic of the latter-day sea-changes to working-class livelihoods wrought by the upsurge of Britain's free-market economy. Writers following the generational impulses of "Angry Young Men" (as diverse as Angus Wilson, Kingsley Amis, and Alan Sillitoe), were hailed retrospectively as social documentarians, prescient of a new and virulently divisive era of urban capitalism. As D. J. Taylor remarks, this strategy was "convenient" for sociologists—insofar as regional fiction offered a sort of affective archive, a literary plight symptomatic of the need to raise public awareness of the effects of industrial poverty—yet "highly injurious to the writers themselves" (26). Despite the specificity of their respective polemical and stylistic concerns, northern regionalists from the 1950s and 60s found themselves "turned into a movement whether they liked it or not" (Taylor 26). From Stanley Middleton and Alan Sillitoe in Nottingham, further north still to David Storey's This Sporting Life (1960) and Stan Barstow's A Raging Calm (1968), their achievements became variously misrepresented as "dramatized sociology" (26). [End Page 421] One key metacritical lesson emerges from this use of realist literature as merely an adjunctive resource for historical revisionism. Realism's narratological evolution has meant many things for writers committed to projecting alternative conditions for provincial life, writers who capitalize upon the hybridity of mimetic narration as a distinctive manner of addressing social forces...