Indirect Comparison Research Articles

Therapeutic Effect of Stem Cells from Different Sources on Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

To evaluate the efficacy of stem cell therapy from different sources on the ankle-brachial index, wound closure percentage, and wound closure time in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library's Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science, extending through June 29, 2023. Quality evaluation was done using the Cochrane's bias risk assessment tool (RoB 2.0). Employing a Bayesian approach, the statistical computations was executed with the JAGS software, leveraging the gemtc 0.8-2 and rjags 4-10 libraries, within the R environment 4.1.2. The included interventions came from peripheral blood, bone marrow, placenta, umbilical cord blood, adipose tissue, or others. A preliminary search identified 2286 articles, of which 23 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were ultimately included. The analysis findings indicated that mesenchymal stem cells derived from the umbilical cord (HUCMSCs) led to a notable enhanced the ankle-brachial index in patients with DFUs compared to standard treatment (MD: 0.2; 95% CI [0.01, 0.36]). HUCMSCs were found to be the optimal therapeutic approach for enhancing the ankle-brachial index (SUCRA = 82.7%). Research on the wound closure percentage revealed that compared to platelet-rich plasma (PRP), processed microvascular tissue (PMVT), peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs), microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT), autologous bone marrow-derived stem cell therapy (ABMSCT), adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), and dehydrated human umbilical cord allograft (EpiCord), Huoxue Shengji Decoction (HXSJD) + ABMSCT (H_Group_hematopoietic) significantly increased the wound closure percentage in DFU patients (P < 0.05). According to the SUCRA ranking, HXSJD + ABMSCT was the best therapeutic method to increase the percentage of wound closure (SUCRA = 93.8%). This study employed a network meta-analysis method, combining direct and indirect comparisons, to analyze the latest clinical data and concluded that umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells and the combination of HXSJD + autologous bone marrow hematopoietic stem cell treatment as adjunctive therapies for DFUs may have beneficial effects. Future research needs to focus on this.

Optimal approach to ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum blocks for postoperative analgesia in elective caesarean section: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionUltrasound-guided quadratus lumborum blocks are commonly used for postoperative analgesia during caesarean section. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum blocks can be performed through four approaches, including lateral, posterior, anterior, and intramuscular quadratus...

Analysis of Nonconcurrent Controls in Adaptive Platform Trials: Separating Randomized and Nonrandomized Information.

Adaptive platform trials allow treatments to be added or dropped during the study, meaning that the control arm may be active for longer than the experimental arms. This leads to nonconcurrent controls, which provide nonrandomized information that may increase efficiency but may introduce bias from temporal confounding and other factors. Various methods have been proposed to control confounding from nonconcurrent controls, based on adjusting for time period. We demonstrate that time adjustment is insufficient to prevent bias in some circumstances where nonconcurrent controls are present in adaptive platform trials, and we propose a more general analytical framework that accounts for nonconcurrent controls in such circumstances. We begin by defining nonconcurrent controls using the concept of a concurrently randomized cohort, which is a subgroup of participants all subject to the same randomized design. We then use cohort adjustment rather than time adjustment. Due to flexibilities in platform trials, more than one randomized design may be in force at any time, meaning that cohort-adjusted and time-adjusted analyses may be quite different. Using simulation studies, we demonstrate that time-adjusted analyses may be biased while cohort-adjusted analyses remove this bias. We also demonstrate that the cohort-adjusted analysis may be interpreted as a synthesis of randomized and indirect comparisons analogous to mixed treatment comparisons in network meta-analysis. This allows the use of network meta-analysis methodology to separate the randomized and nonrandomized components and to assess their consistency. Whenever nonconcurrent controls are used in platform trials, the separate randomized and indirect contributions to the treatment effect should bepresented.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of acalabrutinib in treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory form of mantle cell lymphoma who previously received at least one line of therapy

Objective: to conduct a clinical and economic study of acalabrutinib for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory form of mantle cell lymphoma who previously received at least one line of therapy in the Russian Federation.Material and methods. Acalabrutinib and ibrutinib were considered as compared treatment options. Based on the adjusted indirect comparison, they were found to be comparable in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival. Therefore, a cost minimization analysis method was selected for the study. Based on results of ACE-LY-004 clinical trial a distributed survival model was developed. The model was used to calculate drug costs over a 3-year horizon. To explore uncertainty in the results of economic evaluations we conducted a sensitivity analysis. A number of patients in the hypothetical cohort who could be further treated with a less expensive drug was determined during a missed opportunity analysis. Both mean life years gained and mean progression-free life years were calculated too.Results. Based on simulations over a 3-year horizon, the mean life years gained were 2.45, and the mean progression-free life years were 1.75. The average costs of acalabrutinib therapy both over 1 year and in total over 3 years were 36.6% lower compared to ibrutinib. So, in the 1st year, the costs for acalabrutinib were 3,546,237,60 rubles, for ibrutinib – 5,591,391,00 rubles (a difference of 2,045,153,40 rubles). Using acalabrutinib for 3 years was associated with costs of 7,252,980,60 rubles compared to 11,435,852,60 rubles for ibrutinib (a decrease of 4,182,872,00 rubles). Univariate multi-way sensitivity analysis showed the robustness of modeling results to price fluctuations in the range ±10%. For a hypothetical cohort of 100 patients, using acalabrutinib instead of the more expensive ibrutinib within the same budget will provide therapy to additional 57 patients per year.Conclusion. The results of the study demonstrated that acalabrutinib compared to ibrutinib for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/ refractory form of mantle cell lymphoma can reduce costs for the 1st year of therapy by 2,045,153,40 rubles (36.6%), and by 4,182,872,00 rubles (36.6%) for 3 years. Thus, acalabrutinib is the cost-saving option for previously treated adult patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma in the Russian Federation.

Sequential Peg-IFN after bepirovirsen may reduce post-treatment relapse in chronic hepatitis B

Bepirovirsen, an antisense oligonucleotide, induces sustained reductions in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV DNA to below the lower limit of quantification (<LLOQ) in a subset of patients. The B-Together study investigated if sequential bepirovirsen and pegylated interferon-α-2a (Peg-IFN) therapy can reduce relapse rates and improve response rates. In this phase IIb, multicentre, open-label trial, participants on stable nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy were randomised 1:1 to bepirovirsen 300mg once weekly (plus loading dose on Days 4 and 11) for 24 (Arm 1) or 12 (Arm 2) weeks followed by Peg-IFN 180μg once weekly for up to 24 weeks, with up to 36 weeks follow-up. Participants continued NA therapy throughout. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with HBsAg <0.05 IU/ml and HBV DNA <LLOQ for 24 weeks after planned end of Peg-IFN treatment, in the absence of newly initiated antiviral therapy. The intent-to-treat population included 108 participants (Arm 1, n= 55; Arm 2, n= 53). The primary outcome was achieved by 5 (9%) participants in Arm 1 and 8 (15%) in Arm 2. All responders had baseline HBsAg ≤3,000 IU/ml. Indirect comparison with the phase IIb study B-Clear indicates that sequential addition of Peg-IFN may reduce the relapse rates previously observed with bepirovirsen alone. The proportions of participants with adverse events and treatment-related adverse events in both treatment windows were similar between treatment arms. Sequential therapy with bepirovirsen followed by Peg-IFN is tolerable and effective in participants with chronic HBV infection on stable NA therapy. This proof-of-concept trial demonstrates a potential strategy to extend responses to bepirovirsen by reducing relapse. This phase IIb study investigated whether sequential therapy with bepirovirsenfollowed by Peg-IFN could improve off-treatment response rates to bepirovirsen alone by converting partial bepirovirsen responders to full responders and/or reducing relapse rates in participants with chronic HBV. These data show that sequential therapy with bepirovirsen followed by Peg-IFN is tolerable and effective; in patients with a bepirovirsen response, sequential treatment with Peg-IFN may help to reduce off-treatment relapses in participants on stable NA. Participants had a similar response during bepirovirsen treatment as seen in B-Clear, with increased response rates in participants with lower baseline HBsAg; all responders to the sequential regimen had baseline HBsAg <3000 IU/mL. As the first study of antisense oligonucleotide-mediated RNA silencing followed by interferon immunomodulation in patients with chronic HBV infection, this study is an important proof-of-concept for sequential therapy, shedding light on the therapeutic potential of utilising immunomodulators following suppression of HBV antigens. NCT04676724.

Efficacy and safety of first-line regimens for advanced HER2-positive breast cancer: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

The current standard of care for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel as first-line therapy. However, with the development of newer treatment regimens, there is a lack of evidence regarding which is the optimal treatment strategy. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line regimens for advanced HER2-positive breast cancer by indirect comparisons. A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis were conducted. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles published through to December 2023. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% credible interval (CrI) were used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) between treatments, and the odds ratio and 95% CrI were used to compare the objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Twenty randomized clinical trials that included 15 regimens and 7094 patients were analyzed. Compared with the traditional trastuzumab and docetaxel regimen, PFS was longer on the pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen (HR: 0.41, 95% CrI: 0.22-0.75) and the pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen (HR: 0.65, 95% CrI: 0.43-0.98). Consistent with the results for PFS, the ORR was better on the pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen and the pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen than on the traditional trastuzumab and docetaxel regimen. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve indicated that the pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen was most likely to rank first in achieving the best PFS and ORR. Comparable results were found for grade ≥3 AE rates of ≥10%. Our results suggest that the pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus docetaxel regimen is most likely to be the optimal first-line therapy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Talquetamab Versus Real-World Physician's Choice Treatment: Comparative Effectiveness in Patients With Triple-Class Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BackgroundTalquetamab, a first-in-class GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, is approved for treatment of triple-class exposed (TCE) patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on MonumenTAL-1 results. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of talquetamab in MonumenTAL-1 versus real-world physician's choice (RW) treatment. Materials and MethodsAn external control arm for MonumenTAL-1 was created from eligible patients in the Flatiron Health database who satisfied key MonumenTAL-1 eligibility criteria (n = 629 with 1169 eligible lines of therapy). Patient-level data from MonumenTAL-1 were included for patients who received subcutaneous talquetamab 0.4 mg/kg QW (n = 143) and 0.8 mg/kg Q2W (n = 145). After adjusting for baseline covariate imbalances, comparative effectiveness was assessed for progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS). ResultsBaseline covariates were comparable across cohorts after adjustment. Talquetamab 0.4 mg/kg QW and 0.8 mg/kg Q2W cohorts, respectively, showed significant improvement in PFS (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.44-0.69; P<0.0001; median, 7.5 vs. 4.0 months] and 0.40 [95% CI, 0.31-0.53; P<0.0001; median, 14.2 vs. 4.0 months]), TTNT (HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.47-0.74; P<0.0001; median, 9.1 vs. 5.1 months] and 0.45 [95% CI, 0.35-0.59; P<0.0001; median, 13.3 vs. 5.1 months]), and OS (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.40-0.78; P=0.0007; median, NR vs. 16.5 months] and 0.48 [95% CI, 0.33-0.70; P=0.0002; median NR vs. 15.9 months]) versus RW treatment. ConclusionBoth talquetamab schedules demonstrated superior effectiveness over RW treatment for all outcomes assessed. These data suggest talquetamab as an effective novel immunotherapy option in patients with TCE RRMM. MicroabstractTalquetamab has been evaluated in the single-arm MonumenTAL-1 trial in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Effectiveness of talquetamab was assessed against outcomes of real-world treatments using indirect treatment comparison methodology. Talquetamab led to better outcomes compared to standard treatments, suggesting that novel immunotherapies such as talquetamab may be a superior treatment option versus previous standard regimens.

Efficacy of Upadacitinib and Dupilumab on Achieving Stringent and Composite Skin and Itch Outcomes: an Indirect Comparison of Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

Efficacy of upadacitinib has been assessed in trials including Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), and Heads Up (NCT03738397). Measure Up 1 and 2 assessed efficacy of upadacitinib 30mg and upadacitinib 15mg against placebo, while Heads Up assessed efficacy of upadacitinib 30mg in a head-to-head trial against dupilumab 300mg. A head-to-head trial of upadacitinib 15mg against dupilumab 300mg has not been conducted. Network meta-analysis has shown that upadacitinib 30mg and upadacitinib 15mg are among the most efficacious targeted systemic therapies, but prior indirect comparisons have not evaluated more stringent outcomes. A population-adjusted indirect comparison was conducted using post hoc individual patient data from Measure Up 1 and 2 and Heads Up to estimate how upadacitinib 15mg would have performed if included in Heads Up by adjusting for patient-level covariates. Absolute response rates at weeks 4, 16, and 24 were estimated for the following outcomes: no/minimal itch [Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) score of 0/1], Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score of ≤ 3 (EASI ≤ 3), 100% improvement in EASI (EASI 100), both ≥ 90% improvement in EASI (EASI 90) and WP-NRS 0/1, both EASI ≤ 3 and WP-NRS 0/1, and both EASI 100 and WP-NRS 0/1. The analysis was conducted on adult patients, aligned with the intention-to treat population for the clinical trials, and used non-responder imputation. Across all outcomes assessed, the estimated absolute response rates were greatest for upadacitinib 30mg, followed by upadacitinib 15mg and then dupilumab. This pattern was observed at week 4, week 16, and week 24. For adults with moderate-to-severe AD, upadacitinib 30mg appears to be the most efficacious treatment in attaining more stringent and composite outcomes across multiple timepoints, followed by upadacitinib 15mg and then dupilumab 300mg.

Indirect comparison in network meta-analysis between SuperPATH, direct anterior and conventional approach hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fracture.

The aim of the study was to compare the short-term outcome of SuperPATH, direct anterior (DAA) and conventional approach (CA) hemiarthroplasty (HA) in patients with femoral neck fractures using a network meta-analysis. PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Epistemonikos, and Embase were searched until May 31, 2024. In a network meta-analysis, mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method and a fixed/random effects model for continuous outcomes, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method and a fixed/random effects model for dichotomous outcomes. The literature search identified a total of 9 randomized controlled trials on SuperPATH with 762 patients and 8 randomized controlled trials on DAA with 641 patients. In the overall ranking, SuperPATH was placed first, DAA second and CA third. SuperPATH HA was best in 7, second best in 2 and third best in 1 of the 10 outcome parameters. DAA HA was best in 2 and second best in 8 of the 10 outcome parameters. CA HA was best in 1 and third best in 9 of the 10 outcome parameters. In the indirect comparison between SuperPATH HA and DAA HA, SuperPATH HA had a 1.36 point lower visual analog scale at 2 to 7 days postoperatively and a 0.17 lower overall complication rate compared to DAA. For the treatment of patients with femoral neck fractures, SuperPATH HA ranked first, DAA HA ranked second and CA HA ranked third. Based on the results, we recommend that trauma surgeons increase their use of minimally invasive hip HA techniques. It should be noted that SuperPATH HA had a significantly lower overall complication rate compared to DAA HA when the minimally invasive technique was chosen.

Comparative Efficacy of Finerenone versus Canagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.

This study aimed to close an evidence gap concerning the relative efficacy of finerenone versus SGLT2is in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Canagliflozin was selected as a proxy for the SGLT2i class. Patient-level data of two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of finerenone (FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD) were used alongside aggregated data from CREDENCE, an RCT of canagliflozin. To account for meaningful between-study heterogeneity between each finerenone trial and CREDENCE, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of a range of efficacy outcomes was undertaken for each finerenone study versus CREDENCE. These results were meta-analyzed, enabling the estimation of the relative effects of finerenone against canagliflozin. For the cardiorenal composite endpoint, the hazard ratio (HR) comparing finerenone to canagliflozin was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.83 to 1.36). The corresponding HRs for all-cause mortality, end-stage kidney disease and cardiovascular death were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.73 to 1.34), 1.03 (95% CI: 0.68 to 1.55) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.64 to 1.37), respectively. The absence of statistically significant differences was consistent throughout the main analysis and a range of sensitivity analyses. Based on this study, using a large sample of data and adjusted for meaningful differences between the baseline characteristics of the included RCTs, there was no statistically significant evidence indicating a difference in the efficacy of finerenone compared to canagliflozin in the treatment of CKD in patients with T2D.

Effect of testosterone replacement therapy on lower urinary tract symptoms: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

In this study, we aimed to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) to investigate the effects of different testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) administration routes on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men with late-onset hypogonadism (LOH). A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, or prostate volume. NMA was performed, and subgroup analysis was conducted to assess the impact of TRT duration on outcomes. A total of 21 RCTs involving 2453 participants were included. For pairwise meta-analysis, p values for TRT delivered by transdermal, intramuscular, and oral routes were as follows: IPSS: 0.93, 0.20, and 0.76; PSA level: 0.20, 0.27, and 0.98; prostate volume: 0.18, 0.04, and 0.16. There were no significant differences in IPSS, PSA level, or prostate volume between TRT routes. In subgroup analysis, long-term intramuscular TRT significantly decreased IPSS (p=0.03), short-term transdermal TRT increased PSA levels (p<0.001), and short-term intramuscular TRT increased the prostate volume (p=0.04). Other forms of TRT showed no significant change in IPSS, PSA level, and prostate volume compared with the placebo. Indirect comparison of the three administration routes demonstrated no significant differences in IPSS, PSA level, and prostate volume. Nevertheless, surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis indicated that intramuscular TRT had an 83% probability of being the best method for decreasing IPSS. The results demonstrate that TRT does not worsen LUTS regardless of the administration route. Intramuscular TRT may be the preferred treatment for aging men with LOH and LUTS. Intramuscular TRT may be the preferred treatment for men with LOH and LUTS. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and optimize TRT management strategies.

Health technology assessments of new specialized therapies: A typology of key challenges and potential policy solutions

ObjectivesCurrent transformations in the pharmaceutical sector raise pressing questions about what is considered acceptable evidence for the effects of new therapies. This article aims to identifying key challenges in clinical effectiveness evaluation of new therapies and discuss possible policy responses to these challenges. MethodsThe study builds on a systematic review of the 41 appraisals issued in 2019 by the Danish Medicines Council (DMC), which is responsible for the appraisal of new specialized therapies in Denmark. ResultsWhile much political attention currently centers on the use of ‘real-world evidence’, we find that clinical effectiveness evaluation based solely on non-RCT evidence still constitutes an exception in the Danish setting (9% of the evaluations). Yet, challenges of indirectness were prevalent even when evaluations were based on RCT data (54% of the evaluations). Challenges of effect extrapolation arose in about a third of the evaluations. DiscussionAs the identified challenges are likely to increase with the current trend from ‘blockbuster’ to ‘niche’ products in the pharmaceutical sector, we point to a need for regulators and health technology assessment agencies to collaborate about the development of guidance on the use of other study designs than traditional RCTs, methods that can reduce the risk of bias when conducting indirect comparisons, and principles for managed entry agreements.

Systematic Review of Cellular, Acellular, and Matrix-like Products and Indirect Treatment Comparison Between Cellular/Acellular and Amniotic/Nonamniotic Grafts in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Significance: This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant review focuses on the efficacy of cellular, acellular, and matrix-like products (CAMPs) in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) based on published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Recent Advances: Although CAMPs have been incorporated into the clinical algorithm for chronic wounds, evidence is lacking to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of these products. Critical Issues: Level 1 RCT studies are the gold standard to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment approaches; however, due to differences in surgical techniques, patient demographics, and compliance, standard-of-care (SOC) outcomes in the wound care space can vary significantly between different RCTs, making it difficult to compare them against each other. Future Directions: To mitigate variability between different RCTs, wound closure outcomes can be reported as risk ratios (RRs). This review of all the currently published RCTs (with a similar trial design) in patients with DFU and RRs confirms that CAMPs adjunct to SOC result in statistically superior wound closure outcomes in DFUs, when compared with SOC alone, with a RR of 1.72 [1.56, 1.90], p < 0.00001. Enough evidence is still lacking to determine a statistical difference between broad categories of cellular/acellular and amniotic/nonamniotic CAMPs, and hence, decision makers should consider published head-to-head comparative studies, real-world evidence, and cost-effectiveness evidence between individual CAMPs to decide on which to use in practice.

Assessment of centanafadine in adults with ADHD: a matching adjusted indirect comparison versus methylphenidate hydrochloride extended release (Concerta)

Objective To compare safety and efficacy of centanafadine versus methylphenidate hydrochloride extended release (ER; Concerta) in adults with ADHD. Methods Without head-to-head trials, anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC) of adverse event rates reported across trials and mean change from baseline in Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) score between centanafadine and methylphenidate hydrochloride ER were conducted. Pooled patient-level data from two centanafadine trials (NCT03605680/NCT03605836) and aggregate data from one published methylphenidate hydrochloride ER trial (NCT00937040) were used. Characteristics of individual patients from the centanafadine trials were matched to aggregate baseline characteristics from the methylphenidate hydrochloride ER trial using propensity score weighting. A sensitivity analysis assessed the robustness of the results to the capping of extreme weights (i.e. >99th percentile). Results Compared with methylphenidate hydrochloride ER, centanafadine was associated with significantly lower risk of dry mouth (risk difference [RD] in percentage points: −11.95), initial insomnia (−11.10), decreased appetite (−8.05), anxiety (−5.39), palpitations (−5.25), and feeling jittery (−4.73) though a significantly smaller reduction in AISRS score (4.16-point). In the sensitivity analysis, the safety results were consistent with the primary analysis but there was no significant difference in efficacy between centanafadine and methylphenidate hydrochloride ER. Conclusion In this MAIC, centanafadine had better safety and possibly lower efficacy than methylphenidate hydrochloride ER. While safety results were robust across analyses, there was no efficacy difference between centanafadine and methylphenidate hydrochloride ER in the sensitivity analysis. Considering its favorable safety profile, centanafadine may be preferred among patients for whom treatment-related adverse events are a concern.

IBD Patients with Primary or Secondary Nonresponse to Ustekinumab Benefit from Dose Escalation or Reinduction.

Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of IBD. This drug has a well-established efficacy; however, patients may not respond or lose response. The availability of other biological therapies prompts the need for comparative data between different agents to suggest first- or second-line strategies. Aim of this review is to compare the effectiveness of ustekinumab to other biologics in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, as well as report the available data on dose escalation and reinduction. A systematic electronic search of the English literature was performed up to November 2023, using Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library. Conference proceedings were also screened. Out of 659 citations, 80 relevant articles were selected and included in the present narrative review. Head-to-head comparisons of different biological drugs are relatively scarce, mostly deriving from indirect comparison or retrospective studies. Overall available data indicate similar effectiveness in the treatment of IBD patients. Dose escalation and reinduction strategies are well documented, but the optimal treatment schedule is still to be defined. Response and remission rates vary in different studies, and a proportion of patients fail to achieve clinical and endoscopic outcomes. However, both approaches are effective and safe in nonresponders and secondary loss of response. IBD patients may benefit from dose escalation or reinduction. Both strategies prove effective in regaining response in a proportion of patients, avoiding unnecessary early switch. Head-to-head trials are still needed to determine the exact placement of this drug compared to other biologics.

Efficacy of fexuprazan compared with rebamipide in Korean patients with gastritis: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison.

Gastritis is one of the most frequently diagnosed diseases requiring medical treatment in South Korea. Fexuprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, has been approved for treating gastritis and erosive esophagitis. Meanwhile, rebamipide is the most commonly used mucoprotective agent for acute and chronic gastritis in real-world settings in South Korea. However, there have been no studies comparing the efficacy of these two drugs yet. To compare the efficacy of fexuprazan with that of rebamipide for acute and chronic gastritis. This was a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Individual patient data from a phase III study of fexuprazan (10 mg BID) were compared with cumulative data from two matching studies of rebamipide (100 mg TID). Erosion improvement and healing rates were compared between two weeks of fexurapan, two weeks of rebamipide, and four weeks of rebamipide. The two main outcome variables were presented as percentages, and the risk differences (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the relative treatment effects. In the primary analysis, the erosion improvement and healing rates after a two-week treatment with fexuprazan were 64.5% and 53.2%, respectively, while a two-week treatment with rebamipide resulted in erosion improvement and healing rates of 43.6% (RD: 21.0%; 95%CI: 9.6-32.3; P < 0.01) and 35.6% (RD: 17.6%; 95%CI: 6.1-29.2; P = 0.003), respectively. In the additional analysis, the erosion improvement and healing rates for the two-week fexuprazan treatment (64.2% and 51.2%, respectively) were similar to those obtained during a four-week treatment with rebamipide (60.6%; RD: 3.6%; 95%CI: -9.8, 17.0; P = 0.600 and 53.5%; RD: -2.3%; 95%CI: -16.1, 11.5; P = 0.744, respectively). The two-week fexuprazan treatment was superior to the two-week rebamipide treatment and similar to the four-week rebamipide treatment for patients with gastritis.

A comparison of two models for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.

The application of network meta-analysis is becoming increasingly widespread, and for a successful implementation, it requires that the direct comparison result and the indirect comparison result should be consistent. Because of this, a proper detection of inconsistency is often a key issue in network meta-analysis as whether the results can be reliably used as a clinical guidance. Among the existing methods for detecting inconsistency, two commonly used models are the design-by-treatment interaction model and the side-splitting models. While the original side-splitting model was initially estimated using a Bayesian approach, in this context, we employ the frequentist approach. In this paper, we review these two types of models comprehensively as well as explore their relationship by treating the data structure of network meta-analysis as missing data and parameterizing the potential complete data for each model. Through both analytical and numerical studies, we verify that the side-splitting models are specific instances of the design-by-treatment interaction model, incorporating additional assumptions or under certain data structure. Moreover, the design-by-treatment interaction model exhibits robust performance across different data structures on inconsistency detection compared to the side-splitting models. Finally, as a practical guidance for inconsistency detection, we recommend utilizing the design-by-treatment interaction model when there is a lack of information about the potential location of inconsistency. By contrast, the side-splitting models can serve as a supplementary method especially when the number of studies in each design is small, enabling a comprehensive assessment of inconsistency from both global and local perspectives.

Feasibility of Indirect Treatment Comparisons Between Niraparib Plus Abiraterone Acetate and Other First-Line Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase Inhibitor Treatment Regimens for Patients with BRCA1/2 Mutation-Positive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are a novel option to treat patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Niraparib plusabiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) is indicated for BRCA1/2 mutation-positive mCRPC. Niraparib plus AAP demonstrated safety and efficacy in the phase 3 MAGNITUDE trial (NCT03748641). In the absence of head-to-head studies comparing PARPi regimens, the feasibility of conducting indirect treatment comparisons (ITC) to inform decisions for patients with first-line BRCA1/2 mutation-positive mCRPC has been explored. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify evidence from randomized controlled trials on relevant comparators to inform the feasibility of conducting ITCs via network meta-analysis (NMA) or population-adjusted indirect comparisons (PAIC). Feasibility was assessed based on network connectivity, data availability in the BRCA1/2 mutation-positive population, and degree of within- and between-study heterogeneity or bias. NMAs between niraparib plus AAP and other PARPi regimens (olaparib monotherapy, olaparib plus AAP, and talazoparib plus enzalutamide) were inappropriate due to the disconnected network, differences in trial populations related to effect modifiers, or imbalances within BRCA1/2 mutation-positive subgroups. The latter issue, coupled with the lack of a common comparator (except for olaparib plus AAP), also rendered anchored PAICs infeasible. Unanchored PAICs were either inappropriate due to lack of population overlap (vs. olaparib monotherapy) or were restricted by unmeasured confounders and small sample size (vs. olaparib plus AAP). PAIC versus talazoparib plus enzalutamide was not possible due to lack of published arm-level baseline characteristics and sufficient efficacy outcome data in the relevant population. The current randomized controlled trial evidence network does not permit robust comparisons between niraparib plus AAP and other PARPi regimens for patients with 1L BRCA-positive mCRPC. Decision-makers should scrutinize any ITC results in light of their limitations. Real-world evidence combined with clinical experience should inform treatment recommendations in this indication.

The benefit of dupilumab as a postoperative short-term adjuvant therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A preliminary study.

Recent evidence recommends the use of biologics in patients with severe uncontrolled type 2 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp (CRSwNP) owing to its propensity for recurrence after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Among the type 2 biologics used for the treatment of nasal polyps, dupilumab (Dupi, anti-IL-4) exhibited superior efficacy and safety in indirect comparison studies. This study aimed to evaluate the objective and subjective outcomes of patients with CRSwNP treated with and without adjuvant Dupi therapy after FESS. Adult patients with type 2 CRSwNP who underwent FESS with adjuvant Dupi after surgery were enrolled. A matched control group without adjuvant Dupi therapy were recruited during the same period. All patients underwent nasal endoscopy and completed the sinonasal outcome test-22 questionnaire evaluations at baseline and 3 months after surgery. A total of 10 patients who received postoperative adjuvant therapy with Dupi and 20 patients who underwent surgery only were included. Patients with add-on Dupi therapy had significantly higher eosinophil cationic protein levels in the serum, eosinophil counts in peripheral blood, prevalence of asthma, and nasal polyp score at baseline. Both treatments were effective in reducing the patient's symptoms by SNOT-22 at 3 months postoperatively. However, patients with adjuvant Dupi therapy exhibited significantly better endoscopic scores than those with surgery only (p = .022). Surgery plays an important role in treating patients with CRSwNP, and adjuvant Dupi use may facilitate objective mucosal recovery postoperatively. 4.

Benefit-risk assessment of three oral Chinese patent medicines for activating blood and eliminating mass in treating primary liver cancer based on network Meta-analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis

Network Meta-analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis(MCDA) model were performed to evaluate the benefit-risk of Compound Cantharis Capsules, Huisheng Oral Solution, and Jinlong Capsules in the adjuvant treatment of primary liver cancer(PLC). The randomized controlled trial(RCT) of Compound Cantharis Capsules, Huisheng Oral Solution, and Jinlong Capsules in treating PLC were retrieved from CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. R 4.2 was employed to conduct a network Meta-analysis, on the basis of which the effect values of the three medicines were obtained by indirect comparison. MCDA was performed to establish the value tree based on the benefit-risk indexes. Hiview 3.2 was used to calculate the benefit values, risk values, and benefit-risk values of the three medicines in treating PLC, and a sensitivity analysis was carried out to evaluate the robustness of the results. Oracle Crystal Ball 11.1 was employed to optimize the evaluation results by Monte Carlo simulation. A total of 39 RCTs were included. The results showed that Compound Cantharis Capsules, Huisheng Oral Solution, and Jinlong Capsules combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) had the benefit values of 45, 51 and 45, the risk values of 59, 47, and 41, and the benefit-risk values of 52, 49, and 43, respectively. The benefit-risk differences and [95%CI] of Compound Cantharis Capsules vs Huisheng Oral Solution, Compound Cantharis Capsules vs Jinlong Capsules, and Huisheng Oral Solution vs Jinlong Capsules were 3.00[-13.09, 21.82], 9.00[-4.39, 24.62], and 6.00[-8.84, 20.28], respectively. Based on the results of MCDA, Huisheng Oral Solution, Jinlong Capsules, and Compound Cantharis Capsules combined with TACE had the greatest benefit, the greatest risk, and the best overall benefit, respectively. Considering the efficacy and safety, the priority of the three oral Chinese patent medicines combined with TACE for treating PLC followed the trend of Compound Cantharis Capsules, Huisheng Oral Solution, and Jinlong Capsules.