To the Editor: We thank Tittelbach-Helmrich et al. for sharing their thoughts about our paper entitled ‘Single Kidney Transplantation from Young Pediatric Donors in the United States’ and appreciate the opportunity to respond. In short, our analysis found that single kidney transplant (KTX) graft survival from donors weighing >35 kg was similar to KTX with ideal standard criteria donors (SCDs); and, single grafts from donors 10–34 kg conferred graft loss risks similar to transplantation with nonideal SCDs. Tittelbach-Helmrich et al. object to the exclusion of the top and bottom weight percentiles in our analysis since these exclusions may skew the results. Importantly, we excluded cases from the top and bottom one percentile in order to avoid inclusion of pediatric donor weights that were considered unlikely or inaccurately coded rather than explicitly removing ‘rare cases’. Tittelbach-Helmrich et al. state ‘as shown by Kayler et al. early splitting in donors between 10 and 20 kg leads to results comparable with those from marginal adult donors. In contrast to Kaylers’ statement, we do not regard en bloc transplanted kidneys from young donors up to 20 kg as equal to organs from marginal donors…’. In response, we did not use the word ‘marginal’ anywhere in the manuscript. We did report that for single KTXs from 10 to 19 kg donors the adjusted hazard ratio was similar to the outcomes achieved with nonideal SCDs. This distinction is important, as nonideal SCDs are associated with significantly better survival than expanded criteria donors as described in the original methods. Another comment is that we failed to consider the importance of adequate recipient selection criteria. Our focus was to elucidate KTX outcomes from pediatric donors specifically by weight and number of kidneys transplanted. Therefore we adjusted for other potentially confounding variables relating to both the recipient and donor. We agree that questions remain about donor–recipient matching to achieve optimal outcomes. The results in our manuscript reflect outcomes based on current practice. Tittelbach-Helmrich et al. comment that dividing en-bloc kidneys does not always yield two transplantable organs due to an increased rate of discarded grafts. We found that among KTXs from donors 10–35 kg, both kidneys were transplanted in 86% of cases in which at least one was transplanted. Clearly, the second pediatric kidney is being transplanted a high proportion of the time. Finally, Tittelbach-Helmrich et al. advocate setting the cut-off for organ splitting at a donor weight of 20 kg (instead of the 10 kg concluded in our analysis). We found that whereas en bloc KTX from donors 10 to 35 kg do offer increased graft years, the protective benefit was substantially less than ‘half’ as compared to single kidneys in the same weight range. We therefore concluded that kidneys from pediatric donors 10–35 kg used as singles offer more cumulative graft years to the candidate population. Essentially, any increases in the cut-off for single kidney transplantation to a maximum of 35 kg would result in longer graft function for an individual recipient, but fewer cumulative graft years to candidates, as fewer transplants would be performed. The authors of this manuscript have no conflict(s) of interest as defined by the American Journal of Transplantation.