Incomplete Revascularization Research Articles

Complete versus culprit-only coronary revascularization in patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis.

Recently, the FFR-Guidance for Complete Nonculprit Revascularization (FULL REVASC) trial in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multiple vessel disease (MVD) did not show differences in the composite endpoint of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization than culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at 4.8 years, although complete revascularization is a recommendation IA in current guidelines. We want to determine through an updated meta-analysis whether complete revascularization is associated with decreased mortality and hard clinical endpoints compared to culprit lesion only PCI. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from January 1990 to April 2024 using the terms "percutaneous coronary intervention" combined with "non culprit lesions" or "culprit lesion" or "complete revascularization" or "incomplete revascularization." Additionally, a "snowball search" was conducted. Only randomized clinical trials (RCT) reporting mortality, re-infarction or new revascularization after at least 12 months and using predominantly drug eluting stents were included. The summary effect of different revascularization strategies on cardiovascular endpoints was estimated and measures of effect size were expressed as odds ratios (ORs). Eight RCT involving 9515 patients were included, with a follow-up range between 12 months and 4.8 years. Main findings show that culprit lesion revascularization was associated with an increased risk of MI (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.81, I2 42%) and ischemia-guided revascularization (OR: 2.81; 95% CI: 1.86 to 4.26, I2 80%) compared to complete revascularization, without differences in overall mortality (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.36, I2 2%). In patients with STEMI and MVD without cardiogenic shock, our metanalysis showed that complete revascularization with PCI significantly reduced the risk of non-fatal myocardial reinfarction and ischemic-driven revascularization compared to culprit vessel-only revascularization, without differences in overall mortality.

Incomplete Revascularization in OPCAB: A Critical Factor in Long-Term Outcomes

Incomplete Revascularization in OPCAB: A Critical Factor in Long-Term Outcomes

Long-Term Impacts of Complete Revascularization on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion

The impact of complete revascularization (CR), achieved through the recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs), on long-term patient outcomes remains uncertain.To evaluate this in patients who achieved CR after CTO-PCI with those who did not due to deferred CTO-PCI, the Asan Medical Center Registry was reviewed to identify coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with CTOs treated between January 2003 and December 2018. Patients were included with single-vessel disease with CTO and with multivessel disease who had undergone revascularization for non-CTO lesions. These subjects were divided into those who achieved CR with CTO-PCI and those who did not due to deferred CTO-PCI. Their outcomes were compared following 1:1 propensity score matching. Of the 2,746 enrolled CAD patients with CTOs, 1,837 achieved CR with CTO-PCI and 909 did not. Propensity score matching yielded 653 patient pairs. The CR-achieving group had a significantly lower 10-year risk of the primary composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46–0.72; P < 0.001), as well as significantly lower risks of death (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.51–0.87; P = 0.003) and repeat revascularization (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.48–0.95; P = 0.023). CR was beneficial in all subgroups, including patients with major cardiovascular risk factors such as older age, hypertension, diabetes, and advanced CAD. Compared with incomplete revascularization, CR may significantly reduce the 10-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events in patients with CTO.

Complete vs culprit-lesion-only myocardial revascularization in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: insights from the multicentric "Lombardia CARe" registry

Abstract Background Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) is a potentially devastating complication of patients with Myocardial Infarction (MI). Multivessel Disease (MVD) is a frequent occurrence in this setting, being present in nearly half patients undergoing Coronary Angiography (CAG). We previously reported that, in case of MI complicated by OHCA and evidence of MVD, a complete myocardial revascularization, as compared to culprit-lesion-only revascularization, was associated with an improved 1-year survival and favorable neurological outcomes. We aimed to validate and confirm these results on a multicentric scale with a larger patient cohort. Methods This is a multicentric, prospective, observational study. We considered all the consecutive patients with OHCA and MI enrolled in the Lombardia CARe Registry from January 1st 2015 to December 31st 2022 who underwent CAG in 6 centers in Northen Italy. Results A total of 623 patients were included; of these, 403 underwent CAG. Median age was 64 years, and about 80% had no previous history of ischemic heart disease. Median ejection fraction (EF) at presentation was 40%. MVD was present in 186 (46.1%) patients and was subsequently treated with either complete (32.3%) or incomplete (67.7%) coronary revascularization. Left anterior descendent (LAD) artery was the culprit lesion in almost 1/3 of patients. The 1-year survival rate was 78.3% in the complete revascularization group and 42.9% in the culprit-lesion-only revascularization group (p-value &amp;lt; 0.001). After correction for factors that were predictors on univariate analysis, complete revascularization strategy was independently associated with a reduced risk of death [HR: 0.27 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.739; p = 0.01] and death or unfavorable neurological outcome [HR: 0.23 (95% CI: 0.08 to 0.67); p = 0.007]. Conclusions Complete revascularization strategy was confirmed to be associated with an improvement of 1-year survival and with a good neurological outcome in patients resuscitated from OHCA. These results highlight the independent impact on survival of a complete coronary intervention strategy in patients with OHCA plus MVD.

Residual ischemia location after STEMI by CMR and association with non-culprit coronary artery disease

Abstract Background Many ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients present with non-culprit coronary artery disease. In cases with incomplete revascularization, stress cardiac magnetic resonance (sCMR) could help detect and locate residual ischemia. Purpose We aim to evaluate the usefulness of sCMR to detect and locate residual ischemia in STEMI patients after discharge and correlate the findings with angiographical non-culprit coronary lesions, if any. Methods Reperfused, stable STEMI patients submitted to undergo sCMR within the first year after STEMI were included in the cohort. Index coronary angiography was revised, culprit and non-culprit coronary artery disease were registered, and significant stenoses were defined as ≥50% by visual assessment. Residual ischemia on sCMR (by first-pass vasodilator stress perfusion) was analysed and categorized as either absent or present in anterior, lateral, and inferior territories. Unrevascularized non-culprit coronary lesions were correlated with territories with residual ischemia on sCMR and lesions in subsequent coronary angiography. A p-value &amp;lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The study group was made up of 234 patients who underwent sCMR within the first year after STEMI (mean age 58.95±11.85 years, 78.2% male, 48.7% anterior infarction). Residual ischemia by sCMR was noted in 63 (26.9%) patients. In the 95 patients (40.6%) who underwent complete revascularization during index admission, residual ischemia by sCMR was seldom detected (n=14, 14.7%) and distributed on anterior (n=8), lateral (n=3) and inferior (n=4) territories. More than half of the cohort (n=139, 59.4%) depicted unrevascularized non-culprit coronary lesions, and residual ischemia was detected in 49 (35.3%) patients. Non-culprit lesions on left anterior descendent artery (n=62) associated with ischemia in 38.7% of cases (n=24), most commonly in the anterior territory (n=17, 70.8%). Similar findings were noted for lesions on circumflex artery (n=66), which depicted residual ischemia in 34.8% (n=23) of cases and most frequently in the lateral territory (n=13, 56.5%); and lesions in right coronary artery (n=45), which depicted residual ischemia in 42.2% (n=19) of cases, most commonly in the inferior territory (n=13, 68.4%). Significant coronary stenosis was found in most patients who underwent subsequent coronary angiography after residual ischemia detection (41 out of 47, 87.2%). Conclusions One third of STEMI patients with incomplete revascularization and non-culprit coronary artery disease depict residual ischemia on sCMR, the location of which generally correlates with index coronary anatomy and significant stenosis in subsequent coronary angiography. Residual ischemia is infrequent in patients with complete revascularization, but not inexistent. sCMR should be considered in selected STEMI patients according to coronary anatomy and/or symptoms to guide therapy.Stress CMR and ischemia location

Comparison of the prognosis between complete and incomplete revascularization among moderate to severe chronic kidney disease patients with acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Background Complete revascularization (CR) in acute coronary syndrome patients with multivessel disease (MVD) is recommended in current clinical practice guidelines. However, the benefit of CR in moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients remains controversial. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between complete and incomplete revascularization among moderate to severe CKD patients who presented with ACS. Methods Of 1,924 ACS patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in our center, 127 patients were CKD. CR was defined as residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score ≤ 3. The primary outcome was the patient oriented clinical outcome (POCO) at 1 year, including all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, any revascularization, and heart failure requiring hospitalization. Results The mean age of the patients was 73.89±9.07 years. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 32.56±10.68 ml per minute per 1.73 m2. The rate of POCO at 1 year was significantly lower in the CR group (16.3% vs 39.3%; HR 0.36; 95%CI, 0.16-0.81; p=0.014). The primary outcome was mainly driven by 1-year all-cause death which was significantly lower in the CR group (14.0% vs 39.3%; HR 0.32; 95%CI 0.13-0.76; p=0.017). The rate of initiation of renal replacement therapy was comparable (4.7% vs 2.4%; p=0.55). Conclusion CR with a target SYNTAX score ≤ 3 improved 1-year prognosis of POCO and all-cause death in ACS patients with moderate to severe CKD without increasing the rates of renal replacement therapy.1-year POCOPrespecified Subgroup Analysis of POCO

Negative long-term prognostic value of stress echocardiography in patients with incomplete revascularization after successful primary PCI

Abstract Background The role of stress echocardiography (SECHO) in a risk stratification of patients with incomplete revascularization after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) has not been extensively documented. The Aim The aim of our study was to assess the negative long-term prognostic value of SECHO after successful pPCI and incomplete revascularization of non-culprit lesions. Methods Our study consisted of 194 patients (mean age 59±10years, male 136; 70.1%) successfully treated with pPCI, who performed SECHO according to Bruce protocol in order to assess residual ischemia in coronary artery with non-culprit lesion other than treated vessel. Lesion severity of non-culprit coronary arteries was assessed by quantitative coronary angiography. Duke treadmill score, functional capacity (Metabolic Equivalents - METs), achieved target heart rate (THR), chronotropic incompetence, heart rate recovery (HRR), wall motion score index (WMSI) and ejection fraction were calculated in all patients. Slow HRR was defined as ≤18 beats/min. Median follow up of the patients was 96 ± 32.5 months for the occurrence of all-cause mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). Results Out of 194 patients, 38 (19.6%) had positive SECHO test, and 7 patients (3.6%) were lost to follow up so they were excluded from further analysis. During the follow-up period 29 out of 149 patients (18.8%) had an adverse event (20 deaths and 9 non-fatal MI). Negative predictive value of SECHO test was 81.2%. Median time from MI to SECHO test was 8 months. Using the Cox regression analysis, univariate predictors of adverse events were slow HRR (HR 3.750 [95% CI 1.620-8.679], p=0.002), Duke score (HR 0.866 [95% CI 0.755-0.994], p=0.040) and chronotropic incompetence (HR 0.310 [95% CI 0.107-0.895], p=0.030). In the multivariate analysis only the slow HRR remained an independent predictor of adverse events (HR 3.329 [95% CI 1.417-7.825], p=0.006). Using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve we see that the patients with slow HRR had much shorter event-free time (slow HRR 117.2 ± 13.4 months vs normal HRR test 139.4 ± 4.2 months, Log Rank 4.988, p=0.026). (Figure 1.) Conclusion SECHO test has excellent negative long-term prognostic value in patients with incomplete revascularization of non-culprit lesions after successful pPCI while patients with slow HRR have more pronounced risk for the occurrence of adverse events.Figure 1.Kaplan-Meier survival curve

Association between completeness of revascularization and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a population-based registry analysis

Abstract Introduction Approximately one-third of the patients presenting with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) have diabetes. From these, two-thirds have multivessel coronary disease. The impact of completeness of revascularization in this population remains unclear. Purpose To evaluate the contemporary patterns of coronary revascularization among patients with diabetes and NSTEMI, and the clinical outcomes stratified by anatomic completeness of revascularization. Methods All patients with diabetes and multivessel disease admitted for NSTEMI between April 2009 and March 2020 in Ontario, Canada were included. Patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) at any time, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the previous 90 days, or shock were excluded. Patients were classified in four groups, from the most to the least complete revascularization strategy: CABG, complete revascularization with PCI, incomplete revascularization with PCI, or no revascularization. Outcomes included all-cause death and the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Multivariable Cox regression was used to account for confounding (demographics, comorbidities, left ventricular function, coronary anatomy, laboratory tests, and diabetes treatment). Results We included 14,511 patients (mean age: 68.7±11.5y; 69.6% males). A total of 4,525 (31.2%) patients were treated with CABG, 3,008 (20.7%) with complete PCI, 3,624 (25.0%) with incomplete PCI and 3,354 (23.1%) were not revascularized. Patients with more complex coronary disease were more frequently treated with CABG, while PCI was more common in those with less complex disease (p&amp;lt;0.001; Fig 1). The mean number of grafts in the CABG group was 3.4±1.0. The mean number of stents in the complete and incomplete PCI groups was 2.4±1.3 and 1.7±0.9, respectively. Adjusted 5-y risks of all-cause death following CABG, complete PCI, incomplete PCI and no revascularization were, respectively, 25.9%, 29.8%, 32.2%, and 39.4%. Over a median follow-up of 5.8ys, CABG was associated with reduced all-cause death compared with complete PCI (HR 0.82; 95%CI 0.75 - 0.90), incomplete PCI (HR 0.73; 95%CI 0.67 - 0.80), or no revascularization (HR 0.54; 95%CI 0.50 - 0.58); p&amp;lt;0.001 for all (Fig 2). Adjusted 5-y risks of the composite endpoint following CABG, complete PCI, incomplete PCI and no revascularization were, respectively, 34.0%, 41.5%, 44.6%, and 52.9%. CABG was associated with reduced rates of the composite endpoint compared with complete PCI (HR 0.75; 95%CI 0.69 - 0.81), incomplete PCI (HR 0.67; 95%CI 0.62 - 0.72), or no revascularization (HR 0.50; 95%CI 0.47 - 0.54); p&amp;lt;0.001 for all. Conclusion In this contemporary real-world cohort study, almost a quarter of the patients with diabetes and NSTEMI did not receive any revascularization procedure. Cardiovascular outcomes were incrementally improved with CABG or complete revascularization with PCI, compared to no revascularization.Figure 1Figure 2

Clinical outcome based on functional complete revascularization in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease: The FAME 3 Trial

Abstract Background Anatomic complete revascularization after angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved clinical outcomes. The impact of functional complete revascularization (PCI of all fractional flow reserve (FFR) positive lesions) in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease (3VD) amenable to PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is unknown. Purpose To investigate the clinical impact of functional complete revascularization after FFR-guided PCI in the FAME 3 trial Methods The FAME 3 trial is a multicenter, international, randomized study comparing FFR-guided PCI with CABG in patients with angiographic 3VD. This pre-specified sub-study evaluated the impact of functional complete revascularization after PCI on the primary endpoint of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke at 3 years. The degree of functional complete revascularization was quantified by calculating the residual functional SYNTAX score (rFSS), defined as the residual anatomic SYNTAX score based on post-PCI angiography minus any FFR-negative deferred lesions. Results Of the 757 patients treated with FFR-guided PCI, the rFSS could be calculated by the core laboratory in 81% (n=601). Among the angiographically significant lesions, PCI was deferred based on FFR in 17% (51 % of patients had deferral of at least one lesion). The patients were divided into two groups according to acceptable functional complete revascularization: rFSS 0-8 (63%) and functional incomplete revascularization: rFSS&amp;gt;8 (37%). The cumulative incidence of death, MI, or stroke at 3 years was significantly lower in patients with rFSS 0-8 (9% vs. 17%, Hazard ratio[HR]:0.5, 95% confidence interval[CI]:0.3-0.8, p=0.006) compared with rFSS&amp;gt;8. In comparison with the CABG arm, the patients with rFSS 0-8 had similar outcome (HR:0.97, 95%CI:0.6-1.5, p=0.87), while in those with rFSS &amp;gt;8 outcome was worse (HR:1.9, 95%CI: 1.3-2.8, p=0.002) (Figure). There was no difference in death, MI or stroke in CABG patients with or without anatomic complete revascularization. In a multivariate-adjusted model, rFSS&amp;gt;8 showed a significant association with death, MI or stroke at three years (adjusted HR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.09-3.09, p=0.02). Conclusions Acceptable functional complete revascularization with FFR-guided PCI in patients with 3VD is an independent predictor of death, MI or stroke at three years and can be achieved in 63% of patients resulting in similar outcomes compared with CABG.

Revascularization of myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation in multivessel coronary artery disease

Many patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction have multivessel coronary artery disease, which complicates the course of the disease and is associated with fatal outcomes. Most patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction undergo coronary angiography and revascularization during initial hospitalization. However, the decision to perform total or incomplete revascularization and whether to perform total revascularization on admission or at the stage of its implementation is complex and must be adapted to the age, general condition of the patient and comorbidities. Sincethe majority of patients with non-STelevation myocardial infarction have multivessel disease, treatment and timing are critical components to ensure favorable outcomes. Early revascularization is associated with improved long-term patient outcomes, but the optimal approach to revascularization in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease remains poorly understood. However, in this patient population, a multidisciplinary cardiac approach is recommended to determine revascularization options. Published data suggest that evaluation of the risk-benefit associated with future invasive procedures should be based on an analysis of the patient's general condition and cardiovascular risk factors, the ability to identify the culprit artery, the technical feasibility of performing multivessel revascularization, and the location, degree of stenosis, and severity of lesions.Whether multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting provides better outcomes in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction remains largely debatable. In this connection, it is relevant to conduct prospective studies to study the optimal revascularization strategies.

TCT-24 Prognostic Value of Functional Incomplete Revascularization by Quantitative Flow Ratio for Valve Surgery With Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

TCT-24 Prognostic Value of Functional Incomplete Revascularization by Quantitative Flow Ratio for Valve Surgery With Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

Обратное ремоделирование левого желудочка у пациентов с многососудистым поражением при инфаркте миокарда после реваскуляризации

The role of factors leading to reverse LV remodeling in patients with multivessel ischemic heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been sufficiently studied. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief and concise review of the current understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical predictors, and studies of LV reverse remodeling after complete and incomplete revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary disease. Materials and methods. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in the search systems: eLIBRARY.RU, PubMed, Medline, ResearchGate, Connected papers and Google Scholar mainly from 2019 to 2024 (85.7 %). Results. The cumulative evidence suggests that key factors that can initiate and maintain remodeling processes include myocardial ischemic injury, chronic inflammation, neurohormonal activation, and oxidative stress. A decrease in all these factors can lead to reverse myocardial remodeling. This is possible with complete revascularization during primary PCI, which leads to improved clinical course and reduced 30-day, 1-year and 3-year mortality rates. A combination of biomarkers from different groups may be suitable for predicting reverse remodeling (brain natriuretic peptide precursor-N-terminal natriuretic hormone propeptide, high-sensitivity troponins, C-reactive protein and creatinine kinase), as well as echocardiographic findings, especially 3D-echocardiographic assessments of ventricular volumes, mass and ejection fraction. Conclusion. Complete revascularization is feasible and has great advantages over revascularization of only one infarct-related coronary artery.

Comparison of Complete Versus Incomplete Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The optimal extent of revascularization in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains debated. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of complete versus incomplete revascularization in CTO patients. A systematic search of EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science was conducted up to July 6, 2024. Studies reporting outcomes in CTO patients undergoing PCI with complete or incomplete revascularization were included. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. Eight studies with a total of 7,067 patients (4,854 complete and 2,213 incomplete revascularization) were included. Complete revascularization was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE (RR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.77), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.37-0.78), and cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29-0.75) compared to incomplete revascularization. There was no significant difference in the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction between the two groups (RR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.20-1.80). In patients with CTO undergoing PCI, complete revascularization is associated with significantly better clinical outcomes, including lower risks of MACE, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality, compared to incomplete revascularization. These findings suggest that achieving complete revascularization should be prioritized when feasible in CTO patients.

The impact of incomplete revascularization on survival in minimal invasive off-pump coronary artery surgery: a propensity score analysis of 1,149 cases.

Minimally invasive concepts are increasingly influential in modern cardiac surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of completeness of revascularization on clinical outcomes and overall survival in minimally invasive, thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. We retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 1,149 patients who underwent minimally invasive off-pump CABG with single, double, or triple-vessel revascularization between 2007 and 2018. Of these patients, 185 (16.1%) had incomplete revascularization (IR) (group I), and 964 (83.9%) had complete revascularization (CR) (group C). We used gradient boosted propensity score estimation to account for possible confounding variables. Median age was 69 years, interquartile range (IQR) 60-76 years, and median EuroSCORE II was 4, IQR 2-7. Of the 1,149 patients, 495 patients suffered from two vessel disease (VD) and 353 presented with three VD. Long-term median follow-up 5.58 (3.27-8.48) years was available for 1,089 patients (94.8%). The incidence of recurrent or persisting angina, myocardial infarction, redo-bypass surgery, and stroke during follow-up did not differ significantly between groups. During follow-up, there were 47 deaths in group I and 172 deaths in group C. The 1-, 3-, 5-, 8-, and 10-year unadjusted survival rates were 94%, 84%, 75%, 62%, and 51% for group I, and 97%, 94%, 88%, 77%, and 72% for group C, respectively (long-rank test P<0.001), favouring CR. Following risk adjustment the long-rank test P value for survival was 0.23. In minimally invasive coronary surgery, IR resulted in decreased long-term survival, but did not achieve statistical significance after risk adjustment. However, IR should only be used in carefully selected cases.

Complete vs. incomplete percutaneous revascularization in patients with chronic total coronary artery occlusion.

There is current controversy surrounding the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO). We aimed to evaluate the impact of complete percutaneous revascularization on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with CTO. A retrospective observational study was conducted of consecutive patients referred for invasive coronary angiography at a single center between January 2018 and December 2019 and at least a CTO. The patients were divided into two groups according to the result of the procedure: complete revascularization of CTO (CR-CTO) versus incomplete revascularization (ICR-CTO) (patients with at least one non-recanalized CTO). Short- and mid-term clinical outcomes were evaluated. The primary endpoint was a composite of MACE that included all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or unplanned revascularization. In total, 359 patients with CTO were included. The median age was 68 years [interquartile range (IQR) 60-77 years], 66 (18%) were women and 169 (47.3%) had diabetes mellitus. In all, 167 (46.5%) patients received complete revascularization. After a median follow-up of 42 months (IQR 46-50 months), the primary endpoint occurred in 39 (23.4%) patients in the CR-CTO group and in 75 (39.1%) in the ICR-CTO group (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.74; p < 0.001). This association remained significant in an inverse probability weighted model considering prognostic factors (adjusted HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.92; p = 0.018) and was driven by lower rates of all-cause death (adjusted OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.23-0.84; p = 0.01). Complete revascularization of CTO was associated with a lower risk of MACE in the midterm follow up.

Predictors of outcomes after PCI with incomplete revascularization: Impact of CTO and LAD vessel.

Incomplete revascularization (ICR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with mortality and morbidity. We sought to investigate whether ICR in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) is worse than ICR of the right coronary artery (RCA) or left circumflex artery (LCX); and whether ICR in patients with a chronic total occlusion (CTO) is worse than in those without. In the RIVER-PCI trial, 2651 patients with ICR after PCI were randomly assigned to ranolazine or placebo. Angiograms were assessed at an independent core laboratory in 2501 patients (94.3%). The primary endpoint was the composite of ischemia-driven revascularization or hospitalization. A total of 1664 patients (66.5%) had ICR involving the LAD, whereas 837 (33.5%) had ICR limited to the RCA or LCX. At median follow-up of 643 days, the primary endpoint occurred in 26.9% versus 26.5% of patients (adjusted HR [aHR]: 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-1.21). A nonrecanalized CTO was present in 854 patients (34.1%) with ICR after PCI. The primary endpoint occurred in 28.6% versus 25.9% of ICR patients with versus without a CTO (aHR: 1.10, 95%CI: 0.94-1.29). However, patients with a CTO had higher rates of ischemia-driven hospitalization without revascularization (aHR: 1.27, 95%CI: 1.04-1.56), heart failure hospitalization (aHR: 2.69, 95%CI: 1.61-4.59) and myocardial infarction (aHR: 1.46, 95%CI: 1.11-1.92) compared with those without. The 2-year prognosis was similar in post-PCI patients with ICR whether the LAD was versus was not involved. ICR patients with a CTO had more frequent hospitalizations for ischemia and myocardial infarctions compared with those without.

Off-pump Versus On-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Diabetic patients: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies with a Propensity-Score Analysis.

The debate between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCAB) in diabetic patients remains. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate outcomes after OPCAB versus ONCAB for patients with diabetes. Literature research was conducted up to December 2023 using Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies were observational studies with a propensity-score analysis of OPCAB versus ONCAB. The primary outcomes were early mortality and mid-term survival. The secondary outcomes were cerebrovascular accidents, reoperation for bleeding, incomplete revascularization, myocardial infarction, low cardiac output, and renal replacement therapy. Our research identified seven observational studies with a propensity-score analysis enrolling 13,085 patients. There was no significant difference between OPCAB and ONCAB for early mortality, mid-term survival, myocardial infarction, low cardiac output, and renal replacement therapy. OPCAB was associated with a lower risk of cerebrovascular accidents (OR 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.76, P = 0.004) and reoperation for bleeding (OR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.88, P = 0.009). However, OPCAB was associated with a higher risk of incomplete revascularization (OR 2.07; 95% CI, 1.60-2.68, P < 0.00001). Among patients with diabetes, no difference in early mortality and mid-term survival was observed. However, OPCAB was associated with a lower incidence of morbidity, including cerebrovascular accidents and reoperation for bleeding.

Managing the Intricacies of Coronary Revascularization: A Close Look at the Complete Versus Culprit-Only Approach and its Implications in Elderly Patients.

Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of mortality in the United States, and data indicates that 805,000 Americans will face a new or recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) attack every year. Frailty, a conceptual syndrome categorized by a functional decline that occurs with aging, has been linked to adverse health outcomes in cardiovascular disease and all cardiac-related procedures in general. It is therefore reasonable to deliberate that more conservative medical therapy or medical management should be considered in the frail population when managing acute coronary syndrome. This course of action has, in fact, been documented in clinical practice. However, the recent Functional Assessment in Elderly MI Patients with Multivessel Disease trial, in which all subjects were 75 years of age or above, indicated that the more invasive complete revascularization approach may be favorable over incomplete or culprit-only revascularization in patients with acute MI. In this review, we will discuss coronary heart disease and review guidelines and procedures for culprit lesion identification, including electrocardiogram procedures, coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, fractional flow reserve, and instantaneous fractional flow reserve. We then discuss the concept of complete vs culprit-only/incomplete coronary revascularization and staging. Following this, we will delve into recent trials discussing complete vs culprit-only revascularization, emphasizing the insights gleaned from this latest trial within this special frailty cohort which warrants special consideration.

Short term clinical outcomes of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in patients with intermediate to high SYNTAX score: Ain Shams complex PCI Registry

Abstract Background Risk stratification is an important and essential component in proper patient counseling when dealing with complex coronary anatomy and decision making between either coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The SYNTAX score was pioneered as an anatomical-based risk score that aided in this decision-making process. Objective To develop an electronic registry for patients with complex coronary anatomy with intermediate to high SYNTAX score undergoing non-emergent PCI who were indicated for CABG but either they were rejected by the surgeons or they refused it. Patients and Methods Our registry was conducted on 193 patients presented during eight months from the first of July 2021 till the end of February 2022 to Ain Shams University Hospitals and underwent PCI. Results comparing the intermediate to high SYNTAX score groups, there is a statistically significant increase in the in hospital and short term MACE and mortality with high SYNTAX score patients, while there was no difference regarding in hospital CIN. Regarding MACE it significantly increases in patients with anemia, CKD, LV dysfunction. For multivariate analysis it is shown that both incomplete revascularization and clinical SYNTAX II are independent predictors for the occurrence of short term MACE. Conclusion Both incomplete revascularization and clinical SYNTAX II score are independent predictors of short term (6 months) occurrence of MACE.

Complete versus incomplete revascularization in patients with a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Analysis from the e-ULTIMASTER registry

BackgroundIncomplete revascularization (ICR) has been associated with a worse prognosis after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In NSTEMI patients with multivessel disease (MVD) however, the benefit of a complete revascularization (CR) remains unclear. MethodsPatients presenting with an NSTEMI and MVD were selected from the global e-ULTIMASTER registry and grouped according to completeness of revascularization at index hospitalization discharge. The primary endpoint was the patient oriented composite endpoint (POCE) defined as all death, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization at 1 year. Target lesion failure (TLF) was defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel related myocardial infarction and clinically driven target lesion revascularization. Inverse propensity score weighting (IPSW) was performed to harmonize the patient's baseline characteristics between the groups. ResultsCR was achieved in 1800 patients (47.0 %) and ICR in 2032 patients (53.0 %). The incidence of POCE at 1 year was lower in the CR group compared to the ICR group: 7.0 % vs. 12.9 %, p < 0.0001. Similarly for TLF at 1 year: 3.6 % vs. 5.5 %, p < 0.01. After IPSW, the incidence of POCE was 7.7 % vs. 12.0 %, p < 0.0001, due to a lower all-cause mortality: 2.7 % vs. 4.2 %, p = 0.02 and less revascularizations: 4.9 % vs. 7.9 %, p < 0.001. The incidence of TLF was no longer statistically significant: CR 3.9 % vs. IR 5.0 %, p = 0.10. ConclusionsPatients with a NSTEMI and multi vessel disease undergoing a percutaneous coronary revascularization with a complete revascularization during index hospitalization have better 1-year clinical outcomes. Randomized studies are warranted to confirm these results.