Individual Surgeon Research Articles

Representation of female vascular surgeons in national clinical trial leadership: analysis of trends over 20 years

Female vascular surgeons constitute 15% of the workforce. Despite an increased pipeline of female vascular surgeons, representation in leadership positions nationally has not maintained pace. We hypothesized that female vascular surgeons are underrepresented as leaders of clinical trials in the United States for several vascular conditions germane to our specialty. Clinical trials registered in the United States were reviewed using the ClinicalTrials.gov website for several index vascular conditions: abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid artery disease, hemodialysis access, venous thrombectomy and stenting, and peripheral arterial disease. The specialty and presenting gender of national and site principal investigators were recorded. The gender distribution was compared for trials led by vascular surgeons and nonvascular surgeon physicians. A subgroup analysis was performed for solo and group investigators, intervention types, sponsorship sources, and professional affiliation. Temporal trends were examined to evaluate the relationship between the duration of board certification and clinical trial leadership involvement. For all conditions, female vascular surgeons represent 10.3% and 7.8% of national and site principal investigators, respectively. A significantly lower proportion of female investigators were included in national vascular surgeon-led trials compared with nonvascular surgeon-led trials (10.3% vs 19.9%; P = .006). However, site investigators had a lower, but similar, proportion of women in both groups (7.8% vs 7.9%; P = .89). A significantly lower proportion of female vascular surgeons led clinical trials focused on interventions vs noninterventions (6% vs 11%; P = .02). There was a trend toward fewer female vascular surgeons conducting industry-sponsored trials for group (8% vs 11%; P = .3) and solo (5% vs 12%; P = .1) investigator-led trials. A similar proportion of female investigators had both academic and nonacademic affiliations (15% vs 16%; P = .83). Of 109 individual vascular surgeon investigators who were board certified between 1983 and 2003, 6 were women (5.5%) compared with 24 women (28.6%) of 84 investigators who had received board certification between 2004 and 2023. Finally, female vascular surgeon investigators started leading clinical trials sooner after board certification compared with male investigators (mean, 5.5 years vs 10.9 years; P = .0009). The representation of female leaders in vascular clinical trials lags behind that of male leaders, although this trend has improved over time. However, a percentage of women in vascular surgery are successful in leading clinical trials early in their career, suggesting the importance of strong sponsorship and allyship. Furthermore, it is a call to action to our leaders and our industry partners to “lift the curtain” on the pathway to clinical trial leadership.

Novel workflow analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy through objective performance indicators: a pilot study.

The curriculum for a da Vinci surgeon in gynecology requires special training before a surgeon performs their first independent case, but standardized, objective assessments of a trainee's workflow or skills learned during clinical cases are lacking. This pilot study presents a methodology to evaluate intraoperative surgeon behavior in hysterectomy cases through standardized surgical step segmentation paired with objective performance indicators (OPIs) calculated directly from robotic data streams. This method can provide individual case analysis in a truly objective capacity. Surgical data from six robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomies (rTLH) performed by two experienced surgeons was collected prospectively using an Intuitive Data Recorder. Each rTLH video was annotated and segmented into specific, functional surgical steps based on the recorded video. Once annotated, OPIs were compared through workflow analysis and across surgeons during two critical surgical steps: colpotomy and vaginal cuff closure. Through visualization of the individual steps over time, we observe workflow consistencies and variabilities across individual surgeons of a similar experience level at the same hospital, creating unique surgeon behavior signatures across each surgical case. OPI differences across surgeons were observed for both the colpotomy and vaginal cuff closure steps, specifically reflecting camera movement, energy usage and clutching behaviors. Comparing colpotomy and vaginal cuff closure time needed for the step and the events of energy use were significantly different (p < 0.001). For the comparison between the two surgeons only the event count for camera movement during colpotomy showed significant differences (p = 0.03). This pilot study presents a novel methodology to analyze and compare individual rTLH procedures with truly objective measurements. Through collection of robotic data streams and standardized segmentation, OPI measurements for specific rTLH surgery steps can be reliably calculated and compared to those of other surgeons. This provides opportunity for critical standardization to the gynecology field, which can be integrated into individualized training plans in the future. However, more studies are needed to establish context surrounding these metrics in gynecology.

Association between aortic pathology, surgeon experience, and regional variability on use of intravascular ultrasonography during thoracic endovascular aortic repair

ObjectiveIntravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a useful adjunct to obtain precise intraluminal measurements during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), but IVUS examination is not routinely used by all surgeons or centers during TEVAR. We sought to identify patient- and system-related factors that influence the decision to use IVUS examination during TEVAR. MethodsA retrospective review of the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database was performed to identify all patients undergoing TEVAR from 2015 to 2019. Multivariable logistic regression modeling with three-fold repeated cross-validation was performed to identify predictors of IVUS use during TEVAR. Association of IVUS use with contrast volume and radiation exposure was also assessed. ResultsA total of 12,414 patients undergoing TEVAR met the inclusion criteria. Of these, IVUS examination was used in 41.3% of cases (n = 5121). IVUS use was more common in younger patients with fewer comorbidities; however, IVUS examination was also more commonly deployed in symptomatic patients and those with a higher preoperative American Society of Anesthesiology classification. IVUS examination was use in 80% (n = 3385/4213) TEVAR procedures performed for type B aortic dissection, which accounted for 50% of total IVUS use and only 11% of cases during which IVUS examination was not used (n = 822/7293) (P < .01). In multivariable analysis, the strongest independent predictor of IVUS use was aortic dissection (odds ratio, 13.7; 95% confidence interval, 11.7-16.3; P < .001, with aortic aneurysm as the reference). Surgeon years of independent practice experience was not associated with IVUS use, but when accounting for clustering on physicians and geographic regions, these variables explained 15% of the variance observed in the final risk-adjusted model. After adjustment for confounding factors, IVUS use was associated with a significant decrease in fluoroscopy time and contrast volume (both P < .001). ConclusionsThe decision to use IVUS examination during TEVAR is most heavily influenced by aortic pathology. Although surgeon experience was not associated with the decision to use IVUS examination, there was substantial variation in IVUS examination use among individual surgeons and VQI regions. IVUS use was associated with decreased contrast administration and fluoroscopy use but did not appear to have an impact on survival or re-intervention. Although aortic dissection was strongly associated with IVUS use, a significant number of TEVAR for dissection were performed without IVUS examination. Further research is warranted to identify the barriers to IVUS use as well as the risks and benefits of IVUS use during TEVAR so that quality benchmarks can be established and resource use is improved.

Comparison of Efficacy of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy between Supracostal and Subcostal Access in Patients with Renal Stone

Background: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a prevalent surgical procedure for the treatment of large renal stones. The choice between supra-costal and sub-costal access is pivotal in optimizing patient outcomes. This study provides an in-depth comparison of these two approaches, contributing to the evolving discourse in urological surgery. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of supra-costal and sub-costal access in PCNL for the treatment of renal stones. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Urology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, from May to October 2023. Sixty-four patients with renal stones larger than 2cm were enrolled and divided into two groups based on the access point: supra-costal (Group A) and sub-costal (Group B). Variables such as age, gender, duration of surgery, stone size, clearance rate, and complications were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 25. Results: The average age of participants was 37.20 ± 13.0 years, with surgery duration averaging 45.75 ± 4.98 minutes. The majority of participants were male (59.4%). Stone clearance rates were high in both groups (93.8% in Group A and 90.6% in Group B), with no statistically significant difference (P-value &gt; 0.05). Complication rates were 9.4% in Group A and 15.6% in Group B, also showing no significant difference. Conclusion: Both supra-costal and sub-costal accesses in PCNL are effective for renal stone clearance, with comparable success rates and complication profiles. The choice between these approaches can be based on individual patient anatomy and surgeon preference. Further research could explore long-term outcomes and patient-specific factors influencing the choice of access point.

A comparative study of endoscopic myringoplasty versus microscopic myringoplasty at tertiary care center

Background and objectivesMyringoplasty is a surgical procedure performed to repair tympanic membrane perforation which can be performed either using a microscope or an endoscope. The aim of this study is to compare the graft uptake, hearing outcome and operative time of endoscopic myringoplasty (EM) versus microscopic myringoplasty (MM) by underlay cartilage island graft technique. Subjects and methodsIn this prospective comparative study of sixty patients divided into two equal groups with small to medium sized tympanic membrane perforation were included. Tragal cartilage was used as graft material. Both the groups underwent myringoplasty by underlay cartilage island graft using endoscope (n = 30) and microscope (n = 30). The study was conducted between February 2022 to May 2023 after taking ethical approval from IRC of Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences. All patients were followed up on 7th postoperative day (POD), 1 and 3 months after surgery. ResultsGraft uptake in was 90 % (27/30) in MM group and 93.33 % (28/30) in EM group. Mean operating time was more in MM group (66.46 ± 6.78min) than EM group (64.53 ± 6.6 min). The improvement in Air Bone Gap (ABG) was better in EM group (12.46 ± 6.58 dB) compared to MM group (10.9 ± 9.01 dB). The differences in graft uptake, operating time and improvement in ABG were not statistically significant. ConclusionThe study concludes that it does not matter which approach is used, good results are predictable and choice of the tool used is up to the individual surgeon.

Communication in your department and beyond

Technical skills and clinical acumen are necessary for success in a surgical career. However, these skills alone are not sufficient. A surgeon’s emotional intelligence and ability to communicate, manage conflict, and cultivate relationships may be even more critical to success. Health care environments are increasingly complex. An individual surgeon’s or surgical department’s success depends highly on the teams around them, including anesthesia, nursing, hospital administration, clinic teams, and many more. The surgeon’s ability to communicate across the organization and lead by influence is critical.

Determinants of Surgical Approach for Benign Outpatient Hysterectomy

Identify determinants of the surgical approach to a benign, outpatient, minimally invasive hysterectomy. A cross-sectional sample of patients undergoing outpatient hysterectomy between the 4th quarter of 2015 and the 4th quarter of 2022, excluding those with a diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy, was obtained from the Vizient Clinical Data Base. The primary outcome was surgical approach to hysterectomy that was analyzed using mixed-effects regression, including a surgeon-level random effects to capture unobserved surgeon-level differences influencing variation in surgical approach. The Vizient Clinical Data Base includes patient encounter data from >50 healthcare systems and >400 community hospitals and represents approximately 97% of academic medical centers in the United States. Women >18 years undergoing an outpatient benign hysterectomy. Surgical approach to hysterectomy. The final sample included 411208 cases performed by 6089 surgeons. Among observed variables, patient diagnosis, surgeon specialty, and insurance type were strongly associated with choice of approach. However, after controlling for patient, hospital, and observable surgeon characteristics, unobserved surgeon-level differences still accounted for 72% of the variance in the use of transvaginal hysterectomy (95% confidence interval, 71-73) and 85% of the variance in the use of robot-assisted total hysterectomy (95% confidence interval, 84-86). The strongest determinant of surgical approach to a benign outpatient hysterectomy in the United States was not patient- or hospital-level variability, but unexplained differences across individual surgeons. This has implications in how surgeons are trained and incentivized to deliver high-value surgical care.

HPB P24 Quality assurance within multicentre randomised controlled trials of surgical interventions for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

Abstract Background Pancreatic cancer surgery is a complex intervention, with numerous studies exploring variations in approach to curative resection with the aim of improving outcomes. Multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCTs) represent the gold standard for evaluating these technical modifications. However, variations in how surgical intervention are delivered across trial sites and individual surgeons can influence results. Surgical quality assurance mechanisms within trial designs attempt to mitigate this by ensuring standardised, high-quality technique and reducing heterogeneity of procedures. This systematic review aimed to identify approaches to quality assurance within multicentre randomised controlled trials of surgical interventions for pancreatic cancer. Methods A systematic review was performed by searching MEDLINE and Embase databases between 1st January 2000 and 18th December 2022. Articles were deemed eligible for inclusion if they were a multicentre RCT and evaluated a surgical intervention, technique modification or variation in approach to surgical resection for pancreatic cancer. Data was extracted from included studies using a semi-structured form, with consideration of four prospectively defined quality assurance domains: i) surgical intervention and co-interventions description, ii) surgical technique standardisation, iii) performance monitoring methods, iv) surgeon/ unit credentialing methods. Results A total of 1970 studies were identified from the initial search, of which 44 trials were deemed eligible for inclusion. Thirty-six RCTs (81.8%) provided description of the intervention and/or co-intervention. Attempts to standardise technique were described in 33 RCTs (75.0%). However, only 4 trials (9.1%) deconstructed the intervention into its constituent components. Twelve studies (27.3%) described methods used to monitor performance and adherence to the intervention. The most common approaches used were intra-operative photographs (n=7; 15.9%), surgeon self-declaration (n=3; 6.8%), and pathological specimen review (n=2; 4.5%). Ten studies (22.7%) used credentialing methods based on unit entry criteria. Conclusions This study provides important data on the utilisation of methods of surgical quality assurance within pancreatic RCTs. With the exception of intervention description, compliance to the remaining domains of quality assurance was low. This may compromise the extent to which observed differences in clinical outcomes are due to the technique being evaluated within these trials. Confidence in the results of future RCTs would be improved by enhanced quality assurance across the four domains described.

Video-based Coaching: Current Status and Role in Surgical Practice, Part II- Practical Implementation and Risk Mitigation from the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Health Care Quality and Outcomes Committee

IntroductionVideo-based surgical coaching is gaining traction within the surgical community. It has an increasing adoption rate and growing recognition of its utility, especially an advanced continuous professional growth tool, for continued educational purposes. This method offers instructional flexibility in real-time remote settings and asynchronous feedback scenarios. In our first paper, we delineated fundamental principles for video-based coaching, emphasizing the customization of feedback to suit individual surgeon’s needs. MethodIn this second part of the series, we review into practical applications of video-based coaching, focusing on quality improvements in a team-based setting, such as the trauma bay. Additionally, we address the potential risks associated with surgical video recording, storage, and distribution, particularly regarding medicolegal aspects. We propose a comprehensive framework to facilitate the implementation of video coaching within individual healthcare institutions. ResultsOur paper examines the legal and ethical framework and explores the potential benefits and challenges, offering insights into the real-world implications of this educational approach. ConclusionThis paper contributes to the discourse on integrating video-based coaching into continuous professional development. It aims to facilitate informed decision-making in healthcare institutions, considering the adoption of this innovative educational quality tool.

Substantial Variation in Decision Making to Perform Subacromial Decompression Surgery for Subacromial Pain Syndrome Between Orthopaedic Shoulder Surgeons for Identical Clinical Scenarios: A Case-Vignette Study

To provide further insight into the variation in decision making to perform subacromial decompression (SAD) surgery in patients with subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) and its influencing factors. Between November 2021 and February 2022, we invited 202 Dutch Shoulder and Elbow Society members to participate in a cross-sectional Web-based survey including 4 clinical scenarios of SAPS patients. Scenarios varied in patient characteristics, clinical presentation, and other contextual factors. For each scenario, respondents were asked (1) to indicate whether they would perform SAD surgery, (2) to indicate the probability of benefit of SAD surgery (i.e., pain reduction), (3) to indicate the probability of harm (i.e., complications), and (4) to rank the 5 most important factors influencing their treatment decision. A total of 78 respondents (39%) participated. The percentage of respondents who would perform SAD surgery ranged from 4% to 25% among scenarios. The median probability of perceived benefit ranged between 70% and 79% across scenarios for respondents indicating to perform surgery compared with 15% to 29% for those indicating not to perform surgery. The difference in the median probability of perceived harm ranged from 3% to 9% for those indicating to perform surgery compared with 8% to 13% for those indicating not to perform surgery. Surgeons who would perform surgery mainly reported patient-related factors (e.g., complaint duration and response to physical therapy) as the most important factors to perform SAD surgery, whereas surgeons who would not perform surgery mainly reported guideline-related factors. Overall, Dutch orthopaedic shoulder surgeons are reluctant to perform SAD surgery in SAPS patients. There is substantial variation among orthopaedic surgeons regarding decisions to perform SAD surgery for SAPS even when evaluating identical scenarios, where particularly the perceived benefit of surgery differed between those who would perform surgery and those who would not. Surgeons who would not perform SAD surgery mainly referred to guideline-related factors as influential factors for their decision, whereas those who would perform SAD surgery considered patient-related factors more important. There is substantial variation in decision making to perform SAD surgery for SAPS between individual orthopaedic surgeons for identical case scenarios.

Supply and demand of hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons in the United States

BackgroundHepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery requires specialized training and adequate case volumes to maintain procedural proficiency and optimal outcomes. Studies of individual HPB surgeon supply related to annual HPB case demand are sparse. This study assesses the supply and demand of the HPB surgical workforce in the United States (US). MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried from 1998–2019 to estimate the number of HPB procedures performed. To approximate the number of HPB surgeons, models based on previous HPB workforce publications were employed. We then calculated the number of HPB surgeons needed to maintain volume-outcome thresholds at current reported levels of centralization. ResultsIn 2019, approximately 37,335 patients underwent inpatient HPB procedures in the US, while an estimated 905–1191 HPB surgeons were practicing. Assuming 50% centralization and an optimal volume-outcome threshold of 24 HPB cases-per-year, only 778 HPB surgeons were needed. Without adjustment in centralization, by 2030 there will be a demand of fewer than 12 annual cases per HPB surgeon. ConclusionThe current supply of HPB surgeons may exceed demand in the United States. Without alteration in training pathways or improved care centralization, by 2030, there will be insufficient HPB case volume per surgeon to maintain published volume-outcome standards.

“Choose Your Own Threat”—A Modern Paradigm for Academic Surgery

This Viewpoint discusses a potential shift from academic surgery’s triple-threat paradigm (provide high-quality clinical care, perform primary research, and train residents and students) to defining success in ways that allow individual surgeons to focus on their own path based on intrinsic motivation and curiosity.

Reducing Surgical Site Infections Post-Caesarean Section.

Surgical Site Infections (SSI) are one of the most common complications after a caesarean with significant morbidity. Evidence suggests that SSI rates can be reduced post caesarean by using a Leukomed® Sorbact® (Essity) bacteria binding wound dressing, thereby reducing bacterial wound colonisation. Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK (BHRUT) maternity unit sought change their clinical practice by using Leukomed Sorbact and evaluate if this reduced their SSI rate, SSI readmission rate, antibiotic usage and evaluate any associated cost savings. From January 1st 2022, Mepore® (Molnlycke) wound dressings were replaced with Leukomed Sorbact for all caesareans. Retrospective and prospective audits were undertaken to compare SSI incidence pre- and post- implementation of the dressing. No changes were made to wound cleaning products, prophylactic antibiotic use or surgical technique. Wound closure technique remained the choice of the individual surgeon. Prior to this practice change, the baseline SSI rate between January-December 2021 was 6.1% and the SSI readmission rate was 1.27%. Comparative data for January-December 2022 showed a 38% reduction in SSI rates (overall SSI rate = 3.8%), a 31% reduction in readmission rate for SSI (overall rate = 0.88%), a 38% reduction in readmission bed days and a 30% reduction in antibiotic use. There was a reduction in SSI rates in all body mass index (BMI) categories. Total savings due to the reduction in SSI rates over twelve months were £234,784. The cost savings to BHRUT solely attributable to the reduction in readmissions was £49,750 or £21 per Caesarean, which will be an ongoing saving. The use of Leukomed Sorbact dressings after Caesarean resulted in improved clinical outcomes with reduced SSI and readmission rates. Investment in the new dressing was cost effective when considering bed days freed, the reduction in antibiotic usage, reduced morbidity and improved patient experience.

Surgeon factors but not hospital factors associated with length of stay after colorectal surgery - A population based study.

Length of stay (LOS) after colorectal surgery (CRS) is a significant driver of healthcare utilization and adverse patient outcomes. To date, there is little high-quality evidence in the literature examining how individual surgeon and hospital factors independently impact LOS. We aimed to identify and quantify the independent impact of surgeon and hospital factors on LOS after CRS. A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using validated health administrative databases, encompassing all patients from the province of Ontario, Canada. All patients from 121 hospitals in Ontario who underwent elective CRS between 2008 and 2019 in Ontario were included, and factors pertaining to these patients and their treating surgeon and hospital were assessed. A negative binomial regression model was used to assess the independent effect of surgeon and hospital factors on LOS, accounting for a comprehensive collection of determinants of LOS. To minimize unmeasured confounding, the analysis was repeated in a subgroup comprising patients undergoing lower-complexity CRS without postoperative complications. A total of 90,517 CRS patients were analysed. Independent of patient and procedural factors, low surgeon volume (lowest volume quartile) was associated with a 20% increase in LOS (95% CI: 12-29, p < 0.0001) compared to high surgeon volume (highest volume quartile). In the 22,639 patients undergoing uncomplicated lower-complexity surgeries, a 43% longer LOS was seen in the lowest volume surgeon quartile (95% CI: 26-61, p < 0.0001). In both models, more years-in-practice was associated with a small increase in LOS (RR 1.02, 95% CI: 1.02-1.03, p < 0.0001). Hospital factors were not significantly associated with increased LOS. Surgeon factors, including low surgeon volume and increasing years-in-practice, were strongly and independently associated with longer LOS, whereas hospital factors did not have an independent impact. This suggests that LOS is driven primarily by surgeon-mediated care processes and may provide actionable targets for provider-level interventions to reduce LOS after CRS.

Anterior talofibular ligament plastic in patients with chronic ankle instability (literature review)

Ankle joint injury is one of the leading nosologies in the general structure of the musculoskeletal system lesions, not only among professional athletes, but also among the adult population in general. In case of conservative therapy ineffectiveness, chronic instability of the ankle joint develops, which can significantly reduce the patient’s quality of life, in this situation, the surgical treatment becomes uncontested. The choice of the surgical intervention method is determined not only by the nature of the injury, but also by the ligamentous-tendon apparatus condition. In addition, to a large extent, surgical tactics is chosen based on the preferences of the individual surgeon. The article describes the anatomical and physiological features and risk factors that determine the occurrence of acute the ankle joint instability and its transition to a chronic state, as well as the main methods of the anterior talofibular ligament plastic surgery and their common modifications. Special attention is paid to the effectiveness evaluating methods of surgical techniques on cadaveric ligamentous material. An analysis of the literature shows that the study of the issue remains insufficient. New clinical data obtaining will increase the effectiveness of the surgical technique for ankle instability treating and significantly improve the quality of life of patients.

Timing of mastectomy and the effect on the likelihood of outpatient surgery and cost savings in breast cancer patients

BackgroundSame-day discharge after mastectomy has potential patient- and hospital-level benefits; however, few data are available regarding factors affecting the likelihood of same-day discharge in order to address barriers. We sought to evaluate factors contributing to same-day discharge, focusing on the timing of mastectomy during the operative day. MethodsWe conducted a single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent mastectomies for malignancy over a 3-y time frame. Clinicopathologic variables were collected along with a binary variable for mastectomy start time (morning versus afternoon). Our primary endpoint was rate of same-day discharge. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed from significant univariate variables to determine independent predictors of same-day discharge. A secondary endpoint was a cost-utility analysis for morning versus afternoon start time, using hospital cost data. ResultsThere were 451 patients included in the analysis. Factors associated with same-day discharge rate included the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, use of a preoperative regional anesthesia block, type of mastectomy performed, individual surgeon variation, and a morning start for the mastectomy. On multivariable analysis, morning start was a strong independent predictor of same-day discharge (odd ratio = 2.83; 95% CI, 1.75–4.60). The cost-utility analysis favored a morning start, with average cost savings of $550 per patient. ConclusionDespite patient- and surgeon-specific variations, simple scheduling policies can improve same-day discharge rates after mastectomy, leading to improved hospital bed use and cost reduction.

Does Academic Productivity Correlate With Industry Payments in Hand Surgery Fellowship Programs in the United States?

Hand surgeons and the industry share a common goal to improve the care of patients. However, industry support remains controversial, and the current relationship with fellowship programs remains unclear. This study explores the relationship between industry support and research productivity among hand surgeons in the academic setting. The Open Payments database, created by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as a result of the Sunshine Act, was used to identify supplemental income paid to physicians of hand surgery fellowships in the United States. Both lifetime individual physician and aggregated fellowship Sunshine Act supplemental income (2015-2021) were collected for review. Supplemental income only reflects royalties, consulting fees, or food and does not include direct research funding. H-index was collected through the Scopus website as a proxy for academic productivity. Six hundred and thirty-four faculty physicians (90.8%) from 94 hand surgery fellowships (100%) were included in the study. The mean individual physician lifetime supplemental income was $67,272 (median$341,861),whereas the mean individual physician H-index was 12.5 (median 9.0). There was a significant and weak positive correlation between individual physician H-index and lifetime income (p<0.001). Similarly, there was a significant and moderately positive correlation between the combined fellowship H-index and total lifetime income (p<0.001). Research productivity of an orthopedic hand fellowship group and individual academic hand surgeon correlate with overall industry support from indirect research funding. Further work is required to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of industry support of academically productive hand surgeons at hand surgery fellowships.

Post-surgical Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques in Hirschsprung's Disease: A Literature Review.

Hirschsprung's disease (HD) is a rare condition that affects newborns and is characterized by the lack of ganglion cells in the colon. Typical symptoms include difficulty passing stool, vomiting, and trouble feeding. Various surgical methods are available to manage the condition. The aim of the study is to investigate and compare the post-surgical outcomes of different surgical techniques used in the treatment of HD. A thorough literature search was conducted using various electronic databases to identify relevant studies to be referred to.Double-blinded screening of the identified articles led to the final selection of 40 out of 440 HD, including transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT), laparoscopic approaches, and modified techniques.Several studies have investigated surgical procedures for HD, including TERPT, laparoscopic methods, and modified techniques. These have shown positive outcomes, with fewer complications, improved bowel function, and favorable cosmetic results. Individual patient characteristics and surgeon expertise should guide procedure selection.Surgery for HD aims to restore normal bowel function, but post-surgical outcomes can include constipation or fecal incontinence. Complications like enterocolitis, anastomotic stricture, and sphincter damage may occur. Laparoscopic approaches have shorter hospital stays. However long-term follow-up is essential to assess quality of life, psychological well-being, and potential side effects.

Scoping review of the second victim syndrome among surgeons: Understanding the impact, responses, and support systems

BackgroundIt is thought that 50% of healthcare providers experience Second Victim Syndrome (SVS) in the course of their practice. The manifestations of SVS varies between individuals, with potential long-lasting emotional effects that impact both the personal lives and professional clinical practice of affected persons. Although surgeons are known to face challenging and high-stress situations in their profession, which can increase their vulnerability to SVS, majority of studies and reviews have focused squarely on nonsurgical physicians. MethodsThis scoping review aimed to consolidate existing studies pertaining to a surgeon's experience with SVS, by broadly examining the prevalence and impact, identifying the types of responses, and evaluating factors that could influence these responses. The scoping review protocol was guided by the framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley and ensuing recommendations made by Levac and colleagues. Three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception till March 19, 2023. ResultsA total of 13 articles were eligible for thematic analysis based on pre-defined inclusion criteria. Effects of SVS were categorized into Psychological, Physical and Professional impacts, of which Psychological and Professional impacts were particularly significant. Factors affecting the response were categorized into complication type, surgeon factors and support systems. ConclusionSVS adds immense psychological, emotional and physical burden to the individual surgeon. There are key personal, interpersonal and environmental factors that can mitigate or exacerbate the effects of SVS, and greater emphasis needs to be placed on improving availability and access to services to help surgeons at risk of SVS.

Posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy for Cervical Brachialgia: the FORVAD RCT.

Posterior cervical foraminotomy and anterior cervical discectomy are routinely used operations to treat cervical brachialgia, although definitive evidence supporting superiority of either is lacking. The primary objective was to investigate whether or not posterior cervical foraminotomy is superior to anterior cervical discectomy in improving clinical outcome. This was a Phase III, unblinded, prospective, United Kingdom multicentre, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled superiority trial comparing posterior cervical foraminotomy with anterior cervical discectomy. A rapid qualitative study was conducted during the close-down phase, involving remote semistructured interviews with trial participants and health-care professionals. National Health Service trusts. Patients with symptomatic unilateral cervical brachialgia for at least 6 weeks. Participants were randomised to receive posterior cervical foraminotomy or anterior cervical discectomy. Allocation was not blinded to participants, medical staff or trial staff. Health-care use from providing the initial surgical intervention to hospital discharge was measured and valued using national cost data. The primary outcome measure was clinical outcome, as measured by patient-reported Neck Disability Index score 52 weeks post operation. Secondary outcome measures included complications, reoperations and restricted American Spinal Injury Association score over 6 weeks post operation, and patient-reported Eating Assessment Tool-10 items, Glasgow-Edinburgh Throat Scale, Voice Handicap Index-10 items, PainDETECT and Numerical Rating Scales for neck and upper-limb pain over 52 weeks post operation. The target recruitment was 252 participants. Owing to slow accrual, the trial closed after randomising 23 participants from 11 hospitals. The qualitative substudy found that there was support and enthusiasm for the posterior cervical FORaminotomy Versus Anterior cervical Discectomy in the treatment of cervical brachialgia trial and randomised clinical trials in this area. However, clinical equipoise appears to have been an issue for sites and individual surgeons. Randomisation on the day of surgery and processes for screening and approaching participants were also crucial factors in some centres. The median Neck Disability Index scores at baseline (pre surgery) and at 52 weeks was 44.0 (interquartile range 36.0-62.0 weeks) and 25.3 weeks (interquartile range 20.0-42.0 weeks), respectively, in the posterior cervical foraminotomy group (n = 14), and 35.6 weeks (interquartile range 34.0-44.0 weeks) and 45.0 weeks (interquartile range 20.0-57.0 weeks), respectively, in the anterior cervical discectomy group (n = 9). Scores appeared to reduce (i.e. improve) in the posterior cervical foraminotomy group, but not in the anterior cervical discectomy group. The median Eating Assessment Tool-10 items score for swallowing was higher (worse) after anterior cervical discectomy (13.5) than after posterior cervical foraminotomy (0) on day 1, but not at other time points, whereas the median Glasgow-Edinburgh Throat Scale score for globus was higher (worse) after anterior cervical discectomy (15, 7, 6, 6, 2, 2.5) than after posterior cervical foraminotomy (3, 0, 0, 0.5, 0, 0) at all postoperative time points. Five postoperative complications occurred within 6 weeks of surgery, all after anterior cervical discectomy. Neck pain was more severe on day 1 following posterior cervical foraminotomy (Numerical Rating Scale - Neck Pain score 8.5) than at the same time point after anterior cervical discectomy (Numerical Rating Scale - Neck Pain score 7.0). The median health-care costs of providing initial surgical intervention were £2610 for posterior cervical foraminotomy and £4411 for anterior cervical discectomy. The data suggest that posterior cervical foraminotomy is associated with better outcomes, fewer complications and lower costs, but the trial recruited slowly and closed early. Consequently, the trial is underpowered and definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. Recruitment was impaired by lack of individual equipoise and by concern about randomising on the day of surgery. A large prospective multicentre trial comparing anterior cervical discectomy and posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical brachialgia is still required. This trial is registered as ISRCTN10133661. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 21. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.