380 SEER, 84, 2, 2006 five case studyregions,coming to the conclusionthat the growthof competent and independent local government has in fact been impeded where regional governmenthas proved competent. Brie uses the concept of 'machine'politics to analyse the dynamics of the Moscow City regime where Mayor Luzhkov successfullyutilized the power of the city government to fashion a winning voter coalition and construct alliances to prevent opposition from gaining power. The strength of this coalition and federal weakness enabled Moscow to pursue a privatizationprogramme significantlydifferentfrom that implemented at the federal level. While giving a useful insight into the dynamic of power in Russia's largest city, Moscow's special status as a subject of the RussianFederationmeans that it is partof the second tier of government,and it is debatablewhether it should be included in a book on local government. A more substantivecriticismof this book is not so much the content of its contributors'chapters, which are excellent, but the absence from the main body of the volume of work on the Putin era. While the editor's conclusion does go some way in correcting this omission, it seems probable that this volume will need updatingalmostimmediately.These criticismsnotwithstanding , ThePoliticsof LocalGovernment in Russiamakes a positive contribution to the understandingof this multi-dimensionalsubject and is necessaryreading for scholarsof Russian local government. Centre ofRussianandEastern European Studies W. T. WESTWATER University ofBirmingham Kubicek,PaulJ. Organized Labor inPostcommunist States: From Solidarity toInfirmi. Pitt Series in Russian and East European Studies. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh,PA, 2004. xiv + 256 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Index. $29.95 (paperback). WHERE the reform impetus was strong in the late Communist period, trades unions made great strides in their own internal democratizationand began rapidly to shift from their traditional role as 'transmissionbelts' between society and the Communist regime. Yet rather than becoming strongerand more influentialin the new democraticenvironment,unions became weaker, both as membershiporganizationsservingthe needs of their members and as pressuregroups capable of influencinggovernmentpolicy. The weakness of trades unions is unproblematic and unsurprising.It is a product interalia of the incapacity of union leaders to articulatetheir own positive vision or programme, internal divisions between and within sectors, the fragmentationof the labour movement with the rise of competing new unions, the lack of public trust,linked to an inabilityto maintain and attract members and consequent membershipdecline. Unions were ill preparedand uncomprehending of the implicationsof capitalism-building.They remained largelydefensive,tryingto maintain the rightsand benefitsenjoyed under the old regime. Union weaknessis also a product of the changing economic environment. The reorientation of industry to the profit motive, the closure of factories REVIEWS 38I producing shoddy goods with outdated technology, the shedding of labour, and the consequent emergence of unemployment created a climate of anxiety unsuited to labour mobilization. The decline of heavy industry, the shift to smallfirms,the developmentof the (hithertolargelyabsent)servicesectorand the resultantincreasingheterogeneityof the workforce alsoproved inimicalto union organization.Of course,weak unions made weak partnersin the formal tripartitestructuresdeveloped to provide unions with an institutionalizedrole in nationalpolicy processes.And in any case the IMF-definedorthodoxyconstrainedgovernmentpolicy (p. I90), leavingless space for responseto society's interests. Paul Kubicek charts not only these myriad interactingfactors(and more), he also elaboratesvarious theoreticalperspectivesthat have sought to understandthe weakenedpositionof unions and also to explain the relativepassivity of workerswho, given their generallydire position, might have been expected to engage in greatermobilizationand protest.Kubicek sees his own contribution as his 'concerted attention to the lasting effects of structuraleconomic change on organized labor' (p. 2I). There are separate chapters on Poland, Russia, Hungary and Ukraine which certainly bring out the distinctivefeaturesof the processof economic change. Not surprisinglythese are also rather repetitive,since the similaritiesare more markedthan the differences.Even in Poland where both Solidarity and the OPZZ pursued an electoral strategy, creatinga new political formation (Solidarity)orjoining one (the OPZZ), the results were not notably favourable to labour. Of course there were major differences;Poland and Hungary did not experience the acute Russian and Ukrainian problems of wage arrears, for example. More attention to the nature of structuralchange would have been useful,includingsuch indicators as the proportion of enterprisesremaining in state hands and their numbers of workers,the changingproportionsof manual and white-collarworkers,and the like. There is little such data...