Increased Objective Response Rate Research Articles

Comparative efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in diffuse pleural mesothelioma.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) versus chemotherapy on the prognosis of real-world diffuse pleural mesothelioma patients in China. Clinical data of 90 patients with diffuse pleural mesothelioma from 2019 to 2022 were collected from Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: the ICIs-treated group (n = 46) and the chemotherapy-only group (n = 44). The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy relative to chemotherapy at different treatment stages were explored. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.0 and 7.0 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.7 and 15.8 months in the ICIs-treated group and the chemotherapy group, respectively. The ICIs-treated group showed an 11% increase in objective response rate (ORR) (52.2% vs. 41.0%) and an 8.0% increase in disease control rate (DCR) (78.3% vs. 70.0%) compared to the chemotherapy group. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significant PFS (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38-0.98; p = 0.038) and OS (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.26-0.86; p = 0.011) benefits of receiving immunotherapy over chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analysis according to treatment timing showed the same trend. In patients with nonsurgical diffuse pleural mesothelioma, immunotherapy achieved better survival benefits compared to chemotherapy in both first- and second-/third-line treatments. The early addition of immunotherapy improved survival in patients with nonsurgical diffuse pleural mesothelioma.

Neoadjuvant treatment with camrelizumab in combination with doxorubicin and ifosfamide: A phase II clinical study of high-risk soft tissue sarcoma.

e23548 Background: Surgery remains the cornerstone in the management of non-metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. However, high rate of recurrence and metastasis are not uncommon in patients(pts) with high-risk soft tissue sarcoma. Although doxorubicin plus ifosfamide resulted in better tumor shrinkage which facilitate surgical resection, approaches of reducing recurrence and metastasis are still needed. Chemotherapy combined with PD-1 antibodies showed promising activity in several tumors. To date, there is no study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy for high-risk Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Methods: This is a phase II, open-label single-arm study (NCT04606108), aimed to include pts aged 14-65 with histopathologically confirmed high risk soft tissue sarcoma and ECOG 0-1, at least one measurable lesion. One course of treatment every three weeks (camrelizumab 200 mg on day 1, doxorubicin 37.5 mg/m2 or liposomal doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 on days 1-2, and ifosfamide 3 g/m2 on days 1-3). After completing the 2nd course of chemotherapy, the drug will be stopped for 14 days, and surgery or the next stage of treatment will be carried out according to the efficacy of the treatment. Six courses of preoperative chemotherapy will be administered 2 weeks ± 5 days after surgery based on the effectiveness, followed by radiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fractions or 60 Gy in 30 fractions.) within 3 months after surgery. The primary objective is the Objective response rate (ORR). Using the Simon minimax 2 stage design, planned sample size is 62 pts with 80% power and alpha of 5% to detect an increase in ORR from 27% to 42%. Interim analysis requiring at least 9 confirmed responses in the first 30 pts to proceed to full accrual. Results: 35 pts completed neoadjuvant therapy and surgery, 30 pts received postoperative adjuvant therapy and 1 patient achieved partial response (PR). Median age was 36.4 years (14-61), 62.8% were females, and 57.1% were ECOG-PS 0. Surgery was performed in 35 pts including 16/35 Synovial Sarcoma (SS), 5/35 Liposarcoma (LPS), 2/35 Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS), 2/35 Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), 1/35 Leiomyosarcoma (LMS), 5/35 Malignant mesenchymal tumors and 4/35 other pathologic subtype. The 2-year PFS rate was 84.9%, the 2-year OS rate was 96.77%, and the 2-year RFS rate was 72.6%. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events included leukopenia (37.7%), Neutrophil count decreased (37.7%), Platelet count decreased (20.0%), Blennisthmia (3.1%), and Aspartate aminotransferase increased (0.8%). Conclusions: Camrelizumab combined with doxorubicin, liposomal doxorubicin, and ifosfamide in the perioperative treatment of soft tissue sarcoma pts were safe and tolerable. Survival follow-up is still ongoing to analyze the effect of perioperative immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy on long-term outcomes of pts with soft tissue sarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT04606108 .

Targeting HER3 to overcome EGFR TKI resistance in NSCLC.

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) play a crucial role in cellular signaling and oncogenic progression. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) have become the standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations, but resistance frequently emerges between 10 to 14 months. A significant factor in this resistance is the role of human EGFR 3 (HER3), an EGFR family member. Despite its significance, effective targeting of HER3 is still developing. This review aims to bridge this gap by deeply examining HER3's pivotal contribution to EGFR TKI resistance and spotlighting emerging HER3-centered therapeutic avenues, including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), TKIs, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Preliminary results indicate combining HER3-specific treatments with EGFR TKIs enhances antitumor effects, leading to an increased objective response rate (ORR) and prolonged overall survival (OS) in resistant cases. Embracing HER3-targeting therapies represents a transformative approach against EGFR TKI resistance and emphasizes the importance of further research to optimize patient stratification and understand resistance mechanisms.

Association Between Time-of-Day of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Administration and Outcomes in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Preclinical evidence demonstrating circadian rhythmicity within the immune system provides a rationale for hypothesis that immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) infusion time-of-day may serve as an actionable mechanism to improve outcomes. Herein, we explore the association between ICI time of infusion (TOI) and outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Data from patients with mRCC who received nivolumab or nivolumab/ipilimumab, in first- or second-line were retrospectively collected. Patients who received < 20% of infusions after 16:30 were assigned to the early TOI sub-cohort, while the rest were assigned to the late TOI sub-cohort. Clinical outcomes were compared across the 2 groups. Among 135 patients included, 89 (65.9%) and 46 (34.1%) were assigned to early and late TOI sub-cohorts, respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable across the 2 sub-cohorts. Objective response rate (ORR) was 36.0% with early TOI versus 29.5% with late TOI (P=.157). Median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 9.5 months in the early TOI sub-cohort versus 4.6 months in the late TOI sub-cohort with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.405 (95% CI, 0.919-2.149; P=.11) in univariate analysis and 1.694 (95% CI, 1.064-2.698; P=.026) in multivariate analysis. Higher cut offs allocating patients into the late TOI sub-cohort yielded an incremental increase in the HR for TTF and overall survival (OS) that reached statistical significance. In patients with mRCC, early TOI yielded a numerical increase in ORR, TTF and OS, with the TTF difference reaching significance in multivariate analysis. Prospective randomized studies are warranted to examine the impact of chronomodulation on outcomes with ICIs in mRCC.

Efficacy and safety of veliparib plus chemotherapy for the treatment of lung cancer: A systematic review of clinical trials.

As a poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, veliparib has been identified as a potential therapeutic agent for lung cancer. The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review of clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety of veliparib for treating lung cancer. PubMed, Scopus, the Web of Science, and Google Scholar were systematically searched up to October 30, 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy or safety of veliparib in the treatment of lung cancer patients were included. Studies were excluded if they were not RCTs, enrolled healthy participants or patients with conditions other than lung cancer, or investigated therapeutic approaches other than veliparib. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for quality assessment. The seven RCTs (n = 2188) showed that patients treated with a combination of veliparib and chemotherapy had a significantly higher risk of adverse events, when compared to the control arm. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) between those treated with veliparib plus chemotherapy and those receiving the standard therapies. Only two trials demonstrated an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), and only one study found an increase in objective response rate (ORR). Furthermore, adding veliparib to standard chemotherapy showed no benefit in extending the duration of response (DoR) in any of the studies. Only a small number of studies have found veliparib to be effective, in terms of improved OS, PFS, and ORR, while the majority of studies found no benefit for veliparib over standard treatment.

Transarterial chemoembolization with or without multikinase inhibitors for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus multikinase inhibitor (MKI) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have yielded inconsistent results. Methods In this work, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the TACE+MKI combination therapy versus TACE monotherapy in HCC patients with time to progression (TTP) adopted as primary outcome. Results A total of 10 RCTs comprising 2837 patients receiving combination therapy (TACE plus sorafenib, brivanib, orantinib or apatinib) were included. TACE+MKI significantly prolonged TTP (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.89, p=0.001) versus TACE monotherapy. Subgroup analysis suggested MKI administration before TACE might be preferable to post-TACE MKI for TTP. TACE+MKI also increased objective response rate (ORR) (risk ratio [RR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.32, p=0.01), but failed to improve overall survival (OS) (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.13, p=0.82) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.50-1.12, p=0.16). The incidence of any adverse event (AE) did not significantly differ between TACE+MKI and TACE groups (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96-1.42, p=0.01), while serious AEs showed significant difference (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.26-1.59, p&amp;lt;0.0001). Nevertheless, these AEs showing significant difference were mainly associated with MKI toxicities rather than TACE. Conclusions TACE+MKI combination therapy improved TTP and ORR but not OS and PFS in patients with unresectable HCC. Further high-quality trials are needed to verify these clinical benefits, and our findings could be very informative for future trial design.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Results from a German real‐world cohort

Phase III trials have established atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as the novel standard of care for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, these trials raised concerns regarding treatment efficacy in non-viral HCC, and it remains unclear whether combination immunotherapy is safe and effective in patients with advanced cirrhosis. One hundred patients with unresectable HCC initiated therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at our centre between January 2020 and March 2022. The control cohort consisted of 80 patients with advanced HCC who received either sorafenib (n= 43) or lenvatinib (n= 37) as systemic treatment. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly longer within the atezolizumab/bevacizumab group and comparable to phase III data. The benefits in terms of increased objective response rate (ORR), OS and PFS were consistent across subgroups, including non-viral HCC (58%). The ROC-optimised neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) cut-off of 3.20 was the strongest independent predictor of ORR and PFS. In patients with advanced cirrhosis Child-Pugh B, liver function was significantly better preserved with immunotherapy. Patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis showed similar ORR but shorter OS and PFS compared to patients with preserved liver function. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab showed good efficacy and safety in patients with unresectable HCC and partially advanced liver cirrhosis in a real-world setting. Moreover, the NLR was able to predict response to atezolizumab/bevacizumab treatment and may guide patient selection.

Abstract OT2-10-03: HCRN BRE 19-433: A Multi-institutional Phase II Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of TAlazoparib, Radiotherapy and Atezolizumab in gBRCA 1/2 negative Patients with PD-L1+ Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TARA)

Abstract Background Although immunotherapy (IO) in combination with chemotherapy has improved progression free and overall survival in patients with PD-L1+ metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC), prognosis remains poor. A potential therapeutic strategy to restore sensitivity to IO in patients with progressive disease is to introduce agents that re-sensitize the immune system to IO leading to a more tumor-specific and less toxic treatment in the second-line setting or beyond. Both talazoparib, a PARP inhibitor, and radiation (XRT) independently increase PD-L1 expression on the tumor cell surface resulting in heightened sensitivity to IO agents like atezolizumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor. Although a local treatment, XRT has the ability to produce an abscopal effect resulting in systemic shrinkage of non-irradiated tumors outside/distant to the XRT field, a phenomenon observed in patients receiving concurrent IO. While talazoparib is standard treatment in patients with gBRCA1 and 2 mutations, it is also a potent radiosensitizing agent that suppresses homologous recombination and PARP-1-dependent nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) repair while promoting error-prone alt-NHEJ. When combined with IO, talazoparib can amplify immune responses by generating immunogenic neo-antigens independent of gBRCA1/2 status. We, therefore, hypothesize that the combination of talazoparib, XRT, and atezolizumab will re-sensitize mTNBC tumors to IO and promote a durable tumor-specific response that spares patients from toxicities associated with traditional chemotherapy regimens. Methods This is a Phase II multi-institutional study designed to assess efficacy and safety of talazoparib, high dose XRT, and atezolizumab given in the second-, third-, or fourth-line settings to patients with mTNBC that is PD-L1 positive. A total of 23 patients with mTNBC who do not carry gBRCA pathogenic variants will be enrolled. All patients will be treated with induction talazoparib of 1mg PO daily starting Day 1 of a 28-day cycle. Patients will then receive 8 Gy x 3 fractions to 1-4 metastatic lesions QOD beginning Day 12, 13, or 14. Atezolizumab will be given intravenously (840 mg)) on Day 15 of the 1st cycle and then on Day 1 and Day 15 of the subsequent cycles. Talazoparib and atezolizumab treatment will continue until progression or severe toxicity. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) in non-irradiated lesions 8 weeks after the first dose of atezolizumab. Key inclusion criteria include biopsy proven mTNBC (ER&amp;lt; 10%, PR&amp;lt; 10%, Her2-) with at least 2 extracranial metastatic lesions. Patients must have at least 1 extracranial metastatic lesion amenable to high dose radiotherapy and at least one additional extracranial lesion of measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) that will not receive radiotherapy. Tumors must be PD-L1 positive as defined as &amp;gt;1% on IHC using the SP142 Ventana Assay. Key exclusion criteria include patients with germline BRCA pathogenic variants, more than three previous lines of chemotherapy treatment in the advanced setting with or without IO, and breast cancer progression within the first 3 months of previous IO treatment for non-metastatic or metastatic breast cancer. Sample size was determined using Simon’s 2-stage Minimax design to detect a 20% increase in ORR. The null hypothesis that the true response rate among gBRCA1/2 negative patients of 10% will be tested against a one-sided alternative. Inflammatory cytokines, circulating B cells, and ctDNA will be collected for correlative analysis. Enrollment began in April 2021. The study is managed by the Hoosier Cancer Research Network and is open to accrual at Emory University and University of Alabama at Birmingham. Clinical trial information: NCT04690855 Citation Format: Mylin A. Torres, Kevin Kalinsky, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Ahmed Elkhanany, Jolinta Lin, David M. Schuster, Sarah Friend, Jeffrey Switchenko, Manali Bhave. HCRN BRE 19-433: A Multi-institutional Phase II Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of TAlazoparib, Radiotherapy and Atezolizumab in gBRCA 1/2 negative Patients with PD-L1+ Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TARA) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-10-03.

A phase II trial of pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line systemic therapy in advanced penile cancer: HERCULES (LACOG 0218) trial.

TPS14 Background: Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is an uncommon malignancy which accounts for 2,300 new cases and 400 deaths annually worldwide. However, in low-income countries from South America, Asia and Africa, incidence corresponds to 10-20% of all malignancies in men. Approximately 4% of PSCC patients present with metastatic disease at diagnosis. Also, even if diagnosed in early stages (localized disease), around 30% of patients will recur. No improvements have been achieved over the last three decades in platinum-based chemotherapy, which remains the standard-of-care; objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are currently at 20-30%, 3-4 months and 7-15 months, respectively. HPV16 is the most important known risk factor for PSCC. Favorable results have been achieved with Pembrolizumab in other HPV-associated cancers, such as cervical and oropharyngeal cancer. HERCULES (LACOG 0218) aims to evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced PSCC. Methods: HERCULES is a phase 2, single-arm, multicentric trial evaluating patients with histologically proven PSCC and metastatic disease (de novo or recurrent); or recurrent locally advanced disease not amenable to curative-intent therapy; or TanyN3M0 or T4NanyM0 (stage IV – AJCC 8th ed) not amenable to curative-intent therapy. Additional inclusion criteria were ECOG PS 0–1; measurable disease by RECIST 1.1; no prior systemic therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease (however, patients progressing after 12 months of neo/adjuvant chemotherapy completion are allowed). The primary endpoint is ORR up to week 24. Secondary endpoints are OS, PFS, clinical benefit rate, immune related response criteria, quality of life, safety, and predictive biomarkers of response/survival. Eligible subjects receive 5-FU 1000mg/m²/day IV D1-D4, cisplatin 70mg/m² or carboplatin AUC 5 IV D1 plus pembrolizumab 200mg IV D1 at each 3-week (Q3W) dosing cycle for 6 cycles, followed by Pembrolizumab 200mg IV Q3W maintenance. Patients without disease progression are allowed to continue pembrolizumab monotherapy until completing 34 cycles, disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whichever comes first. Tumor evaluations are performed every 6 weeks until week 24. Sample size was calculated as 33 patients to detect an increase in ORR from 20% to 40% up to week 24 with 78.5% power and considering 10% drop-out. From Aug 2020 to Jul 2022, 33 patients were enrolled in 11 Brazilian research sites. Results are expected in 2023. NCT04224740. Clinical trial information: NCT04224740 .

Immunotherapy and Hepatocellular Cancer: Where Are We Now?

Simple SummaryHCC is the third-leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Prior to the immunotherapy era, treatment of advanced HCC was dominated by antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with a quite poor prognosis with a median survival time of around one year. In this review, we aimed to elaborate on all the advances in immunotherapy in HCC from the indisputable first-line therapy atezolizumab–bevacizumab in advanced HCC to promising new strategies. We highlight the new standard of care in advanced HCC, namely, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) durvalumab–tremelimumab, and also discuss the different combinations of antiangiogenic drugs with ICI. We develop how the combination of ICI with locoregional therapies could become a future treatment in early and intermediate-stage HCC, and, finally, we outline several new cell-therapy-based strategies to follow in the coming years.Immunotherapy has demonstrated its effectiveness in many cancers. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), promising results shown in the first phase II studies evaluating anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 monotherapies resulted in their approval in the United States. Approval was not obtained in Europe; subsequent randomized studies in first- or second-line treatment did not confirm these initial results. However, first data with immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic treatments or dual immunotherapy combinations were positive. In this context, the combination of bevacizumab and atezolizumab took the lead. The IMbrave150 trial revealed an improved objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and overall survival with this combination versus the previous standard, sorafenib. Subsequent results of dual immunotherapy with the anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 monotherapies tremelimumab and durvalumab (also superior to sorafenib monotherapy) confirmed the value of using a combination in first-line treatment. These significant therapeutic advances, and the increase in ORR, raise two main questions. Whereas response was very limited with previous treatments, the ORR reported with these new combinations are between 20% and 30%. This raises the question of whether immunotherapy (ICI single agent, combination of ICI with antiangiogenic agent or other antitumoral treatment) can be used in patients beyond those in BCLC group C, the traditional candidate group for systemic therapy. We have thus seen an increasing number of patients previously treated with trans-arterial chemoembolization (BCLC group B) receiving these new treatments, and we develop the results of several studies combining loco-regional therapies and immunotherapy-based systemic treatments. The other major question is that of how and when to use these medical treatments as “adjuvants” to interventional radiology or surgery; the results of several works are discussed for this purpose. In this review, we cover all of these points in a fairly comprehensive manner.

A Comparison of Chemotherapy Used with and without Apatinib for Patients with Ovarian Carcinoma Who Progressed after Standard Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the therapeutic efficacy and clinical safety of the combination therapy of apatinib plus chemotherapy with that of chemotherapy alone in patients with refractory or recurrent ovarian carcinoma (OC). Methods Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) or case-control studies (CCS) were identified by searching Chinese and English databases up to October 31, 2020. The risk of methodological bias tool and Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) were used to assess trial quality. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to evaluate the therapeutic effects and adverse drug reactions. Subgroup analyses of study type, study sample size, dosage of apatinib, and chemotherapy regimen between treatment group and control group were performed. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot symmetry, Begg–Mazumdar test, and Egger test. The robustness of our results was presented by removing the trial one by one. Results Fifteen eligible studies covering 1,020 patients were included in this review and meta-analysis. Among these studies, 8 were RCTs, and 7 were CCSs. Compared with chemotherapy alone, apatinib plus chemotherapy significantly increased objective response rate (OR = 3.55; 95% CI 2.31 to 5.47), disease control rate (OR = 3.04; 95% CI 2.12 to 4.36), and overall survival (OR = 5.03; 95% CI 3.16 to 6.90). Conclusions The combination treatment of apatinib plus chemotherapy provides better clinical benefits for OC patients when compared to chemotherapy alone and should be recommended for suitable patients with OC after the failure of standard regimens. However, further investigation into future large-scale prospective randomized research is still needed.

Phase II trial of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib in patients (pts) with advanced and refractory well‐differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP NETs).

TPS376 Background: Despite advances in the treatment of advanced GEP NETs, long‐term disease control remains a challenge. Overexpression and altered regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4 and 6 have been observed in multiple subtypes of GEP NETs. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that the CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib reduces growth of pancreatic NET cell lines and levels of phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein in vitro. Moreover, the drug significantly inhibited tumor growth in vivo in pancreatic NET xenograft models. Abemaciclib is a selective small molecule CDK 4/6 inhibitor, approved for the treatment of HR+ HER2– metastatic breast cancer. Clinical activity and central nervous system penetration of the drug have been observed in several tumor types in clinical trials, including partial response in one pt with metastatic small intestinal NET. We have developed a Phase 2 trial of abemaciclib in GEP NETs to evaluate its efficacy and safety in these rare cancers. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated non-randomized phase 2 trial using a two-stage design. Eligible pts have metastatic or locally advanced unresectable well-differentiated grade 1-2 GEP NETs, ECOG PS 0-2, and must have progressed on at least one line of systemic therapy. Prior or concurrent treatment with somatostatin analogs is allowed,. Abemaciclib is administered at a dose of 200 mg orally every 12 hours continuously in 28-day cycles. Dose reductions for toxicities are allowed to level -1 (150 mg) and -2 (100 mg). Primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. A two‐stage design with 88% power to detect an increase in ORR to 20% with abemaciclib at the 1‐sided 0.05 level would require a total of 37 patients. Stage 1 will include 20 patients, and if one response is seen among these patients, the study will continue to enroll another 17 patients. The trial was activated in January 2020, and 3 patients have been enrolled to date. Available archival tumor tissue and molecular profiling data are collected for future correlative studies including assessment of response biomarkers.

Efficacy and Safety of 8 spheres Plus Cisplatin Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Background: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety between 8 spheres plus bronchial arterial infusion (BAI) cisplatin and intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin as third-line treatments in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Materials and Methods: Totally, 56 locally advanced NSCLC patients with second-line chemotherapy failure were recruited. Then, 28 patients received 8 spheres plus BAI cisplatin treatment, and another 28 patients received intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin treatment. Results: In general, 8 spheres plus BAI cisplatin increased objective response rate (57.2% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.002) and disease control rate (78.6% vs. 42.8%, p = 0.003) compared with intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin; meanwhile, it also elevated quality of life (QOL) score (46.7 ± 7.1 vs. 41.5 ± 5.2, p = 0.003) compared with intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin. Furthermore, 8 spheres plus BAI cisplatin prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (median [95% confidence interval, CI]: 7.9 [6.3-9.5] months vs. 4.3 [3.5-5.1] months, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (median [95% CI]: 14.6 [11.0-18.2] months vs. 10.5 [10.2-10.8] months, p = 0.029) compared with intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin, which was further supported by multivariate Cox's regression analysis (PFS: p < 0.001; OS: p = 0.007). In addition, subgroup analyses revealed that 8 spheres plus BAI cisplatin markedly elevated treatment response, QOL, and survival compared with intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin in squamous cell carcinoma patients, but not in adenomatous carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma patients. Regarding safety, 8 spheres plus BAI cisplatin exhibited lower rates of gastrointestinal tract complication (p < 0.001) and myelosuppression (p < 0.001) than intravenous vinorelbine plus cisplatin. Conclusions: 8 spheres plus BAI cisplatin displays good efficacy and well-tolerated safety profiles in locally advanced NSCLC patients with second-line chemotherapy failure.

Prognostic and Predictive Impact of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Advanced Cancers Treated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade.

The utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker in patients with advanced cancers receiving immunotherapy is uncertain. We therefore analyzed pretreatment (n = 978) and on-treatment (n = 171) ctDNA samples across 16 advanced-stage tumor types from three phase I/II trials of durvalumab (± the anti-CTLA4 therapy tremelimumab). Higher pretreatment variant allele frequencies (VAF) were associated with poorer overall survival (OS) and other known prognostic factors, but not objective response, suggesting a prognostic role for patient outcomes. On-treatment reductions in VAF and lower on-treatment VAF were independently associated with longer progression-free survival and OS and increased objective response rate, but not prognostic variables, suggesting that on-treatment ctDNA dynamics are predictive of benefit from immune checkpoint blockade. Accordingly, we propose a concept of "molecular response" using ctDNA, incorporating both pretreatment and on-treatment VAF, that predicted long-term survival similarly to initial radiologic response while also permitting early differentiation of responders among patients with initially radiologically stable disease. SIGNIFICANCE: In a pan-cancer analysis of immune checkpoint blockade, pretreatment ctDNA levels appeared prognostic and on-treatment dynamics predictive. A "molecular response" metric identified long-term responders and adjudicated benefit among patients with initially radiologically stable disease. Changes in ctDNA may be more dynamic than radiographic changes and could complement existing trial endpoints.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1775.

Integrated analysis of concomitant medications and oncological outcomes from PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in clinical practice.

BackgroundConcomitant medications, such as steroids, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and antibiotics, might affect clinical outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter observational retrospective study aimed at evaluating the impact of concomitant medications on clinical outcomes, by weighing their associations with baseline clinical characteristics (including performance status, burden of disease and body mass index) and the underlying causes for their prescription. This analysis included consecutive stage IV patients with cancer, who underwent treatment with single agent antiprogrammed death-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) with standard doses and schedules at the medical oncology departments of 20 Italian institutions. Each medication taken at the immunotherapy initiation was screened and collected into key categories as follows: corticosteroids, antibiotics, gastric acid suppressants (including proton pump inhibitors - PPIs), statins and other lipid-lowering agents, aspirin, anticoagulants, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), ACE inhibitors/Angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium antagonists, β-blockers, metformin and other oral antidiabetics, opioids.ResultsFrom June 2014 to March 2020, 1012 patients were included in the analysis. Primary tumors were: non-small cell lung cancer (52.2%), melanoma (26%), renal cell carcinoma (18.3%) and others (3.6%). Baseline statins (HR 1.60 (95% CI 1.14 to 2.25), p=0.0064), aspirin (HR 1.47 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.08, p=0.0267) and β-blockers (HR 1.76 (95% CI 1.16 to 2.69), p=0.0080) were confirmed to be independently related to an increased objective response rate. Patients receiving cancer-related steroids (HR 1.72 (95% CI 1.43 to 2.07), p<0.0001), prophylactic systemic antibiotics (HR 1.85 (95% CI 1.23 to 2.78), p=0.0030), prophylactic gastric acid suppressants (HR 1.29 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.53), p=0.0021), PPIs (HR 1.26 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.48), p=0.0050), anticoagulants (HR 1.43 (95% CI: 1.16 to 1.77), p=0.0007) and opioids (HR 1.71 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.28), p=0.0002) were confirmed to have a significantly higher risk of disease progression. Patients receiving cancer-related steroids (HR 2.16 (95% CI 1.76 to 2.65), p<0.0001), prophylactic systemic antibiotics (HR 1.93 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.98), p=0.0030), prophylactic gastric acid suppressants (HR 1.29 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.57), p=0.0091), PPI (HR 1.26 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.52), p=0.0172), anticoagulants (HR 1.45 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.84), p=0.0024) and opioids (HR 1.53 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.11), p=0.0098) were confirmed to have a significantly higher risk of death.ConclusionWe confirmed the association between baseline steroids administered for cancer-related indication, systemic antibiotics, PPIs and worse clinical outcomes with PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors, which can be assumed to have immune-modulating detrimental effects.

Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab with axitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma

Objective Pembrolizumab/axitinib significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and increased objective response rate versus sunitinib in the phase III trial KEYNOTE-426 among previously untreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab/axitinib versus other first-line treatments of advanced RCC from a US public healthcare payer perspective. Methods A partitioned survival model with three states (progression-free, progressed, death) evaluated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for pembrolizumab/axitinib and other first-line regimens: sunitinib, pazopanib and avelumab/axitinib in the overall population; and sunitinib, cabozantinib and nivolumab/ipilimumab in the subgroup with intermediate/poor prognostic risk. Costs of treatments, adverse events and medical resources were estimated. OS, PFS and treatment duration were extrapolated using parametric models fitted to KEYNOTE-426 data and hazard ratios from network meta-analyses. Utilities were derived through mixed-effects regressions of KEYNOTE-426 EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels data. Results In the overall population, pembrolizumab/axitinib was associated with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of $95,725/QALY versus sunitinib and $128,210/QALY versus pazopanib, and was dominant (lower cost, higher effectiveness) versus avelumab/axitinib, with incremental QALY gains of 2.73, 2.40 and 1.80 versus these therapies, respectively. In the intermediate/poor-risk subgroup, base-case ICERs for pembrolizumab/axitinib were $101,030/QALY versus sunitinib, $6989/QALY versus cabozantinib, and $130,934/QALY versus nivolumab/ipilimumab, with incremental QALY gains of 2.62, 1.78 and 1.06 versus these therapies. Conclusions In this economic evaluation, pembrolizumab/axitinib was associated with higher life expectancy and QALYs and, based on typical willingness-to-pay thresholds of $150,000–$180,000/QALY, was found cost-effective versus other first-line treatments for advanced RCC in the US.

Critical appraisal of MGMT in digestive NET treated with alkylating agents

The efficacy of alkylating agents (temozolomide, dacarbazine, streptozotocin) in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has been well documented, especially in pancreatic NETs. Alkylating agents transfer methyl adducts on DNA bases. Among them, O6-methylguanine accounts for many of their cytotoxic effects and can be repaired by the O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT). However, whether the tumor MGMT status could be a reliable biomarker of efficacy of alkylating agents in NETs is still a matter of debate. Herein, we sought to provide a critical appraisal of the role of the MGMT status in NETs. After reviewing the molecular mechanisms of repair of DNA damage induced by alkylating agents, we aimed to comprehensively review the methods of determination of the MGMT status and its impact on prognosis, prediction of objective response and progression-free survival in patients with advanced digestive NETs treated by alkylating agents. About half of pancreatic NETs are MGMT-deficient, as determined by impaired tumor MGMT expression or by MGMT promoter methylation. Overall, while published studies are heterogeneous and mostly limited in size, they advocate that MGMT deficiency may be a relevant biomarker for increased objective response rate, prolonged progression-fee survival and overall survival in patients with advanced NETs treated by alkylating agents. While these data require confirmation in prospective controlled studies, future research should focus on the standardization of MGMT status assessment. Additional mechanisms of repair of DNA damages induced by alkylating agents should be explored in order to identify biomarkers complementary to MGMT and targets for potential antitumor synergy, such as PARP.

Olaparib to Change Practice in mCRPC

Olaparib can be effective in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have homologous recombination repair gene alterations. In the phase III PROfound trial, the drug extended median radiographic progression-free survival and increased objective response rate in patients with BRCA 1/2 and ATM mutations, compared with enzalutamide or abiraterone plus prednisone.

Prognostic value of EGFR 19-del and 21-L858R mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Previous studies have demonstrated a significant difference in clinical characteristics between patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring exon 19 deletion (19-del) and an exon point mutation (21-L858R) in EGFR. The present retrospective study aimed to investigate the differential prognosis in patients with NSCLC harboring exon 19-del and 21-L858R mutations. The clinical and follow-up data of 137 patients treated at the Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (Wuhan, Hubei, China) between August 2012 and August 2016, who were diagnosed with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC harboring either exon 19-del or 21-L858R mutations, were analyzed. The patients were divided into the first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), first-line chemotherapy and second-line TKI treatment groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time of patients harboring the exon 19-del mutation was significantly improved compared with that in patients harboring the 21-L858R mutation (11.3 vs. 8.8 months, respectively; P=0.017) following first-line TKI treatments. However, no significant difference in the median PFS time was observed between the exon 19-del and 21-L858R groups following the first-line chemotherapy or second-line TKI treatment. In patients with the exon 19-del, first-line TKI treatment achieved an increased objective response rate (ORR; 51.9 vs. 18.5%; P=0.004) and disease control rate (96.2 vs. 77.8%; P=0.030), and a longer PFS time (11.3 vs. 8.0 months; P=0.034) compared with that in the patients following first-line chemotherapy. First- and second-line TKI treatment achieved a similar PFS time (11.3 vs. 11.0 months, respectively; P=0.140). However, in patients with the 21-L858R mutation, the first-line TKI therapy and first-line chemotherapy groups exhibited a similar PFS time (8.8 vs. 3.5 months, respectively; P=0.063), while the second-line TKI treatment group exhibited a significantly longer PFS time compared with the first-line TKI treatment group (13.6 vs. 8.8 months, respectively; P=0.030). There was a differential sensitivity to treatment between patients harboring the exon 19-del and 21-L858R mutations. Therefore, chemotherapy may increase the sensitivity to TKIs in patients harboring the 21-L858R mutation.

Combination treatment with cetuximab in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a meta-analysis.

PurposeCetuximab, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, carries the potential for combination treatment against nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the possible benefits and safety between the combination treatment with cetuximab and conventional treatment in NPC patients. Skin toxicity (ST) associated with additional cetuximab was evaluated as well.MethodsWe performed a systematic search (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang Data) for studies comparing combination treatment with cetuximab versus conventional treatment in NPC patients. The selected studies included completely or partly reported clinical outcomes including survivals, complete and partial responses, and adverse reactions (ST). The pooled HR, relative risk (RR), and respective 95% CI were estimated by using fixed effects model or random effects model.ResultsA total of 23 relevant studies with available data were included in the final analysis. According to the pooled data, combination treatment with cetuximab showed improved efficacy on increased objective response rate (studies with cetuximab treatment: RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.29–1.50; concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab: RR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.25–1.54) and prolonged survival (studies with cetuximab treatment: the pooled HR for OS was 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55–0.89; concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab: the pooled HR for OS was 0.64, 95% CI: 0.49–0.84) compared with conventional treatment. Moreover, the improved efficacy was invariably accompanied by an increased occurrence of ST (studies with cetuximab treatment: RR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.81–3.34; concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab: RR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.02–3.31). However, the majority of adverse reactions exhibited similar occurrence rates between the different treatments.ConclusionPatients with NPC receiving additional cetuximab treatment can benefit more from this systemic comprehensive therapy, while the efficiency of conventional treatment for NPC is limited. ST associated with cetuximab may be used as a potential on-treatment marker to guide treatment with cetuximab against NPC.