In the following, the corrected version Table 1 to the above-mentioned paper [Mattessich, 1998] is shown. The author apologizes for having supplied (on p. 16) an obsolete version (based on incorrect conversion rates). In consequence, the figures this table did not match with the figures the first 17 lines the commentary in the subsequent section, UNEXPLAINED DISCREPANCIES AND OTHER ITEMS TO BE CLARIFIED (p. 17). The present version does match this original commentary (a proof that two versions the table got switched erroneously). However, I ask the reader to regard my interpretations Nissen et al. [1993] as a preliminary attempt by an accountant, hardly familiar with the intricacies Sumerian language and measurement systems. As was repeatedly hinted at, this area is worthy continuing research. The figures the new Table 1 conform to the original conversion rates (for translating such Sumerian volume measures, such as gur, barig, ban and sila, into each other and into liters) and to the conversions various types raw material and various finished products (types flours) into their barley equivalents [for both types conversion rates, see Mattessich, 1998, fn. 10, p. 14]. Above all, the new table matches with the commentary in Mattessich [1998, p. 17]. 1 This commentary may require (on p. 17, four lines from the bottom) the insertion the following addition after the expression of Table 1):
Read full abstract