Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay,Kowloon, Hong KongABSTRACT: According to the literature statistics, only less than 10% of reported iterative learning control (ILC) methods havebeendevotedtotheindirectapproach.Motivatedbythefullpotentialofresearchopportunitiesinthisfield,anumberofstudiesonindirectILCwereproposedrecently,whereILC-basedP-typecontrolandlearning-typemodelpredictivecontrol(L-MPC)aretwosuccessfulstories.AllindirectILCalgorithmsconsistoftwoloops:anILCintheouterloopandalocalcontrollerintheinnerloop.Thelocalcontrollersare,respectively,aP-typecontrollerintheILC-basedP-typecontrolandamodelpredictivecontrol(MPC)inthe L-MPC. Logically, this leads to the question of what type of ILC should be chosen respectively for the two above-mentionedindirectILCmethods.Inthisstudy,P-typeILCandanticipatoryP-type(A-P-type)ILCarestudiedandcompared,becausetheyaretypical and widely implemented. Based on mathematical analysis and simulation test, it has been proved that the A-P-type ILCshouldbeusedintheILC-basedP-typecontrolandwhiletheP-typeILCshouldbeusedintheL-MPC.Furthermore,animprovedL-MPC with batch-varying learning gain was proposed to handle the trade-off between convergence rate and robustnessperformance. The simulation results on injection molding process and a nonlinear batch process validated the feasibility andeffectiveness of the proposed algorithm.1. INTRODUCTIONIntelligentmachinesincludingindustrialcomputerscanbeledfrom repeated trainingto reach superiorperformance of a speci-fied task. Scholars and engineers have therefore developediterative learning control (ILC) methods to formulate the learn-ingproceduresystematically.ILCwasfirstpresentedinJapanesein 1978