Incidence Of Severe Toxicity Research Articles

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionTo evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to the primary tumor and lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) who are ineligible for or refused concomitant chemoradiation. Materials and MethodsIn accordance with the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, a systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted. The study included reports that assessed the outcomes of SABR treatment in patients with LA-NSCLC. Studies evaluating SBRT as a boost following primary radiotherapy were excluded. The primary outcomes measured were local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was the incidence of severe toxicity (grades 3–5). A meta-regression analysis was performed to explore the relationship between LC, OS, and severe toxicity. The Biologically Effective Dose (BED) was analyzed as a continuous variable. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value < 0.05. ResultsA total of seven studies (3 prospective and 4 retrospective studies) involving 268 patients (SBRT to primary and lymph nodes) were included in the analysis. The pooled 1-year LC rate was 80 % (95 % CI: 63–94 %), and the factors significantly associated with LC were BEDGy10 (p = 0.005) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.005). The 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 74 % (95 % CI: 58–90 %) and 55 % (95 % CI: 34–76 %), respectively. Meta-regression analysis indicated a linear relationship between OS and LC, with a 0.7 % increase in OS for each 1 % improvement in LC (p = 0.005). The pooled rate of grade 3 acute toxicity was 5 % (95 % CI: 1–10 %), and the rate of grade 5 toxicity was 1.7 % (95 % CI: 0–3 %). ConclusionPromising results (LC and OS) with limited toxicity (feasibility) using SABR in LA-NSCLC warrant further research, emphasizing the need for larger, well-designed trials for further validation of the approach.

Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Ultra-central Thoracic Tumors: A Single Center Retrospective Review

Purpose/Objective(s)We sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for ultra-central thoracic tumours at our institution. Materials/MethodsPatients with ultra-central lung tumours or nodes, defined as having the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping or abutting the central bronchial tree and/or esophagus, treated at our institution with SBRT between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. All SBRT plans were generated with the goal of creating homogenous dose distributions. The primary endpoint was incidence of SBRT-related grade ≥3 toxicity, defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (V5.0). Secondary endpoints included local failure (LF), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Competing risk analysis was used to estimate incidence and identify predictors of severe toxicity and LF, while the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS. Results154 patients receiving 162 ultra-central courses of SBRT were included. The most common prescription was 50Gy in 5 fractions (42%), with doses ranging from 30-55Gy in 5 fractions (BED10 range 48-115Gy). The incidence of severe toxicity was 9.4% at 3 years. The most common severe toxicity was pneumonitis (n=4). There was 1 possible treatment related death from pneumonitis/pneumonia. Predictors of severe toxicity included increased PTV size, decreased PTV V95%, lung V5Gy, and lung V20Gy. The incidence of LF was 14% at 3 years. Predictors of LF included younger age, and greater volume of overlap between the PTV and esophagus. Median PFS was 8.8 months, while median OS was 44.0 months. ConclusionIn the largest case series of ultra-central thoracic SBRT to date, homogenously prescribed SBRT was associated with relatively low rates of severe toxicity and LF. Predictors of toxicity should be interpreted in the context of the heterogeneity in toxicities observed.

A multicentric, single arm, open-label, phase I/II study evaluating PSMA targeted radionuclide therapy in adult patients with metastatic clear cell renal cancer (PRadR)

BackgroundDespite advancements in managing metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mccRCC) through antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy, there remains a demand for novel treatments for patients experiencing progression despite the use of these medications. There is currently no established standard treatment for patients receiving third therapy line. Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) whose high expression has been demonstrated in metastatic aggressive prostate adenocarcinoma is also highly expressed in neovessels of various solid tumors including renal cell carcinoma (RCC): 86% of clear cell RCC, 61% of chromophobe RCC, and 28% of papillary RCC. Therefore, PSMA may be a target expressed in metastatic ccRCC for radionuclide therapy using PSMA ligands radiolabeled with Lutetium-177 (PRLT). 177Lu-PSMA delivers ß-particle radiation to PSMA-expressing cells and the surrounding microenvironment with demonstrated efficacy in metastatic prostate cancer.MethodsThis is a multicenter phase I/II study designed to assess the tolerability and effectiveness of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in individuals with PSMA-positive metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), identified through 68Ga-PSMA PET, conducted in France (PRadR). 48 patients will be treated with 4 cycles of 7.4 GBq of 177Lu-PSMA-1 every 6 weeks. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of 177Lu-PSMA-1 (phase I) and the efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (phase II). Primary endpoints are incidence of Severe Toxicities (ST) occurring during the first cycle (i.e. 6 first weeks) and disease Control Rate after 24 weeks of treatment (DCR24w) as per RECIST V1.1. Secondary objective is to further document the clinical activity of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (duration of response (DoR), best overall response rate (BORR), progression fee survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).DiscussionOur prospective study may lead to new potential indications for the use of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients and should confirm the efficacy and safety of this radionuclide therapy with limited adverse events. The use of 177Lu-PSMA-1may lead to increase disease control, objective response rate and the quality of life in mccRCC patients.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06059014.

Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Ultra-Central Thoracic Tumors

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized in the management of ultra-central thoracic tumors, although concerns regarding significant toxicity remain. We sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of SBRT to these tumors at our institution. Patients with ultra-central lung tumors or nodes treated at our institution with SBRT between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Ultra-central was defined as having the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping or abutting the central bronchial tree and/or esophagus. All SBRT plans were generated with homogenous dose distributions using target coverage objectives of ITV V100% >99%, PTV V95% >99%, and an ideal PTV Dmax <105% (strict <120%). All plans were reviewed in quality assurance rounds by a team of dosimetrists, physicists, and radiation oncologists. The primary endpoint was incidence of severe toxicity (ST), defined as SBRT-related grade ≥3 toxicities, graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V5.0. Secondary endpoints included local failure (LF), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Competing risk analysis was used to estimate incidence and predictors of ST and LF, with death as a competing risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS. A total of 154 patients who received 162 ultra-central courses of SBRT were included, with a median follow-up of 21.5 months. Treatment intent was most commonly for oligoprogression (46%), oligometastasis (30%), followed by curative (20%). The most frequent tumor histologies were NSCLC (41%) and RCC (26%). SBRT prescription doses ranged from 30-55 Gy in 5 fractions (BED10 range 48-115 Gy). The most common prescription was 50 Gy in 5 fractions (42%). The cumulative incidence of ST was 8.9% at 3-years. The most common ST was pneumonitis (n = 4). Notable toxicities included bronchopleural fistula (n = 2, grade 3 and 4), bronchial stricture (n = 1, grade 3), and esophagitis leading to bleeding (n = 1, grade 4). There were no esophageal strictures or perforations, and no bronchial bleeds. There was 1 possible treatment related death from pneumonitis/pneumonia. Predictors of any ST included increased lung V5 Gy, decreased PTV V95%, and not having prior radiation therapy to the chest. The cumulative incidence of LF was 4.8%, 11% and 14% at 1-, 2-, and 3-years respectively. Predictors of LF included younger age, and greater volume of overlap between the PTV and esophagus. Median PFS was 8.4 months, while median OS was 3.7 years. In one of the largest case series of ultra-central thoracic SBRT reported to date, homogenously prescribed SBRT plans were associated with relatively low rates of ST and LF across a variety of treatment indications. Predictors of ST should be interpreted recognizing the heterogeneity in toxicities observed. Identified predictors of both ST and LF can contribute to future work to optimize the therapeutic ratio in treatment of ultra-central thoracic tumors.

A multicenter, phase II trial of maintenance sirolimus in combination with metronomic chemotherapy in children and adolescents with high-risk solid tumors.

TPS10072 Background: Risk of relapse for children with high-risk solid tumors (ST) remains unacceptably high despite aggressive multimodal therapy. Maintenance therapy is an emerging option to improve outcomes. Sirolimus, an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, is a potent immunosuppressant with antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects. Low-dose metronomic chemotherapy along with the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib also decreases neovascularization in in vitro and in vivo systems. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sirolimus in combination with celecoxib and etoposide alternating with cyclophosphamide was determined in a phase I study in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory ST. The regimen was well-tolerated and showed best response of stable disease in 8/18 subjects and partial response in 1/18. The efficacy of this regimen in relapsed/refractory ST is being tested in a Phase II study (NCT02574728). We hypothesize that patients with high-risk ST administered a 12-month course of this maintenance regimen will have improved 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to matched historical patients who were observed following completion of upfront therapy. Methods: This is a phase II study of sirolimus in combination with celecoxib and alternating low-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide delivered as maintenance therapy. Sirolimus will be given at the MTD of 2mg/m2/day with celecoxib 100mg twice daily and oral etoposide 50mg/m2/day (max 100mg) alternating every 21 days with oral cyclophosphamide 2.5mg/kg/day (max 100mg). This study includes: 1) a prospective cohort of patients with high-risk ST in first complete remission (CR), 2) a prospective cohort of patients with recurrent ST in second CR, and 3) a historical cohort matched 2:1 with cohort 1 on diagnosis, age, metastatic sites, and date of diagnosis treated with observation following upfront therapy. The study will enroll up to 38 patients in cohort 1. Eligible subjects are children (1-30 years) with a diagnosis of high-risk extracranial ST (metastatic sarcoma, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, malignant rhabdoid tumor) in first CR or any ST in second CR. Patients enrolled in upfront clinical trials are excluded. Primary endpoint is 2-year PFS of cohort 1 compared to the historical cohort. Secondary endpoints are median PFS of cohort 1, 2-year PFS and overall survival of cohorts 1 and 2, incidence of severe toxicities, and feasibility of completing the 12-month course following standard upfront therapy. Exploratory objectives include evaluation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in this population of patients in CR or with minimal disease burden and correlation of clinically obtained tumor molecular profiling with outcomes. As of January 2023, 12 subjects are enrolled, 9 in cohort 1 and 3 in cohort 2. Clinical trial information: NCT04469530 .

Influence of germline variations in drug transporters ABCB1 and ABCG2 on intracerebral osimertinib efficacy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are present in approximately 40% of patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib is a substrate of transporters ABCB1 and ABCG2 and metabolized by CYP3A4. We investigated relationships between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) ABCB1 3435C>T, ABCG2 421C>A and 34G>A, and CYP3A4∗22 and CNS treatment efficacy of osimertinib in EGFRm+NSCLC patients. Patients who started treatment with osimertinib for EGFRm+NSCLC between November 2014 and June 2021 were included in this retrospective observational multicentre cohort study. For patients with baseline CNS metastases, the primary endpoint was CNS progression-free survival (CNS-PFS; time from osimertinib start until CNS disease progression or death). For patients with no or unknown baseline CNS metastases, the primary endpoint was CNS disease-free survival (CNS-DFS; time from osimertinib start until occurrence of new CNS metastases). Relationships between SNPs and baseline characteristics with CNS-PFS and CNS-DFS were studied with competing-risks survival analysis. Secondary endpoints were relationships between SNPs and PFS, overall survival, severe toxicity, and osimertinib pharmacokinetics. From 572 included patients, 201 had baseline CNS metastases. No SNP was associated with CNS-PFS. Genotype ABCG2 34GA/AA and/or ABCB1 3435CC --present in 35% of patients-- was significantly associated with decreased CNS-DFS (hazard ratio 0.28; 95% CI 0.11-0.73; p=0.009) in the multivariate analysis. This remained significant after applying a Bonferroni correction and internal validation through bootstrapping. ABCG2 421CA/AA was related to more severe toxicity (27.0% versus 16.5%; p=0.010). ABCG2 34G>A and ABCB1 3435C>T are predictors for developing new CNS metastases during osimertinib treatment, probably because of diminished drug levels in the CNS. ABCG2 421C>A was significantly related with the incidence of severe toxicity. Pre-emptive genotyping for these SNPs could individualize osimertinib therapy. Addition of ABCG2 inhibitors for patients without ABCG2 34G>A should be studied further, to prevent new CNS metastases during osimertinib treatment. No funding was received for this trial.

External Validity of Two Scores for Predicting the Risk of Chemotherapy Toxicity Among Older Patients With Solid Tumors: Results From the ELCAPA Prospective Cohort.

Severe chemotherapy-related toxicities are frequent among older patients. The Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients (CRASH) and the Cancer and Aging Research Group Study (CARG) score were both developed to predict these events. The objective of this study was to evaluate the scores' predictive performance in a prospective cohort, which included patients aged 70 years and older referred for a geriatric assessment prior to chemotherapy for a solid tumor. The main endpoints were grades 3/4/5 toxicities for the CARG score and grades 4/5 hematologic toxicities and grades 3/4/5 non-hematologic toxicities for the CRASH score. A total of 248 patients were included, of which 150 (61%) and 126 (51%) experienced at least one severe adverse event as defined respectively in CARG and CRASH studies. The incidence of adverse events was not significantly greater in the intermediate and high-risk CARG groups than in the low-risk group (odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] = 0.3 [0.1-1.4] (P = .1) and 0.4 [0.1-1.7], respectively). The area under curve (AUC) was 0.55. Similarly, the incidence of severe toxicities was no greater in the intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high-risk CRASH groups than in the low-risk CRASH group (OR [95%CI] = 1 [0.3-3.6], 1 [0.3-3.4], and 1.5 [0.3-8.1], respectively). The AUC was 0.52. The type of cancer, performance status, comorbidities, body mass index, and MAX2 index were independently associated with grades 3/4/5 toxicities. In an external cohort of older patients referred for a pretherapeutic GA, the CARG and CRASH scores were poor predictors of the risk of chemotherapy severe toxicities.

Lenalidomide-Rituximab or Lenalidomide-Rituximab-Bendamustine in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Priimary Analysis of the Randomized Phase II HOVON110/Rebel Trial

Introduction The R2 regimen (lenalidomide-rituximab) is effective in treatment-naive and relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL). Combining R2 with bendamustine (R2B) is feasible (Stevens WBC et al., Hemasphere 2020) and hypothesized to deepen remission and prolong event-free survival (EFS) compared to historic controls. We performed a randomized phase II trial of R2 and R2B, aiming at identifying the most promising arm to take forward to a randomized phase III trial. Methods In the multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-comparative phase II part of the HOVON110/ReBeL study (Dutch Clinical Trial Register NTR3028), patients (pts) with FL relapsed after ≤5 prior therapies were randomized 1:1 to R2 (Arm A) or R2B (Arm B). Stratification factors used were FLIPI score (0-2 vs 3-5), number of prior treatments (1 vs 2-5), prior bendamustine use and relapse during rituximab maintenance (RM). Arm A pts received 6 cycles of R2 q28 days (lenalidomide 20 mg day 1-21, rituximab 375 mg/m2 day 1); Arm B pts received 6 cycles of R2B q28 days (lenalidomide 20 mg day 3-21, rituximab 375 mg/m2 day 1, bendamustine 90 mg/m2 day 1,2). In both arms, pts with partial or complete remission (PR/CR) received 2 years of RM treatment, once every three months. Subcutaneous rituximab was allowed. Thrombosis prophylaxis was advised during induction; antimicrobial prophylaxis with valaciclovir and cotrimoxazole was mandatory in arm B. Arms A and B were separately evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. Co-primary endpoints were CT-based CR rate according to Cheson 2007 criteria at end of induction (EOI) and incidence of severe toxicities (ST), defined as grade ≥ 3 non-hematological toxicity, specified grade 4 hematologic toxicity (neutropenia lasting ≥ 7 days despite GCSF, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia) or non-lymphoma related death. An event for event-free survival was defined as induction failure, progression, relapse or death from any cause. PET-CT was performed before and after induction. Central pathology and blinded central PET-CT review (Lugano classification) were performed. Results Between 2014 and 2019, 92 of 150 planned pts were randomized. The trial was stopped early because of slow accrual. Two pts (1 in each arm) were ineligible. Baseline characteristics were comparable between Arms A/B in terms of gender and median age (64/62 years). Most pts had stage III/IV disease (85%/80%), an intermediate/high risk FLIPI score (78%/89%) and had undergone 1 prior treatment (75%/76%; range 1-5). For pts in arms A/B, 80%/76% completed all 6 induction cycles and 41%/43% completed 8 cycles of RM. Main reasons for discontinuation during induction were progressive disease (PD) (n=4 per arm) and toxicity or other reasons in 5/7 patients. Severe toxicity (ST) occurred in 3 pts in arm A (6.8%; 2 fatal pneumonia cases) and in 6 pts in arm B (13.0%; no fatalities), while 43%/66% of pts experienced any grade 3-4 AE (2%/7% grade 4). These comprised mainly skin toxicity, infections and gastrointestinal toxicity. In the R2B arm, 1 pt had Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia during RM. Based on intention to treat (ITT) and local CT assessment (efficacy co-primary endpoint), 16% of R2 and 22% of R2B treated pts achieved a CR at EOI; the overall response rate (ORR) was 70% and 72%, respectively. The complete metabolic remission rate (CMR) by central PET-CT review at EOI was 48% and 54%. At a median follow-up of 48 months (mo), EFS was 39% and 61%; median EFS was 24.6 mo and not reached (NR). Importantly, median time to next treatment (TTnT) was 9.2 mo and NR. There were 7 second primary malignancies (SPM) in 5 pts in Arm A) and 5 SPM in 4 pts in Arm B). Overall survival was excellent in both arms with 72% and 91% of pts alive at 48 months. Causes of death during the study were progression of FL (n=8) and toxicity (n=3) in Arm A; FL (n=3), toxicity (n=1) and suicide (n=1) in Arm B. Conclusions This randomized non-comparative phase II trial of R2 and R2B in R/R FL patients showed high CT-based OR rates and PET-CT CMR rates, but low CT-based CR rates for both treatments. At a median FU of 48 months, 39% of R2 treated patients and 61% of R2B treated patients were still alive and in remission; this compares favorably with historic real world controls (Batlevi et al, Blood Cancer J 2020). Both regimens were associated with less severe toxicity than expected (pre-set acceptability threshold of 20% ST), supporting further investigation of R2 combinations in randomized phase III trials. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

TIRA study: A phase III, multicenter, randomized controlled study of toripalimab plus radical chemoradiotherapy with or without concurrent cisplatin in patients with high-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

TPS6101 Background: Patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) suffer a high risk of distant metastasis and require guideline-recommended multimodality therapy. However, cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy leads to a high incidence of severe toxicities and low patient compliance, consequently limiting survival improvement. Toripalimab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), has a novel anti-cancer mechanism and mild toxicity spectrum. Robust evidence showed that given toripalimab + gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy regimen, the median progression-free survival could be markedly improved in patients with recurrent and metastatic NPC. Besides, PD-1 antibody + radiotherapy is also regarded as a promising therapeutic strategy due to the synergistic effect. Therefore, we hypothesized that the de-intensification strategy using toripalimab + induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by radiotherapy alone would obtain equivalent survival and low toxicity in patients with LA-NPC compared with toripalimab + IC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Methods: TheTIRA study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, phase III study. Since August 2021, we have been recruiting high-risk LA-NPC patients (stage III-IVa, except T3-4N0M0 &amp; T3N1M0) from 12 Chinese centers. Our target sample size is temporarily set at 494 patients with 247 for each arm. Patients will be 1:1 ratio randomized to the experimental or control arm. Patients in the experimental arm will receive induction-concurrent toripalimab (240 mg, d1, Q3W × 6 cycle) with IC (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, d1 &amp; d8 + cisplatin 80 mg/m2, d1, Q3W × 3 cycle) + intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT, 70 Gy in 33 fractions), and thereafter adjuvant toripalimab (240 mg, d1, Q3W × 11 cycle). Patients in the controlled arm will receive an additional concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2, d1, Q3W × 2 cycle). The primary endpoint is the 3-year failure-free survival. Secondary endpoints include 3-year overall survival, 3-year distant metastasis-free survival, 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival, quality-of-life assessment according to the systems of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, and safety profile. Exploratory analysis will be performed for potential biomarkers of survival prediction including PD-L1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Clinical trial information: NCT04907370.

Predicting toxicity caused by high-dose-rate brachytherapy single boost for prostate cancer.

PurposeTreating localized prostate cancer (PC) with combination radiotherapy consisting of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) has been proven to result in better disease outcome than EBRT only. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of toxicities due to combination therapy and identify parameters correlated to acute or late urinary, rectal, and erectile toxicities.Material and methodsData on symptoms and tumor/treatment parameters were collected from 359 patients treated between 2008 and 2018 with EBRT (42 Gy in 14 fractions) and HDR-BT (14.5 Gy in one fraction) for localized PC, at the Örebro University Hospital. Urinary, rectal, and erectile symptoms were presented descriptively, and bivariate analyses for correlation between grade ≥ 2 toxicity and potential predictors were performed. To evaluate prognostic models, multivariable analyses were applied.ResultsUrinary toxicity grade ≥ 2 was observed in 154 patients (47% of patients without pre-existing symptoms grade ≥ 2), of which 15 were grade 3. Rectal toxicity grade 2 was observed in 22 (6%) patients. Any grade erectile dysfunction was evident in all patients without pre-existing dysfunction (n = 103), whereas only 7 recovered completely. In bivariate analyses age was correlated with higher risk of acute urinary toxicity, and irradiated volume was associated with both urinary and rectal toxicities. However, we found no multivariable model of clinical and statistical significance to predict the risk of urinary or rectal toxicities.ConclusionsIn our study cohort, the severity of toxicities was in general mild or moderate and temporary, whereas the incidence of severe toxicity was considerably low. Although we found no predictive models for toxicities, our findings are reassuring that this treatment approach as curative therapy for localized PC is well-tolerated.

Modified FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective comparative study

BackgroundGemcitabine plus platinum as the first-line chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has limited efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) compared to that of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (Gemox) for patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA.MethodsFrom January 2016 to December 2019, consecutive patients who were diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic CCA were treated with either mFOLFIRINOX or Gemox as a first-line chemotherapy. The main endpoint was Progression free survival (PFS). The second endpoints were Overall survival (OS), Disease control rate (DCR) and incidence of severe toxicity (grade 3–4). Tumors were evaluated at baseline and thence every 4–6 weeks. The study was designed and carried out in accordance with the principles of the declaration of Helsinki, approved by the Ethics Committee of Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine (XHEC-D-2020-154) and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04305288 (registration date: 12/03/2020).ResultsOf 49 patients in this study, 27 were in the FOLFIRINOX regimen group and 22 in the Gemox regimen group. There were no significant differences between groups in baseline characteristics. The DCR was 77.8% in the mFOLFIRINOX group and 63.5% in the Gemox group. The corresponding median PFS was 9.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3–12.4) in the mFOLFIRINOX group versus 6.4 months (95% CI,3.6–9.2, p = 0.040) in the Gemox group. The corresponding median OS was 15.7 months (95% CI, 12.5–19.0) versus 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.3–14.8, p = 0.099). Significantly more grade 3–4 vomiting occurred in the mFOLFIRINOX than the Gemox groups (7 (25.9%) vs 1 (4.5%), p = 0.044).ConclusionsFirst-line mFOLFIRINOX offered more promising results in patients with advanced or metastatic CCA.

Is adjuvant treatment for melanoma in clinical practice comparable to trials? The first population-based results.

e21523 Background: Little is known about the outcome of adjuvant therapy in melanoma patients beyond the clinical trial setting. The Dutch Melanoma treatment Registry (DMTR) is a population-based registry, set up in July 2013 to monitor the safety and quality of melanoma care. Since 2019, adjuvant treated melanoma patients have also been registered in the DMTR, following approval and reimbursement of adjuvant treatment in the Netherlands in December 2018. Methods: Analyses were performed on melanoma patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy included in the DMTR between 01-07-2018 and 31-12-2019. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze patient-, and treatment characteristics, and death as well as relapse rates. Results: Six hundred and fifty-seven patients treated with adjuvant systemic therapy were included in the DMTR. The majority (94%) of these patients was treated with anti-PD1. Twenty percent of the anti-PD1-treated patients developed grade ≥3 toxicity. Of the 279 patients with a minimum follow-up of one year after start of anti-PD1, 170 (61%) prematurely discontinued therapy. Relapse and death occurred in respectively, 38% and 12% of patients within one year of follow-up. Relapse was significantly more frequent in older patients, with high Breslow thickness and ulcerated melanomas. Conclusions: These data show more frequent premature discontinuation of adjuvant anti-PD1 in daily clinical practice than reported in the registration trials. Moreover, incidence of severe toxicity, relapse and death during adjuvant treatment appears higher in the real-world setting.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib in recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A pilot study

BackgroundThere is no standard-of-care for recurrent, metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rmNPC) after first-line chemotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy and safety data of apatinib in rmNPC patients. MethodsThirty-five biopsy-proven rmNPC patients received apatinib at 500 mg/day under a compassionate access programme. Primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Kaplan-meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Toxicity was assessed by CTCAE v4.0. Results82.9% (29 of 35) of patients had poly-metastatic rmNPC. All patients, except five, were platinum-refractory; 37.1% (13 of 35) received ≥ 2 lines. Median number of apatinib cycles was 4.0 (IQR: 2.0–8.0). ORR was 31.4% (11 of 35 [95% CI: 16.9–49.3]) and disease control rate was 74.3% (26 of 35 [95% CI: 56.7–87.5]); 11 (31.4%) and 4 (11.4%) patients demonstrated response for ≥ 6 and ≥ 12 months, respectively. Median PFS and OS was 3.9 (95% CI: 3.1–5.5) months and 5.8 (95% CI: 4.5–8.0) months, respectively. Among the ≥ 12-month responders, all patients had pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer of <700 (range: 353–622) copies/ml; this was consistent with the association of PFS with pre-apatinib EBV DNA titer (adjusted HR 3.364 [95% CI: 1.428–7.923] for ≥ 4000 copies/ml, P = 0.006). 42.9% (15 of 35) of patients required dose reduction. Nonetheless, only five (14.3%) patients suffered from G3 toxicities (two haematological, one hypertension, one hand-foot syndrome and one elevated aminotransferases). ConclusionOur data suggests potential efficacy of apatinib in rmNPC patients. Although incidence of severe toxicities was low, dose modification was required in 42.9% of patients.

Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: An Overview of Toxicity and Dose Response

Ultrahypofractionationed radiation therapy for prostate cancer is increasingly studied and adopted. The American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Biological Effects of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy therefore aimed to review studies examining toxicity and quality of life after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer and model its effect. We performed a systematic PubMed search of prostate SBRT studies published between 2001 and 2018. Those that analyzed factors associated with late urinary, bowel, or sexual toxicity and/or quality of life were included and reviewed. Normal tissue complication probability modelling was performed on studies that contained detailed dose/volume and outcome data. We found 13 studies that examined urinary effects, 6 that examined bowel effects, and 4 that examined sexual effects. Most studies included patients with low-intermediate risk prostate cancer treated to 35-40 Gy. Most patients were treated with 5 fractions, with several centers using 4 fractions. Endpoints were heterogeneous and included both physician-scored toxicity and patient-reported quality of life. Most toxicities were mild-moderate (eg, grade 1-2) with a very low overall incidence of severe toxicity (eg, grade 3 or higher, usually <3%). Side effects were associated with both dosimetric and non-dosimetric factors. Prostate SBRT appears to be overall well tolerated, with determinants of toxicity that include dosimetric factors and patient factors. Suggested dose constraints include bladder V(Rx Dose)Gy <5-10 cc, urethra Dmax <38-42 Gy, and rectum Dmax <35-38 Gy, though current data do not offer firm guidance on tolerance doses. Several areas for future research are suggested.

Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

ObjectiveTo determine the toxicity and efficacy of radiotherapy for cervical cancer in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsMedical records of patients with SLE who received radiation for cervical cancer from January 2011 to January 2019 were reviewed. For definitive radiotherapy, a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions was delivered by intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy of 28 to 30 Gy in 5 fractions. A dose of 45 to 50.4 Gy in 25–28 fractions was delivered for postoperative radiation. All patients were in remission with or without a low dosage of prednisone or immunosuppressive medication. Survival data were analyzed with the Kaplan–Meier method. The incidence of severe toxicities among patients was compared with the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.ResultsTwelve patients with SLE were included in this study. Definitive radiotherapy was delivered in 7 patients with FIGO (2009) stage II–III disease. Five patients with FIGO I disease received postoperative radiation. The median follow-up time was 22.1 months. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) were 77.8% and 83.3%, respectively. One patient of definitive radiotherapy and one patient of postoperative radiation died due to distant metastasis of cervical cancer. Grade 3 or higher acute and chronic reactions occurred in 58.3% and 8.3% patients, respectively. Acute grade 3 or higher toxicity correlated with the presence of chemotherapy (p = 0.045).ConclusionModern radiotherapy for cervical cancer was well tolerated in SLE patients with remission and provided a favorable outcome.

ABCB1 and ERCC1 gene polymorphisms are associated with nephro- and hepatotoxicity to carboplatin/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with gynecologic cancers.

Paclitaxel/carboplatin combination is the standard chemotherapeutic protocol for gynecologic cancers, but severe toxicities may compromise treatment. There is great inter-individual variability regarding the incidence and severity of toxicities, which may be due to single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) affecting drug disposition or cellular sensitivity. Here we investigate the impact of selected SNPs in ERCC1, ABCB1, CYP2C8, and CYP3A5 genes on the incidence of severe toxicities, including nephro- and hepatotoxicity. A cohort of 507 gynecological cancer patients receiving paclitaxel/carboplatin was recruited at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA-Brazil). Clinical data were obtained during routine consultations or from electronic medical records. Toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 5.0). Genotyping was performed using real-time PCR. ABCB1 c.1236C>T was associated with moderate-to-severe (grades 2-4) nephrotoxicity (ORadjusted 2.40; 95% CI 1.39-4.15), even after adjustment for age (≥ 65) and diabetes. The risk association between ABCB1 c.1236C>T and moderate-to-severe nephrotoxicity following paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy was also present among non-diabetic patients (ORadjusted 2.16; 95% CI 1.22-3.82). ERCC1 c.118C>T was the only individual variable associated with an increased risk for moderate-to-severe (grades 2-4) hepatotoxicity (OR 3.71; 95% CI 1.08-12.77), severe nausea (OR 4.18; 95% CI 1.59-10.95), and severe myalgia (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.12-3.40). ABCB1 c.1236C>T and ERCC1 c.118C>T might serve as potential biomarkers for the risk of moderate-to-severe toxicities to carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy of gynecological cancers.

Open-label randomized multi-center phase 2 study: gemcitabine cisplatin plus avelumab or gemcitabine cisplatin as first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial bladder carcinoma: GCisAve

The standard treatment in first line of advanced or metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (MBC) is the association of Gemcitabine and Cisplatin (GC). Avelumab, an anti-PD-L1 agent, has recently demonstrated efficacy. The objective is to evaluate the combination of these 3 agents. This phase II randomized open-label study, evaluated if GC-avelumab increases response rate and duration of response of patients in 1st line treatment for MBC compared to GC. Severe toxicities should not overlap and be acceptable. The two co-primary end points are the objective response rate and the incidence of severe toxicity after six cycles of treatment. The study will recruit 90 participants, randomized in two arms (1:2), GC (gemcitabine 1 000 mg/m2/j, J1,J8, Cisplatine 70 mg/m2, J1 = J21), and GC-avelumab (10 mg/Kg/3 semaines). Randomization will be stratified on Karnofsky status (≥ 80 % vs. < 80 %) and visceral vs non visceral metastases. The duration of the inclusion period is 24 months, with a duration of participation of each patient of 18 months and a total study duration of 42 months. If both efficacy and safety of the association of GC+avelumab are in the range of acceptable through this specific study design, this will support a subsequent randomized phase III study comparing both arms with an overall survival end-point. In addition, the evaluation of predictive parameters to be confirmed (e.g. the impact of tumor PD-L1 expression) or other immunological parameters, may support a selection of the population. NCT number : NCT03324282.

Older versus younger adults with gastric cancer receiving perioperative treatment: Results from the CRITICS trial

AimTo evaluate treatment-related toxicity, treatment compliance, surgical complications and event-free survival (EFS) in older (≥70 years) versus younger (<70 years) adults who underwent perioperative treatment for gastric cancer. MethodsIn the CRITICS trial, 788 patients with resectable gastric cancer were randomised before start of any treatment and received preoperative chemotherapy (3 cycles of epirubicin, cisplatin or oxaliplatin and capecitabine), followed by surgery, followed by either postoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (45Gy + cisplatin + capecitabine). Results172 (22%) patients were older adults. During preoperative chemotherapy, 131 (77%) older adults versus 380 (62%) younger adults experienced severe toxicity (p < 0.001); older adults received significantly lower relative dose intensities (RDIs) for all chemotherapeutic drugs. Equal proportions of older versus younger adults underwent curative surgery: 137 (80%) versus 499 (81%), with comparable postoperative complications and postoperative mortality. Postoperative therapy after curative surgery started in 87 (64%) older adults versus 391 (78%) younger adults (p < 0.001). Incidence of severe toxicity during postoperative chemotherapy was 22 (54%) in older adults versus 113 (59%) in younger adults (p = 0.541); older adults received significantly lower RDIs for all chemotherapeutic drugs. Severe toxicity rates for postoperative chemoradiotherapy were 22 (48%) older adults versus 89 (45%) for younger adults (p = 0.703), with comparable chemotherapy RDIs and radiotherapy dose. Two-year EFS was 53% for older adults versus 51% for younger adults. ConclusionPerioperative treatment compliance, especially in the postoperative phase, was poorer in older adults compared with younger adults. As comparable proportions of patients underwent curative surgery, future studies should focus on neo-adjuvant treatment. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00407186. EudraCT number: 2006–00413032.

Compound Kushen injection combined with platinum-based chemotherapy for stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of 37 RCTs following the PRISMA guidelines.

Objective: Compound Kushen injection (CKI), one of the commonly used antitumor Chinese patent medicines, has been widely prescribed as adjunctive treatment to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy and safety of this combination therapy for advanced NSCLC remain controversial. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of CKI combined with PBC on patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer.Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) guidelines. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CKI in combination with PBC versus PBC alone were retrieved and assessed for inclusion. Analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014), Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.0 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, United States; 2016) and Trial Sequential Analysis software (TSA) (Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2011). The disease control rate (DCR) was regarded as the primary outcome, and the objective response rate (ORR), quality of life (QOL), survival rate, and toxicities were the secondary outcomes.Results: Thirty-seven trials, recruiting 3,272 patients with stage III/IV NSCLC, were included. The results showed that, CKI combined with PBC resulted in significant improvements in DCR (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.15, P < 0.00001), ORR (RR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.40, P < 0.00001), QOL (RR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.55 to 1.92, P < 0.00001), 1-year survival rate (RR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.94, P = 0.001), and a 58% decline in the incidence of severe toxicities (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.49, P < 0.00001).Conclusions: From the available evidence, our data indicate that CKI plus platinum-based chemotherapy is more effective in improving clinical efficacy and alleviating the toxicity of chemotherapy than platinum-based chemotherapy alone in the treatment of stage III/IV NSCLC. However, considering the intrinsic limitations of the included trials, high-quality RCTs with survival outcomes are still needed to further confirm our findings.

Complications and toxicity of re-irradiation following total laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer

Study outcomes of re-irradiation after salvage total laryngectomy (TL) for patients with recurrent laryngeal cancer. Determine overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Determine the incidence of severe complications associated with re-irradiation with a focus on carotid blowout (CB). Patients previously irradiated, with recurrent or second primary cancer of the larynx status-post salvage TL who received a second course of radiation from 2000 to 2017 were identified. Toxicities were measured using the CTCAE 4.0. Major toxicities were defined as grade 3+. Survival data and Kaplan-Meier curves were computed in SAS 9.4. Twenty-six patients were included in the analysis. Seventeen had progression of disease and 16 died during the follow-up period. Nine patients had no evidence of disease (NED) at last follow-up. One-, two-, and five-year OS were 65.8%, 44.2%, and 23.2%. One-, two-, and five-year PFS were 48.4%, 24.7%, and 18.5%. The most common severe toxicities were fibrosis (61.5%), dysphagia (53.8%), and wound healing complication (23.1%). Four patients (15.4%) suffered carotid blowouts. Two blowouts were preceded by manipulation of the aerodigestive tract. Patients undergoing re-irradiation for recurrent laryngeal cancer have a poor prognosis with high risk of progression or recurrence. Re-irradiation may offer survival benefit at the expense of significant toxicities. The incidence of severe toxicity is high enough to warrant pretreatment counseling. Carotid blowout was seen in 15% of patients unrelated to cancer progression. Caution should be exercised in re-irradiated patients before instrumentation of the aerodigestive tract.