Abstract -The paper presents a comparative case analysis of two leading banks, Axis Bank and HDFC Bank. The rising tide of Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) in the banking sector is a major threat to financial stability and economic progress. The case study uncovered severe deficiencies in risk management, credit evaluation, and regulatory compliance, which have resulted in a considerable accumulation of Non-Performing Assets. The banks' exposure to economically sensitive sectors amplifies the impact of downturns on asset quality. The limitations in credit risk assessment underline the necessity for increased due diligence. Regulatory frameworks, such as the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and prompt corrective action have a significant impact on NPA responses. The findings highlight the complicated interplay between internal banking practices, regulatory frameworks, and economic conditions that affect a bank's financial performance. Addressing discovered weaknesses inside both these banks is important to the stability of India's financial system. The implications, as indicated by rising NPAs, are felt throughout the sector, jeopardizing overall resilience. Addressing these problems is crucial for reducing systemic risks, preventing a credit crisis, and rebuilding trust in the financial industry. A better banking system is critical for India's financial stability, economic growth, and stakeholder trust. As major private sector players, Axis Bank and HDFC Bank’s successful remediation set a precedent, emphasizing the need for excellent risk management, regulatory compliance, and strategic adaptation. Key Words: Axis Bank, HDFC Bank, Non-Performing Assets, Risk Management, Regulatory Compliance, Financial Stability, Economic Impact