ABSTRACT With escalating living expenses and tuition fees, food insescurity continues to moderate university student well-being and academic success. In the postsecondary food security literature, studies assessing distinctions among social support subtypes and how they might interact with mental health are absent. Therefore, the primary objectives of the current study were to characterise students classified as food insecure at an Atlantic Canadian university, compare their social support subtype and psychological distress levels with students classified as food secure, and determine whether/how these subtypes predict psychological distress. Using data from the 2023 National College Health Assessment (NCHA-III) survey (n = 1694), 46.6% were deemed food insecure based on the USDA ERS Food Security scale. A series of two-factor chi-square tests revealed that students classified as food insecure were more likely to be male, undergraduate, international, identify as Black or South Asian, and report lower family incomes and poorer grade point averages (GPAs). These students were also less likely to report campus belongingness, reciprocity, and wellness advocacy. Subsequent t-tests revealed that students classified as food insecure scored lower on each Social Provisions Scale subtype (‘attachment’, ‘guidance’, ‘reliable alliance’, ‘social integration’, and ‘reassurance of worth’), and higher in psychological distress. A hierarchical regression analysis revealed ‘reassurance of worth’ to be the lone, significant support subtype predicting lower psychological distress for students classified as food insecure, a finding which suggests that having one’s self-worth validated, affirmed, and fostered by others may help moderate psychological distress, perhaps by counteracting stigma and shame. The implications of this finding are considered.
Read full abstract