Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Research Articles

Efficacy of Strategies Intended to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Lower Limb Revascularization Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of strategies intended to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) after lower limb revascularization surgery. SSIs are common, costly complications of lower limb revascularization surgery associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (inception to April 28, 2022). Two investigators independently screened abstracts and full-text articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated strategies intended to prevent SSI after lower limb revascularization surgery for peripheral artery disease. We used random-effects models to pool data and GRADE to assess certainty. Among 6258 identified citations, we included 26 RCTs (n=4752 patients) that evaluated 12 strategies to prevent SSI. Preincision antibiotics [risk ratio (RR)=0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.57; n=4 studies; I2 statistic=7.1%; high certainty] and incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) (RR=0.54; 95% CI, 0.38-0.78; n=5 studies; I2 statistic=7.2%; high certainty) reduced pooled risk of early (≤30 days) SSI. iNPWT also reduced the risk of longer-term (>30 days) SSI (pooled-RR=0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.73; n=2 studies; I2 =0%; low certainty). Strategies with uncertain effects on risk of SSI included preincision ultrasound vein mapping (RR=0.58; 95% CI, 0.33-1.01; n=1 study); transverse groin incisions (RR=0.33; 95% CI, 0.097-1.15; n=1 study), antibiotic-bonded prosthetic bypass grafts (RR=0.74; 95% CI, 0.44-1.25; n=1 study; n=257 patients), and postoperative oxygen administration (RR=0.66; 95% CI, 0.42-1.03; n=1 study) (low certainty for all). Preincision antibiotics and iNPWT reduce the risk of early SSI after lower limb revascularization surgery. Confirmatory trials are required to determine whether other promising strategies also reduce SSI risk.

The wound adjuncts effect of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy on stopping groin surgical site wound infection in arterial surgery: A meta-analysis.

A meta-analysis study was conducted to assess the influence of the wound adjuncts therapy of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) on stopping groin site wound infection (SWSI) in arterial surgery. A comprehensive literature examination till January 2023 was implemented and 2186 linked studies were appraised. The picked studies contained 2133 subjects with groin surgical wounds of arterial surgery in the picked studies' baseline, 1043 of them were using ciNPWT, and 1090 were using standard care. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the consequence of the wound adjuncts therapy of ciNPWT on stopping groin SWSI in arterial surgery by the dichotomous and continuous styles and a fixed or random model. The ciNPWT had a significantly lower SWSI (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.33-0.55, P < .001), superficial SWSI (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33-0.66, P < .001), and deep SWSI (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25-0.63, P < .001) compared with the standard care in groin surgical wound of arterial surgery. The ciNPWT had a significantly, lower SWSI, superficial SWSI, and deep SWSI compared with the standard care in groin surgical wounds of arterial surgery. Although precautions should be taken when commerce with the consequences because some of the picked studies for this meta-analysis was with low sample sizes.

Use of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy on C-section wounds in obese women

Rates of obesity in pregnant women are increasing. Obesity is linked to increased patient risk of developing postoperative wound complications such as surgical site infection, wound dehiscence and haematoma formation. Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been introduced as a prophylactic intervention to reduce caesarian section (C-section) wound complications. Evidence from randomised controlled trials and retrospective studies has shown variable rates of success in reducing risk of SSI. The studies reviewed in this article found that ciNPWT had no statistically significant impact in reducing rates of wound dehiscence and haematoma formation or increasing long-term satisfaction with the appearance of scar tissue following C-section. Further research into the use of cINPWT to prevent surgical site infection is needed to determine the effectiveness of this therapy in reducing this wound complication.

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies of closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy versus standard wound dressing in the prevention of surgical site infections for patients undergoing surgeries for lower extremity fractures

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies of closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy versus standard wound dressing in the prevention of surgical site infections for patients undergoing surgeries for lower extremity fractures

Managing No-Drain Mastectomy with Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy using Full-Coverage Foam Dressings

Managing No-Drain Mastectomy with Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy using Full-Coverage Foam Dressings

Comparative evaluation of postoperative incisional negative pressure wound therapy with conventional dressings in patients of proximal tibia fracture managed by dual plating

Comparative evaluation of postoperative incisional negative pressure wound therapy with conventional dressings in patients of proximal tibia fracture managed by dual plating

A Prospective comparative study of Incidence of early Suture site infection following incisional negative pressure wound therapy and Povidone-iodine dressing in a post-operative emergency non-traumatic exploratory laparotomy

A Prospective comparative study of Incidence of early Suture site infection following incisional negative pressure wound therapy and Povidone-iodine dressing in a post-operative emergency non-traumatic exploratory laparotomy

Administration of Prophylactic Enoxaparin on the Morning of Surgery Does Not Increase Risk of Blood Transfusion or Wound Drainage Following Internal Fixation of Geriatric Femur Fractures.

Despite standard use of chemoprophylaxis, 30-day incidence of venous thromboembolism after geriatric, those older than 60 years, femur fracture surgery is reported to be up to 10%. Missing one dose of enoxaparin has been proven to increase the risk of developing venous thromboembolism. It is commonplace to hold preoperative chemoprophylaxis the morning of surgery because of concern for intraoperative bleeding or wound drainage. We sought to determine whether administration of prophylactic enoxaparin the morning of surgery resulted in an increased rate of blood transfusion or wound drainage in geriatric patients undergoing femur fracture treatment. We retrospectively reviewed patients older than 60 years who underwent internal fixation of an isolated femur fracture, including femoral neck, intertrochanteric, subtrochanteric, femoral shaft, and distal femur fractures, at a Level 1 trauma center. Medical records, hospital billing data, and radiographs were reviewed to determine patient characteristics such as Charlson Comorbidity Index, enoxaparin dosing, packed red blood cell transfusion, and persistent wound drainage, defined as any drainage requiring utilization of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy. Thirty-day mortality served as the secondary outcome measure. Five hundred seven patients were included. One hundred sixty-four (32%) received enoxaparin on the morning of surgery, whereas 343 (68%) did not. 27% of patients received PRBC transfusion, and this did not differ between groups (27% vs. 28%, P = 0.72). Subgroup analysis of fixation strategies revealed no difference in the frequency of blood transfusion for any fixation type as related to the timing of enoxaparin dosage. Utilization of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of postoperative wound drainage did not differ between dosing groups. No difference was observed in thirty-day mortality between groups (2.4% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.9). Administration of a prophylactic dose of enoxaparin on the morning of surgery does not seem to increase the rate of postoperative blood transfusion or wound drainage after fixation of geriatric femur fracture. Level III, therapeutic.

Evaluation of the Effects of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Complications after Abdominal Body Contouring Procedures

Evaluation of the Effects of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Complications after Abdominal Body Contouring Procedures

Role of a skin bridge incision and prophylactic incisional negative-pressure wound therapy in the prevention of surgical site infection after inguinal lymph node dissection.

Background:Modification of the surgical technique to a 2-incision technique with skin bridge from the traditional lazy S (LS) incision, as well as use of prophylactic incisional negative-pressure wound therapy (iNPWT), are theorized to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) after inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND). We sought to investigate the role of a perioperative ILND bundle on adverse events after ILND and lymph node harvest.Methods:We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent ILND before and after implementation of the ILND bundle (September 2016) at 1 centre in southeastern Ontario between 2013 and 2018. The ILND bundle included a skin bridge incision, running subcuticular skin closure and NPWT. Previously, an LS incision was used, with stapled skin closure and conventional dressing. Development of SSI was the primary outcome, and dehiscence and seroma and hematoma formation were secondary outcomes. We estimated the associations using multivariable logistic regression.Results:Thirty-four ILNDs in 33 patients were included, 15 in the LS incision group and 19 in the perioperative bundle group. The baseline demographic characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. The perioperative bundle was associated with a reduction in the SSI rate (11 [73%] v. 6 [32%], p = 0.02) and elimination of wound dehiscence (0 [0%] v. 5 [33%], p = 0.006). On multivariable logistic regression, it was associated with a 5.9-fold reduction in the SSI rate (odds ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.03–0.74).Conclusion:The results suggest a decrease in SSI rates with use of a perioperative bundle compared to the LS incision and a standard dressing. Randomized controlled trials are required to better understand the associations among the skin bridge incision, iNPWT and SSI.

P-135 FIRST EXPERIENCE WITH A NEW CLOSED INCISION NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY, PREVENA™, IN ABDOMINAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION PATIENTS

Abstract Aim Surgical site infection (SSI) contributes a significant proportion of post operative morbidity in patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Prevena™ closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPT) has been demonstrated to reduce SSI rates in the elective and emergency laparotomy setting. However, there is no evidence for Prevena™ use in AWR patients. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of Prevena™ in AWR patients. Materials and Method Patients undergoing AWR at a single trust were selected at random to receive Prevena™. This was applied to the incision under sterile conditions, a continuous pressure of -125mmHg was applied for 7 days. The primary outcome measure was SSI, with secondary outcomes of 90 day mortality, complications and length of stay. Results 10 patients received ciNPT in the study period, 8 female 2 male, mean BMI was 34.5. All patients had a Rives-Stoppa repair, with 2 patients also requiring bilateral transversus abdominal release (TAR). A vertical panniculectomy with umboplasty was used in 7 cases, fleur-de-lys panniculectomy with umboplasty in 2 cases, and a single case approached via transverse panniculectomy. There were no deaths within 90 days, median length of stay was 4 days. There was a single SSI managed with oral antibiotics, not requiring admission. Conclusion Prevena™ has been shown to reduce SSI rates in other patient cohorts and this small series demonstrates it is feasible and safe to use in the AWR setting. Larger studies are required to demonstrate SSI rate reduction in AWR patients.

Flap monitoring with incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in diabetic foot patients

Various types of flaps are considered as reconstructive options for patients with diabetic foot ulcer. However, flap reconstruction for diabetic foot ulcer treatment is particularly challenging because of the relatively limited collateral perfusion in the distal lower extremity. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel postoperative monitoring procedure implemented in conjunction with negative pressure wound therapy immediately after flap operations for treating diabetic foot. A retrospective analysis was performed on diabetic foot patients who underwent free flaps and perforator flaps from March 2019 through August 2021. The surgical outcomes of interest were the rates of survival and complications. On the third postoperative day, patients underwent computed tomography angiography to check for pedicle compression or fluid collection in the sub-flap plane. Monitoring time, as well as comparisons between NPWT and conventional methods, were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed between the two groups. This study included 26 patients. Among patients, the negative pressure wound Therapy treated group included 14 flaps and the conventional monitoring group included 12 flaps. There was no significant intergroup difference in flap survival rate (p = 0.83). In addition, there was no significant intergroup difference in the diameters of perforators or anastomosed vessels before and after negative pressure wound therapy (p = 0.97). Compared with conventional monitoring, flap monitoring with incisional negative pressure wound therapy was associated with a significantly lower mean monitoring time per flap up to postoperative day 5. Although conventional monitoring is widely recommended, especially for diabetic foot ulcer management, the novel incisional negative pressure wound therapy investigated in this study enabled effortless serial flap monitoring without increasing complication risks. The novel flap monitoring technique is efficient and safe for diabetic foot patients and is a promising candidate for future recognition as the gold standard for flap monitoring.

Incisional and Surrounding Periarticular Soft Tissue Management With Negative Pressure Therapy.

Periarticular injuries of the lower extremity are known for wound healing and infection complications. The role for incisional negative pressure wound therapy for lower extremity periarticular fractures has expanded over the last 10 years in hopes of minimizing complications. To date, there is no standardized published protocol of how negative pressure wound therapy is best used in lower extremity periarticular fractures. A review of strategies to decrease complications associated with the operative management of lower extremity periarticular fractures to include the use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy is presented.

How to Decide Upon an Appropriate Post-Operative Dressing: 2022.

In the current era, there are numerous advanced postoperative dressings. The ideal postoperative dressing is one that is thought to improve patient comfort, manage postoperative drainage, potentially allow for visualization of the wound, improve postoperative healing, and possibly reduce bacterial invasion. However, many advanced surgical dressings have shown increased ease of handling and increased patient comfort, but have not shown true superiority with regard to objective criteria. To ease the overall evaluation of such products, we have categorized them as standard of care dressings, engineered dressings, antimicrobial engineered dressings, skin glues and adhesives, and closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy. Among these categories, closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy has repeatedly shown superior subjective and objective outcomes. However, due to cost constraints, this therapy is not ideal for everyone. In many cases, the postoperative dressing should be dictated by the type of surgery, the location of the surgery, and the comorbidities of the patient. The authors will review the appropriate indications for the use of all categories of postoperative dressing and identify specific items that have shown great promise. The current guidelines will also be reviewed.

The application of negative pressure wound therapy in orthopedics: current concepts

We conducted a literature review to better understand the correct application and indications of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in orthopedics and traumatology. A literature search was conducted on PubMed and all articles in English, Spanish, and Italian were included. Relevant articles, references, data, and relevant findings were identified, reviewed, extracted, and accepted by consensus of at least 66% of the researchers. Relevant articles were discussed by the research group. NPWT has several beneficial effects on the wound that contribute to the maintenance of a favorable biochemical and cellular environment, to the formation of granulation tissue and to faster healing. NWPT can be useful in the treatment of septic wounds after initial debridement surgery and removal of the septic foci, and in necrotizing fasciitis in the presence of gas gangrene, venous or pressure ulcers. NPWT can also be used “for prophylactic purposes” (incisional NPWT) in patients with risk factors for skin dehiscence and with a high risk of wound drainage in the post-operative period and after prosthetic surgery or internal fixation to protect the surgical scar. However, the available evidence is mostly unclear. The appropriate use of NPWT seems to reduce the number of dressing changes in complex wounds, reduce hospitalization times, and offer greater comfort to the patient; when applied on surgical incisions, it may reduce the risk of delayed healing and the risk of infections.

Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Orthopaedic Trauma: Indications & Outcomes.

The treatment of surgical incisions has evolved. This article aims to discuss the indications and outcomes associated with the use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) for the management of surgical incisions. Multiple factors play a role in the benefits seen with iNPWT. The primary indication for iNPWT is to help manage the closed surgical incision environment and remove fluid from the incision via application of continuous negative pressure at -125 mm Hg. Pertinent literature will be reviewed.

Evolution of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Orthopaedic Trauma.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has evolved from open wound management to now include closed incision management. It has been a major advance in the management of open wounds and closed incisional wounds especially in orthopaedic trauma surgery. Because of the success of NPWT in the late 1990s and early 2000s, surgeons began using NPWT with adjuncts on closed incisions as a way to help prevent surgical wound dehiscence especially in at-risk patients for wound problems. It has been well established that obesity, diabetes, and smoking in addition to other comorbidities increase the risk of wound dehiscence and surgical site infections in orthopaedic patients. It is widely used for open wound management, often associated with open fractures, and in the mitigation of risk of surgical site infections over closed incisions (incisional negative pressure wound therapy). Newer systems allow the use of various topical wound solutions to be instilled in conjunction with NPWT, termed NPWTi-d. This has shown promising results in difficult wounds that may be resistant to standard NPWT. This article reviews the evolution and use of NPWT in orthopaedic trauma.

How Can Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Pay for Itself?-Reducing Complications Is Important.

Orthopaedic trauma demonstrates a relatively high rate of surgical site infections (SSI) as compared with other surgical specialties. SSIs provide significant clinical challenges and create significant health care costs. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) has reduced the risk of SSI in orthopaedic surgery and other surgical specialties. The purpose of this study is to investigate potential cost savings with the use of iNPWT (3M Prevena Therapy, 3M, St. Paul, MN) in high-risk orthopaedic trauma patients with closed OTA/AO 41C and 43C fractures. This is a retrospective cohort study performed at a single, level-1 trauma center using data from a lower extremity fracture registry. Using the results from the registry and baseline infection rates derived from the literature, a health economic model was developed to evaluate the potential cost savings. A total of 79 patients included in the registry underwent open reduction and internal fixation of OTA/AO 41C and 43C fractures. A total of 10.1% developed a SSI. For those who received iNPWT, the rate of SSI was 7.4%. A health economic model suggests that the use of iNPWT may reduce the costs per patient by approximately $1381 to $4436 per patient. This health economic assessment and model suggests that judicious use of iNPWT may reduce health care costs in patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of OTA/AO 41C and 43C fractures. Economic Level IV.

Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundInguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is associated with a high complication rate. Retrospective studies suggest that incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) might reduce complications, especially seroma, following ILND. MethodsThis was a prospective multicenter, randomized (1:1), open-labeled, parallel-group trial. Patients with macrometastic melanoma to the inguinal lymph nodes and eligible for ILND were randomized to receive either iNPWT for 14 postoperative days or conventional wound dressing. The primary outcome was seroma incidence. Secondary outcomes included surgical-site infection, wound rupture, wound necrosis, hematoma, rehospitalization and readmission rates between groups. All outcomes were registered 3 months after ILND and analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. ResultsThe trial was terminated early due to a low recruitment rate as a consequence of a change in the national treatment protocol, and the estimated sample size was not reached. Twenty patients were included and randomized in the study. The trial showed less seroma formation between the iNPWT 6/11 (55%) and control 7/9 (78%) groups; however, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.29). Similarly, there were no differences in the rates of surgical-site infection (p = 0.63), wound rupture (p = 0.19), wound necrosis (p = 0.82), hematoma (p = 0.19), reoperation (p = 0.82) or readmission (p = 0.34) between groups. ConclusionThere was a tendency toward fewer complications in the iNPWT group, however this trial was underpowered and could not confirm the hypothesis that iNPWT reduces complications after ILND. Future randomized controlled trials are required to fully evaluate the treatment potential of iNPWT. Trial registrationThe trial was prospectively registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03433937.

Effect of Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Donor Site Morbidity in Breast Reconstruction with Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap

SummaryBackgroundThe usefulness of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been well documented in many surgical sites, except for the donor site of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ciNPWT on microsurgical breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap.MethodsFifty-six cases of breast reconstruction with DIEP flap were included and divided into two groups based on post-surgical wound management: the ciNPWT group received ciNPWT at the donor site, while the conventional group received conventional wound management. The primary outcomes were the incidence of seroma, wound dehiscence, and surgical site infection, and secondary outcomes were the time to drain removal and amount of drainage. The breast reconstruction risk assessment (BRA) score was used to evaluate the comprehensive risk in each case.ResultsAmong the patient and surgical characteristics, only the BRA score (P=0.02) and the time to elevate the flap (P=0.02) were significantly higher and longer in the ciNPWT group, respectively. The incidence of seroma, dehiscence, and wound infection showed no significant difference between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis of patients with body mass index ≥ 25, the primary outcomes did not differ, while the secondary outcomes were significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (drainage volume, P = 0.04; time to drain removal, P = 0.04)ConclusionciNPWT can potentially reduce the incidence of donor site complications of DIEP flaps, especially if the comprehensive risk for post-surgical complications is considered.