Individual Donation Testing Research Articles

West Nile Virus among Blood Donors in the United States, 2003 and 2004

West Nile virus first appeared in the United States in 1999 and has since spread throughout the contiguous states, resulting in thousands of cases of disease. By 2002, it was clear that the virus could be transmitted by blood transfusion, and by the middle of 2003, essentially all blood donations were being tested for West Nile virus RNA with the use of investigational nucleic acid amplification tests; testing was performed on individual samples or on "minipools" of up to 16 donations. We analyzed data from the West Nile virus testing program of the American Red Cross for 2003 and 2004 to identify geographic and temporal trends. In areas with a high incidence of infection, individual donations were tested to increase the sensitivity of testing. Donors with reactive results participated in follow-up studies to confirm the original reactivity and to assess the natural history of infection. Routine testing in 2003 and 2004 identified 540 donations that were positive for West Nile virus RNA, of which 362 (67 percent) were IgM-antibody-negative and most likely infectious. Of the 540 positive donations, 148 (27 percent) were detectable only by testing of individual donations, but only 15 of the 148 (10 percent) were negative for IgM antibody. The overall frequencies of RNA-positive donations during the epidemic periods were 1.49 per 10,000 donations in 2003 and 0.44 per 10,000 in 2004. In 2004, 52 percent of the positive donations were from donors in four counties in southern California. Rapid implementation of a nucleic acid amplification test led to the prospective identification of 519 donors who were positive for West Nile virus RNA and the removal of more than 1000 potentially infectious related components from the blood supply of the Red Cross. No cases of transfusion-transmitted infection were confirmed among recipients of the tested blood.

Screening the Blood Supply for West Nile Virus RNA by Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing

The use of nucleic acid amplification tests of "minipools" of 16 samples to screen blood donors for West Nile virus RNA began in July 2003. We report the yield and characteristics of positive donations and the incremental yield and safety of nucleic acid amplification tests of individual donations. Reactive minipools were analyzed to identify the individual reactive donations. For the regions with the highest yield on minipool testing, retrospective nucleic acid amplification testing was performed on individual donations that were negative on minipool testing. Reactive donations were confirmed by alternative nucleic acid amplification tests and IgM and IgG tests, and donors were followed to document seroconversion. From July 1 through October 31, 2003, 677,603 donations were prospectively screened for West Nile virus by minipool testing, yielding 183 confirmed viremic donations (0.027 percent, or 1 in 3703 donations). Retrospective individual testing of 23,088 donations from high-prevalence regions that were negative on minipool testing yielded 30 additional units with a low level of viremia, with 14 additional viremic units detected by prospective testing of individual donations late in the 2003 transmission season. Of all the viremic units detected, 5 percent were detected only by individual testing and were negative for IgM antibody, 29 percent were detected by individual testing after IgM seroconversion, and 66 percent were detected by minipool testing. West Nile virus infection was confirmed in both recipients of IgM-negative units that were reactive on individual testing, whereas neither recipient of antibody-positive blood components that were reactive on individual testing was infected. In 2004, prospective testing of individual donations in regions that yielded donations that were reactive on minipool testing resulted in a 32 percent incremental yield of units with a low level of viremia that would have been missed by minipool testing. Although nucleic acid amplification testing of minipools of blood donations prevented hundreds of cases of West Nile virus infection in 2003, it failed to detect units with a low level of viremia, some of which were antibody-negative and infectious. These data support the use of targeted nucleic acid amplification testing of individual donations in high-prevalence regions, a strategy that was implemented successfully in 2004.

Triggers for switching from minipool testing by nucleic acid technology to individual‐donation nucleic acid testing for West Nile virus: Analysis of 2003 data to inform 2004 decision making

Concern about West Nile virus (WNV) transfusion-transmitted infections missed by minipool (MP) nucleic acid testing (NAT) has prompted consideration of the use of individual-donation (ID) NAT. Strategies were investigated for the application of limited ID-NAT capacity in 2004. Patterns of WNV MP-NAT-reactive donations tested by the Blood Systems Laboratory each week for 79 blood centers from June 29 to November 23, 2003 (196 MP-NAT repeat-reactive [RR] donations among 801,697 units), were analyzed. ID-NAT initiation strategies were developed consisting of counts of RR donations and/or weekly RR rates, together with three ID-NAT discontinuation strategies, and ID testing burden was assessed based on these combined start and stop strategies. The effectiveness, reported as the percentage of MP-RR donations that would trigger ID-NAT based on each initiation strategy, ranged from 57 to 100 percent. The addition of a 1- or 2-week no-yield requirement for ID discontinuation substantially increased testing burden. Combined strategies resulted in projected ID-NAT of between 10 and 50 percent of donations for a 10- to 20-week period. For this organization, the most feasible ID-NAT initiation strategy was 2 MP-reactive donations and a weekly rate of 1 in 1000, which had an effectiveness of 81 percent and led to peak weekly ID-NAT of 20 to 25 percent of donations depending on the discontinuation rule. This new approach of targeted ID-NAT based on ongoing monitoring of MP-NAT yield may prove to be a rational policy for agents like WNV that cause seasonal and regional epidemics.

Concentrate safety and efficacy.

Safety from transmission of infections through plasma-derived clotting factor concentrates is assured by improved donor screening, serological testing of individual donations and direct viral testing of small plasma pools. Modern viral-inactivation techniques are highly effective. Recombinant concentrates stabilized in human albumin are being superaeded by those with other stabilizers. Recently reported discrepancies between estimates of concentrate potency from in vitro assays versus in vivo recovery, depending upon type of assay and reference standard used, are not fully resolved.

Detection of hepatitis C virus RNA in alpha interferon derived from in vitro culture of leukocytes of human origin

In order to assure the virological safety of blood products, in addition to serological testing of individual donations and virus inactivation steps undertaken during manufacture, routine PCR testing for HCV RNA of starting materials (plasma, cells), intermediates or final product is necessary. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of HCV RNA positive batches of human native leukocyte interferon during large-scale production. Our findings indicate the presence of HCV RNA in 6·1% batches despite acidification of intermediates in order to inactivate Sendai virus.

Will genome detection replace serology in blood screening for microbial agents?

The residual risk of transfusion-transmitted viral infection in developed countries is considered minimal or negligible. However, zero risk remains a strong political objective. Genomic screening for HCV, HIV and HBV represents a major advance, eliminating infectious blood donations collected during the pre-seroconversion window period, rare cases of immunosilent infections and, possibly, a large spectrum of viral variants. In Western countries, HCV RNA genomic screening started on pools of 16–400 plasma samples from individual donations. Pooling may produce false-positive and false-negative results. Individual donation testing is more suitable to blood screening but requires multiplexing, automation, and affordable cost. Because donations from individuals who are HBV DNA-negative/serologically positive, or those apparently recovered from HCV infection, may remain infectious, it is unlikely that HBsAg, anti-HCV, and anti-HIV will be discontinued when genomic screening is extended to all three viruses. HIV-1 p24 antigen may prove redundant with HIV RNA screening. Anti-HTLV-I and HTLV-II will remain more effective than genomic testing.