Incidental Soil Research Articles

Using in vitro bioaccessibility to refine estimates of human exposure to PAHs via incidental soil ingestion

PAH bioaccessibility in contaminated soil was determined using the organic physiologically based extraction test with the inclusion of a sorption sink. Silicone cord was incorporated into the assay in order to overcome the limited capacity of the in vitro medium to accommodate desorbable PAHs. Initially, silicone cord sorption efficacy was determined by assessing sorption kinetics using PAH-spiked sand (phenanthrene, pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene; 10–1000mgkg−1). Irrespective of PAH and concentration, >95% of the initial PAH mass partitioned into the silicone cord within 12h although rates were lower at higher concentration and with increasing hydrophobicity. When PAH bioaccessibility was assessed in contaminated soil (n=18), contamination source (i.e. pyrogenic versus petrogenic) influenced PAH bioaccessibility. Individual PAH bioaccessibility ranged up to 81.7±2.7% although mean values ranged from 2.1 (acenaphthalene) to 20.8% (benzo[k]fluoranthene) with upper 95% confidence intervals of the means of 4.5 and 28.3% respectively. Although a PAH in vivo–in vitro correlation is yet to be established, bioaccessibility approaches incorporating sorption sinks represent a robust approach for estimating PAH bioavailability as the desorbable fraction may be a conservative measure of the absorbable fraction.

Bioaccessibility of arsenic in mining-impacted circumneutral river floodplain soils.

Floodplain soils are frequently contaminated with metal(loid)s due to present or historic mining, but data on the bioaccessibility (BA) of contaminants in these periodically flooded soils are scarce. Therefore, we studied the speciation of As and Fe in eight As-contaminated circumneutral floodplain soils (≤ 21600 mg As/kg) and their size fractions using X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and examined the BA of As in the solids by in-vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) extractions. Arsenopyrite and As(V)-adsorbed ferrihydrite were identified by XAS as the predominant As species. The latter was the major source for bioaccessible As, which accounted for 5-35% of the total As. The amount of bioaccessible As increased with decreasing particle size and was controlled by the slow dissolution kinetics of ferrihydrite in the gastric environment (pH 1.8). The relative BA of As (% of total) decreased with decreasing particle size only in a highly As-contaminated soil--which supported by Fe XAS--suggests the formation of As-rich hydrous ferric oxides in the gastric extracts. Multiple linear regression analyses identified Al, total As, C(org), and P as main predictors for the absolute BA of As (adjusted R(2) ≤ 0.977). Health risk assessments for residential adults showed that (i) nearly half of the bulk soils may cause adverse health effects and (ii) particles <5 μm pose the highest absolute health threat upon incidental soil ingestion. Owing to their low abundance, however, health risks were primarily associated with particles in the 5-50 and 100-200 μm size ranges. These particles are easily mobilized from riverbanks during flooding events and dispersed within the floodplain or transported downstream.

Validation of the predictive capabilities of the Sbrc-G in vitro assay for estimating arsenic relative bioavailability in contaminated soils.

A number of bioaccessibility methodologies have the potential to act as surrogate measures of arsenic (As) relative bioavailability (RBA), however, validation of the in vivo-in vitro relationship is yet to be established. Validation is important for human health risk assessment in order to ensure robust models for predicting As RBA for refining exposure via incidental soil ingestion. In this study, 13 As-contaminated soils were assessed for As RBA (in vivo swine model) and As bioaccessibility (Solubility Bioaccessibility Research Consortium gastric phase extraction; SBRC-G). In vivo and in vitro data were used to assess the validity of the As RBA-bioaccessibility correlation previously described by Juhasz et al. (2009). Arsenic RBA and bioaccessibility in the 13 soils ranged from 6.8±2.4% to 70.5±6.8% and 5.7±0.3% to 78.4±0.8% respectively with a strong linear relationship (R2=0.75) between in vivo and in vitro assays. When the As in vivo-in vitro correlation was compared that of Juhasz et al. (2009), there was no significant difference (P>0.05) indicating that the relationship between As RBA and As bioaccessibility was consistent thereby demonstrating its validation. For these data, a grouped linear regression model was developed (R2=0.82) with a slope and y-intercept of 0.84 and 3.56 respectively. A number of cross validation methodologies (2-fold, repeat random subsampling, leave one out) were utilized to determine the performance of the linear regression model. Residuals and prediction errors ranged from 5.4 to 9.4 and 6.9-12.2 respectively illustrating the capacity of the SBRC-G to accurately predict As RBA in contaminated soil.

In vivo measurement, in vitro estimation and fugacity prediction of PAH bioavailability in post-remediated creosote-contaminated soil

In this study, PAH bioavailability was assessed in creosote-contaminated soil following bioremediation in order to determine potential human health exposure to residual PAHs from incidental soil ingestion. Following 1000days of enhanced natural attenuation (ENA), a residual PAH concentration of 871±8mgkg−1 (∑16 USEPA priority PAHs in the <250μm soil particle size fraction) was present in the soil. However, when bioavailability was assessed to elucidate potential human exposure using an in vivo mouse model, the upper-bound estimates of PAH absolute bioavailability were in excess of 65% irrespective of the molecular weight of the PAH. These results indicate that a significant proportion of the residual PAH fraction following ENA may be available for absorption following soil ingestion. In contrast, when PAH bioavailability was estimated/predicted using an in vitro surrogate assay (FOREhST assay) and fugacity modelling, PAH bioavailability was up to 2000 times lower compared to measured in vivo values depending on the methodology used.

Home gardening near a mining site in an arsenic-endemic region of Arizona: Assessing arsenic exposure dose and risk via ingestion of home garden vegetables, soils, and water

The human-health risk posed by gardening near a legacy mine and smelter in an arsenic-endemic region of Arizona was characterized in this study. Residential soils were used in a greenhouse study to grow common vegetables, and local residents, after training, collected soil, water, and vegetables samples from their home gardens. Concentrations of arsenic measured in water, soil, and vegetable samples were used in conjunction with reported US intake rates to calculate the daily dose, Incremental Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (IELCR), and Hazard Quotient for arsenic. Relative arsenic intake dose decreased in order: water>garden soils>homegrown vegetables, and on average, each accounted for 77, 16, and 7% of a residential gardener's daily arsenic intake dose. The IELCR ranges for vegetables, garden soils, and water were 10−8 to 10−4, 10−6 to 10−4, and 10−5 to 10−2, respectively. All vegetables (greenhouse and home garden) were grouped by scientific family, and the risk posed decreased as: Asteraceae≫Fabaceae>Amaranthaceae>Liliaceae>Brassicaceae>Solanaceae≫Cucurbitaceae. Correlations observed between concentrations of arsenic in vegetables and soils were used to estimate a maximum allowable level of arsenic in soil to limit the excess cancer risk to 10−6. The estimated values are 1.56mgkg−1, 5.39mgkg−1, 11.6mgkg−1 and 12.4mgkg−1 for the Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Fabaceae, and Amaranthaceae families, respectively. It is recommended that home gardeners: sample their private wells annually, test their soils prior to gardening, and, if necessary, modify their gardening behavior to reduce incidental soil ingestion. This study highlights the importance of site-specific risk assessment, and the need for species-specific planting guidelines for communities.

Bioaccessibility and health risk assessment of arsenic in arsenic-enriched soils, Central India

Incidental soil ingestion is expected to be a significant exposure route to arsenic for children because of the potentially high arsenic contents found in certain soils. Therefore, it is prudent to get information on oral bioaccessibility of arsenic following incidental soil ingestion and its relevance in health risk assessment for future remediation strategies. Soil samples were collected from eight villages of Ambagarh Chauki block, Chhattisgarh, Central India. The soils from seven villages had total arsenic content more than the background level of 10mgkg−1 (ranged from 16 to 417mgkg−1), whereas the total arsenic content of soil from Hauditola was 7mgkg−1. Bioaccessible arsenic assessed by the simplified bioaccessibility extraction test (SBET) ranged from 5.7 to 46.3%. Arsenic bioaccessibility was significantly influenced by clay content (R2=0.53, p<0.05, n=8), TOC (R2=0.50, p<0.05, n=8), Fe content (R2=0.47, p<0.05, n=8) and soil pH (R2=0.75, p<0.01, n=8). Risk assessment of the study sites showed that hazard index of arsenic under incidental soil ingestion was below 1 in all the study sites, except Kaudikasa. However, carcinogenic risk probability for arsenic to children from the villages Meregaon, Thailitola, Joratarai and Kaudikasa was below acceptable level (<1×10−4), suggesting potential health risk for children from these sites could not be overlooked. With high carcinogenic risk value (3.8E−05) and HI index (>1) for arsenic in soils of Kaudikasa, attention should be paid for development of remediation measure.

Human health risks of Pb and As exposure via consumption of home garden vegetables and incidental soil and dust ingestion: A probabilistic screening tool

The consumption of home grown vegetables may represent a significant exposure pathway for arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) relative to direct incidental ingestion of soil, thus a probabilistic screening tool for estimating these exposures was developed using regression models relating co-located soil and home garden (HG) vegetable concentrations of Pb and As established from multiple independent studies and 2-dimensional Monte Carlo analyses. For high-quantity consumers of HG vegetables (i.e., the upper 95th percentile of consumers in the general population), the HG consumption pathway can be as significant as incidental soil and dust ingestion for inorganic As and, therefore, should be considered when developing generic health-based soil criteria in residential settings. Predicted Pb Hazard Quotient (HQ) estimates among young children resulting from HG consumption were 4- to 10-fold lower than exposures resulting from direct incidental soil and dust ingestion. The difference in soil/dust ingestion rates used to characterize young children (the 95th percentile of 202mg/d) versus a lifetime residential receptor (the 95th percentile of 30mg/d) was a primary factor contributing to the relative differences observed between HQ and incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) resulting from these two exposure pathways for lead Pb and inorganic arsenic As, respectively.

Assessment of Persistent Organic Pollutant (POP) Bioavailability and Bioaccessibility for Human Health Exposure Assessment: A Critical Review

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are ubiquitous environmental contaminants which persist in the environment, bioaccumulate through the food chain, and pose a risk of causing adverse effects to human health and the environment. When quantifying exposure to POPs via incidental soil ingestion for human health risk assessment, it is assumed that 100% of the contaminant is bioavailable for absorption into systemic circulation. However, this assumption may overestimate exposure thereby influencing risk calculations. A variety of in vivo and in vitro methods have been developed in order to quantify POP bioavailability for exposure assessment. The authors review bioavailability assays utilizing animal models (in vivo), surrogate assays (in vitro) for estimating in vivo POP bioavailability, the validation of surrogate assays, and future research needs for POP bioavailability determination.

Impact of soil particle size and bioaccessibility on children and adult lead exposure in peri-urban contaminated soils

The impact of soil particle size and bioaccessibility on children and adult lead (Pb) exposure via the incidental soil ingestion pathway was assessed in 16 peri-urban contaminated soils. A comparison of Pb distribution across 4 particle size fractions (<50μm, <100μm, <250μm and <2mm) found increasing Pb concentrations associated with decreasing particle size fractions. Lead enrichment in the <50μm particle size fraction was up to 5 times the concentration observed in the bulk soil. When gastric phase Pb bioaccessibility was determined in the <50, <100 and <250μm particle size fractions using the SBRC assay, Pb bioaccessibility also increased with decreasing particle size fraction for 6 of the 16 soils tested. Assessment of children and adult Pb exposure indicated that particle size and bioaccessibility had a significant influence on the contribution of incidental soil ingestion to daily Pb intake values. Although the <250μm particle size fraction is recommended for incidental soil ingestion calculations, using this fraction has the potential to underestimate Pb exposure due to the preferential adhesion of smaller particles to hands with elevated Pb concentrations.

Great horned owl (Bubo virginianus) dietary exposure to PCDD/DF in the Tittabawassee River floodplain in Midland, Michigan, USA

Soils and sediments in the floodplain of the Tittabawassee River downstream of Midland, Michigan, USA contain elevated concentrations of polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDF) and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD). As a long-lived, resident top predator, the great horned owl (Bubo virginianus; GHO) has the potential to be exposed to bioaccumulative compounds such as PCDD/DF. Site-specific components of the GHO diet were collected along 115 km of the Tittabawassee, Pine, Chippewa, and Saginaw Rivers during 2005 and 2006. The site-specific GHO biomass-based diet was dominated by cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus) and muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus). Incidental soil ingestion and cottontail rabbits were the primary contributors of PCDD/DF to the GHO diet. The great horned owl daily dietary exposure estimates were greater in the study area (SA) (3.3 to 5.0 ng 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalents (TEQ(WHO-avian))/kg body wt/d) than the reference area (RA) (0.07 ng TEQ(WHO-Avian)/kg body wt/d). Hazard quotients (HQs) based on central tendency estimates of the average daily dose and no-observable-adverse effect level (NOAEL) for the screech owl and uncertainty factors were <1.0 for both the RA and the SA. Hazard quotients based on upper end estimates of the average daily dose and NOAEL were <1.0 in the RA and up to 3.4 in the SA.

Arsenic distribution and bioaccessibility across particle fractions in historically contaminated soils

Incidental soil ingestion is a common contaminant exposure pathway for humans, notably children. It is widely accepted that the inclusion of total soil metal concentrations greatly overestimates the risk through soil ingestion for people due to contaminant bioavailability constraints. The assumption also assumes that the contaminant distribution and the bioaccessible fraction is consistent across all particle sizes. In this study, we investigated the distribution of arsenic across five particle size fractions as well as arsenic bioaccessibility in the <250-, <100-, <10- and 2.5-microm soil particle fractions in 50 contaminated soils. The distribution of arsenic was generally uniform across the larger particle size fractions but increased markedly in the <2.5-microm soil particle fraction. The marked increase in arsenic concentration in the <2.5-microm fraction was associated with a marked increase in the iron content. Arsenic bioaccessibility, in contrast, increased with decreasing particle size. The mean arsenic bioaccessibility increased from 25 +/- 16% in the <250-microm soil particle fraction to 42 +/- 23% in the <10-microm soil particle fraction. These results indicate that the assumption of static arsenic bioaccessibility values across particle size fractions should be reconsidered if the ingested material is enriched with small particle fractions such as those found in household dust.

In vitro assessment of arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated (anthropogenic and geogenic) soils

Arsenic (As) bioaccessibility in contaminated soils (n=50) was assessed using the simplified bioaccessibility extraction test (SBET). Soils used in the study were collected from sites where As was used as an herbicide (railway corridor) or pesticide (cattle dip sites), from former gold mines and from highly mineralised locations containing geogenic As sources (gossans). In all but three soils, As bioaccessibility was less than 50% indicating that a significant proportion of the total As concentration may not be available for absorption in the gastrointestinal tract following incidental soil ingestion. When regression models were developed based on soil properties, the descriptive variables best able to describe As bioaccessibility in railway corridor, dip site and mine site soils were total As and total or dithionite-citrate extractable (free) iron (Fe). While As bioaccessibility could be predicted (r(2)=0.955, n=50) in these contaminated soils, As bioaccessibility for gossan soils was a poor fit using linear or multivariate regression analysis.

Do Current Standards of Practice in Canada Measure What is Relevant to Human Exposure at Contaminated Sites? II: Oral Bioaccessibility of Contaminants in Soil

ABSTRACT Human health risk estimates for sites with contaminated soils are often based on the assumption that the outdoor soil sieved to < 250 μm is a reasonable surrogate for predicting exposures via incidental soil ingestion. In vitro bioaccessibility tests are also increasingly used to “improve” ingestion exposure predictions of contaminants at different sites. However, when considered in terms of factors that influence desorption of contaminants from particles and uptake into humans, available studies indicate that current “standards of practice” with respect to assays of oral bioaccessibility have a number of significant shortcomings, at least in Canada. These shortcomings are discussed and various factors that influence the assessment of bioaccessibility of contaminants in soils are examined. We finish with proposing some minimum data submission requirements to support the application and relevance of bioaccessibility assays at contaminated sites.

Do Current Standards of Practice in Canada Measure What is Relevant to Human Exposure at Contaminated Sites? I: A Discussion of Soil Particle Size and Contaminant Partitioning in Soil

ABSTRACT Human health risk estimates for sites with contaminated soils are often based on the assumption that the bulk concentration of substances in outdoor soil samples is a reasonable predictor of exposures via incidental soil ingestion, soil particle inhalation, and dermal absorption. Most underlying conceptual models are grossly simplistic, however, when considered in light of (i) biases in the distribution of contaminants across soil particle sizes, (ii) the size range of particles in soils and dusts that is environmentally available, and (iii) factors that influence desorption from particles and uptake into humans. The available studies indicate that contaminant distribution across soil particle size fractions varies widely between different soil types and contaminant delivery mechanisms, and it cannot be assumed that higher masses of contaminants per unit mass of soil are correlated with smaller particles sizes. Soil data gathered in support of detailed human health risk assessments, therefore, should allow for the examination of distribution across particle sizes of contaminants of concern, and consider those size fractions most critical to human exposure. Soil evaluations for health risk assessments of metals/metalloids should also consider mineralogical characterization.

In Vitro Gastrointestinal Bioavailability of Arsenic in Soils Collected near CCA-Treated Utility Poles

Because of the potentially high arsenic concentrations found in soils immediately adjacent to chromated copper arsenate (CCA)-treated wood structures and utility poles, CCA-contaminated soil ingestion may be a significant exposure route to arsenic for children. Therefore, a strong need exists to provide accurate data on oral relative bioavailability (RBA) of arsenic (in vivo or in vitro) in field-collected CCA-contaminated soils. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated soils collected near in-service CCA-treated utility poles, (2) to determine the influence of soil properties and arsenic fractionation on arsenic bioaccessibility, and (3) to estimate an average daily arsenic intake from incidental soil ingestion. Arsenic bioaccessibility (in vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) method) was determined on surface soil samples collected immediately adjacent to 12 CCA-treated utility poles after 18 months of service. Bioaccessible arsenic was also determined in 3 certified reference materials. Total arsenic concentrations in soils (<300 microm) varied from 37 +/- 2 to 251 +/- 12 mg/kg, irrespective of soil organic matter contentwith the major soil-bound arsenic species being As(V). Arsenic bioaccessibility ranged between 25.0 +/- 2.7 and 66.3 +/- 2.3% (mean value 40.7 +/- 14.9%). The mean value was in agreement with the in vivo arsenic RBA reported by Casteel et al. (2003) in soil near CCA-treated utility poles. Bioaccessible arsenic was positively correlated with total organic carbon content (r2 = 0.36, p < 0.05) and with water-soluble arsenic (2 = 0.51, p < 0.01), and was negatively correlated with clay content (r2 = 0.43, p < 0.05). Using conservative exposure parameters, the mean daily arsenic intake from incidental ingestion of contaminated soil near CCA-treated utility poles was 0.18 +/- 0.09 microg As kg(-1) d(-1). This arsenic intake appeared negligible compared to the daily intake of inorganic arsenic from water and food ingestion for children.

Survey of methodologies for developing media screening values for ecological risk assessment

This review evaluates the methodologies of 13 screening value (SV) compilations that have been commonly used in ecological risk assessment (ERA), including compilations from state and U.S. federal agencies, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Canada, The Netherlands, and Australia. The majority of surfacewater SVs were primarily derived for the protection of aquatic organisms using 2 approaches: (1) a statistical assessment of toxicity values by species groupings, such as "ambient water quality criteria," or (2) extrapolation of a lowest observed adverse effect level determined from limited toxicity data using an uncertainty factor. Sediment SVs were primarily derived for the protection of benthic invertebrates using 2 approaches: (1) statistical interpretations of databases on the incidence of biological effects and chemical concentrations in sediment, or (2) values derived from equilibrium partitioning based on a surfacewater SV. Soil SVs were derived using a diversity of approaches and were usually based on the lowest value determined from soil toxicity to terrestrial plants or invertebrates and, less frequently, from modeled, incidental soil ingestion or chemical accumulation in terrestrial organisms. The various SV compilations and methodologies had varying levels of conservatism and were not consistent in the pathways and receptors considered in the SV derivation. Many SVs were derived from other compilations and were based on outdated values, or they relied on only older toxicity data. Risk assessors involved in ERA should carefully evaluate the technical basis of SVs and consider the uncertainty in any value used to determine the presence or absence of risk and the need for further assessment.

Survey of Methodologies for Developing Media Screening Values for Ecological Risk Assessment

This review evaluates the methodologies of 13 screening value (SV) compilations that have been commonly used in ecological risk assessment (ERA), including compilations from state and U.S. federal agencies, the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Canada, The Netherlands, and Australia. The majority of surfacewater SVs were primarily derived for the protection of aquatic organisms using 2 approaches: (1) a statistical assessment of toxicity values by species groupings, such as “ambient water quality criteria,” or (2) extrapolation of a lowest observed adverse effect level determined from limited toxicity data using an uncertainty factor. Sediment SVs were primarily derived for the protection of benthic invertebrates using 2 approaches: (1) statistical interpretations of databases on the incidence of biological effects and chemical concentrations in sediment, or (2) values derived from equilibrium partitioning based on a surfacewater SV. Soil SVs were derived using a diversity of approaches and were usually based on the lowest value determined from soil toxicity to terrestrial plants or invertebrates and, less frequently, from modeled, incidental soil ingestion or chemical accumulation in terrestrial organisms. The various SV compilations and methodologies had varying levels of conservatism and were not consistent in the pathways and receptors considered in the SV derivation. Many SVs were derived from other compilations and were based on outdated values, or they relied on only older toxicity data. Risk assessors involved in ERA should carefully evaluate the technical basis of SVs and consider the uncertainty in any value used to determine the presence or absence of risk and the need for further assessment.

Contamination of soil with fluoride by long-term application of superphosphates to pastures and risk to grazing animals

Fluoride (F) is an impurity in phosphatic fertilisers and significant amounts of F will be added to soils with long-term application of phosphatic fertiliser to soil. There is a risk that F concentrations in soil may increase to levels toxic to plants or grazing animals. If F added to soil remains in the upper soil profile, due to high reactivity with soil, grazing animals could increase their intake of F through inadvertent ingestion of F-enriched soil. This study determined the distribution of F in the soil profile of medium (&gt;8 years) and long-term permanent pastures (&gt;50 years) where F had been applied as an impurity in phosphatic fertiliser, and assessed the potential bioavailability of fertiliser F in soil. Long-term application of superphosphate was linked to increased concentrations of the more soluble fraction of F in soil. The more soluble F fraction in the soil surface led to increased F concentrations in herbage (from 11 to 22 mg F/kg). Fluoride concentrations in herbage were not high enough to be toxic to plants or grazing animals. Fluoride applied as an impurity in phosphatic fertiliser was generally found to accumulate in the upper soil profile (0–6 cm depth). Such increases could also increase F ingestion by ruminants through incidental soil ingestion while grazing. The risk of fluorosis to grazing animals is low at present, but with continued application of fertiliser to soil containing high concentrations of F, and depending on the bioavailability of fertiliser-derived F in soil, we estimate that fluorosis may become an issue in the next 25–50 years in highly fertilised pasture soils.

Heavy Metal Contamination in a Lizard, Agama stellio stellio, Compared in Urban, High Altitude and Agricultural, Low Altitude Areas of North Greece

Contamination from heavy metals is a serious problem recognized In most countries of the world. Direct methods of metal detection are applied to soil and water; Indirect methods use plants and animals as bioindicators. Reptiles have not been used as bioindicators for various reasons: difficulty in sampling, ancient fears, little economic Importance, difficulty in the laboratory etc. Since Invertebrates are the prey of most lizards, the uptake of metals through invertebrates is an important pathway. Heavy metals accumulate through food ingestion and by incidental soil ingestion of soil. Reptiles have recently started to be used as bioindicators of pesticides entering the environment, with great success. The environment in Greece has a burden of heavy metals. The purpose of this paper is to ascertain whether reptiles, especially lizards, can be used as bioindicators of heavy metal pollution by compacting indirectly the level of pollution of two areas differing to some extent ecologically In the vicinity of a large city and in the vicinity of cultivated areas. The bioindicator species was the lizard Agama stellio stellio. 28 refs., 1 tab.

Bases for secondary standards for residual radionuclides in soil and some recommendations for cost-effective operational implementation.

The future use of land contaminated with radionuclides depends upon scientifically defensible bases for setting limits for radionuclides in soil. The purpose of this work is to develop such bases for establishing "posting criteria" to protect nonradiological workers at the Nevada Test Site and to provide a rationale for cost-effective measurements to readily determine the boundary conditions. The analysis begins with a mandated limit on total effective dose equivalent (1 mSv y(-1)) via all pathways. The possible pathways of exposure are external gamma exposure, inhalation of resuspended material, and incidental soil ingestion. These pathways are evaluated for each radionuclide of interest on the Nevada Test Site, and the results are used to define for each radionuclide the deposition-density limits for each pathway of exposure. The minimum deposition-density limits are noted to occur via the external gamma-exposure pathway for most radionuclides; exceptions are incidental soil ingestion for 90Sr/90Y and inhalation for 238Pu, 239,240Pu, and 241Am. The limiting values of deposition density or average concentration in soil are then determined appropriately by combining all pathways. Procedures are developed for dealing with mixtures of many radionuclides and to apply the principles developed so that even a simple measurement of external gamma-exposure rate may be used to define the boundary conditions in the field, provided that the relative abundance of the radionuclide mixture is known and that the defining level of exposure rate is sufficiently above background.