Induction Of P-glycoprotein Research Articles

Lack of P-glycoprotein induction by rifampicin and phenobarbital in human lymphocytes

The efficacy of drugs acting within lymphocytes depends on their intracellular concentrations, which could be modulated by membrane efflux transporters including P-glycoprotein (P-gp), encoded by the MDR1 gene. In particular, P-gp induction may compromise the efficacy of its substrates. Rifampicin and phenobarbital have been shown to induce P-gp in hepatic and intestinal cells through the activation of the nuclear receptors PXR and CAR. However, controversial data exist in human lymphocytes. We investigated the effect of these drugs on P-gp activity and expression in lymphocytes in vitro and ex vivo. CCRF-CEM cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy volunteers were incubated in the presence of rifampicin, phenobarbital, or without any drug. P-gp activity was measured by flow cytometry using DiOC 6 efflux. MDR1, PXR and CAR mRNA expression were measured by quantitative RT-PCR. Neither P-gp activity nor MDR1 mRNA expression were modified by rifampicin or phenobarbital both in CCRF-CEM cells and PBMCs. Moreover, P-gp protein expression at the membrane was neither detectable nor induced. The very weak PXR and CAR mRNA expression levels in these cells could partly explain these results. Therefore, P-gp induction by rifampicin and phenobarbital may play a negligible role in drug interactions occurring within lymphocytes.

Drug and dietary interactions of the new and emerging oral anticoagulants

Oral warfarin is associated with extensive food and drug interactions, and there is a need to consider such interactions with the new oral anticoagulants (OACs) dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban and apixaban. A literature survey was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE and recent abstracts from thrombosis meetings to identify publications related to food, drug and dietary supplement interaction studies with dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban and apixaban. Clinical experience regarding food interactions is currently limited. Regarding drug-drug interactions, dabigatran requires caution when used in combination with strong inhibitors or inducers of P-glycoprotein, such as amiodarone or rifampicin. Rivaroxaban (and possibly apixaban) is contraindicated in combination with drugs that strongly inhibit both cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein, such as azole antimycotics, and caution is required when used in combination with strong inhibitors of only one of these pathways. Important drug interactions of the new OACs that can lead to adverse clinical reactions may also occur with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antiplatelet drugs, such as aspirin and clopidogrel. Over-the-counter (OTC) medications and food supplements (e.g. St. John's Wort) may also interact with the new OACs. Given the common long-term use of drugs for some chronic disorders, the frequent use of OTC medications and the need for multiple treatments in special populations, such as the elderly people, it is essential that the issue of drug interactions is properly evaluated. New OACs offer significant potential advantages to the field of venous thromboprophylaxis, but we should not fail to appreciate their lack of extensive clinical experience.

Rifampicin reduces the plasma concentrations and the renin-inhibiting effect of aliskiren

This study aimed to investigate the effect of rifampicin, an inducer of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of aliskiren, a renin inhibitor used in the treatment of hypertension. In a randomized crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers took 600 mg rifampicin or placebo once daily for 5 days. On day 6, they ingested a single 150-mg dose of aliskiren. Plasma aliskiren concentrations were measured up to 72 h and urine concentrations up to 12 h; pharmacodynamic variables were measured up to 24 h. Rifampicin reduced the peak plasma aliskiren concentration (C(max)) by 39% (95% confidence interval 0.41, 0.90; P = 0.017) and the area under the plasma aliskiren concentration-time curve AUC(0-infinity) by 56% (95% confidence interval 0.35, 0.56; P < 0.001). Rifampicin had no significant effect on aliskiren elimination half-life (t(1/2)) or its renal clearance (Cl(renal)). Plasma renin activity 24 h after aliskiren intake was 61% higher during the rifampicin phase than during the placebo phase (P = 0.008). Rifampicin considerably reduces the plasma concentrations and the renin-inhibiting effect of aliskiren by decreasing its oral bioavailability.

Drug/natural product interactions at the blood brain barrier

Drug/natural product interactions at the blood brain barrier

Comparative efficacy and safety of the novel oral anticoagulants dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban in preclinical and clinical development

Therapeutic oral anticoagulation is still commonly achieved by administration of warfarin or other vitamin K antagonists that are associated with an untoward pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile leading to a high incidence of bleeding complications or therapeutic failure. Hence, there is an unmet medical need of novel easy-to-use oral anticoagulants with improved efficacy and safety. Recent developments include the identification of non-peptidic small-molecules that selectively inhibit certain serine proteases within the coagulation cascade. Of these, the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban have recently been licensed for thromboprophylaxis after orthopaedic surgery mainly in Europe. In addition, the factor Xa inhibitor apixaban is in late-stage clinical development. Each drug is prescribed at fixed doses without the need of anticoagulant monitoring. Phase III trials in orthopaedic patients essentially resulted in non-inferior efficacy of dabigatran and superior efficacy of rivaroxaban over enoxaparin without any marked differences of drug safety, while apixaban data is still controversial. However, alterations of rivaroxaban and apixaban pharmacokinetics upon interactions with inhibitors and inducers of CYP3A4 or P-glycoprotein may complicate the use of these compounds in daily practice, whereas dabigatran elimination largely depends on renal function. Hence, this review reports PK/PD, efficacy and safety data of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban throughout preclinical and clinical development.

PXR-mediated induction of P-glycoprotein by anticancer drugs in a human colon adenocarcinoma-derived cell line

PurposeThe development of multidrug resistance (MDR) is one of the major limitations in the treatment of cancer. Induction of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) has been regarded as one of the main mechanisms underlying anticancer drug-induced MDR. Since the induction of Pgp is (in part) regulated by the pregnane X receptor (PXR), the ability of several widely used anticancer drugs to activate PXR-mediated Pgp induction was investigated.MethodsA Pgp-reporter gene assay was employed to determine the ability of a panel of widely used anticancer drugs to induce Pgp. To further assess whether PXR could be involved in the induction of Pgp by anticancer drugs, Pgp protein expression after treatment with the anticancer drugs was determined in both wild-type and PXR-knocked down LS180 cells. Furthermore, the effect of the anticancer drugs on the intracellular accumulation of the Pgp-probes rhodamine 123 and doxorubicin was determined.ResultsOur study showed that vincristine, tamoxifen, vinblastine, docetaxel, cyclophosphamide, flutamide, ifosfamide and paclitaxel activate PXR-mediated Pgp induction, and were additionally shown to affect the intracellular accumulation of the Pgp probe rhodamine 123. Moreover, PXR activation was also shown to reduce the cytotoxic activity of the Pgp substrate doxorubicin in colon cancer cells.ConclusionOur results indicate that several anticancer drugs can activate PXR-mediated induction of Pgp and affect the accumulation of Pgp substrates.

Effects of the P-glycoprotein Inducer Carbamazepine on Fexofenadine Pharmacokinetics

The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible effects of carbamazepine, a P-glycoprotein inducer, on fexofenadine pharmacokinetics. Twelve healthy Japanese volunteers (nine males and three females) were enrolled in this study after giving written informed consent. This randomized open-label study consisted of two phases (control and 7-day treatment) with a 2-week washout period. In the control phase, volunteers received 60 mg fexofenadine hydrochloride after an overnight fast. In the treatment phase, carbamazepine was dosed 100 mg three times daily (for a total daily dose of 300 mg) for 7 days, and on Day 7, a single 60-mg dose of fexofenadine was coadministered with a 100-mg dose of carbamazepine. The plasma concentrations and urinary excretion of fexofenadine were measured for 24 hours after dosing. Carbamazepine pretreatment significantly altered fexofenadine pharmacokinetics, decreasing the mean (+/- standard deviation) peak plasma concentration from 176.6 (+/- 82.1) ng/mL to 103.2 (+/- 33.6) ng/mL (P < 0.01) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 1058.4 (+/- 528.7) ng/h/mL to 604.8 (+/- 255.9) ng/h/mL (P < 0.01) without changing the elimination half-life. Relatively, carbamazepine significantly reduced the amount of fexofenadine excreted into the urine from 8.1 (+/- 2.1) mg to 4.5 (+/- 1.4) mg (P < 0.001), although the renal clearance of fexofenadine remained constant between the two study phases. Thus, this study indicates that carbamazepine significantly decreases fexofenadine plasma concentrations, probably as a result of P-glycoprotein induction in the small intestine. Carbamazepine treatment, therefore, is of moderate clinical significance for patients receiving fexofenadine.

Interactions Between Herbal Medicines and Prescribed Drugs

The concomitant use of herbal medicines and pharmacotherapy is wide spread. We have reviewed the literature to determine the possible interactions between seven popular herbal medicines (ginkgo, St John's wort, ginseng, garlic, echinacea, saw palmetto and kava) and conventional drugs. Literature searches were performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and EMBASE and we identified 128 case reports or case series, and 80 clinical trials. Clinical trials indicate that St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum), via cytochrome P450 (CYP) and/or P-glycoprotein induction, reduces the plasma concentrations (and/or increases the clearance) of alprazolam, amitriptyline, atorvastatin, chlorzoxazone, ciclosporin, debrisoquine, digoxin, erythromycin, fexofenadine, gliclazide, imatinib, indinavir, irinotecan, ivabradine, mephenytoin, methadone, midazolam, nifedipine, omeprazole, oral contraceptives, quazepam, simvastatin, tacrolimus, talinolol, verapamil, voriconazole and warfarin. Case reports or case series suggest interactions of St John's wort with adrenergic vasopressors, anaesthetics, bupropion, buspirone, ciclosporin, eletriptan, loperamide, nefazodone, nevirapine, oral contraceptives, paroxetine, phenprocoumon, prednisone, sertraline, tacrolimus, theophylline, tibolone, tryptophan, venlafaxine and warfarin. Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba) decreases the plasma concentrations of omeprazole, ritonavir and tolbutamide. Clinical cases indicate interactions of ginkgo with antiepileptics, aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), diuretics, ibuprofen, risperidone, rofecoxib, trazodone and warfarin. Ginseng (Panax ginseng) may interact with phenelzine and warfarin. Kava (Piper methysticum) increases the clearance of chlorzoxazone (a CYP2E1 substrate) and may interact with alprazolam, levodopa and paroxetine. Garlic (Allium sativum) interacts with chlorpropamide, fluindione, ritonavir and warfarin; it also reduces plasma concentrations of chlorzoxazone (a CYP2E1 probe). Echinacea might affect the clearance of caffeine (a CYP1A2 probe) and midazolam (a CYP3A4 probe). No interactions have been reported for saw palmetto (Serenoa repens). Numerous interactions between herbal medicines and conventional drugs have been documented. While the significance of many interactions is uncertain, several interactions, particularly those with St John's wort, may have serious clinical consequences.

P-glycoprotein induction as a cellular protection tool against xenobiotics toxicity

P-glycoprotein induction as a cellular protection tool against xenobiotics toxicity

Influence of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) induction on the pharmacokinetics of risperidone and paliperidone in mouse brain

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is responsible for active efflux of drugs at the blood-brain barrier (BBB). With this study we wanted to investigate the consequences of P-gp induction on the pharmacokinetics of the known P-gp substrates risperidone and its active metabolite 9-OH-risperidone (paliperidone) in P-gp wildtype (WT) mice (FVB/N) and double-knockout (KO) mice (mdr1a/1b -/-/-/-). We used the known P-gp inducing substances dexamethasone (50mg/kg/d) and 5-pregnene-3beta-ol-20-one-16alpha-carbonitrile (PCN) (25mg/kg/d) for our study and injected them i.p. for 4 days. As controls solvent only was injected. On day 5 risperidone (3mg/kg) was i.p. injected. 1, 3 and 6h after the risperidone injection brain levels of risperidone and paliperidone were analysed using a reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method. The active moiety, sum of risperidone and paliperidone, were calculated due to their similar receptor profile and pharmacological effect with respect to therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) standards. The results demonstrate the outstanding influence of transporter proteins in the disposition of risperidone and paliperidone. Brain levels of the active moiety were significantly changed in both induction groups. Both inducers showed distinct decreases in the area-under-the-data (AUD) and the brain versus plasma (B/P) ratios. But the results of the KO mice and the risperidone vs. 9-OH-risperidone (RIS:9-OH-RIS) ratios suggest that other mechanisms must be involved.

In vivo down-regulation of mouse brain capillary P-glycoprotein: A preliminary investigation

Over-expression of blood–brain barrier P-glycoprotein is considered as a major hurdle in the treatment of various CNS disorders. A down-regulation strategy is considered as one means to counteract disease- or therapy-associated induction of P-glycoprotein. Here, we evaluated whether a targeting of P-glycoprotein can be achieved in mouse brain capillary endothelial cells using siRNA. A 4-day treatment paradigm with once daily hydrodynamic intravenous injections of siRNA resulted in a significant reduction of the P-glycoprotein-labeled area in the hippocampal hilus and parietal cortex. P-glycoprotein expression proved to be down-regulated in these brain regions by 31 and 16%, respectively. An impact of siRNA administration on density of brain capillaries was excluded by quantification of the endothelial cell marker GLUT-1. In conclusion, the study provides first preliminary evidence that a down-regulation of P-glycoprotein can be achieved in brain capillary endothelial cells by administration of siRNA in vivo.

Development of Decision Tree Models for Substrates, Inhibitors, and Inducers of P-Glycoprotein

In silico classification of new compounds for certain properties is a useful tool to guide further experiments or compound selection. Interaction of new compounds with the efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is an important drug property determining tissue distribution and the potential for drug-drug interactions. We present three datasets on substrate, inhibitor, and inducer activities for P-gp (n = 471) obtained from a literature search which we compared to an existing evaluation of the Prestwick Chemical Library with the calcein-AM assay (retrieved from PubMed). Additionally, we present decision tree models of these activities with predictive accuracies of 77.7 % (substrates), 86.9 % (inhibitors), and 90.3 % (inducers) using three algorithms (CHAID, CART, and C4.5). We also present decision tree models of the calcein-AM assay (79.9 %). Apart from a comprehensive dataset of P-gp interacting compounds, our study provides evidence of the efficacy of logD descriptors and of two algorithms not commonly used in pharmacological QSAR studies (CART and CHAID).

Prevention of seizure-induced up-regulation of endothelial P-glycoprotein by COX-2 inhibition

In the epileptic brain, seizure activity induces expression of the blood–brain barrier efflux transporter, P-glycoprotein, thereby limiting brain penetration and therapeutic efficacy of antiepileptic drugs. We recently provided the first evidence that seizures drive P-glycoprotein induction through a pathway that involves glutamate-signaling through the NMDA receptor and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). Based on these data, we hypothesized that selective inhibition of COX-2 could prevent seizure-induced P-glycoprotein up-regulation. In the present study, we found that the highly selective COX-2 inhibitors, NS-398 and indomethacin heptyl ester, blocked the glutamate-induced increase in P-glycoprotein expression and transport function in isolated rat brain capillaries. Importantly, consistent with this, the COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, blocked seizure-induced up-regulation of P-glycoprotein expression in brain capillaries of rats in vivo. To explore further the role of COX-2 in signaling P-glycoprotein induction, we analyzed COX-2 protein expression in capillary endothelial cells in brain sections from rats that had undergone pilocarpine-induced seizures and in isolated capillaries exposed to glutamate and found no change from control levels. However, in isolated rat brain capillaries, the COX-2 substrate, arachidonic acid, significantly increased P-glycoprotein transport activity and expression indicating that enhanced substrate flux to COX-2 rather than increased COX-2 expression drives P-glycoprotein up-regulation. Together, these results provide the first in vivo proof-of-principle that specific COX-2 inhibition may be used as a new therapeutic strategy to prevent seizure-induced P-glycoprotein up-regulation at the blood–brain barrier for improving pharmacotherapy of drug-resistant epilepsy.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of lapatinib administered once daily in combination with tamoxifen.

Abstract Abstract #2073 Background: The pharmacokinetics (PK) and tolerability of daily oral dosing with lapatinib (LAP) and tamoxifen (TAM) in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are examined in this study. Optimal dose selection requires characterization of PK to accommodate the potential for a bi-directional PK interaction involving LAP inhibition and TAM induction of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (Pgp).&amp;#x2028; Methods: Twenty three previously treated pts with ER and/or PR positive MBC, not ErbB selected, were randomly assigned to one of two groups, to separately assess each direction of the potential PK interaction at steady state during daily dosing of 1250mg LAP and 20mg TAM. In one group, the PK of LAP is assessed on the 14th day of dosing LAP alone, and again on the 28th day dosing of LAP and TAM together. In the other group, the PK of TAM is assessed on the 28th day of dosing TAM alone, and on the 7th day of dosing TAM and LAP together. LAP and TAM are dosed together throughout subsequent 28 day cycles.&amp;#x2028; Results: To date 23 pts have been enrolled with a median age of 58 (38-83) and a median PS of 1. Preliminary PK data for LAP from six patients summarized in the table below showing geometric median (95% confidence limits) parameters indicate that LAP plasma concentrations are decreased by TAM. Final PK analysis will be presented at the meeting. To date, the most common adverse events at cycle 1 were: fatigue gr1/2 (100%), diarrhoea gr 1/2 (53%), rash gr 1 (40%), anorexia gr 1 (40 %) and nausea gr1/2 (40 %). Transaminase elevation (SGPT/ALT) increased from 3 pts at baseline to 6 pts at cycle 1 including one gr3.&amp;#x2028; &amp;#x2028; Conclusions: The preliminary PK results are consistent with data indicating TAM induces hepatic CYP3A, the primary route of LAP elimination. This important information may impact in ongoing adjuvant lapatinib studies. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 2073.

Atazanavir: its role in HIV treatment

Azatanavir is a protease inhibitor (PI) approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Atazanavir is a substrate and inhibitor of cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A and an inhibitor and inducer of P-glycoprotein. It has similar virologic efficacy as efavirenz and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in antiretroviral-naive individuals. Its impact on lipids is less than other PIs and it is suitable for those in whom hyperlipidemia is undesirable. Ritonavir boosting of atazanavir enhances the bioavailability of atazanavir but may result in some elevation of lipids and is recommended for treatment-experienced patients and those receiving efavirenz or tenofovir. Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir has similar antiviral activity as ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in both antiretroviral therapy-naive and -experienced patients. Atazanavir causes unconjugated bilirubinemia in over 40% of patients but results in less than 2% discontinuations. Atazanavir is licensed for once-daily use and atazanavir/ritonavir competes with lopinavir/ritonavir as the most commonly prescribed PI.

Molecular Mechanisms Underlying St. Johns Wort Drug Interactions

The phytopharmaceutical agent St. John's wort (SJW) is currently under intense investigation. Studies of drug interactions resulting from concomitant use of SJW and conventional medication are of fundamental importance, since the use of SJW as a complementary and alternative medicine is highly popular. Intake of SJW often remains unrecognized by physicians resulting in clinical relevant alterations of treatment, as this phytopharmaceutical agent is available without prescription. This review elicits molecular explanations for clinical observations in terms of concomitant use of SJW and conventional drugs. Since patients suffering from severe diseases such as cancer are especially at risk, we focus on chemotherapeutic agents. There is strong evidence that SJW extract lowers drug plasma levels of various anti-cancer agents by pregnane X receptor activation resulting in induction of cytochrome P450 isotype 3A4, P glycoprotein and several other enzymes. New methods such as photophysical diagnosis (PPD) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) seem to be highly promising with respect to their clinical application. Due to its fluorescent activity and an intense accumulation in cancer cells, hypericin could be applied to locate tumorous tissues. Upon excitation by light, hypericin generates cytotoxic products rendering its use attractive as photosensitizing agent. In this review both PPD and PDT are explained in detail, with a particular focus on molecular mechanisms.

Effect of P-Glycoprotein inducers on its expression and activity in Caco-2 cells

Effect of P-Glycoprotein inducers on its expression and activity in Caco-2 cells

Induction of P-glycoprotein expression and function in human intestinal epithelial cells (T84)

Intestinal induction of Pgp is known to limit the oral availability of certain drug compounds and give rise to detrimental drug–drug interactions. We have investigated the induction of P-glycoprotein (Pgp; MDR1) activity in a human intestinal epithelial cell line (T84) following pre-exposure to a panel of drug compounds, reported to be Pgp substrates, inhibitors or inducers. Human MDR1-transfected MDCKII epithelial monolayers were used to assess Pgp substrate interactions and inhibition of digoxin secretion by the selected drug compounds. The T84 cell line was used to assess induction of Pgp-mediated digoxin secretion following pre-exposure to the same compounds. Changes in gene expression (MDR1, MRP2, PXR and CAR) were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Net transepithelial digoxin secretion was increased (1.3 fold, n = 6, P < 0.05) following pre-exposure to the PXR activator hyperforin (100 nM, 72 h), as was MDR1 mRNA expression (3.0 fold, n = 4, P < 0.05). A number of Pgp substrates (quinidine, amprenavir, irinotecan, topotecan, atorvastatin and erythromycin) induced net digoxin secretion, as did the non-Pgp substrate artemisinin. Various non-Pgp substrates demonstrated inhibition of digoxin secretion (verapamil, mifepristone, clotrimazole, mevastatin, diltiazem and isradipine) but did not induce Pgp-mediated digoxin secretion. Of the compounds that increased Pgp secretion, quinidine, topotecan, atorvastatin and amprenavir pre-exposure also elevated MDR1 mRNA levels, whereas erythromycin, irinotecan and artemisinin displayed no change in transcript levels. This indicates possible post-translational regulation of digoxin secretion. Finally, a strong correlation between drug modulation of MRP2 and PXR mRNA expression levels was evident.

Clinical Drugs that Interact with St. Johns Wort and mplication in Drug Development

St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum, SJW) is one of the most commonly used herbal antidepressants for the treatment of minor to moderate depression. A major safety concern about SJW is its ability to alter the pharmacokinetics and/or clinical response of a variety of clinically important drugs that have distinctive chemical structure, mechanism of action and metabolic pathways. This review highlights and updates the knowledge on clinical interactions of prescribed drugs with SJW and the implication in drug development. A number of clinically significant interactions of SJW have been identified with conventional drugs, including anticancer agents (imatinib and irinotecan), anti-HIV agents (e.g. indinavir, lamivudine and nevirapine), anti-inflammatory agents (e.g. ibuprofen and fexofenadine), antimicrobial agents (e.g. erythromycin and voriconazole), cardiovascular drugs (e.g. digoxin, ivabradine, warfarin, verapamil, nifedipine and talinolol), central nervous system agents (e.g. amitriptyline, buspirone, phenytoin, methadone, midazolam, alprazolam, and sertraline), hypoglycaemic agents (e.g. tolbutamide and gliclazide), immuno-modulating agents (e.g. cyclosporine and tacrolimus), oral contraceptives, proton pump inhibitor (e.g. omeprazole), respiratory system agent (e.g. theophylline), statins (e.g. atorvastatin and pravastatin). Both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic components may play a role in the interactions of drugs with SJW. For pharmacokinetic changes of drugs by SJW, induction of cytochrome P450s (e.g. CYP2C9 and 3A4) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) are considered the major mechanism. Thus, it is not a surprise that many drugs that interact with SJW are substrates of CYP3A4, CYP2C9 and P-gp. A comprehensive understanding of clinical drugs that interact with SJW has important implications in drug development. New drugs may be designed to minimize interactions with SJW; and new SJW formulations may be designed to avoid drug interactions. Further clinical and mechanistic studies are warranted to explore the interaction of SJW with other important drugs and the potential clinical impact.

Pharmacodynamics of Tubulin and Tubulin-Binding Agents: Extending Their Potential Beyond Taxanes

Chemotherapeutic agents that disrupt the assembly or disassembly of microtubules, including paclitaxel and docetaxel, are among the most commonly prescribed anticancer therapies. However, the utility of taxane-based therapy is limited principally by problems with formulation, slow administration, cumulative neurotoxicity, and resistance in part through induction of P-glycoprotein. The broad-spectrum anticancer activity of taxane therapy has encouraged investigators to identify a class of structurally novel microtubulin-stabilizing agents that could produce comparable outcomes with fewer problems. Preclinical studies indicate that epothilones have a broad spectrum activity in paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer models. Several epothilone analogues have displayed promising antitumor activity in initial clinical trials. Ixabepilone, an epothilone derivative in the later stages of clinical development, has exhibited antitumor activity in breast cancers, with or without previous taxane therapy. The most common adverse events associated with ixabepilone are reversible sensory neuropathy and neutropenia. This review briefly outlines the basic science behind microtubule-targeting agents and examines the preclinical studies of several of these agents in breast cancer models. Also discussed are results from clinical trials of epothilones alone and in combination in patients with breast cancer.