ABSTRACT Postterm pregnancies are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, including meconium and meconium aspiration syndrome, Apgar score <4 at 5 minutes, oligohydramnios, fetal macrosomia, and stillbirth. To prevent or minimize these complications in pregnancies >41 weeks of gestation, routine antenatal surveillance is recommended. In comparison to expectant management, most evidence supports benefits from induction of labor in pregnancies at 41 and 42 weeks of gestation. Yet, individuals with postterm pregnancies may decide to decline the medical recommendation for induction. Evidence on the outcomes associated with choosing care that is against medical advice (AMA) is scant in this population. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of refusing medical advice for labor induction in postterm pregnancies on maternal and neonatal outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study of women with pregnancies >41 + 3 weeks' gestation who refused labor induction AMA. Included were healthy, adult women with low-risk, singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation, who received care at a single tertiary hospital between 2017 and 2019. Excluded were those with a suspected small-for-gestational-age infant, as well as those in active labor or with premature rupture of membranes, nonreassuring fetal heart rate, hypertensive disorders, diabetes, or oligohydramnios. Women who refused induction AMA (study group) were compared with those who agreed to the medical recommendation (control group) in a 1:2 ratio. The analysis included 249 postterm women—83 in the study group and 166 in the control group. There were significantly higher rates of cesarean delivery (21.7% vs 10.2%, P = 0.04), longer postdelivery hospitalizations (2.9 vs 2.4 days, P < 0.05), and more advanced gestational age at delivery (41 + 6 vs 41 + 4 weeks, P < 0.05) in the study group versus the control group. Cesarean delivery also was indicated most often for nonreassuring fetal heart rate (77% vs 47%), followed by arrest of dilation and arrest of descent (16% vs 17.6%) and failure of induction of labor (5.5% vs 35.2%) in the study group. Among those who refused induction AMA, 67% returned to the hospital at the onset of active delivery, 24% chose to continue surveillance twice a week, and 8% were admitted upon their request for daily nonstress test and biophysical scoring. They also experienced significantly higher rates of meconium stained amniotic fluid (44% vs 15.7%, P < 0.01), admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (9.6% vs 5%, P < 0.01), and mechanical ventilation (4.81% vs 0.6%, P < 0.01). The composite of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes was higher in the study group than the control group (25.3% vs 17.46%, P < 0.001). In conclusion, the risk of choosing to refuse induction AMA in postterm pregnancies is associated with increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, as well as cesarean delivery.
Read full abstract