A laboratory study was designed and executed to evaluate the performance of Warm Mix Asphalt prepared using foamed asphalt binders (WMA-FA) and compare it to traditional Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA). Two aggregates (crushed limestone and natural gravel) and two asphalt binders (neat PG 64-22 and polymer modified PG 70-22M) were used in this study. The Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS), Dynamic Modulus (E*), Modified Lottman (AASHTO T 283), and Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA) tests were utilized to evaluate the laboratory performance of the considered mixtures. The test results showed lower ITS values for the WMA-FA mixtures than for the HMA mixtures. No significant difference in dynamic modulus was found between the WMA-FA and HMA mixtures. The WMA-FA mixtures were slightly more susceptible to moisture-induced damage than the HMA mixtures. However, both mixtures met the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) minimum Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR) requirement of 0.7 for medium traffic. The WMA-FA mixtures were more prone to rutting than the HMA mixtures. However, the results suggested that using an appropriate type of aggregate and asphalt binder can address any adverse effects from using the foaming technology.
Read full abstract