TOPIC: Pulmonary Vascular Disease TYPE: Original Investigations PURPOSE: The association between systemic sclerosis and pulmonary hypertension (PH) is well established. Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) are usually older than 50 years, therefore, along with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), they often have PH due to left heart disease (PH-LHD). Some patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction may have normal resting pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) and this bears the potential of misclassifying post-as pre-capillary PH if the PAWP should be lowered to a value below 15 mm Hg. It is very important, that pulmonary vasodilator drugs approved for PAH may have deleterious effects or be ineffective if administered to patients with LHD. In this context, in cases of borderline PAWP (13–15 mm Hg) a "volume challenge" (500 ml of saline within 5–10 min) has been proposed to reverse the "occult LHD", but the therapeutic consequences of such testing remain unclear. In acute circulatory failure, passive leg raising (PLR) is a test that predicts whether the cardiac output will increase with volume expansion. By transferring a volume of around 300 mL of venous blood from the lower body toward the right heart, PLR mimics a fluid challenge.The aim of this study to investigate the possibility of PLR test in the differentiation between PAH and PH due to left heart disease in patients with "normal" PAWP. METHODS: PLR test is applied during 77 catheterizations in 69 patients with SSc and PH, among them 14 patients with established PH-LHD and 55 patients with precapillary PH (45 with PAH, 10 with PH, associated with SSc interstitial lung diseases). The hemodynamic parameters were measured before the test, and on 5 and 10 minutes during the test. It was found that the maximum increase in PAWP occurred 10 minutes from the start of the test. The diagnosis of PH-LHD was established in the presence of lesions of the left heart (CHD or subclinical cardiomyopathy), identified using echocardiography, coronary angiography, and heart MRI. RESULTS: PAWP level was 12 (7; 14) mm Hg at PH-LHD and 8.5 (6; 12) mm Hg, p = 0.06) at patients with PAH. Logistic regression analysis showed that the main differences between the groups were in the age of the patients (OR 1,06 95% CI 1,00-1,12, p 0,036), the PAWP level before the test (OR 1,15 95% CI 1,00 – 1,31, p=0,04), and the increase in PAWP during the test (OR 1,28 95% CI 1,10-1,47, p=0,001). The ROC analysis of PAWP increasing in these two groups showed the area under the curve was 0.837 (0.737; 0,937), p < 0,0001. The cut-off of the PAWP raise was 4 mm Hg with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 73%. CONCLUSIONS: It is advisable to study the PLR ??test for differential diagnosis of PAH and PH-LHD, as a safer and more affordable method. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: none DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Ildar Kurmukov, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Eugene Nasonov, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Ekaterina Nikolaeva, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Alexander Volkov, source=Web Response
Read full abstract