O190* Aims: Antibody-mediated rejection including hyperacute rejection (HAR) or accelerated humoral rejection (ACHR) in presensitized recipients and de novo acute humoral rejection (AHR) in non-presensitized recipients cannot be prevented by anti-T cell therapy, leading to early graft loss. Complement has been shown to play an important role in antibody-mediated rejection. We previously reported that a functionally blocking anti-C5 monoclonal antibody (mAb) inhibited terminal complement activation and prevented HAR in a rat-to-presensitized mouse heart transplant model. The present study was undertaken to determine whether blocking terminal complement with anti-C5 mAb would prevent antibody-mediated rejection in mouse allograft models of AHR and ACHR. Methods: In the AHR model, C3H mouse hearts were heterotopically transplanted into BALB/c mice. In the ACHR model, BALB/c recipients were presensitized with C3H skin grafts one week prior to heart transplantation from same donor, a model designed to mimic HAR or ACHR in presensitized patients. Graft survival was determined by daily palpation. Complement activity and circulating anti-donor antibody levels were measured by a presensitized hemolytic assay and flow cytometry, respectively. In addition, antibody and complement deposition, as well as CD4 and CD8 cell infiltration in heart grafts were detected by immunohistochemistry. Results: AHR model: Allografts in untreated recipients were rapidly rejected at 8.0 ± 0.6 days. These grafts exhibited typical AHR, characterized by elevation of circulating anti-donor antibodies and antibody deposition, vasculitis, hemorrhage, fibrin deposition and thrombosis in the grafts. Administration of cyclosporine A (CsA, 15mg/kg, daily, S.C.) did not inhibit AHR, and grafts were rejected in 15.5 ± 1.1 days. Anti-C5 mAb monotherapy (40mg/kg/day, twice a week, I.P.) completely inhibited terminal complement activity and attenuated pathological changes of AHR, but did not prolong graft survival. In contrast, the combination of anti-C5 mAb and CsA successfully prevented AHR and achieved indefinite graft survival in all recipients (>100 days). This therapy completely inhibited terminal complement activity and prevented both cellular- and humoral-mediated rejection. Evaluation of the long-term surviving allografts revealed no pathology. ACHR model: After presensitization, anti-donor antibody levels, predominantly total IgG and IgG1, were rapidly elevated in BALB/c recipients. In untreated recipients, C3H heart grafts were rejected in 3 days by ACHR, characterized by severe hemorrhage, infarction and thrombosis. Immunohistochemistry showed massive antibody and complement deposition but minimal CD4+ and CD8+ cell infiltration in heart grafts. Treatment with CsA (15mg/kg, daily, S.C.) and/or cyclophosphamide (CyP, 40mg/kg, I.V., days 0 and 1) did not prevent ACHR and grafts were rejected in 3-4 days. Remarkably, the addition of anti-C5 mAb to the same dosing regimen of CsA and CyP effectively inhibited antibody-mediated rejection. These grafts have survived for more than 70 days and continue to demonstrate normal function and histology. Conclusions: The combination therapy of anti-C5 mAb and CsA achieves indefinite graft survival in a mouse allograft model of AHR and triple therapy of anti-C5 mAb, CsA and CyP effectively prevents ACHR in presensitized mouse recipients. These data suggest that inhibition of terminal complement using a novel anti-C5 mAb may be of value in the prevention of humoral rejection in clinical transplantation including presensitized recipients.
Read full abstract