Trials For Inclusion Research Articles

Molecular profiling in ABC: Is complementary testing with tissue and plasma necessary and clinically relevant?

e12566 Background: This retrospective analysis explores the concordance between molecular analyses of tissue and plasma amongst Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) patients and investigates the utility of simultaneous profiling for enhanced clinical insights. Methods: A total of 187 (177 Cancertrack paired and 10 Guardant 360) patient samples with availability of both tissue and ctDNA specimens, were subjected to comparative molecular profiling. Median age was 52 years (Range 23 – 82 years), 174 (93%) patients had advanced breast cancer and 177 (95%) patients had received prior treatments. We assigned tier 1 status to predictive biomarkers with FDA approved or guideline recommended therapies in breast cancer. Tier 2 status was assigned to alterations for which therapies were approved in different tumor type. Tier 3 had either clinical evidence in small studies or had clinical trial inclusion criteria. Results: Paired tissue-ctDNA profiling showed 139/187 (74%) samples had at least one concordant molecular alteration. Simultaneous tissue and ctDNA profiling led to the opportunity to offer Tier 1 recommended therapies in 113/187 (60%) patients. Amongst these, 71/113 (63%) exhibited concordance in tissue and circulating free DNA (cfDNA). ctDNA missed Tier 1 alterations in 14 patients which were detected by tissue biopsy. On the contrary tissue biopsy failed to detect Tier 1 alterations in 18 patients which were identified by ctDNA only. When Tier 2 and 3 alterations were considered, ctDNA identified additional alterations compared to tissue in 29 patients (37 variants), whereas tissue identified additional alterations in 20 patients (24 variants). Complementary tissue and ctDNA profiling showed alterations with potential to impact clinical management (Tier1/2/3) in 82% patients. When including only Tier 1 and 2 alterations, simultaneous profiling approach gives an opportunity to offer personalized therapy in 68% patients. The Tier1 ctDNA only alterations were most frequent in ESR1 gene. In fact, a total of a total of 29 ESR1 mutations were detected in these patients, of which 10 mutations were detected in both tissue and liquid. In 3 patients’ tissues were positive for ESR1 mutations but the corresponding ctDNA was negative. Similarly, ctDNA detected 16 ESR1 variants which were negative in the tissue sample. The most common ESR1 variants were D538G and Y537S. Conclusions: The simultaneous profiling of tissue and ctDNA enhanced overall clinical utility of molecular analysis in advanced breast cancer by identifying predictive biomarkers. The integration of data from both sources allowed for comprehensive understanding of the molecular heterogeneity in breast cancer. It underscores the potential of simultaneous profiling to guide treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes. By detecting acquired resistance ESR1 mutations more effectively, ctDNA serves as a valuable tool for monitoring as well.

A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Felzartamab in Antibody-Mediated Rejection

BackgroundAntibody-mediated rejection is a leading cause of kidney-transplant failure. The targeting of CD38 to inhibit graft injury caused by alloantibodies and natural killer (NK) cells may be a therapeutic option.MethodsIn this phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients with antibody-mediated rejection that had occurred at least 180 days after transplantation to receive nine infusions of the CD38 monoclonal antibody felzartamab (at a dose of 16 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo for 6 months, followed by a 6-month observation period. The primary outcome was the safety and side-effect profile of felzartamab. Key secondary outcomes were renal-biopsy results at 24 and 52 weeks, donor-specific antibody levels, peripheral NK-cell counts, and donor-derived cell-free DNA levels.ResultsA total of 22 patients underwent randomization (11 to receive felzartamab and 11 to receive placebo). The median time from transplantation until trial inclusion was 9 years. Mild or moderate infusion reactions occurred in 8 patients in the felzartamab group. Serious adverse events occurred in 1 patient in the felzartamab group and in 4 patients in the placebo group; graft loss occurred in 1 patient in the placebo group. At week 24, resolution of morphologic antibody-mediated rejection was more frequent with felzartamab (in 9 of 11 patients [82%]) than with placebo (in 2 of 10 patients [20%]), for a difference of 62 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 19 to 100) and a risk ratio of 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06 to 0.83). The median microvascular inflammation score was lower in the felzartamab group than in the placebo group (0 vs. 2.5), for a mean difference of −1.95 (95% CI, −2.97 to −0.92). Also lower was a molecular score reflecting the probability of antibody-mediated rejection (0.17 vs. 0.77) and the level of donor-derived cell-free DNA (0.31% vs. 0.82%). At week 52, the recurrence of antibody-mediated rejection was reported in 3 of 9 patients who had a response to felzartamab, with an increase in molecular activity and biomarker levels toward baseline levels.ConclusionsFelzartamab had acceptable safety and side-effect profiles in patients with antibody-mediated rejection. (Funded by MorphoSys and Human Immunology Biosciences; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05021484; and EUDRACT number, 2021-000545-40.)

Plasma pTau181 and pTau217 predict asymptomatic amyloid accumulation equally well as amyloid PET.

The dynamic phase of preclinical Alzheimer's disease, as characterized by accumulating cortical amyloid-β, is a window of opportunity for amyloid-β-lowering therapies to have greater efficacy. Biomarkers that accurately predict amyloid-β accumulation may be of critical importance for participant inclusion in secondary prevention trials and thus enhance development of early Alzheimer's disease therapies. We compared the abilities of baseline plasma pTau181, pTau217 and amyloid-β PET load to predict future amyloid-β accumulation in asymptomatic elderly. In this longitudinal cohort study, baseline plasma pTau181 and pTau217 were quantified using single molecule array assays in cognitively unimpaired elderly selected from the community-recruited F-PACK cohort based on the availability of baseline plasma samples and longitudinal amyloid-β PET data (median time interval = 5 years, range 2-10 years). The predictive abilities of pTau181, pTau217 and PET-based amyloid-β measures for PET-based amyloid-β accumulation were investigated using receiver operating characteristic analyses, correlations and stepwise regression analyses. We included 75 F-PACK subjects (mean age = 70 years, 48% female), of which 16 were classified as amyloid-β accumulators [median (interquartile range) Centiloid rate of change = 3.42 (1.60) Centiloids/year). Plasma pTau181 [area under the curve (95% confidence interval) = 0.72 (0.59-0.86)] distinguished amyloid-β accumulators from non-accumulators with similar accuracy as pTau217 [area under the curve (95% confidence interval) = 0.75 (0.62-0.88) and amyloid-β PET [area under the curve (95% confidence interval) = 0.72 (0.56-0.87)]. Plasma pTau181 and pTau217 strongly correlated with each other (r = 0.93, Pfalse discovery rate < 0.001) and, together with amyloid-β PET, similarly correlated with amyloid-β rate of change (r pTau181 = 0.33, r pTau217 = 0.36, r amyloid-β PET = 0.35, all Pfalse discovery rate ≤ 0.01). Addition of plasma pTau181, plasma pTau217 or amyloid-β PET to a linear demographic model including age, sex and APOE-ε4 carriership similarly improved the prediction of amyloid-β accumulation (ΔAkaike information criterion ≤ 4.1). In a multimodal biomarker model including all three biomarkers, each biomarker lost their individual predictive ability. These findings indicate that plasma pTau181, plasma pTau217 and amyloid-β PET convey overlapping information and therefore predict the dynamic phase of asymptomatic amyloid-β accumulation with comparable performances. In clinical trial recruitment, confirmatory PET scans following blood-based prescreening might thus not provide additional value for detecting participants in these early disease stages who are destined to accumulate cortical amyloid-β. Given the moderate performances, future studies should investigate whether integrating plasma pTau species with other factors can improve performance and thus enhance clinical and research utility.

Enrollment Trends Among Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastasis in Active Clinical Trials

The CNS is a common site for distant metastasis and treatment failure in melanoma patients. This study aimed to evaluate the inclusion rate of patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) in prospective clinical trials. 69.3% of trials excluded MBM patients based on their CNS disease. In univariate analysis, trials not employing immunotherapy (p = 0.0174), inclusion of leptomeningeal disease (p < 0.0001) and non-pharmaceutical sponsor trials (p = 0.0461) were more likely to enroll patients with MBM. Thoughtful reconsideration of clinical trial designs is needed to give patients with MBMs access to promising investigational agents and improve outcomes for patients with MBM.

Maternal Bacille Calmette-Guérin Scars and Mortality Risk for Male and Female Newborns: Observational Study From Guinea-Bissau.

Maternal priming with bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) has been associated with reduced mortality in male offspring. We investigated this association in a cohort of healthy BCG-vaccinated neonates. This observational study within a randomized controlled trial comparing different BCG strains was conducted in Guinea-Bissau from 2017 to 2020. As part of trial inclusion procedures, on the day of discharge from the maternity ward, maternal BCG scar status was evaluated by visual inspection, followed by offspring BCG and polio vaccination. Through mortality data collected at telephone interviews at 6 weeks and 6 months of age, we assessed all-cause mortality risk in Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for maternal schooling and BCG strain, providing adjusted mortality rate ratios (aMRRs). In total, 64% (11 070/17 275) of mothers had a BCG scar, which was not associated with admission risk, admission severity, or all-cause mortality for females and the overall sample. By 6 months of age, the mortality rate (MR) was 4.1 (200 deaths/4919 person-years) for the maternal BCG scar cohort and 5.2 (139/2661) for no maternal scar (aMRR, 0.86; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], .69-1.06). In males, 6-month MRs were 4.3 (109 deaths/2531 person-years) for maternal BCG scar vs 6.3 (87/1376) for no scar (aMRR, 0.74; 95% CI, .56-.99). In females, 6-month MRs were 3.8 (91 deaths/2388 person-years) vs 4.0 (52/1286), respectively (aMRR, 1.04; 95% CI, .74-1.47; for interaction with sex, P = .16). While we cannot rule out an association in females, being born to a mother with a BCG scar reduced the risk of death during early infancy for BCG-vaccinated males, reproducing findings from previous studies.

A multiple criteria decision analysis to establish the use cases and candidate point of care tests to enter into a platform trial of multiple in vitro diagnostic point of care tests in the prehospital environment

Background There are increasing demands on Emergency Medical Services. More efficient treatment pathways are required to support conveyance decision making and patient referral in prehospital care. Point of Care testing is increasingly available and utilised across the NHS to support optimal ways of working. We aimed to design and conduct a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis to prioritise in vitro point of care tests and use cases for inclusion in a platform trial of in vitro point of care testing in UK Emergency Medical Services. Methods We designed a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis that included systematic scoping reviews stakeholder recruitment, two stakeholder surveys and two stakeholder workshops to scope the use cases, explore criteria and map use cases, evaluate the criteria and measure the use cases against the criteria. Results We recruited 32 stakeholders. We developed a scoring matrix with 4 criteria for scoring the use cases and 8 criteria for scoring the point of care tests and applied weighting determined from survey results. Use cases were scored by the stakeholders against 4 criteria. The 3 highest scoring use cases were point of care troponin testing in: possible Acute Myocardial Infarction, lactate testing in suspected sepsis and in trauma. We developed the process for scoring the point of care tests to be completed close to a proposed trial to allow for a changes in technology. Conclusions We successfully designed a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis to identify use cases and candidate tests for inclusion in a future platform trial of in vitro point of care testing in UK Emergency Medical Services. We identified 3 use cases for evaluation in a platform trial of in vitro point of care testing: troponin testing in possible acute myocardial infarction, lactate testing in suspected sepsis and lactate testing to identify occult haemorrhage in trauma.

First, do no harm: a global perspective on diversity and inclusion in clinical trials.

First, do no harm: a global perspective on diversity and inclusion in clinical trials.

Negative selection bias for women inclusion in a clinical trial

IntroductionDespite the growing awareness towards the importance of adequate representation of women in clinical trials among patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), available evidence continues to demonstrate a skewed distribution of study populations in favour of men. Methods and resultsIn this pre-specified analysis from the MASTER DAPT screening log and trial, we aimed to investigate the existence of a negative selection bias for women inclusion in a randomized clinical trial. A total of 2847 consecutive patients who underwent coronary revascularization across 65 participating sites, during a median of 14 days, were entered in the screening log, including 1749 (61.4%) non-high bleeding risk (HBR) and 1098 (38.6%) HBR patients, of whom 109 (9.9%) consented for trial participation. Female patients were less represented in consented versus non-consented HBR patients (22% versus 30%, absolute standardized difference: 0.18) and among non-consented eligible versus consented eligible patients (absolute standardized difference 0.14). The observed sex gap was primarily due investigators' choice not to offer study participation to females because deemed at very high risk of bleeding and/or ischemic complications, and only marginally to a slightly higher propensity of females compared to males to refuse study participation. ConclusionsFemale HBR patients undergoing PCI are less prevalent, but also less likely to participate in the trial than male patients, mainly due to investigators' preference.

Response- and Progression-Based End Points in Trial and Observational Cohorts of Patients With NSCLC

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are commonly used to assess therapeutic response in clinical trials but not in routine care; thus, RECIST-based end points are difficult to include in observational studies. Clinician-anchored approaches for measuring clinical response have been validated but not widely compared with clinical trial data, limiting their use as evidence for clinical decision-making. To compare response- and progression-based end points in clinical trial and observational cohorts of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective cohort study used patient-level data from the IMpower132 trial (conducted April 7, 2016, to May 31, 2017) and a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified database (data collected January 1, 2011, to March 31, 2022). Patients in the observational cohort were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the IMpower132 trial. All patients in the observational cohort had stage IV NSCLC. All patients were randomized to or received first-line carboplatin or cisplatin plus pemetrexed. End points included response rates, duration of response, and progression-free survival, compared between the trial and observational cohorts before and after weighting. Response rates for the observational cohort were derived from the EHR. A total of 769 patients met inclusion criteria, 494 in the observational cohort (median [IQR] age, 67 [60-74] years; 228 [46.2%] female; 45 [9.1%] Black or African American; 352 [71.3%] White; 53 [10.7%] American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or multiracial) and 275 in the trial cohort (median [IQR] age, 63 [56-68] years; 90 [32.7%] female; 4 [1.5%] Black or African American; 194 [70.5%] White; 65 [23.6%] American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or multiracial). All 3 end points were comparable between the study cohorts. Trial patients had a higher number of response assessments compared with patients in the weighted observational cohort. The EHR-derived response rate was numerically higher than the objective response rate after weighting (100.3 of 249.3 [40.2%] vs 105 of 275 [38.2%]) due to higher rates of observed partial response than RECIST-based partial response. Among patients with at least 1 response assessment, the EHR-derived response rate remained higher than the objective response rate (100.3 of 193.4 [51.9%] vs 105 of 256 [41.0%]) due to a higher proportion of patients in the observational cohort with no response assessment. In this study, response- and progression-based end points were similar between clinical trial and weighted observational cohorts, which increases confidence in the reliability of observational end points and can inform their interpretation in relation to trial end points. Additionally, the difference observed in response rates (including vs excluding patients with no response assessment) highlights the importance of future research adopting this 2-way approach when evaluating the relationship of EHR-derived and objective response rates.

Abstract PO1-19-03: The T-REX trial: a randomized international non-inferiority trial on Tailored Regional EXternal beam radiotherapy in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel node macrometastases

Abstract Background: Modern systemic treatment has reduced the incidence of regional recurrences and improved survival in breast cancer (BC). It is thus questionable whether regional radiotherapy (RT) is still indicated in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) macrometastases. Postoperative regional RT is associated with an increased risk of arm morbidity, pneumonitis, cardiac disease, and secondary cancer. Therefore, there is a need to individualize the indication for regional RT in relation to risk of recurrence. Trial design: In this multicenter, prospective randomized phase 3 trial, eligible patients have a clinically node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative BC with 1-2 SLN macrometastases, and have not undergone completion axillary lymph node dissection. Participants are randomly assigned to receive regional RT (standard arm) or not (intervention arm). Regional RT includes the axillary levels I-III and the supraclavicular fossa. Internal mammary nodes are targeted in selected patients. After breast-conserving surgery (BCS), RT to the remaining breast is given in both groups while after mastectomy, chest-wall RT is only given in the standard arm. In the intervention arm, chest wall RT may be indicated in selected cases with extensive multifocality, according to national guidelines. RT quality assurance is an integral part of the trial. In addition, material from the primary tumor, SLN metastases and any recurrences is subjected to gene expression analysis to identify both prognostic markers for locoregional recurrence and predictive markers for the benefit of regional RT. After confirmation of eligibility and written informed consent, patients are randomized 1:1 between the treatment arms. Allocation is stratified by trial site and breast surgery (BCS vs. mastectomy). Participation in T-REX should not affect decisions on systemic adjuvant treatment. Eligibility criteria: Trial inclusion and exclusion criteria are given in Table 1. Specific aims: The main aim of the trial is to investigate if the omission of regional RT is non-inferior to routine regional RT in clinically node-negative BC patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative T1-2 tumors with 1-2 SLN macrometastases not receiving axillary lymph node dissection. Secondary aims are to investigate whether refraining from regional RT reduces arm morbidity and late RT side effects, and improves short- and long-term health-related quality of life. In addition, the use of genomic classifiers for the prognostication of locoregional recurrences and the prediction of a benefit from regional RT will be investigated. Statistical methods: Primary outcome is recurrence free survival (RFS) at five years. Non-inferiority will be declared if the outcome in the intervention arm is not more than 4.5 percentage units below the standard arm, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 1.41 assuming 88% 5-year RFS with standard treatment. Secondary outcomes include locoregional recurrence, overall survival, patient-reported arm morbidity, and health-related quality of life. Accrual: The trial will include 1350 patients in Sweden, Norway and Finland from April 2023 to December 2028. First sites have been opened in April 2023. Contact information: Primary Investigator: Sara Alkner, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, sara.alkner@med.lu.se. Responsible for the biobank: Per Karlsson, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg University, per.karlsson@oncology.gu.se. Inclusion and exclusion criteria Citation Format: Sara Alkner, Jana de Boniface, Dan Lundstedt, Ingvil Mjaaland, Lisa Rydén, Johan vikström, Pär-Ola Bendahl, Erik Holmberg, Helena Sackey, Elinore Wieslander, Per Karlsson. The T-REX trial: a randomized international non-inferiority trial on Tailored Regional EXternal beam radiotherapy in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with 1-2 sentinel node macrometastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-19-03.

Abstract PS11-01: Brain metastases in metastatic breast cancer: prevalence per line of treatment and cumulative incidence in a cohort of 18075 real-world patients

Abstract BACKGROUND Historic data suggest that incidence of brain metastasis (BM) is relatively distributed over time in HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC), occurs early in triple negative BC (TNBC), and occurs late in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic BC (mBC). However, the timing of BM relative to line of therapy has not been well described. We describe the prevalence per line of therapy and cumulative incidence of BM in a large real-world cohort of patients (pts) with mBC, by BC subtype and line of therapy. METHODS This analysis used data from the longitudinal US Flatiron Health de-identified database, which provides unstructured and structured electronic health record-derived data from &amp;gt;2.6 million pts with cancer in ~800 unique sites of care. Eligible pts had initiated a first line of treatment (index data) for mBC up to March 1, 2021, to allow for ≥2 years potential follow-up time. Baseline characteristics were assessed, and pts categorized by HER2 and HR status: 1) HR+, HER2+; 2) HR+, HER2–, 3) HR–, HER2+ and 4) TNBC (i.e., negative for HR and HER2). For the last two categories, HER2-low subsets were defined based on immunohistochemistry results (1+, 2+, or equivocal). Lines of therapy were derived using both treatment regimens and progression data. The primary outcome was the first diagnosis of BM. The prevalence of BM was evaluated by subtype, at the index date, and by the line of therapy. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) of BM was used to estimate the risk of BM in pts free of BM at the index date, and death was treated as a competing event. RESULTS Overall, 18075 pts were included (HR+, HER2+: 3062 pts [16.9%]; HR–, HER2+: 902 pts [5.0%]; HR+, HER2–: 12331 pts [68.2%] [HR+, HER2-low: 7062 (39.1%)]; TNBC: 1780 pts [9.8%] [HR–, HER2-low: 725 pts (4.0%)]). Median age at the index date was 64 years (interquartile range: 54, 73) and 10271pts (56.8%) had visceral metastasis. In total, 5951 pts (32.9%) had de novo disease, 12090 (66.9%) had recurrent disease, and 34 (0.2%) did not have available data for mBC type. The table shows the number of pts by line of therapy, prevalence of BM, and cumulative incidence of BM from the index date. Of the included pts, 1306 (7.2%) had a BM at the index date; the CIF was run on the remaining 16973 pts. Overall, 2248 pts (13.2%) had an incident BM event during follow-up (HR+, HER2+: 578 events; HR–, HER2+: 237 events; HR+, HER2–: 1119 events [HR+, HER2-low: 619 events]; TNBC: 314 events [HR–, HER2-low: 124 events]), 9314 had a competing event, and 5411 were censored. By fourth-line therapy, the prevalence of BM was 26.1% in HR+, HER2+; 37.1% in HR–, HER2+; 24.7% in TNBC (HR–, HER2-low: 27.9%); but remained low at 7.2% in HR+, HER2– (HR+, HER2-low: 9.4%). The cumulative incidence of BM at 60 months was 23% in HR+, HER2+, 34% in HR–, HER2+, 10% in HR+, HER2–, and, 22% in TNBC. Overall, the HER2-low subsets had BM prevalence and cumulative incidence that were very close to those that were HER2–. CONCLUSIONS This large analysis of real-world data demonstrates that the prevalence of BM across pts with mBC differs by tumor subtype and by line of therapy. Conversely, HER2-low status may have limited impact. The cumulative incidence of BM was highest in the HR–, HER2+ and TNBC subgroups, and lowest in the HR+, HER2– subgroup; despite this, due to the high proportion of HER2–, HR+ mBC cases, the HR+, HER2– group represented the largest number of BM events. These data emphasize the need for clinical and biologic predictors of BM and for strategies to prevent their onset, and provide information on the impact of BM inclusion and exclusion criteria in clinical trials for pts with mBC. Number of patients by line of therapy, prevalence of BM, and cumulative incidence of BM from the index date BM, brain metastasis; HR, hormone receptor, pts, patients; TNBC, triple negative breast cancer. Citation Format: Sarah Sammons, Jose Leone, Thibaut Sanglier, Peter Lambert, Filippo Montemurro, Raf Poppe, Eleonora Restuccia, Sara Tolaney, Nancy Lin. Brain metastases in metastatic breast cancer: prevalence per line of treatment and cumulative incidence in a cohort of 18075 real-world patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS11-01.

Abstract PO5-09-08: Cancer Health Disparities among non-Hispanic African women: A systematic review of the disparities, reasons and probable intervention

Abstract Health equity places health inequities in historical and social context and calls for action to address injustice and enhance health. As an ethical and human rights value that drives us to end health inequities, health equality is defined as everyone having a fair and just opportunity to be as healthy as feasible. According to this perspective, structural discrimination and marginalization cause health disparities that can be avoided. If these issues are not resolved, social and economic injustices, bias, and unfavorable outcomes that affect all of us will continue to exist. The idea of cancer health equality recognizes that there is still considerable work to be done to change the social structures and historical momentum that have contributed to different cancer outcomes, and that this work can only succeed if it is done. In USA, non-Hispanic black women experience a complicated and multifaceted disparity in breast cancer incidence and outcome. It's possible that social, economic, and behavioral variables contribute to discrepancies. Black women are less likely to breastfeed after childbirth, statistically more likely to have diabetes, heart disease, and obesity, all of which are risk factors for breast cancer. Compared to white women, they are more likely to lack adequate health insurance or access to medical facilities, which could have an impact on screening, follow-up treatment, and therapy completion. It has become evident via more study that biology also plays a part. Black women are more likely to be diagnosed at younger ages and at higher rates with more aggressive subtypes of breast cancer, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and inflammatory breast cancer. The National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) established a research framework to characterize the multiple domains of influence (biological, behavioral, physical environment, sociocultural environment, and health care system) that may act across various levels of influence to impact health. A literature search was conducted using the National Library of Medicine's PubMed search engine. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a common malignancy in African American women. The incidence of TNBC is higher in women of African ancestry and is associated with overall poor prognosis. This disparity is due to the presence/absence of oncogenes/tumor suppressor genes, mutations and altered signaling pathways that might predispose premenopausal African American women to TNBC. Multiple socioeconomic factors influence the access to standard care, novel treatments and inclusion in clinical trials and contribute to overall prognoses. This review focuses on the epidemiology, molecular alterations, and treatment-related disparities in African Americans with breast cancer. This poster will elaborate the racial disparity in terms of breast cancer among the African-American women in USA, the reasons and it's effects on health equity. Citation Format: Tasnuva Khan Efa. Cancer Health Disparities among non-Hispanic African women: A systematic review of the disparities, reasons and probable intervention [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-09-08.

Abstract PO2-10-06: The Rising Burden of Contraception Requirements in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: Time for Change?

Abstract Background: Breast cancer clinical trials often involve therapies with potentially deleterious effects on the fetus and the baby in the event of pregnancy or breastfeeding. Consequently, eligibility criteria include contraceptive requirements for both the patient and their partner. Patient feedback on the burden of requirements in clinical trials prompted an evaluation of changes in contraceptive requirements in breast cancer clinical trials over the past two decades. Methods: Breast cancer ClinicalTrials.gov trials protocols over three periods of enrollment were reviewed: 01/01/2001 - 01/01/2002, 01/01/2011 - 01/01/2012, and 01/01/2021 - 01/01/2022. Inclusion criteria: 1. Interventional studies including (neo)adjuvant or palliative systemic therapy, 2. Premenopausal female patients. Data, including the required number, types, and duration of contraceptive strategies, treatment regimen, and study design, were collated. A descriptive analysis by time period was performed. Results: 305 studies were included from the three periods: 63 (2001), 127 (2011), and 115 (2021). Of these, contraception requirements were specified in ClinicalTrial.gov protocol information in 4, 61, and 71 CT for 2001, 2011, and 2021, respectively, limiting our analyses in the two later periods. Complete data is available in Table 1. Conclusions: Our data demonstrates a time trend towards more stringent contraception requirements in breast cancer clinical trials inclusion criteria. The impact of contraception burden on enrollment, patient compliance, and investigator insight warrants further assessment. Citation Format: Camila Chiodi, Munzir Hamid, Catherine Weadick, Maeve Hennessy, Ana Martin-Quesada, Louise Kenny, Matteo Lambertini, Ines Vaz Luis, Seamus O'Reilly. The Rising Burden of Contraception Requirements in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: Time for Change? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-10-06.

High-throughput molecular assays for inclusion in personalised oncology trials - State-of-the-art and beyond.

In the last decades, the development of high-throughput molecular assays has revolutionised cancer diagnostics, paving the way for the concept of personalised cancer medicine. This progress has been driven by the introduction of such technologies through biomarker-driven oncology trials. In this review, strengths and limitations of various state-of-the-art sequencing technologies, including gene panel sequencing (DNA and RNA), whole-exome/whole-genome sequencing and whole-transcriptome sequencing, are explored, focusing on their ability to identify clinically relevant biomarkers with diagnostic, prognostic and/or predictive impact. This includes the need to assess complex biomarkers, for example microsatellite instability, tumour mutation burden and homologous recombination deficiency, to identify patients suitable for specific therapies, including immunotherapy. Furthermore, the crucial role of biomarker analysis and multidisciplinary molecular tumour boards in selecting patients for trial inclusion is discussed in relation to various trial concepts, including drug repurposing. Recognising that today's exploratory techniques will evolve into tomorrow's routine diagnostics and clinical study inclusion assays, the importance of emerging technologies for multimodal diagnostics, such as proteomics and in vivo drug sensitivity testing, is also discussed. In addition, key regulatory aspects and the importance of patient engagement in all phases of a clinical trial are described. Finally, we propose a set of recommendations for consideration when planning a new precision cancer medicine trial.

Association of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Valsartan With Blood Pressure Changes and Symptomatic Hypotension: the PARAGLIDE-HF Trial

In PARAGLIDE-HF, among patients with ejection fraction (EF) >40%, stabilized after worsening heart failure (WHF), sacubitril/valsartan led to greater reduction in plasma NT-proBNP levels and was associated with clinical benefit compared to valsartan alone, despite more symptomatic hypotension (SH). Concern over SH may be limiting use of sacubitril/valsartan in appropriate patients. We characterized patients by the occurrence of SH (investigator-reported) after randomization to either sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan. A key trial inclusion criterion was systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥100 mmHg for the preceding 6 hours and no SH. We also compared outcomes based on baseline SBP stratified by the median blood pressure. The primary endpoint was time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP from baseline through Weeks 4 and 8. A secondary hierarchical outcome (win ratio) consisted of: a) cardiovascular death, b) HF hospitalizations, c) urgent HF visits, and d) change in NT-proBNP. Among 466 randomized patients, 92 (19.7%) experienced SH (sacubitril/valsartan, N=56 [24.0%]; valsartan, N=36 [15.5%], p=0.020). The median time to the first SH event was similar between treatment arms (18 days vs. 15 days, respectively, p=0.42) as was the proportion of first SH events classified as "serious" by investigators. Patients who experienced SH with sacubitril/valsartan were more likely to be White (OR 1.87 [95%CI: 0.31, 11.15]), to have a lower baseline SBP (per 10mmHg increase OR 0.68 [95%CI: 0.55, 0.85]), or to have a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of >60% (OR 2.21 [95%CI: 1.05, 4.65]). Time-averaged change in NT-proBNP did not differ between patients with baseline SBP ≥128 mmHg vs. SBP<128mmHg (interaction p=0.43). The composite hierarchical outcome for sacubitril/valsartan in patients with baseline SBP≥128mmHg had a win ratio of 1.34 ([95%CI: 0.91, 1.99], p=0.096) vs SBP<128mmHg with a win ratio of 1.09 ([95%CI: 0.73, 1.66], p=0.62; interaction p value=0.42). Among patients with LVEF>40% stabilized after WHF, incident SH was more common with sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan. SH was associated with lower baseline SBP, White race, and higher LVEF. Treatment benefits with sacubitril/valsartan may be more pronounced in patients with higher baseline SBP and lower LVEF (≤ 60%). (Funded by Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03988634.) ABBREVIATIONS: : HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFmrEF, heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT-proBNP, amino terminal-pro b-type natriuretic peptide; SBP, systolic blood pressure; WHF, worsening heart failure.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in European Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.

Breast cancer is the most prevalent female cancer worldwide with known correlations between the race and tumor characteristics of the patients and prognosis. International and US-based studies, however, have reported a disproportionate representation of Black and Hispanic patients in clinical trials. This is the first study assessing race and ethnicity reporting trends and inclusion in European breast cancer trials. The PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched for trials on breast cancer treatment conducted exclusively in Europe between 2010 and 2022. Of the 97 identified trials, race was reported in 10.31%. Multinational participation, but not the study size or trial phase, was significantly associated with higher race reporting trends. These 10 trials featured a White-predominant population, with 1.08% Asian and 0.88% Black patients included. The acquisition of the race and ethnicity data of patients in European trials is lower compared to the U.S. or worldwide studies and does not permit extensive analysis of minority participation. In a limited analysis, the low rates of minority participation are concerning, based on population-based data on minorities in select European countries. These observations should encourage race reporting practices in European breast cancer trials and adequate minority participation to support the generalizability of the results of the studies and promote healthcare equity.

Hospitalized patients’ attitudes towards participating in a randomized control trial in case of a cardiac arrest

BackgroundNo previous study has evaluated patients attitudes towards inclusion in an ongoing cardiac arrest clinical trial. The aim of this study was to assess patientś willingness and motives to participate in the ongoing randomized controlled drug trial “Vasopressin and Steroids in addition to Adrenaline in cardiac arrest” (VAST-A trial) in case of an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). ObjectivesHospitalized patients, men ≥ 18 and women ≥ 50 years, were asked for informed consent for inclusion in the VAST-A trial in case of an IHCA, the reason for approving or declining inclusion in the trial and baseline characteristics. MethodsPatients admitted to hospital were asked to give informed consent of inclusion in VAST-A in case of an IHCA during their hospital stay. Patients were also asked why they approved or declined inclusion as well as baseline characteristics questions. Results1,064 patients were asked about willingness to participate in the VAST-A trial, of these 902 (84.8%) patients approved inclusion. A subgroup of 411 patients were, except willingness, also asked about motives to participate or not and basic characteristics. The main reason for approving inclusion was to contribute to research (n = 328, 83.9%). The main reason for declining inclusion was concerns regarding testing the drug treatment (n = 6, 30%). ConclusionAmong hospitalized patients the vast majority gave informed consent to inclusion in an ongoing randomized cardiac arrest drug trial. The main reason for approving inclusion was to contribute to research.

Shining a spotlight on the inclusion of disabled participants in clinical trials: a mixed methods study

BackgroundIt is crucial to include a wide range of the population in clinical trials for the outcome to be applicable in real-world settings. Existing literature indicates that under-served groups, including disabled people, have been excluded from participating in clinical trials without justification. Exclusion from clinical trials exacerbates disparities in healthcare and diminishes the benefits for excluded populations. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate potential obstacles that prevent disabled people from participating in clinical trials in the United Kingdom (UK).MethodsThe study was carried out through an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. The Imperial Clinical Trials Unit devised and implemented an online questionnaire-based survey (with open/closed-ended questions) and an online focus group discussion. The target population were disabled people, family members/carers of disabled people and staff involved in clinical trials, whereupon the sample was recruited by convenience sampling methods via posters and emails through various networks. The Qualtrics XM survey system was used as the host platform for the online survey, and Microsoft Teams was used for an online focus group discussion. The focus group discussion was conducted to gain a deeper understanding of the themes identified from the survey responses. We analysed responses to the survey via descriptive analysis and used thematic analysis to synthesise the free-text answers from the survey and focus group discussion.ResultsWe received 45 responses to the survey questionnaire and 5 disabled people took part in a focus group discussion. Our findings highlighted the differences between the perspectives of researchers and those “being researched” and different types of barriers experienced by disabled people: opportunity barriers (inadequate recruitment strategy and ambiguous eligibility criteria), awareness barriers (perception of disability) and acceptance/refusal barriers (available support and adjustment, and sharing of trial results).ConclusionOur findings support perspectives drawn from the Ford Framework regarding the need to consider all barriers, not just up to the point of enrolment into trials but also beyond the point of inclusion in clinical trials. We support calls for the introduction of legislation on including disabled people in clinical trials, implementation of industry/community-wide participatory approaches and the development of guidelines, a combined public–private approach.

Emerging Outlook on Personalized Neuromodulation for Depression: Insights From Tractography-Based Targeting

BackgroundDeep brain stimulation has shown promise in treating individual patients with treatment-resistant depression, but larger-scale trials have been less successful. Here, we created what is, to our knowledge, the largest meta-analysis with individual patient data to date to explore whether the use of tractography enhances the efficacy of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. MethodsWe systematically reviewed 1823 articles, selecting 32 that contributed data from 366 patients. We stratified the individual patient data based on stimulation target and use of tractography. Using 2-way type III analysis of variance, Welch’s 2-sample t tests, and mixed-effects linear regression models, we evaluated changes in depression severity 1 year (9–15 months) postoperatively and at last follow-up (4 weeks to 8 years) as assessed by depression scales. ResultsTractography was used for medial forebrain bundle (MFB) (n = 17 tractography/32 total), subcallosal cingulate (SCC) (n = 39 tractography/241 total), and ventral capsule/ventral striatum (n = 3 tractography/41 total) targets; it was not used for bed nucleus of stria terminalis (n = 11), lateral habenula (n = 10), and inferior thalamic peduncle (n = 1). Across all patients, tractography significantly improved mean depression scores at 1 year (p < .001) and last follow-up (p = .009). Within the target cohorts, tractography improved depression scores at 1 year for both MFB and SCC, though significance was met only at the α = 0.1 level (SCC: β = 15.8%, p = .09; MFB: β = 52.4%, p = .10). Within the tractography cohort, patients with MFB tractography showed greater improvement than patients with SCC tractography (72.42 ± 7.17% vs. 54.78 ± 4.08%) at 1 year (p = .044). ConclusionsOur findings underscore the promise of tractography in deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression as a method for personalization of therapy, supporting its inclusion in future trials.

Facets of physical function assessed by patient-reported outcome measures in oncology research.

The U.S. Food & Drug Administration has identified physical functioning (PF) as a core patient-reported outcome (PRO) in cancer clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to identify PF PRO measures (PROMs) in adult cancer populations and classify the PROMs by content covered (facets of PF) in each measure. As part of the Patient Reports of Physical Functioning Study (PROPS) research program, we conducted a targeted literature review to identify PROMs that could be used in clinical trials to evaluate PF from the patient perspective. Next, we convened an advisory panel to conduct a modified, reactive, Delphi study to reach consensus on which PF facets are assessed by PROMs identified in the review. The panel engaged in a "card sort" activity to classify PROM items by PF facets. Consensus was reached when 80% of panel members agreed that at least one facet was being measured by each PROM item. The literature review identified 13 PROMs that met inclusion criteria. Eight facets of PF were identified for classification in the Delphi study: ability, completion, difficulty, limitation, quality, frequency, bother, and satisfaction. Through two rounds, the panel documented and classified conceptual approaches for each PRO item presented. The most prevalent PF facets were ability, difficulty, and limitation. Classifying PF PROMs by PF facets will promote more consistent communication regarding the aspects of PF represented in each PROM, helping researchers prioritize measures for inclusion in cancer clinical trials.