The level of airtightness is increasing in newly built Australian apartments. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, restrictions have forced many people to work from home. An appropriate ventilation rate is needed to decrease virus transmission and provide occupants with a healthy environment. As occupants tend not to open windows, they need to be informed about the potential benefit of using trickle ventilators, in connection with exhaust systems, to ventilate their apartments. In 2022, a provision for lower rates of continuous ventilation (10 L.s−1 for the bathroom exhaust system and 12 L.s−1 for the kitchen exhaust system) was considered for inclusion in the National Construction Code of Australia. This provision was not adopted; however, this is still a valid reference for good practice. Based on this provision for continuous ventilation, our study aims to investigate the airflow velocity and the ventilation efficiency to remove the carbon dioxide (CO2) generated across winter and summer seasons in a Melbourne apartment occupied by two adults and a child over four hours.The study's objectives are 1) to connect two modelling approaches (Computational Fluid Dynamics and nodal networks), and 2) to investigate the potential benefits of using trickle ventilators across winter and summer seasons. The results show that wind conditions have limited effects (4% decrease in the extracted air flow rate) if the extraction network output is protected from the wind. Comparing winter and summer conditions, we found that indoor airflows differed, highly influenced by the temperature difference between outside and inside. We observed that the airflow patterns were more inclined to create “CO2 pockets” during winter, which could increase virus transmission due to ineffective ventilation in this area. However, in winter, ventilation performed better in reducing the CO2 concentration in the kitchen/living room area and the whole apartment than it did during summer.