Wound infection after intestinal ostomy closure is common postoperative complication. An alternative to primary suturing (PS) of the wound is incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT). The aim of the article was to assess and compare clinical outcomes after PS and iNPWT. Strategy was aimed to find relevant data comparing outcomes of iNPWT and PS after ostomy closure. Search was conducted using the MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, SciELO, and Web of Science databases. Authors conducted a meta-analysis of parameters: wound healing time, surgical site infections, complications, length of stay. The analysis revealed that iNPWT and control group did not differ significantly in wound healing time (OR = -2.06; 95% CI = -5.99-1.87; p=0.30, I2=4%). Meta-analysis of surgical site infection incidence revealed a significant difference favoring the incisional NPWT group versus observational (OR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.25-0.72; p=0.002; I2=14%). Patients in iNPWT group had significantly lower incidence of complications than observational group (OR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.35-0.77; p=0.001, I2=71%). Subgroup analysis limited to randomized studies only also presented significant differences favoring the iNPWT group against observational (OR = 0.27; 95% CI = 0.14-0.52; p<0.001, I2=67%). Our analysis revealed that LOS was not significantly different between groups among patients treated with iNPWT (IV=0.19; 95% CI = -0.66 -1,04; p=0.76, I2=0%). Subgroup analysis of randomized studies also did not present a significant difference (IV=0.25; 95% CI = -0.80 -1,30; p=0.33, I2=10%). Study shows that the use of iNPWT can reduce surgical site infections with other complications (wound hematomas, wound seromas, wound dehiscence, fistulas, ileus) in patients undergoing intestinal ostomy closure without extended hospital stay. Use of iNPWT can be considered in postoperative care after elective ostomy closure to decrease the rate of the most common complication after ostomy closure.