Indications For Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Research Articles

ERCP in critically ill patients is safe and does not increase mortality.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the gold standard for minimally-invasive treatment of biliary or pancreatic tract disease. When treating patients on intensive care units (ICU) with ERCP, interventionalists are faced with considerably higher morbidity compared to patients in ambulatory settings. However, data on complications and outcome of critical ill patients undergoing emergency ERCP are limited.A retrospective analysis of 102 patients treated on ICUs undergoing 121 ERCP procedures at the University Hospital of Essen, Germany between 2002 and 2016 was performed. Indications, interventional success, outcome including survival and procedure-related complications were analyzed. Patients’ condition pre-ERCP was categorized by using the “Simplified Acute Physiology Score” (SAPS 3).66/102 patients (64.7%) were referred to ERCP from surgical ICU, 36/102 (35.3%) from nonsurgical ICU. The majority of patients were male (63.7%), the mean age was 54.1 ± 14.9 [21–88] years. Indications for ERCP were biliary complications after liver transplantation (n = 34, 33.3%), biliary leakage after hepatobiliary surgery (n = 32, 31.4%), and cholangitis/biliary sepsis (n = 36; 35.3%), respectively. 117/121 (96.7%) ERCPs were successful, 1 patient (1.0%) died during ERCP. Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 11.8% of interventions. The median simplified acute physiology score 3 was 65 points, predicting a risk-adjusted estimated mortality of 48.8%, corresponding to an observed mortality of 52.2% (P = n.s.).ERCP is safe in critically ill patients on ICU, it does not increase overall mortality rate and has a relatively low rate of procedure-associated complications.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Pediatric Patients.

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an advanced endoscopic technique used in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreaticobiliary system. ERCP is used less frequently in children than in adults due to the rarity of pancreaticobiliary diseases and technical difficulties. However, ERCP is a safe, effective diagnosis and treatment tool for children. Methods: All patients within the age range of 1-19 years, who underwent ERCP between 2010 and 2021 at our endoscopy unit, were retrospectively examined. Patient demographics, use of imaging methods, indications, type of sedation, interventions, success of ERCP, findings, and complications were evaluated. Results: Overall, 105 ERCPs were performed in 66 children (29 male and 37 female). The indications were choledocholithiasis, cyst hydatic, choledochal cyst, biliary atresia or anomaly, liver transplantation-related disorders, and pancreatic disorders, respectively. ERCP was finished as diagnostic ERCP in 20% and as therapeutic in 80%. Therapeutic procedures were sphincterotomy, stent placement or removal, stone or debris extraction, and balloon sweep or dilatation, respectively. The success rate in the procedures was 75.23%. The overall complication rate was 15.23%. Postprocedure pancreatitis occurred in 11.42%, hemorrhage occurred in 2.85%, and aggravation of cholangitis in 0.95%. All complications were managed conservatively. Conclusion: ERCP in pediatric patients is a safe procedure that can be performed by adult endoscopists with high success rates. Since our region is an endemic region for hydatid cyst disease, the most common ERCP indication after choledocholithiasis is procedures related to liver hydatid cyst disease. The most common complication was pancreatitis, and complications were treated medically.

A high-volume ERCP service led by surgeons is associated with good outcomes and meets national key performance indicators: results from a British district general hospital.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a common, but technically challenging procedure used in the management of hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) disease. It is traditionally performed by medical gastroenterologists. In 2014, the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) proposed key performance indicators to evaluate and set standards of ERCP practice. This study aimed to compare our ERCP outcomes against these targets, in a centre where ERCP is exclusively performed by surgeons. A retrospective analysis of all ERCPs undertaken over a 38months in a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom (UK), by three Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons. Study outcomes were based upon, and compared against, BSG key performance indicators, including number of ERCPs per annum, proportion of successful cannulations of bile duct and stone clearance, ERCP-specific complications and mortality. The unit's caseload over this period was 1324, equating to approximately 418 per annum (BSG minimum 200 per unit). Management of bile duct stones was the commonest indication for ERCP. Overall, 95% (1253/1324) of bile ducts were cannulated and 92% (645/698) for those undergoing their first ERCP. Bile duct clearance was achieved in 80% of patients (BSG recommend > 75%) and the successful stenting of extra-hepatic strictures in 94% (BSG recommend > 80%). The overall complication rate was 4.3% (BSG standard < 6%). Procedure-specific mortality was 0.3% (4/1324) where death was either caused by pancreatitis or sepsis. A high-volume ERCP service led and performed exclusively by surgeons meets all BSG performance indicators, with good procedural and patient outcomes. Formal training pathways should be developed to encourage more surgical centres to provide an ERCP service and deal with what are common surgical pathologies.

Outcome of ERCP related to case-volume

Background and aimsIn some studies, high endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) case-volume has been shown to correlate to high success rate in terms of successful cannulation and fewer adverse events. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between ERCP success and complications, and endoscopist and centre case-volumes.MethodsData were obtained from the Swedish National Register for Gallstone Surgery and ERCP (GallRiks) on all ERCPs performed for Common Bile Duct Stone (CBDS) (n = 17,873) and suspected or confirmed malignancy (n = 6152) between 2009 and 2018. Successful cannulation rate, procedure time, intra- and postoperative complication rates and post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) rate, were compared with endoscopist and centre ERCP case-volumes during the year preceding the procedure as predictor.ResultsIn multivariable analyses of the CBDS group adjusting for age, gender and year, a high endoscopist case-volume was associated with higher successful cannulation rate, lower complication and PEP rates, and shorter procedure time (p < 0.05). Centres with a high annual case-volume were associated with high successful cannulation rate and shorter procedure time (p < 0.05), but not lower complication and PEP rates.When indication for ERCP was malignancy, a high endoscopist case-volume was associated with high successful cannulation rate and low PEP rates (p < 0.05), but not shorter procedure time or low complication rate. Centres with high case-volume were associated with high successful cannulation rate and low complication and PEP rates (p < 0.05), but not shorter procedure time.ConclusionsThe results suggest that higher endoscopist and centre case-volumes are associated with safer ERCP and successful outcome.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Bangladeshi Children: Experiences and Challenges in a Developing Country.

PurposeAlthough endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been used for more than five decades, its applicability in Bangladeshi children has recently become more common. Therefore, this manuscript aims to describe our experience in performing ERCPs in Bangladeshi children with hepatopancreaticobiliary diseases, focusing on presenting diseases, as well as the diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy.MethodsBetween 2018 and 2021, 20 children underwent 30 ERCP procedures at the Bangladesh Specialized Hospital, Dhaka. A single trained adult gastroenterologist performed all procedures using a therapeutic video duodenoscope. The indications for ERCP, diagnostic findings, therapeutic procedures, and complications were documented.ResultsThe median age of the study patients was 10 years (range, 1.7–15 years). Successful cannulation of the papilla was achieved in 28 procedures and failed in 2 cases. Repeated ERCP was required in seven patients. Nine patients had biliary indications and 11 had pancreatic indications. Choledocholithiasis was the most common indication for ERCP in patients with biliary disease, while chronic pancreatitis was common among patients with pancreatic indications. Pancreatic divisum was observed in only one patient. Pancreatic and biliary sphincterotomy was performed in 14 and 9 cases, respectively. A single pigtail or straight therapeutic stent was inserted in seven cases and removed in five cases. Stone extraction was performed in six procedures, and balloon dilatation was performed in five procedures. The post-procedural period for these patients was uneventful.ConclusionWe found that ERCP is a practical and successful therapeutic intervention for treating hepatopancreaticobiliary disorders in children when performed by experienced endoscopists.

Efficacy and safety of transpancreatic sphincterotomy in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a retrospective cohort study.

Difficult cannulation represents a common obstacle during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We assessed the efficacy and adverse events of transpancreatic sphincterotomy (TPS), and investigated potential associated confounders. All patients referred to our department for ERCP during 2015-2020 were eligible if they had intact papilla and visceral anatomy. In addition to standard measures, TPS was combined with pancreatic stent placement. Apart from demographics, we retrieved data related to the indication, periampullary anatomy, necessity for TPS or fistulotomy, their outcomes and complications. Chi-square test was employed to investigate associations between TPS and independent variables. When significance was observed, the respective variables were inserted into a regression model. A total of 1082 individual patients were eligible, with an equal female: male ratio and a mean age of 72.7±15.82 years. Seventy-three patients (6.7%) underwent TPS, with a 95.9% successful cannulation rate. Papilla morphology or regional diverticulum did not affect the decision to perform TPS, though it was significantly associated with malignant common bile duct (CBD) obstruction as the ERCP indication (P=0.001). Considering adverse events, TPS did not increase the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), though it affected bleeding (P=0.005). Regression analysis revealed a protective role of TPS against PEP (risk ratio [RR] 0.015, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-5.05; P<0.001), while the aforementioned risk of hemorrhage was attributed to previous precut attempts (RR 3.02, 95%CI 1.42-6.43; P=0.004). TPS combined with pancreatic stenting is an effective and safe modality in difficult cannulation cases and could be the first-choice alternative in malignant CBD obstruction.

The role of endoscopic ultrasound in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Acute biliary pancreatitis is the most common form of acute pancreatitis worldwide. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) may be helpful in detecting common bile duct stones and in indicating more invasive endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) examinations or determining rarer aetiologies of acute pancreatitis. Over a period of six years, we prospectively collected 131 patients with acute biliary pancreatitis and observed the need for endoscopic examination alongside with a decrease in the number of necessary ERCP examinations as a result of negative EUS results (no bile duct stones detected). We compared groups of patients given different endoscopic treatments in relation to their hospital mortality relative to the incidence of severe acute pancreatitis. As many as 68 % of primarily indicated EUS examinations had a negative result (no common bile duct stones detected) and this result saved the patients from needing to undergo an invasive ERCP procedure. Both the incidence of the severe form of acute pancreatitis and the hospital mortality rate were lower among patients who underwent only EUS or ERCP after EUS as compared to patients who underwent ERCP straight away. The use of EUS in patients with acute pancreatitis is very helpful in determining the treatment strategy (ERCP indication) and may reduce hospital mortality (Tab. 2, Ref. 14).

Study of patients undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at Tishreen University Hospital in Lattakia – Syria

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the indications, findings, and complications of performing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patients and Methods: A Prospective Observational Descriptive study conducted for the period from January 2020 to January 2021, 167 consecutive ERCP were performed at Tishreen University Hospital in Lattakia-Syria. Results: The median age was 58 years, 59.30% of patients were female. The most common indications for ERCP were common bile duct stones (44.9%) and obstructive jaundice (44.3%). The median number of attempts for cannulation was 2 counts, and 74.3% of the procedures were graded as with difficulty grade 1. The most common abnormal findings were common bile duct dilation (50.3%) and bile duct stones (43.7%). The most therapeutic endoscopic interventions were sphincterotomy (64.7%) and stone extraction balloons (68.9%). The therapeutic success rate was 93.5% with repeated the procedure and complications occurred in (10.8%) of patients. The most frequent complication was mild pancreatitis (6%). Death was reported in five cases (3%), one of them (0.6%) was due to ERCP. Conclusion: ERCP is a potential risk for complications, so physicians should be adept at recognizing and treating any complications as soon as they arise.

The feasibility of cap‐assisted routine adult colonoscope for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after total gastrectomy

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with Roux-en-Y reconstruction after total gastrectomy is difficult to be performed using routine tools. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of cap-assisted routine adult colonoscope (CARAC) for ERCP in these patients. Sixteen consecutive patients with indications of ERCP who had previously undergone total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction at two tertiary care endoscopy centers were identified. All ERCP procedures were carried out by using CARAC. The success rate of reaching the papilla, biliary cannulation and procedure-related adverse events were analyzed. The papilla was successful reached in 11 (68.8%) of the 16 cases, and biliary cannulation was subsequently reached in eight (72.7%) of the 11 cases. The procedures succeeded in three patients by using a percutaneous-endoscopic rendezvous procedure after failed cannulation. Overall clinical success was achieved in 11 (68.8%) of 16 patients. Procedure-related mild acute pancreatitis was observed in 25.0% (4/16) of the cases and mild cholangitis in 18.8% (3/16). No serious adverse events were reported. CARAC for therapeutic ERCP is safe and effective in treating patients with Roux-en-Y reconstruction after total gastrectomy.

Safety and efficacy of therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for patients over 90 years of age

This study aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients over 90 years of age. The study included 176 patients aged over 85 years who received their ERCP from February 2002 to January 2021. In the case group (super-elderly group), 44 patients were 90 years old or above. In the control group (younger group), there were 132 patients aged 85-89 years. The control group was matched according to patient gender and the same indications of ERCP at a 1:3 ratio. Logistic regression models were employed to evaluate all complications. The case group had higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation scoring system (APACHE-II) scores and rate of hypoalbuminemia. APACHE-II scores (≥6 or 7) were significantly more common in the case group. The rates of technical success and complete success in the case group were 100% and 100% respectively, which were similar to the rates in the control group, namely a technical success rate of 98.5% and a complete success rate of 98.5%. The rate of complication in the case group was 9.1%, which was slightly lower than that of the control group (15.2%, P > 0.05). ERCP-related death occurred in one patient in the control group, who had malignant biliary obstruction and died from cholangitis. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications such as pancreatitis, hemorrhage, and infection between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, the independent risk factor was Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) for overall complication. ERCP can be performed safely and successfully in patients aged ≥90 years. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2022; 22: 50-55.

Management of complicated biliary disease in the pediatric population

Cholesterol stones and biliary dyskinesia have replaced hemolytic disease as the primary indication for pediatric cholecystectomy. This study looks at the cohort of pediatric patients with complicated biliary disease, defined as choledocholithiasis and/or gallstone pancreatitis, to determine the incidence and best treatment options. A retrospective review of all cholecystectomies performed over 15 years admitted to the surgical service at a single free-standing children's hospital was performed. Patient factors, indications for cholecystectomy, and final treatment were recorded. Complicated gallbladder disease was defined as having image-confirmed choledocholithiasis or gallstone pancreatitis. High-risk patients were those with imaging that demonstrated definitive choledocholithiasis or cholelithiasis with common bile duct enlargement. Low risk patients were those with cholelithiasis or gallbladder sludge on imaging combined with an elevated bilirubin and/or lipase. A total of 695 cholecystectomies were performed over the 15-year time period. Average patient age was 13.4 years. Of the 695 cholecystectomies, 457 were performed for stone disease (66%) (64 hemolytic) and 236 (34.0%) were performed for biliary dyskinesia. Hundred and three (14.8% of all cholecystectomies, 22.5% of those with stone disease) presented with choledocholithiasis and/or gallstone pancreatitis (complicated disease). In high-risk patients, 28/47 (59.6%) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/sphincterotomy. In low-risk patients (no choledocholithiasis or common duct enlargement), 13/56 (23.2%) required endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/sphincterotomy (P < .05). The indication for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after cholecystectomy was choledocholithiasis and none of these patients had bile leak complications. The incidence of pediatric complicated biliary disease due to cholesterol stones is equal to that of adults. These data suggest that a patient with imaging evidence of choledocholithiasis or common bile duct enlargement may require endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, dependent on clinical course, and this should be strongly considered before cholecystectomy. Those without such radiographic findings can undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy and have postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography if needed.

Increased post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis for choledocholithiasis without acute cholangitis.

Choledocholithiasis is the most common indication for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Identifying risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is important for reducing the risk of developing PEP after common bile duct (CBD) stone removal. However, studies examining the risk factors for PEP for CBD stones are scarce. The aim of this study was to examine whether the presence or absence of acute cholangitis is a clinical risk factor for PEP in patients with CBD stones. In this multicenter retrospective study, 1539 patients with naïve papillae were divided into patients without and with acute cholangitis. We compared the incidence of PEP between the two groups using one-to-one propensity score matching to adjust for the potential confounding factors of PEP. In the entire cohort, the rates of PEP in patients without and with acute cholangitis were 9.6% (52/542) and 1.8% (18/997), respectively (P<0.001, odds ratio=5.8). In the propensity-matched cohort, the rates of PEP in patients without and with acute cholangitis were 8.3% (27/326) and 2.5% (8/326), respectively (P=0.002, odds ratio=3.6). The rate of PEP was significantly higher in patients without acute cholangitis than in those with acute cholangitis after adjusting for the confounding factors of PEP. The absence of acute cholangitis may be an important clinical risk factor for PEP due to CBD stone removal. In patients without acute cholangitis, endoscopists should explain the specific risk of PEP carefully and actively implement prophylaxis against PEP.

Comparison of the impact of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography between pre-COVID-19 and current COVID-19 outbreaks in South Korea: Retrospective survey.

BACKGROUNDThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has markedly influenced the endoscopic patterns. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an essential technique for pancreatobiliary disease but increases the risk of exposure to the virus-containing body fluid; however, the impact of COVID-19 on ERCP is unknown. AIMTo compare the number of endoscopic activities and to analyze the clinical outcomes of ERCPs before and during the COVID-19 outbreak in Daegu, South Kore.METHODSThis retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent ERCP between February 18 and March 28, 2020, at a tertiary hospital. ERCP indications and endoscopic details were compared with those from the same period in 2018 and 2019 as control groups.RESULTSOf the 269 ERCP procedures, 113 (42.0%) cases were performed as emergency procedures. The number of ERCP procedures in 2018 and 2019 decreased by 20.2% and 56.6%, respectively, compared with that in 2020 (P < 0.01); among the 113 emergency ERCPs, the observed numbers in 2018 (n = 42) and 2019 (n = 55) dramatically dropped by 61.9% and 70.9%, respectively, compared with that in 2020 (n = 16). Of the 16 cases in 2020, stone removal was performed in five, biliary stenting in five, sphincterotomy in five, and nasobiliary drainage in one. No case of ERCP-related infection in medical workers or other patients has been reported.CONCLUSIONThe COVID-19 outbreak significantly reduced the number of ERCPs; however, there is no difference in the indications and endoscopic interventions before and during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Utility of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in infant patients with conservational endoscopy.

BackgroundThe indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in infant patients (age <1 year) differ from those in adults. A paucity of data and concerns about the potential lower effectiveness and more adverse effects limit its utility, even in tertiary care centres. In this study, we retrospectively analysed the indications, success rates, and adverse effects of ERCP in these groups.MethodsFrom June 2014 to March 2018, 17 ERCPs were performed in 15 children [median age: 10.4 months (6–12 months); median weight: 6.6 kg (3.3–10.7 kg)]. A conventional duodenoscope was utilized in all procedures. All patients were followed up as inpatients.ResultsFifteen therapeutic and two diagnostic procedures were managed by licensed paediatric endoscopist. Successful cannulation was obtained in all patients (100%). A high proportion (47.1%) of pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) and therapeutic procedures (88.2%) were identified. Two cases of mild pancreatitis were recorded, accounting for 12.5% of the post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) rate. By multivariable analysis, recurrent acute pancreatitis and pancreatic duct (PD) cannulation/injection were identified as PEP-related risk factors. All complications were managed conservatively.ConclusionsERCP in infant patients (0.5< age <1 year) could be safely completed by conservational endoscopy. A high proportion of PBM and therapeutic procedures were identified in our study cohort. The overall adverse-event rate was acceptable, and no serious complication occurred. The PEP-related independent risk factors included recurrent acute pancreatitis and PD cannulation/injection.

Role of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage as an Adjunct to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

There is limited literature on the role of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) as an adjunct to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This study evaluates the role of PTBD in patients with failed ERCP or post-ERCP cholangitis. Retrospective evaluation of clinical and intervention records of patients with biliary obstruction referred for PTBD following failed ERCP or post-ERCP cholangitis was performed. The cause of biliary obstruction, baseline serum bilirubin, white blood cell (WBC) count, serum creatinine, and procalcitonin were recorded. Technical success and clinical success (resolution of cholangitis, reduction in bilirubin levels, WBC count, creatinine, and procalcitonin) were assessed. Sixty-three patients (35 females, mean age 51.4 years) were included. Indications for ERCP included malignant causes in 47 (74.6%) cases and benign causes in 16 (25.4%) cases. Indications for PTBD were failed ERCP in 21 (33.3%) and post-ERCP cholangitis in 42 (66.7%). PTBD was technically successful in all patients. Clinical success rate was 68.2% in the overall group. Mild hemobilia was noted in five (7.9%) patients. There were no major complications or PTBD related mortality. Cholangitis and acute kidney injury resolved following PTBD in 63.1% and 80% of the patients, respectively. Total serum bilirubin reduced by 47.8% and 69.4% after one week and one month of the PTBD, respectively. The average fall in procalcitonin was 5.17ng/mL after one week of the PTBD. PTBD is an important adjunctive drainage procedure in patients with ERCP failure or post-ERCP cholangitis.

Success Rate of Wire Control-Assisted ERCP Sphincterotomy Versus Non-assisted ERCP Cannulation of Common Bile Duct in a Secondary Care Unit During the First COVID-19 Peak: A Retrospective Observational Study of 281 Patients

BackgroundThe British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) recommended that during the COVID-19 pandemic, endoscopy units perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for obstructive biliary pathologies in an emergency. We assessed the local performance of ERCP during the first wave of COVID-19 at our local endoscopy center, in particular the technique to common bile duct (CBD) cannulation.MethodologyAll ERCP procedures performed from January to June 2020 were retrospectively assessed and compared with procedures performed between January and June 2019 at the Royal Lancaster Infirmary. The indications for ERCP, success rate, and complications were studied separately. Correlation analysis was conducted using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The binary logistic regression model was used to compute the factors associated with successful ERCP. Significance was established when the two-sided P-value < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, 2017).ResultsA total of 281 ERCP were included in this study, with 169 and 112 performed during the first six months of 2019 and 2020, respectively. A statistically significant (0.0087) higher proportion of cases with liver dysfunction presented for ERCP before the COVID-19 outbreak (152, 89.94%). All patients before COVID-19 underwent wire control-assisted ERCP, while 82 (73.21%) received assisted ERCP during the first wave (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.10) in the number of patients who underwent sphincterotomy before and during the first wave of COVID-19, with 97 (57.39%) and 76 (67.85%), respectively. The success rate of ERCP before COVID-19 was relatively high, accounting for 146 (86.39%) patients in contrast to 87 (77.67%) patients during the first wave (P = 0.074). Sphincterotomy (β = 2.800, P = 0.028) and stent insertion (β = 0.852, P = 0.046) were statistically significant predictors of ERCP outcomes. There was no statistically significant impact of cholangitis on the success of ERCP (β = 1.672, P = 0.109).ConclusionThe first wave of COVID-19 had a statistically proven negative impact on the expected standards of ERCP performance. Although the complication rate was significantly higher during the first wave case difficulty, the American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) status was not assessed on an individual basis. Both ASA status and case difficulty are now included in our endoscopy selection process. We recommend adding the complexity of cases and ASA to the local and national recording databases. This is a rare study on UK-based hospitals.

Evaluation of the performances of a single-use duodenoscope: Prospective multi-center national study.

A single-use duodenoscope (SUD) has been recently developed to overcome issues with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related cross-infections. The aim was to evaluate SUD safety and performance in a prospective multi-centre study. All consecutive patients undergoing ERCP in six French centers were prospectively enrolled. All procedures were performed with the SUD; in case of ERCP failure, operators switched to a reusable duodenoscope. Study outcomes were the successful completion of the procedure with SUD, safety and operators' satisfaction based on a VAS 0-10 and on 22 qualitative items. The study protocol was approved by French authorities and registered (ID-RCB: 2020-A00346-33). External companies collected the database and performed statistical analysis. Sixty patients (34 females, median age 65.5 years old) were enrolled. Main indications were bile duct stones (41.7%) and malignant biliary obstruction (26.7%). Most ERCP were considered ASGE grade 2 (58.3%) or 3 (35.0%). Fifty-seven (95.0%) procedures were completed using the SUD. Failures were unrelated to SUD (one duodenal stricture, one ampullary infiltration, and one tight biliary stricture) and could not be completed with reusable duodenoscopes. Median operators' satisfaction was 9 (7-9). Qualitative assessments were considered clinically satisfactory in a median of 100% of items and comparable to a reusable duodenoscope in 97.9% of items. Three patients (5%) reported an adverse event. None was SUD-related. The use of a SUD allows ERCP to be performed with an optimal successful rate. Our data show that SUD could be used for several ERCP indications and levels of complexity.

Evaluation of the conversion rate as it relates to preoperative risk factors and surgeon experience: a retrospective study of 4013 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BackgroundOur aim is to determine the relationships among patient demographics, patient history, surgical experience, and conversion rate (CR) during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs).MethodsWe analyzed data from patients who underwent LC surgery between 2005 and 2014 based on patient charts and electronic documentation. CR (%) was evaluated in 4013 patients who underwent elective LC surgery. The relationships between certain predictive factors (patient demographics, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), acute cholecystitis (AC), abdominal surgery in the patient history, as well as surgical experience) and CR were examined by univariate analysis and logistic regression.ResultsIn our sample (N = 4013), the CR was 4.2%. The CR was twice as frequent among males than among females (6.8 vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001), and the chance of conversion increased from 3.4 to 5.9% in patients older than 65 years. The detected CR was 8.8% in a group of patients who underwent previous ERCP (8.8 vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001). From the ERCP indications, most often, conversion was performed because of severe biliary tract obstruction (CR: 9.3%). LC had to be converted to open surgery after upper and lower abdominal surgeries in 18.8 and 4.8% cases, respectively. Both AC and ERCP in the patient history raised the CR (12.3%, p < 0.001 and 8.8%, p < 0.001). More surgical experience and high surgery volume were not associated with a lower CR prevalence.ConclusionsPatient demographics (male gender and age > 65 years), previous ERCP, and upper abdominal surgery or history of AC affected the likelihood of conversion. More surgical experience and high surgery volume were not associated with a lower CR prevalence.

Dilation assisted stone extraction for complex biliary lithiasis: Technical aspects and practical principles

Common bile duct stones are frequently diagnosed worldwide and are one of the main indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has been used for the removal of bile duct stones for the past 40 years, providing a wide opening to allow extraction. Up to 15% of patients present with complicated choledocholithiasis. In this context, additional therapeutic approaches have been proposed such as endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy, intraductal or extracorporeal lithotripsy, or endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD). EPLBD combined with EST was introduced in 2003 to facilitate the passage of large or multiple bile duct stones using a balloon greater than 12 mm in diameter. EPLBD without EST was introduced as a simplified technique in 2009. Dilation-assisted stone extraction (DASE) is the combination of two techniques: EPLBD and sub-maximal EST. Several studies have reported this technique as safe and effective in patients with large bile duct stones, without any increased risk of adverse events such as pancreatitis, bleeding, or perforation. Nevertheless, it is difficult to analyze the outcomes of DASE because there are no standard techniques and definitions between studies. The purpose of this paper is to provide technical guidance and specific information about the main issues regarding DASE, based on current literature and daily clinical experience in biliary referral centers.

Is endoscopist-directed sedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with balanced propofol solution (BPS) practical and safe? A prospective study from a tertiary care centre in India.

IntroductionEndoscopist-directed, nurse-administered sedation using propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is being utilized worldwide. However, this is not usually employed in India by endoscopists.AimTo assess the efficacy, acceptability, and safety of this sedation in low to moderate risk patients undergoing ERCP.Material and methodsThis was a prospective study involving 500 patients with any indication for ERCP. The sedation was given by trained nurses.ResultsThe sedative dosages per patient were as follows: propofol = 90 ±20 mg, fentanyl 0.75 ±0.25 mg (range: 0.25–1.00 mg), and midazolam 2 ±0.5 mg (range: 1–3 mg). Ninety-seven percent of patients achieved Richmond agitation sedation score of ≥ –3, and 96.8% achieved Gloucester comfort score of ≤ 2. 4.22% of the patients had mild adverse events (AE), and 2.11% had moderate AE. Two (0.4%) patients required intubation and intensive care unit admission. Mean recovery time was 15.3 min. 98.3% of the endoscopists were satisfied with the sedation achieved. 31.2% of the patients remembered the procedure. 93% of the patients were satisfied with the type of sedation. 92.75% of ERCPs were successful. 7.59% had procedure-related complications: in the form PEP – 5.290%, significant bleeding – 1.08%, and perforation – 0.43%.ConclusionsEndoscopist-directed, nurse-administered sedation for ERCP with balanced propofol solution is practical, efficient, time saving, safe, and acceptable to patients.