1. Introduction Since the 19th century, economists have paid attention to the problem of intertemporal choice and its causes. Economic aspects of intertemporal choice have been examined, as well as the sociological and psychological aspects. Note on the Measurement of Utility, a paper by Samuelson in 1937, was a turning point for views on intertemporal choice, describing a discounted utility model. The main assumption of this model is that all the motives underlying intertemporal choice can be described in a single parameter called a discount rate. This (an discount (IDR) or a rate of time (RTP)) reflects individual time preferences for obtaining utility from consumption, and shows how disadvantageous future utility is when compared to present utility. The higher the of time preference, the more impatient the individual is. A positive means that, all other things being equal, an individual prefers the utility from consumption now, rather than later. Despite the broad use of the discounted utility concept, there is criticism about it. For instance, Frederick and co-authors distinguish time discounting and time preferences (Frederick et al, 2002). They emphasize that the same of time preferences does not apply to all forms of consumption. Despite this criticism, we support the evidence of recent empirical studies that of time preference reflects an individual's intertemporal choice, particularly healthy/unhealthy behavior. Many research papers confirm the relationship between of time preference and obesity (Komlos 2004), health care demand (Bradford 2010, Thalassinos et al. 2010), and smoking (Harrison 2009, Scharff and Viscusi 2011). An estimation of this and the analysis of relevant factors are useful for policy-makers since the economic costs of an unhealthy lifestyle are significant for society. Such analysis is frequently conducted abroad, for example, the research of Harrison for Denmark (Harrison 2002). The usefulness of the of time preferences for government decision-making is highlighted in many studies (Grignon 2009; Bradford 2010). The popularity of the of time preferences abroad has not spread to Russia. Our research aims to measure the relationship between various socio-economic factors and of time preferences in Russia. The results of individual discount estimation and conclusions on the socio-economic factors affecting this can help to improve government policy through a deeper understanding of individual intertemporal choice and to achieve budget savings through improved decision-making. 2. Individual Intertemporal Choice and Socio-Economic Factors 2.1. The Rate of Time Preferences and Problems with its Estimation Various studies suggest using a survey for of time preference evaluation. Here respondents choose either to receive a certain amount of money today or to postpone in exchange for a cash reward to be received at a later date. The answers show the individual time preferences of respondents. The most common ways of constructing questions are as following (Fuchs 1982): * An experimenter offers a respondent a sum of money relating to the future and asks what smaller amount would be acceptable to receive immediately; * An experimenter offers a respondent a sum of money today and asks what minimum amount would be acceptable in the future to compensate the delay in receiving money; * An experimenter offers a respondent two sums of money and asks what time period would make these sums equivalent. Estimating of time preferences faces several problems. First, respondents may inaccurately predict their behavior or not give answers at all. Second, the is not constant with increases in the planning horizon (Tasset et al. 1999). Most economists agree that the of time preference decreases with time. Individuals tend to be more patient in the long-run than in the short-run (Angeletos et al. …
Read full abstract