Book Reviews117 psychoanalysis reveals private motives. But . . . " (296). Fortunately, Rabaté resists the temptation to tie it all up in so tidy and trite a package, moving instead toward a larger view which sees the poem as a tragedy of the imagination, not without its Oedipal overtones but finally reaching beyond that, following "a thin trace in the air" to that country "which leaves the voice mute but heals all wounds" (298). In sum, then, this is a stimulating study of Pound, one which approaches the Cantos from an unusual perspective and uses that perspective to help locate the Cantos in the overall context of postmodern continental thought. While I find myself disagreeing with Rabaté on a few matters (his reading of the tale of the honest sailor, for instance), these are minor quibbles. This is a solid, well written book — of immense value to the novice and the initiate alike. CHARLES GUILFORD Boise State University MATTHIAS SCHUBNELL. N. Scott Momaday: The Cultural and Literary Background. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1985. 336 p. Matthias Schubnell's work is both a biography and critical overview of this Pulitzer Prize-winning American Indian author. In the best tradition of such works, it will be valued, among other things, for its successful incorporation of Momaday's private papers, which provide for useful comparisons between published and unpublished work, and for its thorough bibliography of both primary and secondary source materials. A biographical chapter is coupled with chapters on two important Momaday themes, language and landscape, as an extended preface to individual chapters discussing House Made ofDawn, The Way to Rainy Mountain, The Names, and Momaday's poetry. Schubnell's book seems aimed at reconciling two audiences who are inevitably divided over Momaday because of their critical interests. The first are those passionate advocates of Native American literature for whom the principal virtue of Momaday's work is that it is the work of an Indian author and bears marks of this "Indianness ." The second includes those who want to read Momaday as a writer who has transcended this Indianness to produce a body of work of "universal" appeal. Schubneil argues that neither perspective on his subject is useful because both are constrained by inadequate notions of self and culture as static, impermeable, unalterable realities. Instead, not surprisingly, his analysis of the reader-writer-culture relationship resembles what he quotes as Momaday's own: "An Indian is an idea which a given man has of himself. And it is a moral idea. . . . And that idea, in order to be realized completely, has to be expressed," particularly in words (41). Unfortunately, this crucial argument only intermittently surfaces above the book's explicit agenda of providing close readings and historical contextualization for the Momaday corpus. A book of such scope and complexity demands more attention than can be given here, so let me only sketch out the volume's strengths and weaknesses. Schubneil is at his best in articulating the commonality of interest, method, value, and poetic theory Momaday shares with a number of twentieth-century writers. My sense is that this is one of his central aims, a revisionist impulse against the faddish 118Rocky Mountain Review neoprimitivism of some who want to attribute the distinctive features of Momaday's work to his Indianness, and he has brought this off with great skill and force. Especially illuminating here are his comparative readings of Lawrence, Dinesen, and Momaday on landscape. By using Momaday's correspondence, he convincingly demonstrates the direct influence of Winters and Stevens on the younger Momaday. The elucidation of the relationship between Stevens' idealism and Momaday's "idea of himself" is effective and powerful if for no other reason than it demonstrates that all that is not Aristotelian is not Indian. Occasionally though, Schubnell's attempted demonstrations of influence, like those of others before him, get caught up in the problematics of influence-peddling and their success varies greatly. A second great strength of the book is that is supplies useful readings of neglected works in the Momaday corpus. For instance, the book's longest chapter, which is on Momaday's poetry, is a storehouse of not only sound but insightful readings. I learned...
Read full abstract