It is essential to study spatial distribution of Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) in surface soil, and separate PTEs geochemical background from their human sources, and also determine their correlation with other environmental factors in order to assess their impacts on humans, provide realistic environmental geochemical maps, and carry out soil management. For this purpose, this study was designed to investigate the surface soil in Ahvaz, Southwest of Iran. The applied methods were exploratory data analysis (EDA), including boxplot, Q-Q plot, probability plot (PP), concentration-area (C-A), number-size (N-S) fractal model, and singularity index (SI) model. The obtained results revealed that the fractal models led to a more realistic distinction among the geochemical population compared to the EDA methods such as probability plot. Furthermore, the C-A model was found to be more effective on the separation of subpopulation compared to the N-S and PP models. The studied elements exhibited a similar pattern implying that pollution is a function of geochemical dispersion regarding the surface soil in Ahvaz (Zn ≫ Pb > Cu > As). The studied metals-major elements plot also indicated that there was no meaningful relationship between Pb, Zn, Cu, and major elements in the study area. Plots of association of Pb, Zn, Cu, and As distinctly showed two general geogenic and anthropogenic populations. Moreover, the results of SI revealed that the highly contaminated area was consistent with the main defined hotspots and anthropogenic sources of elements as well as places affected by the contaminated area that have not been reported in previous studies. Furthermore, a combination of geochemical and geographical model comprising different statistical models was developed to more effectively separate geogenic from anthropogenic sources. Also, the geochemical background for the studied elements (Pb 180 mg/kg; Cu 200 mg/kg; Zn 90 mg/kg; As 65 mg/kg) was shown to be higher than the Iranian soil quality guideline with Pb, Zn, Cu, and As of 100, 80, 200, and 18 mg/kg, respectively.
Read full abstract