Increase In Central Subfield Thickness Research Articles

Impact of COVID-19 on a real-world treat-and-extend regimen with aflibercept for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on injection intervals among patients treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. DesignRetrospective cohort study. ParticipantsPatients treated at a single practice using a treat-and-extend regimen with intravitreal aflibercept between December 2018 and April 2021. MethodsThe primary outcome was the change in injection intervals. Secondary outcomes included differences in best-recorded visual acuity (BRVA) and central subfield thickness (CST). Associations were evaluated with linear mixed-effects modelling. ResultsThis study included 1839 injections from 185 eyes (141 patients). The median (interquartile range) injection intervals in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods were 60 (42–70) and 70 (49–90) days, respectively. The pandemic was associated with a mean injection interval lengthening of 7.2 days (P < 0.001), a decrease in BRVA of 3.1 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (P < 0.001), and a reduction in CST of 14.7 μm (P = 0.003). The presence of exudative intraretinal fluid was associated with a reduction in treatment intervals of 11.1 days (P < 0.001), a reduction in BRVA of 1.9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (P < 0.001), and an increase in CST of 52.4 μm (P < 0.001). The presence of subretinal fluid was associated with a reduction in treatment intervals of 8.5 days (P < 0.001) and an increase in CST of 21.6 μm (P < 0.001). ConclusionsThis real-world study estimated that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic resulted in an injection extension of 7.2 days with associated decreases in BRVA and CST that are unlikely clinically significant on a population basis. This builds on evidence suggesting that long-term vascular endothelial growth factor suppression can facilitate meaningful interval extensions while maintaining visual acuity.

Impact of treat and extend criteria on proportions that can be extended after loading phase of 2 mg aflibercept therapy for neovascular age related macular degeneration: PRECISE Report 5.

To study the impact of definitions of various treatment extension criteria on the proportion of patients who could be extended at their first visit after the loading phase of 2 mg aflibercept therapy for neovascular age related macular degeneration (nAMD). Patients with nAMD initiated on the loading phase of three intravitreal doses of 2 mg aflibercept in routine clinical practice were recruited from December 2019 to August 2021. The response to the loading phase was assessed at approximately 8 weeks post-loading (up to 140 days from first injection) based on different definitions of response. The proportion of patients that qualify for interval extension based on different clinical trial criteria was also evaluated. A total of 722 patients with visual acuity (VA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans done at all 4 visits were included. Of these 32.4% of eyes responded with complete macular fluid resolution after the first injection with no recurrence through the loading phase (super-responders) while 26.9% had persistent macular fluid in all 4 visits (true non-responders). The rest were considered suboptimal responders. Change in VA showed marked variations within each of these categories of fluid resolution. For extension of next treatment interval, if presence of any macular fluid at the post-loading visit is the only criteria considered, about 50% could be extended to 8 weeks. If both VA worsening by ≥5 letters and a > 25 μm increase in central sub-field thickness (CST)are considered, 90% will be eligible for interval extension. Clinical trial designs and pre-defined treatment extension/shortening criteria determine the proportion of patients requiring treatment in the post-loading visit. The short and long-term impact of interval extension immediate post-loading on visual outcome in clinical practice is unknown.

Risk factors for failing sub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide for uveitic macular edema

BackgroundSub-Tenon’s triamcinolone acetonide (STA) is less effective than intravitreal corticosteroids in the treatment of uveitic macular edema (ME), but does have some relative advantages, including substantially lower cost and decreased risk of post-injection ocular hypertension. It would be useful for clinicians to know which eyes may respond well to STA and not necessarily require intravitreal therapy. The objective of this study is to identify risk factors for failing STA for the treatment of uveitic ME.Main bodyA retrospective cohort study was performed. Medical records were reviewed of patients who underwent STA for the treatment of uveitic ME between January 1, 2013, and July 31, 2022, at the University of Colorado Hospital. Uveitic ME was defined by a central subfield thickness (CST) greater than 320 μm or the presence of intra-retinal cystoid spaces on optical coherence tomography (OCT), or by the presence of petaloid macular leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA). Data collected included age, race/ethnicity, sex, history of diabetes mellitus, anatomic classification of uveitis, use of corticosteroids, use of immunomodulatory therapy, presence of intra-retinal fluid on OCT, CST on OCT, and presence of petaloid macular leakage on FA. STA failure was defined as the need for additional therapy within 12 weeks of STA due to persistent or worsening uveitic ME. One hundred eighty eyes from 131 patients were included. Forty-two eyes (23.3%) were considered treatment failures. In univariate and multivariable analysis, higher baseline CST was associated with a higher likelihood of failing STA (OR 1.17 for each 30 μm increase in CST, P = 0.016).ConclusionsSTA, while not as potent as intravitreal corticosteroids for the treatment of uveitic ME, was still an effective therapy, particularly for patients with lower baseline CST. Given its lower side effect profile and cost compared to intravitreal treatments, clinicians could consider STA as an initial treatment for mild uveitic ME.

Concentrated triamcinolone acetonide suprachoroidally administered for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema

Introduction/Objective. Diabetic macular oedema is the accumulation of fluid in the macular tissue leading to its thickening. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of concentrated triamcinolone acetonide 10 mg / 0.1 ml injection into the suprachoroidal space in patients with diabetic macular oedema and decreased visual acuity. Methods. In 12 eyes with diabetic macular oedema, without any prior treatment, using a small-diameter 26G needle, an injection of 10 mg / 0.1 ml triamcinolone acetonide was applied into the suprachoroidal space in the superotemporal quadrant of the eye 4 mm from the limbus. Prior to the injection, as well as one, three, six, nine, and 12 months after the injection, visual acuity and intraocular pressure were measured, and central subfield thickness was recorded using optical coherence tomography. Results. After one, three, six, and nine post-injection months there was a statistically significant reduction in central subfield thickness (315.92 ?m, 257.66 ?m, 281.08 ?m and 295.51 ?m, respectively) compared to the baseline of 447.67 ?m. At the end of the 12th month an increase in central subfield thickness was observed again (392.16 ?m). Visual acuity improved significantly from the baseline (0.32) during the first three months (0.61) and remained stable until the end of the nineth month (0.51), but at the end of 12 months it decreased again (0.39). No significant intraocular pressure elevation and cataract development were observed in either eye during the entire follow-up period. Conclusion. A single dose of 10 mg / 0.1 ml triamcinolone acetonide injected in suprachoroidal space can significantly stabilize diabetic macular oedema and maintain satisfactory visual acuity for up to nine months.

Consequences of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment lapse in patients with retinal vein occlusion.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments are the first-line treatment for Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO). Although effectiveness and safety of these treatments is well documented, knowledge regarding the effect of lapses in anti-VEGF treatment among RVO patients is lacking. The purpose of this study is to analyse the anatomic and visual outcomes from a lapse in anti-VEGF treatment in patients with RVO. This retrospective case-control study evaluated 136 patients diagnosed with RVO and treated with anti-VEGF between January 2012 and June 2020 at Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic. Patients were divided into two cohorts: RVO patients with no lapse in anti-VEGF treatment (control group) and RVO patients with a lapse ≥3 months (lapse group). Central subfield thickness (CST) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were collected pre-lapse, the first appointment post-lapse, and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up appointments. Lapse patients (n = 68) and control patients (n = 68) had similar pre-lapse CST (p = 0.466) and BCVA (p = 0.303). Lapse patients experienced a significant increase in CST after discontinuing anti-VEGF therapy (lapse: 400.6 ± 192.1 µm, control: 333.0 ± 111.1 µm, p = 0.024). This persisted 12 months post-lapse after re-initiation of anti-VEGF agents (lapse: 381.6 ± 161.1 µm, control: 307.5 ± 95.4 µm, p = 0.030). Lapse patients also experienced a decrease in BCVA after lapse (lapse: 54.3 ± 25.1 ETDRS, control: 64.4 ± 17.8 ETDRS, p < 0.001) that recovered after 6 months of anti-VEGF treatment. RVO patients with any lapse of anti-VEGF treatment are at risk for poorer anatomic and visual outcomes. Though BCVA normalizes upon treatment resumption, patients experience a statistically significant increase in CST that does not recover.

RECURRENCE RATE OF CYSTOID MACULAR EDEMA WITH TOPICAL DORZOLAMIDE TREATMENT AND ITS RISK FACTORS IN RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA.

To investigate the rate of the recurrence of cystoid macular edema (CME) secondary to retinitis pigmentosa (RP) after the initiation of topical dorzolamide and the recurrence risk factors. We retrospectively analyzed the data of RP patients at Kyushu University Hospital. We included patients who showed a treatment response to 1.0% topical dorzolamide. The day of treatment initiation was set as the baseline. Topical dorzolamide treatment was continued during the follow-up. The recurrence of CME (defined as a >20% increase in central subfield thickness compared to previous visit, or a central subfield thickness value that exceed baseline value) was evaluated at each follow-up visit. Risk factors for RP-CME recurrence were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards modeling. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate the time to recurrent RP-CME. Forty RP-CME patients showed a treatment response to topical dorzolamide. During the mean 3.9-year follow-up, 14 patients exhibited recurrence; its rate was 15.6%, 34.7%, and 48.7% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. A high baseline central subfield thickness was significantly associated with recurrent (hazard ratio 1.11, 95% CI: 1.05-1.18, P = 0.0004). The recurrence rate of RP-CME increased with time. A high baseline central subfield thickness value was a risk factor for recurrence.

Higher Levels of Serum Ionic Calcium are Associated with Macular Edema in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.

The aim was to study the association of serum total calcium, ionic calcium, and magnesium with increases in macular thickness parameters and photoreceptor ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption in diabetic macular edema (DME). This study is a tertiary care center based observational cross-sectional study with sixty-six consecutive cases, divided into 3 groups of 22 cases each with no diabetic retinopathy (No DR), non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and a control group of 22 healthy controls. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured on logMAR scale. Central subfield thickness (CST), cube average thickness (CAT), and EZ disruption were assessed using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Serum total calcium, ionic calcium, and magnesium were measured using standard protocol. Data was analyzed statistically. Significant correlation was found between the increase in CST and the increase in serum total calcium and serum ionic calcium. Increase in CAT was significantly correlated with an increase in serum total calcium, serum ionic calcium, and a decrease in serum magnesium. Grades of EZ disruption and logMAR BCVA were also found to be significantly positively associated with serum total calcium and ionic calcium and negatively with serum magnesium. Increased levels of serum ionic calcium and decreased levels of serum magnesium are associated with an increase in macular thickness and EZ disruption in DME.

The impact of structural optical coherence tomography changes on visual function in retinal vein occlusion.

PurposeWe aimed to determine the correlation between optical coherence tomography (OCT)‐ and demographic features and baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in treatment‐naïve patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO).MethodsThis was a cross‐sectional posthoc analysis of OCT images that included RVO patients from two prospective, open‐label, multicentre studies. The morphological grading was done manually, in the standardized setting of a reading centre. Main outcome measure was the estimated difference in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters associated with each individual biomarker.ResultsIncluded were 381/301 treatment‐naïve patients with BRVO/CRVO. For BRVO, statistically significant correlations with BCVA were seen for a 100 µm increase in central subfield thickness (CST; −3.1 letters), intraretinal cysts at centre point (CP; +4.1), subretinal fluid (SRF) at CP (+3.0) and hyperreflective foci (HRF) at the central B‐scan (−2.2). In CRVO, a 100 µm increase in CST was associated with a loss of −3.4 letters. In the total cohort, 100 µm increase in CST, SRF at CP and HRF at the central B‐scan correlated with a difference of −3.2,+3.2 and −2.0 letters. A 10‐year increase in age and female gender yielded a −2.0 and −2.5 letter decrease in the total cohort. Adjusted multiple R 2 for the respective group was 18.3%/26.3%/23.5%.ConclusionsOf all parameters studied, only CST and age were consistently associated with worse BCVA in treatment‐naïve RVO patients. Morphology on OCT explained only a modest part of functional loss in this patient cohort.

CONSEQUENCES OF LAPSES IN TREATMENT WITH VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR INHIBITORS IN NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION IN ROUTINE CLINICAL PRACTICE.

Evaluating outcomes in patients receiving intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration whom experience a lapse in treatment. A retrospective chart review evaluating 3,304 patients ≥18 years who experienced treatment lapses ≥3 months compared with control counterparts. Demographic information, macular thickness as measured by central subfield thickness, and visual acuity were collected at baseline, the first postlapse appointment, and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the lapse for the study group. Lapse (n = 241) and control patients (n = 241) had similar baseline visual acuity and central subfield thickness (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study: 58.9 ± 20.2 [20/63] vs. 59.2 ± 20.1 [20/63]; central subfield thickness: 252.4 ± 63.2 µm vs. 259.8 ± 66.2 µm, P = 0.21). Analysis revealed that lapse patients experienced a significant increase in central subfield thickness after lapse when compared with controls (279.4 ± 86.9 µm vs. 253.7 ± 65.9 µm, P < 0.01), which normalized on resumption of treatment (259.1 ± 79 µm vs. 246.8 ± 57.6 µm, P = 0.06). Study patients also experienced loss in the visual acuity after lapse when compared with controls (52.9 ± 23.6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [20/100] vs. 59.9 ± 20.8 [20/63] Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, P < 0.01) that did not recover through 12 months of follow-up. Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who have lapses in care are at risk for poorer outcomes. Although macular thickness normalizes on resumption of treatment, their decline in the visual acuity does not recover.

Visual and Anatomic Outcomes following Cataract Surgery in Patients with Pre-operative Macular Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusions Managed with Intravitreal anti-VEGF

ABSTRACT Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusions (RVO) who were actively managed with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) before and after cataract surgery. Methods Retrospective, cohort study of all patients with RVO who underwent cataract surgery and were receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections from January 1st, 2012 through October 31st, 2018. There were 31 eyes that underwent cataract surgery and received at least one intravitreal anti-VEGF injection for a diagnosis of RVO within 6 months prior to surgery. Data collected included the development of subretinal or intraretinal macular fluid in the 6 months following surgery, timing of injections, number of injections, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central subfield thickness (CST). Results There was a significant improvement between pre- and post-operative BCVA when comparing all eyes (p values < .0001) and no significant difference in CST before and after surgery (p > .05). Eyes without fluid pre-operatively saw an improvement in visual acuity, but with an initial significant increase in CST (p = .03) that normalized over time (p = .33) without an increase in frequency of anti-VEGF injections. Conclusion Patients with cataracts who are actively managed for macular edema due to RVO with anti-VEGF agents may undergo cataract surgery, knowing they will have a transient increase in macular thickness that resolves without adjusting the frequency of intravitreal injections and is not visually significant.

The Effect of Select Systemic Medications on Visual Outcomes in Diabetics With Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose:The purpose of this article is to evaluate the effect of systemic medications and glycemic control on the visual outcome and treatment burden in patients with diabetes and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).Methods:A retrospective review was performed for patients with diabetes diagnosed with a BRVO at an academic eye center from 2009 to 2017. The use of select antihypertensives, antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, and hypoglycemics was reviewed. Data on visual acuity (VA), central subfield thickness (CST), treatment course, and hemoglobin (Hb)A1c were obtained throughout follow-up.Results:A total of 121 eyes met criteria with a median follow-up duration of 19.4 months. The mean baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA was 0.56 (Snellen equivalent, 20/72) and mean final logMAR VA was 0.5 (20/63). At final follow-up, aspirin 325 mg was associated with 4.8 fewer injections (n = 13, P = .04), insulin was associated with 3.6 more injections (n = 26, P = .04), warfarin was associated with a 79 µm increase in CST ( P = .02), and a 1% increase in HbA1c was associated with 0.86 more injections ( P &lt; .01).Conclusions:The VA outcome of BRVO in diabetics may be worse than that of BRVO in nondiabetics. Worse diabetic control was associated with a higher treatment burden. High-dose aspirin was associated with fewer injections.

Macular thickness in diabetic retinopathy without clinically significant macular edema

Aim: To measure macular thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in various grades of diabetic retinopathy with no clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and its comparison with non-diabetics.&#x0D; Design: Prospective cross–sectional study.&#x0D; Methods: Macular thickness was measured by OCT in 72 healthy volunteers (107 control eyes), 45 patients with mild and moderate non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (78 eyes) and 37 patients with severe NPDR and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (66 eyes). Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) as assessed by stereoscopic evaluation or photographs were excluded. One-way ANOVA test to compare the mean thickness and Tukey's test for multiple comparison between groups were used.&#x0D; Results: Central subfield thickness (CST) was 238.57 ± 25.077 µm, 251.22 ± 24.649 µm, and 270.45 ± 28.956 µm in the three groups respectively. As the severity of retinopathy increased, the macular thickness significantly increased (p = &lt; 0.001) in all the nine zones on OCT. There was a significant increase in CST noted in all the grades of retinopathy when compared with non-diabetics (p = 0.004, p = &lt; 0.0001). No significant difference in macular thickness was noted between genders, irrespective of their groups (p = 0.72), or between the three groups in all the nine zones (p = 0.609).&#x0D; Conclusion: There is a significant increase in CST in all grades of retinopathy, as well as with increasing severity of retinopathy when compared to non-diabetics. This warrants the need to obtain OCT measurements even in patients with moderate NPDR without CSME to rule out subclinical DME.

Central subfield thickness and cube average thickness as bioimaging biomarkers for ellipsoid zone disruption in diabetic retinopathy

BackgroundTo evaluate the association of central subfield thickness (CST) and cube average thickness (CAT) with ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in patients of diabetic retinopathy (DR).MethodsCross sectional study including consecutive patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus [without DR (No DR, n = 97); non-proliferative DR (NPDR, n = 91); proliferative DR (PDR, n = 83)] and healthy controls (n = 82) was undertaken. CST and CAT values were measured using SD-OCT. Data was analyzed using Chi square test, ANOVA and multivariate analysis. Discriminant values of CST and CAT for EZ disruption were evaluated using receiver operator characteristic curve. Area under curve (AUC) was computed.ResultsMean CAT and CST values in the study subjects showed an incremental trend. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis showed increase in CST (OR = 1.022, p < 0.001) and CAT (OR = 1.029, p < 0.001) as significant independent predictors of EZ disruption. Area under curve showed excellent predictive results of CST (AUC = 0. 943 ± 0.021, 95% CI, 0.902–0.984, p < 0.05) and CAT (AUC = 0.959 ± 0.012, 95% CI 0.936–0.982, p < 0.05), as bioimaging biomarkers, for EZ disruption.ConclusionIncrease in CST and CAT is associated with increased odds of EZ disruption and these macular parameters serve as bioimaging biomarkers for EZ disruption in DR.

One-year outcomes of ziv-aflibercept for macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion

PurposeTo report the 12-month efficacy and safety outcomes of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept in macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). MethodsInterventional case series documenting 12-month outcomes of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (1.25 mg in 0.05 mL) in 6 patients with treatment-naive macular edema secondary to CRVO. All patients had comprehensive ophthalmic examination, spectral domain optical coherence tomography at baseline and all follow-up visits, and fluorescein. Retreatment decisions were based on recurrence or persistence of intraretinal or subretinal fluid, deterioration in visual acuity (VA), increase in central subfield thickness (CST) by ≥ 50 μm from the previous visit, or lowest recorded CST. ResultsParticipants had (2 males, 4 females) an average age of 53.5 years. From baseline to 12 months, the mean logMAR VA improved from 0.86 (Snellen ≈ 20/145) to 0.33 (Snellen ≈ 20/40), central macular thickness decreased from 519 μm to 255 μm, and total macular volume decreased from 14.7 mm3 to 7.1 mm3. No eyes had uveitis, cataract progression, intraocular pressure (IOP) elevations, or systemic adverse events. Conclusions and importanceZiv-aflibercept achieves favorable intermediate-term functional and structural outcomes in macular edema secondary to CRVO. No safety concerns were raised. Low-cost ziv-aflibercept may thus be useful for CRVO in resource-poor countries. Further prospective studies in larger cohorts are needed further establish the efficacy and safety of this agent.

Effect of Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection on Diabetic Macular Edema Refractory to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection.

PurposeTo evaluate the effects of posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection on refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) after intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection failure.MethodsPatients with DME and central subfield thickness (CST) >300 µm who did not respond to IVB injections were retrospectively included. Specifically, we enrolled patients who were diagnosed with refractory DME and who experienced an increase in CST after 1 to 2 IVB injections or no decrease after ≥3 consecutive IVB injections. One clinician injected 20 mg of triamcinolone acetonide into the posterior subtenon space. All patients received ophthalmic examinations at baseline and at 2, 4, and 6 months post-baseline. Examinations included Snellen visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.ResultsForty eyes of 34 patients were included. The average baseline CST was 476 µm. The average CST decreased to 368 µm at 2 months, 374 µm at 4 months, and 427 µm at 6 months (p < 0.001 for all results, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The average intraocular pressure increased from 15.50 to 16.92 mmHg at 2 months but decreased to 16.30 mmHg at 4 months and 15.65 mmHg at 6 months. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity improved from 0.56 to 0.50 at 2 months (p = 0.023), 0.50 at 4 months (p = 0.083), and 0.48 at 6 months (p = 0.133, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No complications were detected.ConclusionsPosterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide is an effective and safe treatment for reducing CST in DME refractory to IVB.

Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Based Alterations in Macular Thickness and Inner Segment Ellipsoidare Associated with Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy

Objective: To study the association of spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) based alterations in macular thickness and inner segment-ellipsoid band (ISel) with severity of retinopathy in cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Method: Two hundred thirty eight consecutive cases and seventy nine healthy controls were included. Eyes of cases were divided into three groups according to ETDRS classification: diabetes without retinopathy (No DR) (n=79), non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) with macular edema (n=79), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with macular edema (n=80). Visual acuity was assessed using logMAR scale. Fasting and post prandial blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin were estimated as per standard protocol. All the study subjects were evaluated using SD-OCT using the macular cube 512×128 feature. Central subfield thickness (µm), cube average thickness (µm) and ISel disruption in foveal region were noted. The integrity of ISel was evaluated by two experienced observers masked to the status of diabetic retinopathy. Chi–square test, analysis of variance, unpaired t test and pearson correlation analysis were used to assess association between the study variables. Results: Statistically significant decrease in visual acuity was found between the study groups (p<0.0001 ). Significant negative correlation of visual acuity was found with HbA1c, central sub field thickness and ISel disruption (p<0.001).Significant increase in central subfield thickness and cube average thickness were found between the study groups (p<0.001). ISel disruption increased with increase in severity of diabetic retinopathy [(NPDR, n=55) versus (PDR, n=68)] (p<0.001).Statistically significant difference in the mean central subfield thickness in the cases with intact and disrupted ISel was observed in NPDR and PDR groups respectively. Conclusion: Diabetic macular edema as assessed by central subfield thickness, cube average thickness and ISel disruption, on SD-OCT, is associated with increased severity of diabetic retinopathy. For the first time, it has been demonstrated that with progression of retinopathy from non-proliferative to proliferative stage, increase in central subfield thickness is associated with ISel disruption.

Factors Associated With Changes in Visual Acuity and Central Subfield Thickness at 1 Year After Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema With Ranibizumab

To identify factors that predict the success or failure of treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab for patients with diabetic macular edema. A total of 37 baseline demographic, systemic, ocular, optical coherence tomographic, and fundus photographic variables were assessed for association with change in visual acuity or central subfield thickness between baseline and 1 year in 361 eyes that were randomly assigned to intravitreal ranibizumab with prompt or deferred laser treatment within a trial of ranibizumab, triamcinolone acetonide, and laser treatment for center-involved diabetic macular edema. A categorical variable describing follow-up anatomic responses to therapy was added to the visual acuity outcome model. After adjusting for baseline visual acuity, a larger visual acuity treatment benefit was associated with younger age (P< .001), less severe diabetic retinopathy on clinical examination (P= .003), and absence of surface wrinkling retinopathy (P< .001). The reduction in central subfield thickness during the first treatment year also predicted better visual acuity outcomes (P< .001). After adjusting for baseline central subfield thickness, the presence of hard exudates was associated with more favorable improvement on optical coherence tomographic scan (P= .004). Because only 11 eyes experienced vision loss and 6 eyes experienced an increase in central subfield thickness, factors for poor outcomes could not be evaluated. A review of baseline factors and anatomic responses during the first year of ranibizumab therapy for association with visual acuity outcome did not identify any features that would preclude ranibizumab treatment. However, baseline central subfield thickness is the strongest predictor of anatomic outcome, and reduction in central subfield thickness during the first treatment year is associated with better visual acuity outcomes.

Correlation between central subfield thickness, visual acuity and structural changes in diabetic macular edema

To correlate the central subfield thickness (CST) measured by Cirrus™ SD-OCT with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and structural changes in diabetic macular edema (DME). The transversal study evaluated 200 patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and selected 55 eyes with DME between January, 2010 and April, 2011. Spectral domain OCT was performed in patients with type 2 diabetes and DME. CST and BCVA were correlated with the edema morphology and the ELM (external limiting membrane) integrity. Statistical tests were applied to validate the results. There was no difference between genders in the NPDR classification. 47.3% of the patients showed moderate NPDR. The CST average for male was of 393.58 µm and 434.16 µm for female, with no statistically significant difference. The patients with continuous ELM showed lower CST average (368.73 µm) than those with disrupted ELM (521.43 µm). There was a strong correlation between the macular volume and CST (59.63%), but poor correlation between age and CST (2.9%). Also, there was a significant difference between the average CST and the type of macular edema. Patients with serous detachment showed higher CST average (488.71 µm) than those with cystoid macular edema (CME) and diffuse edema. Patients with severe NPDR showed higher CST average (491.45 µm), if compared to mild and moderate NPDR. Cystoid macular edema was the most common type of edema (49.1%) and showed the worse VA. Patients with disrupted ELM showed worse BCVA. Patients with higher CST showed worse BCVA. There was a significant difference between the CST average of the case group (407.6 ± 113,1 µm) and the control group (diabetic patients without DME: 252 ± 12.5 µm). There was also a significant difference in the BCVA variables and macular volume between case and control groups. The study suggests that the CST of diabetic patients with edema is higher than the control group, the increase in CST of diabetic patients with edema leads to worsening of BCVA and macular volume. Continuous ELM showed lower CST average, and the serous detachment showed higher CST average. Cirrus™ proved to be an important tool in the DME evaluation.