Infrasound signals are used to monitor various anthropogenic and natural sources. In particular, infrasound is one of the four verification technologies used by the International Monitoring System (IMS) of the Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty organisation (CTBTO). To determine accurate source locations and energies, an accurate model of wind and temperature up to the lower thermosphere is necessary, hence operational NWP products are of great importance for routine infrasound monitoring activities. However, many of these models focus on tropospheric conditions, and the middle atmosphere (MA) is not well represented. UA-ICON is an upper atmosphere version of the ICON model that provides modelled atmospheric parameters up to 150 km. First, to assess ICON and IFS operational analysis products, comparisons to lidar observations are made. The main differences between both products were analysed with respect to winds and temperatures in the MA. Second, UA-ICON simulations outputs were compared to ICON and IFS fields to demonstrate the increased wave activity above ~30 km with UA-ICON. The added value of UA-ICON with respect to ICON and IFS for infrasound propagation simulations is discussed. The comparisons between the instrumental observations and the models will be presented, as well as comparisons between modelled and measured infrasound propagation.