Individual Case Safety Report Database Research Articles

Investigating the safety profiles of exogenous melatonin and associated adverse events: A pharmacovigilance study using WHO-VigiBase.

Melatonin, a pineal hormone that modulates circadian rhythms, sleep, and neurotransmitters, is widely used to treat sleep disorders. However, there are limited studies on the safety of melatonin. Therefore, we aimed to present the overall patterns of adverse events (AEs) following melatonin administration and identify potential safety signals associated with melatonin. Using VigiBase, a global individual case safety report (ICSRs) database managed by the World Health Organization (WHO), we conducted a retrospective, observational, pharmacovigilance study of melatonin between January 1996 and September 2022. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using two comparator settings: all other drugs and other sleep medications. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare the frequencies of AEs reporting between melatonin and each comparator setting. Furthermore, we assessed adverse events of special interests (AESIs) that could potentially be associated with melatonin. Signals were identified when the following criteria were met: cases ≥3, x2 ≥ 4, IC025 ≥ 0, and the lower end of the 95% CI of ROR > 2. These signals were then compared with the AE information on the drug labels provided by regulatory bodies. A total of 35 479 AE reports associated with melatonin were identified, with a higher proportion of reports from females (57.1%) and individuals aged 45-64 years (20.8%). We identified 21 AEs that were commonly detected as safety signals in the disproportionality analyses, including tic, educational problems, disturbance in social behavior, body temperature fluctuation, and growth retardation. In AESI analyses, accidents and injuries (adjusted ROR 2.97; 95% CI, 2.80-3.16), fall (2.24; 2.12-2.37), nightmare (4.90; 4.37-5.49), and abnormal dreams (3.68; 3.19-4.25) were detected as a signal of melatonin when compared to all other drugs, whereas those signals were not detected when compared to other sleep medications. In this pharmacovigilance study, exogenous melatonin showed safety profiles comparable to other sleep medications. However, several unexpected potential safety signals were identified, underscoring the need for further investigation at the population level.

Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Adolescents: Insights From Pharmacovigilance Study of VigiBase.

During coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, several COVID-19 vaccines were licensed with fast-track procedures. Although these vaccines have demonstrated high immunogenicity, there has been concerns on the serious adverse events (AEs) following COVID-19 vaccination among adolescents. We aimed to analyze comparative safety of COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents. In this pharmacovigilance study, we performed a disproportionality analysis using VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global individual case safety report (ICSR) database. To compare serious AEs reported following COVID-19 vaccines vs. all other vaccines in adolescents aged 12-17 years, ICSRs following any vaccines on adolescents aged 12-17 years were included, defining cases as reports with the AEs of interest, with all other AEs as non-cases. The AEs of interest were myocarditis/pericarditis, multisystem inflammatory syndrome/Kawasaki disease (MIS/KD), anaphylaxis, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). We conducted a disproportionality analysis to estimate reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for each AE of interest, adjusted for sex by using logistic regression. Of 99,735 AE reports after vaccination in adolescents, 80,018 reports were from COVID-19 vaccinated adolescents (52.9% females; 56.3% America). The AEs of interest were predominantly reported as serious AE (76.1%) with mRNA vaccines (99.4%). Generally, higher reporting odds for the AEs were identified following COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents; myocarditis/pericarditis (2,829 reports for the COVID-19 vaccine vs. 35 for all other vaccines, adjusted ROR [aROR], 19.61; 95% CI, 14.05-27.39), and MIS/KD (104 vs. 6, aROR, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.89-9.88). The reporting odds for anaphylaxis (515 vs. 165, aROR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.02), GBS (94 vs. 40, aROR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.92) and ITP (52 vs. 12, aROR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.59-2.09) were not significantly higher following COVID-19 vaccination. In this study, there were disproportionate reporting of immune-related AEs following COVID-19 vaccination. While awaiting definitive evidence, there is a need to closely monitor for any signs of immune-related AEs following COVID-19 vaccination among adolescents.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the spontaneous reporting and signal detection of adverse drug events

AbstractExternal factors severely affecting in a short period of time the spontaneous reporting of adverse events (AEs) can significantly impact drug safety signal detection. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) represented an enormous challenge for health systems, with over 767 million cases and massive vaccination campaigns involving over 70% of the worldwide population. This study investigates the potential masking effect on certain AEs caused by the substantial increase in reports solely related to COVID-19 vaccines within various spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs). Three SRSs were used to monitor AEs reporting before and during the pandemic, namely, the World Health Organisation (WHO) global individual case safety reports database (VigiBase®), the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER). Findings revealed a sudden over-reporting of 35 AEs (≥ 200%) during the pandemic, with an increment of the RRF value in 2021 of at least double the RRF reported in 2020. This translates into a substantial reduction in signals of disproportionate reporting (SDR) due to the massive inclusion of COVID-19 vaccine reports. To mitigate the masking effect of COVID-19 vaccines in post-marketing SRS analyses, we recommend utilizing COVID-19-corrected versions for a more accurate assessment.

Adverse reactions following MPox (monkeypox) vaccination: An overview from the Dutch and global adverse event reporting systems.

The spreading of MPox (monkeypox) virus led to a vaccination campaign in the Netherlands for individuals at high risk of infection. This overview elucidates the characteristics of the reported adverse events following immunization (AEFI) following active immunization against monkeypox and thereby provides insight on the safety profile in daily practice. Data were collected from the spontaneous reporting system of the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb. Furthermore, the global database of the World Health Organization was consulted on globally reported AEFI following smallpox or monkeypox immunization in 2022. Until 15 November 2022, 148 unique individual case safety reports (ICSRs) regarding monkeypox vaccination were received at Lareb. Two ICSRs reported a serious outcome (1.4%). A total of 2205 ICSRs were received in the global database in 2022, of which 131 reports (5.9%) concerned a serious reaction. Reported AEFI in both databases mainly included injection site reactions and general systemic reactions commonly observed after vaccination. The pattern of reported AEFI for monkeypox vaccines both in the Dutch and global ICSR database is generally in accordance with the manufacturer's product information and consists largely of injection site reactions and nonserious AEFI related to systemic reactogenicity.

Statins and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy: Variability in the risk

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a form of statin myopathy characterized by the presence of antibodies against 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (anti HMGCR). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the different statins and the risk of IMNM. A two-time approach was used. First, we performed a descriptive analysis of the French national pharmacovigilance database (FNPV) for the period from 1985 to december2020. To identify relevant cases, we used Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms (PTs) related to IMNM. We performed a quantitative and qualitative review of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) recorded in the french vigilance spontaneous reporting system. In a second time, we performed a comparative analysis with the World Health Organization global individual case safety reports database (Vigibase). The association between IMNM and statins exposure was assessed by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and its 95% confidence interval. After analysis, a total of 25 ICSRs were related to IMNM in the FNPV. The suspected statins were atorvastatin (n=21), simvastatin (n=2), pravastatin (n=1) and rosuvastatin (n=1). In Vigibase, 567 notifications were identified. A significant ROR value was found for atorvastatin, pitavastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin and rosuvastatin. Atorvastatin presents the highest risk of IMNM. Our data suggest that the occurrence of IMNM is a class effect.

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis due to medications used for inflammatory bowel disease: A VigiBase pharmacovigilance database study

BackgroundNearly all medications used for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been reported as causes of acute pancreatitis (AP), with the thiopurines being among the most frequently described. However, with the development of newer medications, thiopurine monotherapy has largely been replaced by newer immunosuppressive drugs. There are few data on the association between AP and biologic/small molecule agents. MethodsVigiBase, the World Health Organization's Global Individual Case Safety Report database, was used to assess the association between AP and common IBD medications. A case/non-case disproportionality analysis was performed and disproportionality signals were reported as a reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsA total of 4,223 AP episodes were identified for common IBD medications. Azathioprine (ROR 19.18, 95% CI 18.21–20.20), 6-mercaptopurine (ROR 13.30, 95% CI 11.73–15.07), and 5-aminosalicylic acid (ROR 17.44, 95% CI 16.24–18.72) all had strong associations with AP, while the biologic/small molecule agents showed weaker or no disproportionality. The association with AP was much higher for thiopurines when used for Crohn's disease (ROR 34.61, 95% CI 30.95–38.70) compared to ulcerative colitis (ROR 8.94, 95% CI 7.47–10.71) or rheumatologic conditions (ROR 18.87, 95% CI 14.72–24.19). ConclusionsWe report the largest real-world database study investigating the association between common IBD medications and AP. Among commonly used IBD medications including biologic/small molecule agents, only thiopurines and 5-aminosalicylic acid are strongly associated with AP. The association between thiopurines and AP is much stronger when the drug is used for Crohn's disease compared to ulcerative colitis and rheumatologic conditions.

Antipsychotics and risk of QT prolongation: a pharmacovigilance study.

While meta-analyses of clinical trials found that lurasidone and partial dopamine agonists (brexpiprazole and aripiprazole) were the antipsychotics less likely to cause QTc prolongation, and sertindole, amisulpride, and ziprasidone were the most frequently associated with this adverse drug reaction; no real-world studies have investigated this risk between the different antipsychotics. Using data recorded from 1967 to 2019 in VigiBase®, the World Health Organization's Global Individual Case Safety Reports database, we performed disproportionality analysis to investigate the risk of reporting QT prolongation between 20 antipsychotics. Sertindole had the highest risk of reporting QT prolongation, followed by ziprasidone and amisulpride. Lurasidone was associated with the lowest risk. First-generation antipsychotics were associated with a greater QT prolongation reporting risk (ROR, 1.21; 95%CI, 1.10-1.33) than second-generation antipsychotics. A positive correlation was found between the risk of reporting QT prolongation and affinity for hERG channel (R2 = 0.14, slope = Pearson coefficient = 0.41, p value = 0.1945). This large study in a real-world setting suggests that sertindole and ziprasidone were the antipsychotics drugs associated with the highest risk of QT prolongation reporting. Our results suggest that lurasidone is less associated with QT interval prolongation reports. Our study also suggests that antipsychotics with the higher hERG affinity are more associated with to QT prolongations reports.

Increased reporting of venous and arterial thromboembolic events reported with tixagevimab–cilgavimab for coronavirus disease 2019

ObjectivesAs two phase three clinical trials indicated a disproportion in the number of thromboembolic events in the tixagevimab/cilgavimab group than in the placebo group, there has been a cardiovascular safety concern with the use of anti–SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody (mAb). Whether tixagevimab/cilgavimab use in real life increases the risk of thromboembolic events is unclear. MethodsWe used VigiBase, WHO's individual case safety reports database, to assess the risk of reporting arterial or venous thromboembolic events in patients with COVID-19 (aged ≥12 years) exposed to tixagevimab/cilgavimab compared with patients with COVID-19 exposed to other anti–SARS-CoV-2 mAbs, including casirivimab/imdevimab, bamlanivimab/etesevimab and sotrovimab. ResultsAmong the 8952 reports of patients with an anti–SARS-CoV-2 mAb, 31 reports of thromboembolic events were associated with tixagevimab/cilgavimab, mainly deep vein thrombosis (10), pulmonary embolism (8) and myocardial infarction (7). Compared with other anti–SARS-CoV-2 mAbs, the use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab was associated with an increased risk of reporting arterial thromboembolic events (reporting OR 3.25; 95% CI 1.73, 6.10). Concerning venous thromboembolic events, a significant increase in the risk of reporting was observed with the use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (reporting OR 3.59; 95% CI 2.16, 5.96). DiscussionThis observational study corroborates in a real-world setting in which the cardiovascular safety signal has already been found for tixagevimab/cilgavimab in two clinical trials. Owing to these thromboembolic safety concerns and considering the lack of clinical trials supporting protection against the omicron variant, there is an urgent need to improve knowledge on the effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab with new COVID-19 variants.

The opioid epidemic: A worldwide exploratory study using the WHO pharmacovigilance database.

The current opioid epidemic in the United States began 20 years ago and has become the leading cause of accidental deaths in the country. This crisis prompted us to explore trends in opioid abuse and dependence worldwide. We sought to identify other countries at high-risk of opioid use disorders, using the World Health Organization's (WHO) pharmacovigilance database. We performed a disproportionality analysis using VigiBase, the WHO Global Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) database. Five opioids used worldwide were included: oxycodone, fentanyl, morphine, tramadol, and codeine. We extracted all ICSRs associated with the drugs of interest, considered as suspect medication and recorded up until 5 June 2021, using the narrow Standardised MedDRA Query (SMQ) for drug abuse and dependence. Countries with at least one ICSR for each of the five opioids were retained. The relationship between the use of a drug (i.e. an opioid) and the occurrence of an adverse drug reaction (i.e. drug abuse and dependence) for each country was assessed by calculating the information component (IC) and its 99.9% CI [IC0005 ; IC9995 ], using a quasi-Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). A hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward's method) of the IC0005 value for each of the five opioids was performed to identify subgroups of countries with similar reported risks of opioid abuse and dependence. Among 21 countries, the optimal number of clusters was calculated to be four, each with a Jaccard index >0.5 (0.95, 0.78, 0.65 and 0.75, respectively). Six countries with the highest signals of drug abuse and dependence were identified in cluster 1, with significant CIs for the five opioids of interest (IC0005 > 0), ranging from 0.9 to 5.8 for the lower endpoint. There appear to be four distinct clusters of countries with similar opioid abuse and dependence profiles. The group with the highest reported risk for the opioids oxycodone, fentanyl, morphine, tramadol and codeine includes Australia, Canada, France, Germans, the United Kingdom and the United States.

OP0268 COMPARISON OF MAJOR CARDIOVASCULAR AND THROMBOEMBOLIC EVENTS IN SAFETY REPORTS BETWEEN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH JAK INHIBITORS VERSUS ANTI-TNF: RESULTS FROM VigiBase

BackgroundRecently, awareness has raised regarding JAK inhibitor safety in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in particular with tofacitinib. Indeed, in a trial involving more than 4,000 patients (ORAL Surveillance), a numerically higher number of major cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients treated with tofacitinib compared to anti-TNF (1), and a higher risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in patients treated with tofacitinib 10mg twice a day compared to patients treated with tofacitinib 5mg twice a day or anti-TNF was observed. This increased risk of MACEs was also suspected in another study performed on American Health databases (2). Recently, the FDA extended warnings and use’s recommendations to other JAK-inhibitor drugs (3).ObjectivesTo corroborate these safety warnings, we compared the reporting MACEs and VTEs with JAK inhibitors versus anti-TNF alpha drugs from the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) database (VigiBase).MethodsWe selected reports in Vigibase of patients aged between 18 and 75 years, between 01/01/2011 and 12/31/2020, with JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib) or anti-TNF (etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab) with a diagnosis of RA. In these reports we selected MACEs including myocardial infarction, strokes and cardiovascular deaths and VTE including deep venous thromboses (DVT) and pulmonary embolisms (PE). Characteristics of reports including age of patients, country of declaration, drug involved, co-reported drugs, and type of event were described. The reporting risk was investigated using disproportionality analyses and expressed as Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) with 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI). A sensibility analysis was performed stratifying by age category (≥ 65 years, ≥ 50 years), and by sex.ResultsOf the 11,455,891 reports in patients aged between 18 and 75 years in the period of interest, 39,097 of reports were for a JAK-inhibitor in RA (mean age 60.6 years, SD:16.3) and 231,860 of reports were for an anti-TNF in RA (mean age: 57.2 years, SD: 13.0). Most of the reports came from USA and Canada (respectively 77.4% and 12.5% for JAK-inhibitor and 86.4% and 2,6% for anti-TNF). Among the reports, 611 (1.6%) in JAK-inhibitor treated patients and 3240 (1.4%) in anti-TNF treated patients were MACEs while 341 (0.9%) in JAK-inhibitors and 571 (0.2%) in anti-TNF treated patients were VTE. Disproportionality analyses identified an increased risk of reporting VTE events in JAK-inhibitors compared to anti-TNF (DVT: ROR = 3.99 [95%CI: 3.15-5.04], PE: ROR = 3.47 [2.90-4.13], Figure 1). This risk was not modified after stratification by age or sex. No increased ROR for MACE was found.Figure 1.ConclusionBased on real-world data, the analysis did not identify an increase of declaration of MACEs with JAK-inhibitor compared to anti-TNF whereas we could observe more than three times declarations of VTE in Vigibase with JAK-inhibitors compared to anti-TNF.

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy with pembrolizumab: a specific neuromuscular entity.

Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the programmed cell-death protein-1 (PD-1) on immune T-cells, thus blocking PD-1 activity. Pembrolizumab is indicated for the treatment of advanced melanoma, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, it is associated with immune-related adverse events. We investigated the association between pembrolizumab and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). We analyzed reports in the World Health Organization's global individual case safety report database, Vigibase, up to January 2020 with the MedDRA lower level term "IMNM." The association between exposure to pembrolizumab and occurrence of the adverse event was estimated by disproportionality analysis. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We analyzed the criteria of diagnosis of the adverse reaction. Five-hundred sixty-seven notifications were identified as IMNM of which 14 with pembrolizumab. The ROR was 17.59 (95% CI: 9.4-32.9). The diagnosis of IMNM does not always take into account recent criteria for the diagnosis of this pathology. This study highlights the existence of a signal, as well as the need for collaboration between oncologists and neurologists for these neurological pathologies.

Cardiovascular events and safety outcomes associated with remdesivir using a World Health Organization international pharmacovigilance database.

On October 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved remdesivir as the first drug for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), increasing remdesivir prescriptions worldwide. However, potential cardiovascular (CV) toxicities associated with remdesivir remain unknown. We aimed to characterize the CV adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with remdesivir using VigiBase, an individual case safety report database of the World Health Organization (WHO). Disproportionality analyses of CV‐ADRs associated with remdesivir were performed using reported odds ratios and information components. We conducted in vitro experiments using cardiomyocytes derived from human pluripotent stem cell cardiomyocytes (hPSC‐CMs) to confirm cardiotoxicity of remdesivir. To distinguish drug‐induced CV‐ADRs from COVID‐19 effects, we restricted analyses to patients with COVID‐19 and found that, after adjusting for multiple confounders, cardiac arrest (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–3.29), bradycardia (aOR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.24–3.53), and hypotension (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.03–2.73) were associated with remdesivir. In vitro data demonstrated that remdesivir reduced the cell viability of hPSC‐CMs in time‐ and dose‐dependent manners. Physicians should be aware of potential CV consequences following remdesivir use and implement adequate CV monitoring to maintain a tolerable safety margin.

Comparative effects of 15 antidepressants on the risk of withdrawal syndrome: A real-world study using the WHO pharmacovigilance database

BackgroundWhile case reports and clinical trials reported withdrawal syndrome after reduction and/or discontinuation of antidepressant drugs, no large study has been conducted to compare the risk between the different antidepressants. MethodsUsing data recorded from January 1st, 1988, and December 31st, 2020 in VigiBase®, the World Health Organization's Global Individual Case Safety Reports database, we performed disproportionality analysis to investigate the risk of reporting withdrawal syndrome in patients treated by short half-life antidepressants compared with patients treated by long half-life antidepressants. In addition, we aimed to better inform clinical practice by comparing 15 antidepressants for the risk of reporting withdrawal syndrome. ResultsAmong the 338,498 reports with antidepressants of interest, we found 15,507 cases of withdrawal syndrome. Short half-lives antidepressants were associated with an increased risk of reporting a withdrawal syndrome compared to long half-life antidepressants (ROR 5.38; 95% CI 5.16–5.61). The risk was higher for 18–44 years old (ROR 6.88; 95% CI 6.17–7.62), women (ROR 1.38; 95% CI 1.33–1.43) and patients treated with Paroxetine, Desvenlafaxine, Venlafaxine and Duloxetine. LimitationsThe limitations of this study stem from the case-reporting process. ConclusionsThis large observational study in a real-world setting suggests that the use of short half-life antidepressants increases the risk of reporting withdrawal syndrome compared to long half-life antidepressants. Among the most common antidepressants, paroxetine and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors are associated with a greater risk of reporting withdrawal syndrome, while agomelatine and vortioxetine present a lower risk. Additional studies are needed to corroborate our results.

Diarrhoea with the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril + valsartan: A pharmacovigilance study.

Diarrhoea is an adverse drug reaction of the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril + valsartan. It was also described with olmesartan and more recently with other angiotensin receptor blockers. The study was performed to compare diarrhoea reports in pharmacovigilance databases with sacubitril + valsartan and valsartan. The study used reports of diarrhoea with the ARNI sacubitril + valsartan registered: first in the French PharmacoVigilance Database (FPVD) and second in Vigibase®, the WHO Global Individual Case Safety Report database. After description of the main characteristics, disproportionality analyses were performed. Results are reported as reporting odds ratios (ROR) with 95% confidence interval. We found 29 reports of diarrhoea with sacubitril + valsartan in the FPVD and 686 in Vigibase®. With sacubitril + valsartan, diarrhoea occurred more frequently in males around 70 years with a median delay of 3 days. With valsartan, diarrhoea occurred more frequently in females around 68 years with a median delay of 0.5days. In the FPVD, a significant association was found with sacubitril + valsartan in comparison with valsartan alone before (ROR = 8.78 [5.19-14.85]) and after (ROR = 11.19 [5.89-21.25]) exclusion of concomitant drugs known to be associated with diarrhoea. A significant association was also found in Vigibase® after adjustment on age, sex, reporter and its location (ROR = 1.31 [1.14-1.50]). Diarrhoea reported with sacubitril + valsartan has marked differences in gender, delay of occurrence and frequency of reporting in comparison with diarrhoea with valsartan. From a pharmacodynamic point of view, these results suggest a specific role of sacubitril in diarrhoea.

β-adrenoceptor antagonists and nightmares: A pharmacoepidemiological-pharmacodynamic study.

To compare different β-adrenoceptor antagonists for the risk of reporting nightmare. The study involved two approaches: first, we investigated in VigiBase®, the World Health Organization Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) database, the disproportionality between exposure to each β-adrenoceptor antagonists and reports of nightmares between 1967 and 2019. Second, in a pharmacoepidemiological-pharmacodynamic analysis, we assessed whether use of β-adrenoceptor antagonists with moderate and high lipid solubility or strong 5-HT1A affinity were associated with an increased risk of reporting nightmares. We conducted multivariate logistic regression to estimate reporting odds ratios (RORs) of nightmares compared to all other adverse drug reactions. Of the 126,964 reports recorded with β-adrenoceptor antagonists, 1138 (0.9%) were nightmares. The highest risk of reporting a nightmare was found with exposure of pindolol (adjusted ROR 2.82, 95%CI, 2.19-3.61), metoprolol (1.89, 1.66-2.16), and alprenolol (1.77, 1.06-2.97). Compared to use of low lipid solubility β-adrenoceptor antagonists, use of moderate or high lipid solubility β-adrenoceptor antagonists were significantly more associated with nightmare reports (aROR moderate vs. low 1.72, 95%CI 1.47-2.00 and aROR high vs. low 1.84, 95%CI 1.53-2.22). Use of moderate or high 5-HT1A affinity of β-adrenoceptor antagonists was associated with an increased ROR of nightmares compared with low 5-HT1A affinity of β-adrenoceptor antagonists (aROR moderate vs. low 1.22, 95%CI 1.04-1.43 and aROR high vs. low 2.46, 95%CI 1.93-3.13). In our large pharmacovigilance study, nightmares are more frequently reported for pindolol and metoprolol, and among β-adrenoceptor antagonists with high lipid solubility and high 5-HT1A receptor affinity.

Serious adverse reactions associated with ivermectin: A systematic pharmacovigilance study in sub-Saharan Africa and in the rest of the World.

Ivermectin is known to cause severe encephalopathies in subjects infected with loiasis, an endemic parasite in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In addition, case reports have described ivermectin-related serious adverse drug reactions (sADRs) such as toxidermias, hepatic and renal disorders. The aim of this study was to identify suspected sADRs reported after ivermectin administration in VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global individual case safety reports database and analyze their frequency relative to the frequency of these events after other antinematodal drugs reported in SSA and other areas of the world (ROW). All antinematodal-related sADRs were extracted from VigiBase. Disproportionality analyses were conducted to investigate nervous, cutaneous, psychiatric, respiratory, renal, hepatic and cardiac suspected sADRs reported after ivermectin and benzimidazole drug administration across the world, in SSA and RoW. 2041 post-ivermectin or post-benzimidazole suspected sADRs were identified including 667 after ivermectin exposure (208 in SSA and 459 in the RoW). We found an increased reporting for toxidermias, encephalopathies, confusional disorders after ivermectin compared to benzimidazole drug administration. Encephalopathies were not only reported from SSA but also from the RoW (adjusted reporting odds ratios [aROR] 6.30, 95% confidence interval: 2.68-14.8), highlighting the fact these types of sADR occur outside loiasis endemic regions. We described for the first time suspected sADRs associated with ivermectin exposure according to geographical origin. While our results do not put in question ivermectin's excellent safety profile, they show that as for all drugs, appropriate pharmacovigilance for adverse reactions is indicated.

The Use of Subgroup Disproportionality Analyses to Explore the Sensitivity of a Global Database of Individual Case Safety Reports to Known Pharmacogenomic Risk Variants Common in Japan.

IntroductionGenetic variations of enzymes that affect the pharmacokinetics and hence effects of medications differ between ethnicities, resulting in variation in the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADR) between different populations. Previous work has demonstrated that risk-group considerations can be incorporated into approaches of statistical signal detection. It is unknown whether databases of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) are sensitive to pharmacogenomic differences between populations.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the sensitivity of a global database of ICSRs to known pharmacogenomic risk variants common in Japan.MethodsThe data source was VigiBase, the global database of ICSRs, including all reports entered in the version frozen on 5 January 2020. Subgroup disproportionality analysis was used to compare ICSRs of two subgroups, Japan and rest of world (RoW). Reports for UGT1A1-metabolized irinotecan and the CYP2C19-metabolized drugs voriconazole, escitalopram and clopidogrel were selected for comparison between the subgroups based upon known genetic polymorphisms with high prevalence in Japan. Contrast between the subgroups was quantified by IC delta ({mathrm{IC}}_{Delta }), a robust shrinkage observed-to-expected (OE) ratio on a log scale. Harmonic mean p values (HMP) were calculated for each drug to evaluate whether a list of pre-specified ADRs were collectively significantly over- (or under-)reported as hypothesized. Daily drug dosages were calculated for ICSRs with sufficient information, and dose distributions were compared between Japan and RoW and related to differences in regionally approved doses.ResultsThe predictions of over-reporting patterns for specific ADRs were observed and confirmed in bootstrap HMP analyses (p = 0.004 for irinotecan and p < 0.001 for each of voriconazole, escitalopram and clopidogrel) and compared with similar drugs with different metabolic pathways. The impact of proactive regulatory action, such as recommended dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), was also observable within the global database. For irinotecan and escitalopram, there was evidence of use of lower dosages as recommended in the Japanese labels; for voriconazole, there was evidence of use of TDM with an over-reporting of terms related to drug level measurements and an under-reporting of liver toxicity.ConclusionsPharmaco-ethnic vulnerabilities caused by pharmacogenomic differences between populations may contribute to differences in ADR reporting between countries in a global database of ICSRs. Regional analyses within a global database can inform on the effectiveness of local risk minimization measures and should be leveraged to catalyse the conversion of real-world usage into safer use of drugs in ethnically tailored ways.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40264-021-01063-1.

Serious bradycardia and remdesivir for coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19): a new safety concerns

ObjectivesIn recent clinical trials some cardiac arrhythmias were reported with use of remdesivir for COVID-19. To address this safety concern, we investigated whether use of remdesivir for COVID-19 is associated with an increased risk of bradycardia. MethodsUsing VigiBase®, the World Health Organization Global Individual Case Safety Reports database, we compared the cases of bradycardia reported in COVID-19 patients exposed to remdesivir with those reported in COVID-19 patients exposed to hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, tocilizumab or glucocorticoids. All reports of patients with COVID-19 registered up to the 23 September 2020 were included. We conducted disproportionality analyses allowing the estimation of reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% CI. ResultsWe found 302 cardiac effects including 94 bradycardia (31%) among the 2603 reports with remdesivir prescribed in COVID-19 patients. Most of the 94 reports were serious (75, 80%), and in 16 reports (17%) evolution was fatal. Compared with hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, tocilizumab or glucocorticoids, the use of remdesivir was associated with an increased risk of reporting bradycardia (ROR 1.65; 95% CI 1.23–2.22). Consistent results were observed in other sensitivity analyses. DiscussionThis post-marketing study in a real-world setting suggests that the use of remdesivir is significantly associated with an increased risk of reporting bradycardia and serious bradycardia when compared with the use of with hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, tocilizumab or glucocorticoids. This result is in line with the pharmacodynamic properties of remdesivir.

Delayed thrombocytopenia following administration of abciximab: Pharmacovigilance survey and literature review

Abciximab (ABX) is used for acute coronary syndrome and unstable angina. Thrombocytopenia is a frequent adverse effect described as occurring in the first 24hours. The aim of this study was to evaluate, in a context of pharmacovigilance survey, the occurrence of delayed thrombocytopenia following ABX infusion in pharmacovigilance database reports and in the literature. Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) of delayed thrombocytopenia-between 3 and 30 days - with ABX presented as a single suspect were selected in VigiBase®, the WHO global database of ICSRs. The French cases were then extracted from the French national pharmacovigilance database. In addition, a literature review of published cases was performed using PubMed. Among the 84 ICSRs selected from VigiBase®, 43 were also reported in the FPVD. Mean age was 60.1±12.3 years with a majority of male patients (77.4%). The average time to onset (TTO) was 8.9±5.2 days. Thrombocytopenia regressed in 5.1±2.7 days. Haemorrhagic complications were reported in 15% of ICSRs. In the French cases, the median nadir of platelet count was 28×109/L (range 1-110) with a majority of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (39.5%). The literature review identified 42 cases and provided additional information on administered therapies, which include platelet units, corticosteroids, and IV immunoglobulins. GPIIb/IIIa-ABX complex antibodies were described in 26 published cases. Delayed thrombocytopenia, probably due to immune reaction, is a possible life-threatening adverse effect of ABX with a mean TTO of 9 days, supporting the recommendation of a platelet count monitoring during at least two weeks. This recommendation was added to the abcximab SmPC in 2019.

Atrial fibrillation in patients treated with intravenous zoledronic or pamidronic acid: a pharmacoepidemiological study

Atrial fibrillation (AF) may be triggered by intravenous bisphosphonates (IVBPs) such as zoledronic acid or pamidronic acid. Our objective was to confirm the association between AF and IVBPs in a real-life large pharmacovigilance database. A systematic analysis of VigiBase, the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database. Analysis of adverse events reported as 'atrial fibrillation' (according to the Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Activities) associated with the use of zoledronic acid or pamidronic acid, in VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR) database. All ICSRs reporting AF associated with zoledronic acid or pamidronic acid were included in a disproportionality analysis determining the lower end of the 95% credibility interval for the information component (IC025), showing a statistical association when >0. 530 ICSRs reporting on the association between AF and IVBPs were extracted. Bayesian disproportionality analysis detected a significant association between AF and use of zoledronic acid (IC025 = 1.83) and pamidronic acid (IC025 = 2.16). Further analysis of these ICSRs determined that AF was severe in 85.0% of cases and with a mortality of 17.7%. The risk of severe AF was increased (OR: 2.98 (95% CI: 1.17-7.57), P = 0.02) following zoledronic acid vs pamidronic acid, after adjustment for age and gender. This is the first VigiBase pharmacoepidemiological study confirming the association between IVBPs and AF. Most AF were severe, with a high frequency of lethal outcome. The risk of severe AF was increased following zoledronic acid use compared to pamidronic acid, advocating for a cautious use of IVBPs.