Incidence Of Reflux Esophagitis Research Articles

746. ESOPHAGECTOMY, WITH CHOLECYSTECTOMY HAS A HIGH INCIDENCE OF REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS AND GASTRIC TUBE ULCER

Abstract The surgical methods for thoracic esophageal cancer was subtotal esophagectomy, with gastric pull up via retrosternal route, and cervical anastomosis. However, some cases were complicated by acute cholecystitis in the early postoperative period, and cholecystectomy was performed intraoperatively to prevent postoperative cholecystitis in some cases. The disruption of normal anti-reflux mechanisms including the lower esophageal sphincter, angle of His, and diaphragmatic muscle and the denervation of the vagus nerve are generally thought to be the main factors that interfere with gastric motor function. Furthermore, the pressure difference between thoracic (negative) and abdominal cavity (positive) is another factor that promotes reflux across the anastomosis. Due to these factors, postoperative reflux esophagitis is frequently experienced. Furthermore, after cholecystectomy, due to loss of gallbladder reservoir function after cholecystectomy and decrease in antroduodenal motility, bile is not excreted by food intermittently but continuously, resulting in duodenogastric reflux. We investigated postoperative reflux esophagitis and gastric tube ulcers in cases with and without intraoperative cholecystectomy for the past three years. We investigated cholecystectomy with esophagectomy (n=65) and non-cholecystectomy with esophagectomy (n=101) in 166 cases of radical surgery for esophageal cancer in which 2-3 regions had been dissected in the past 3 years. As shown in Fig. 1, there are no differences in location, TNM, gender, and PPI administration .reflux esophagitis of the cervical esophagus is A:0 B:2 (3%), C:5 (8%), D:3 (5%) for chole(+), A:2 (2%), B:2 (2%), C:2 (2%), and D:2 (2%) for chole(-). Gastritis was Chole(+) superficial gastritis 14 (21%), metaplasia 4 (6%), chole(-) superficial gastritis 25 (25%), metaplasia 3 (2%). However, gastric tube ulcers occurred in 5 cases (7%) of Chole(+) and 1 case of perforation, while only 1 case (1%) of gastric tube ulcers occurred in Chole(-).. (Conclusion) Esophagectomy, gastric pull up with cholecystectomy has a high incidence of reflux esophagitis in the neck and can also cause ulcers in the gastric tube. Therefore, care should be taken in postoperative follow-up.

A comparative study of double track anastomosis and tubular esophagogastric anastomosis in laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy for upper gastric carcinoma.

e16117 Background: For the upper gastric cancer, especially adenocarcinoma at the esophagogastric junction, the optimal surgical method is still controversial. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and clinical effect of double track (DT) anastomosis in laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy (LRPG). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted involving 243 patients who underwent LRPG in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from Jan. 2017 to Dec. 2020. Patients were divided into tubular esophagogastric (TG) anastomosis group and double track (DT) anastomosis group, according to the digestive tract reconstruction. Their intraoperative conditions, perioperative recovery and postoperative follow-up were compared. Patients were divided into ≥60 and < 60 groups according to age, to analysis the pros and cons of the two surgical methods in different age groups. According to whether or not indocyanine green (ICG) tracer technology was used during the operation, DT group was also divided into ICG group and non-ICG group. Results: Compared with the TG group, the DT group had less volume of gastric tube drainage, shorter gastric tube drainage time and proton pump inhibitors application time, and lower reuse rate of proton pump inhibitors. However, the DT group had more total operation time and lymph node dissection time. The median follow-up time of the patients was 36.0 months. At the end of study, the 1-year OS rate and DFS rate were 94.2% and 92.6% in the TG group and 95.8% and 93.7% in the DT group. The 3-year OS rate and DFS rate were 90.2% and 85.2% in the TG group and 91.9% and 87.7% in the DT group. And there was no significant difference in survival outcomes between the two groups. The DT group had a lower anastomotic stenosis at 3rd month after surgery. Moreover, the incidence of reflux esophagitis and Gerd Q score in the DT group were lower compared with the TG group at 3rd month, 1st year and 3rd year after surgery. In addition, elderly patients had a higher incidence of short-term complications in DT group compared with TG group. In the ICG analysis, the ICG DT group had significantly shorter total operation time and lymph node dissection time, less intraoperative blood loss and more lymph nodes obtained compared with the non-ICG DT group. Conclusions: DT anastomosis is a safe and effective way in LRPG for upper gastric carcinoma. Although the operation time of it is longer than that of TG anastomosis, it has a better anti-reflux effect and reduces the incidence of dysphagia and anastomotic stenosis. In elderly patients, it is important to minimize operative time and better to use TG anastomosis. The application of ICG tracer technique in LRPG has positive significance.

A multi-center, prospective, clinical study to evaluate the anti-reflux efficacy of laparoscopic double-flap technique (lD-FLAP Study).

Double-flap technique (DFT) is a reconstruction procedure after proximal gastrectomy (PG). We previously reported a multi-center, retrospective study in which the incidence of reflux esophagitis (RE) (Los Angeles Classification ≥Grade B [LA-B]) 1 year after surgery was 6.0%. There have been many reports, but all of them were retrospective. Thus, a multi-center, prospective study was conducted. Laparoscopic PG + DFT was performed for cT1N0 upper gastric cancer patients. The primary endpoint was the incidence of RE (≥LA-B) 1 year after surgery. The planned sample size was 40, based on an estimated incidence of 6.0% and an upper threshold of 20%. Forty patients were recruited, and 39, excluding one with conversion to total gastrectomy, received protocol treatment. Anastomotic leakage (Clavien-Dindo ≥Grade III) was observed in one patient (2.6%). In 38 patients, excluding one case of postoperative mortality, RE (≥LA-B) was observed in two patients (5.3%) 1 year after surgery, and the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was 17.3%, lower than the 20% threshold. Anastomotic stricture requiring dilatation was observed in two patients (5.3%). One year after surgery, body weight change was 88.9 ± 7.0%, and PNI <40 and CONUT ≥5, indicating malnutrition, were observed in only one patient (2.6%) each. In the quality of life survey using the PGSAS-45 questionnaire, the esophageal reflux subscale score was 1.4 ± 0.6, significantly better than the public data (2.0 ± 1.0; p = 0.001). Laparoscopic DFT showed anti-reflux efficacy. Taken together with the acceptable incidence of anastomotic stricture, DFT can be an option for reconstruction procedure after PG.

Safety and short-term outcomes of a modified valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy versus gastric tube anastomosis after laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThere is no optimal reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy. The valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy can reduce postoperative reflux esophagitis, but it is technically complex with a long operation time. The gastric tube anastomosis is technically simple, but the incidences of reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stricture are higher.MethodsWe have devised a modified valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy after laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG), the arch-bridge anastomosis. After reviewing our prospectively maintained gastric cancer database, 43 patients who underwent LAPG from November 2021 to April 2023 were included in this cohort study, with 25 patients received the arch-bridge anastomosis and 18 patients received gastric tube anastomosis. The short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups to evaluate the efficacy of the arch-bridge anastomosis. Reporting was consistent with the STROCSS 2021 guideline.ResultsThe median operation time was 180 min in the arch-bridge group, significantly shorter than the gastric tube group (p = 0.003). In the arch-bridge group, none of the 25 patients experienced anastomotic leakage, while one patient (4%) experienced anastomotic stricture requiring endoscopic balloon dilation. The postoperative length of stay was shorter in the arch-bridge group (9 vs. 11, p = 0.034). None of the patients in the arch-bridge group experienced gastroesophageal reflux and used proton pump inhibitor (PPI), while four (22.2%) patients in the gastric tube group used PPI (p = 0.025). The incidence of reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles grade B or more severe) by endoscopy was lower in the arch-bridge group (0% vs. 25.0%).ConclusionThe arch-bridge anastomosis is a safe, time-saving, and feasible reconstruction method. It can reduce postoperative reflux and anastomotic stricture incidences in a selected cohort of patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy.Graphical abstract

Navigating the complexities of developing a classification of esophagogastric junction tumors suitable for preoperative setting.

Despite the worldwide decrease in the incidence of gastric cancer, the proportion of occurrence of carcinomas of the esophagogastric junction and proximal third of stomach is on the rise. The cause of this development is believed to lie in an increasing incidence of reflux esophagitis with Barrett´s metaplasiaand successful eradication ofHelicobacter pyloriinfection. The aim of this work is to present various views on the definition of the esophagogastric junction itself and to give an overview of tumor classification schemes being used (Fig. 2, Ref. 54). Keywords: gastric cancer, esophagogastric junction, definition, classification.

Conventional versus oblique fiber-sparing endoscopic myotomy for achalasia cardia: a randomized controlled trial (with videos)

GERD is common after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Selective sparing of oblique fibers may reduce the incidence of reflux esophagitis after POEM. In this study, we compared the incidence of GERD between conventional myotomy (CM) versus oblique fiber-sparing (OFS) myotomy in patients with achalasia. Eligible patients with type I and II achalasia who underwent POEM from January 2020 to October 2020 were randomized into 2 groups (CM and OFS myotomy). Exclusion criteria were type III achalasia, sigmoid esophagus, and history of Heller's myotomy. The primary study outcome was incidence of reflux esophagitis (at least grade B) in the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were reflux symptoms, esophageal acid exposure, clinical success, and adverse events. One hundred fifteen patients were randomized into CM (n= 58) and OFS myotomy (n= 57) groups. POEM was technically successful in all patients. Overall, reflux esophagitis was found in 56 patients (48.7%). The incidence of at least grade B esophagitis was similar in both groups (CM vs OFS myotomy: 25.9% vs 31.6%, P= .541). The mean number of reflux episodes (48.2 ± 36.6 vs 48.9 ± 40.3, P= .933), increased esophageal acid exposure >6% (45.5% vs 31.7%, P= .266), and high DeMeester scores (38.6% vs 41.5%, P= .827) were similar in both groups. There was no difference in the rate of symptomatic reflux (GERD questionnaire score >7) or use of proton pump inhibitors at 1 year. Sparing of sling fibers has no significant impact on the incidence of significant reflux esophagitis after POEM. Novel strategies need to be explored to prevent reflux after POEM. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04229342.).

Clinical effect and follow-up of laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy for upper gastric carcinoma.

To evaluate the safety and clinical effect of tubular esophagogastric anastomosis in laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy. A retrospective analysis was conducted involving 191 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2017 to October 2020. Patients were divided into tubular esophagogastric anastomosis group (TG group) and traditional esophagogastric anastomosis group (EG group) according to the digestive tract reconstruction. Their intraoperative conditions, perioperative recovery and postoperative follow-up were compared. Patients were also divided into indocyanine green group and non-indocyanine green group according to whether or not indocyanine green tracer technology was used during the operation. Their intraoperative condition and perioperative recovery were compared and analyzed after propensity score matching. The operation was successfully completed in all patients. Compared with the EG group, the TG group had less volume of gastric tube drainage, shorter gastric tube drainage time and proton pump inhibitors application time, and lower reuse rate of proton pump inhibitors. However, the TG group had a higher anastomotic stenosis at three months after surgery, as measured using anastomotic width and dysphagia score. Nevertheless, the incidence of reflux esophagitis and postoperative quality of life score in the TG group were lower compared with the EG group at 1st and 2nd year after surgery. In the indocyanine green analysis, the indocyanine green group had significantly shorter total operation time and lymph node dissection time and less intraoperative blood loss compared with the non-indocyanine green group. However, compared with the non-indocyanine green group, more postoperative lymph nodes were obtained in the indocyanine green group. Laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy is safe and effective treatment option for upper gastric cancer. Tubular esophagogastric anastomosis has more advantages in restoring postoperative gastrointestinal function and reducing reflux, but it has a higher incidence of postoperative anastomotic stenosis compared with traditional esophagogastrostomy. The application of indocyanine green tracer technique in laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy has positive significance.

Clinical Outcomes of Resectional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy for Severe Obesity.

Resectional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB) is considered an alternative bariatric surgery in countries with a high incidence of stomach cancer because there is no excluded stomach after RRYGB. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RRYGB. This study included patients who underwent RRYGB and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) between 2011 and 2021. Surgical complications and metabolic and nutritional profiles were compared between the patients preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12months after surgery. Twenty and seventy-six patients underwent RRYGB and SG, respectively; 7 in the SG group were lost to follow-up within 1year. Surgical complications and baseline characteristics were comparable between two groups, except for diabetes (90.0% vs. 44.7%, p < 0.001). The decrease of HbA1c levels and incidence of reflux esophagitis were lower in the RRYGB group compared to that of SG at 1-year postoperative (-3.0% vs. -1.8%, p = 0.014; 0% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.027). The percentage of total weight loss at 1- year postoperative and incidence of dumping syndrome were comparable between the two groups. The RRYGB group had significantly lower total cholesterol level (161.9mg/dl vs. 196.4mg/dl, p < 0.001), but higher incidence of vitamin B12 deficiency (30.0% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.003) at 1year postoperative compared to those of the SG group. The RRYGB group had better postoperative outcomes for diabetes and dyslipidemia without increasing surgical complications compared to that of the SG group. Thus, RRYGB can be considered a safe and effective alternative in areas where gastric cancer is prevalent.

Short-term outcomes and long-term quality of life after undergoing radical proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A propensity score matching analysis

Objective: To evaluate the effects on short-term clinical outcomes and long-term quality of life of laparoscopic-assisted radical proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis versus total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Methods: This was a propensity score matching, retrospective, cohort study. Clinicopathological data of 184 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction admitted to two medical centers in China from January 2016 to January 2021 were collected (147 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University and 37 in the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University). All patients had undergone laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy. They were divided into two groups based on the extent of tumor resection and technique used for digestive tract reconstruction. A proximal gastrectomy with reconstruction by esophageal gastric tube anastomosis group comprised 82 patients and a total gastrectomy with reconstruction by Roux-en-Y anastomosis group comprised 102 patients. These groups differed significantly in the following baseline characteristics: age, preoperative hemoglobin, preoperative albumin, tumor length, tumor differentiation, and tumor TNM stage (all P<0.05). To eliminate potential bias caused by unequal distribution between the two groups, 1∶1 matching was performed by the nearest neighbor matching method. The 13 matched variables comprised sex, age, height, body mass, body mass index, preoperative glucose, preoperative hemoglobin, preoperative total protein, preoperative albumin, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, tumor length, degree of differentiation, and pathological TNM stage. Postoperative complications, postoperative nutritional status, incidence of reflux esophagitis 1 year after surgery, and quality of life were compared between the two groups. Results: After propensity score matching, 60 patients each were enrolled in the proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis groups. The baseline characteristics were comparable between these groups (all P>0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in operative time, intraoperative bleeding, time to semifluid diet, postoperative hospital days, tumor length, and total hospital costs (P>0.05). Patients in the proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis group had earlier postoperative gastric tube and abdominal drainage tube removal time than those in the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis group (t=-2.183, P=0.023 and t=-4.073, P<0.001, respectively). In contrast, significantly fewer lymph nodes were cleared and significantly fewer lymph nodes were positive in the proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis group than in the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis group (t=-5.754, P<0.001 and t=-2.575, P=0.031, respectively). The incidence of early postoperative complications was 43.3% (26/60) in the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis group; this is not significantly higher than the 26.7% (16/60) in the proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis group (χ2=3.663，P=0.056). The incidences of pulmonary infection (31.7%, 19/60) and pleural effusion (30.0%, 18/60) were significantly higher in the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis group than in the proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis group (13.3%, 8/60 and 8.3%, 5/60, respectively); these differences are significant (χ2=8.711, P=0.003 and χ2=11.368, P=0.001, respectively). All early complications were successfully treated before discharge. The incidence of long-term postoperative complications was 20.0% (12/60) in the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis group and 35.0% (21/60) in the proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis group; this difference is not significant (χ2=3.386，P=0.066). The incidence of reflux esophagitis was 23.3% (14/60) in the proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis group; this is significantly higher than the 1.7% (1/60) in the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis group (χ2=12.876, P<0.001). Body mass index had decreased significantly in both groups 1 year after surgery compared with preoperatively; however, the difference between the two groups was not significant (P>0.05). The differences in hemoglobin and albumin concentrations between 1 year postoperatively and preoperatively were not significant (both P>0.05). Quality of life was assessed using the Visick grade. Visick grade I dominated in both groups. The percentage of patients with Visick II and III in the total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis group was 11.7% (7/60), which is significantly lower than the 33.3% (20/60) in the proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis group (χ2=8.076, P=0.004). No patients in either group had a grade IV quality of life. Conclusions: Both proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis laparoscopic-assisted radical surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction are safe and feasible. However, both procedures have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of postoperative complications. The incidence of reflux esophagitis is higher after proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis, whereas the long-term quality of life is lower than that of patients after total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis.

Effect of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction vs Total Gastrectomy on Hemoglobin Level and Vitamin B12 Supplementation in Upper-Third Early Gastric Cancer

Patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy (PG) with double-tract reconstruction (DTR) have been reported to have an incidence of reflux esophagitis that is as low as that observed after total gastrectomy (TG). It is unclear whether PG has an advantage over TG for the treatment of patients with upper early gastric cancer (GC). To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic PG with DTR (LPG-DTR) vs laparoscopic TG (LTG) on levels of hemoglobin and vitamin B12 supplementation required among patients with clinically early GC in the upper third of the stomach (upper-third early GC). This multicenter open-label superiority randomized clinical trial was conducted at 10 institutions in Korea. A total of 138 patients with upper-third cT1N0M0 GC were enrolled between October 27, 2016, and September 9, 2018. Follow-up ended on December 3, 2020. Patients were randomized to undergo either LPG-DTR or LTG. The primary co-end points were change in hemoglobin level and cumulative amount of vitamin B12 supplementation at 2 years after LPG-DTR or LTG. The secondary end points included morbidity, postoperative reflux esophagitis, quality of life, overall survival, and disease-free survival. Quality of life outcomes were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) 30-item core questionnaire (C30) and the EORTC QLQ stomach cancer-specific questionnaire at 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months. Among 138 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.0 [10.9] years; 87 men [63.0%]; all of Asian race and Korean ethnicity), 68 (mean [SD] age, 56.7 [10.4] years; 39 men [57.4%]) were randomized to receive LPG-DTR and 69 (mean [SD] age, 61.3 [11.3] years; 48 men [69.6%]) were randomized to receive LTG. The mean (SD) changes in hemoglobin levels from baseline to month 24 were -5.6% (7.4%) in the LPG-DTR group and -6.9% (8.3%) in the LTG group, for an estimated difference of -1.3% (95% CI, -4.0% to 1.4%; P = .35). The mean (SD) cumulative amount of vitamin B12 supplementation was 0.4 (1.3) mg in the LPG-DTR group and 2.5 (3.0) mg in the LTG group, for an estimated difference of 2.1 mg (95% CI, 1.3-2.9 mg; P < .001). The late complication rates in the LPG-DTR and LTG groups were 17.6% and 10.1%, respectively (P = .31). The incidence of reflux esophagitis was not different between the LPG-DTR and LTG groups (2.9% vs 2.9%; P = .99). Compared with the LTG group, the LPG-DTR group had better physical functioning scores (85.2 [15.6] vs 79.9 [19.3]; P = .03) and social functioning scores (89.5 [17.9] vs 82.4 [19.4]; P = .03) on the EORTC QLQ-C30. Two-year overall survival (98.5% vs 100%; P = .33) and disease-free survival (98.5% vs 97.1%; P = .54) did not significantly differ between the LPG-DTR vs LTG groups. In this study, patients with upper-third early GC who received LPG-DTR required less vitamin B12 supplementation than those who received LTG, with no increase in complication rates and no difference in overall and disease-free survival rates. There was no difference in change in hemoglobin level between groups. In addition, the LPG-DTR group had better physical and social functioning than the LTG group. These findings suggest that LPG-DTR may be as safe as LTG and may be a function-preserving procedure for the treatment of patients with upper-third early GC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02892643.

The association between shift work and the incidence of reflux esophagitis in Korea: a cohort study

Shift work has adverse health effects such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, sleep disturbance, depression, and breast cancer. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) results in lesions such as reflux esophagitis (RE) and Barrett’s esophagus. This study investigated the association between shift work and RE. A cohort study was conducted with 140,553 participants who were followed up at least once from 2012 to 2018. Type of working and shift types were collected using standardized questionnaires. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed by experienced endoscopists who were blinded to the aims of this study. According to the Los Angeles classification, RE was categorized based on the extent of esophageal mucosal breaks. During the 469,217.2 person-years of follow-up, 35,185 participants developed incident cases of RE. The multivariable adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence intervals) for incident cases comparing shift work to fixed day work was 1.09 (1.04–1.13). This association was more strongly observed in the younger age group (18–39 years old) and the female group. In conclusion, shift work was significantly associated with the incidence of RE. Particularly, the results were more significant in the younger and female groups.

Double-tract reconstruction is superior to esophagogastrostomy in controlling reflux esophagitis and enhancing quality of life after proximal gastrectomy: Results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial in China.

The aim of this study was to prospectively compare double-tract reconstruction (DTR) and esophagogastrostomy (EG) after proximal gastrectomy (PG) regarding the incidence of reflux esophagitis, quality of life (QOL), nutritional status and surgical safety. This study was a randomized controlled trial. Patients eligible for PG were enrolled and randomly assigned to the EG group and DTR group. The characteristics of patients, parameters for surgical safety, incidence of reflux esophagitis, nutrition status and QOL were collected and compared between the two groups. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed to determine the significant factors affecting the incidence of reflux esophagitis after PG. Thirty-seven patients of the EG group and 36 patients of the DTR group were enrolled. The incidence of reflux esophagitis was significantly lower in the DTR group than in the EG group (8.3% vs. 32.4%, P=0.019). The DTR group demonstrated a more favorable QOL than the EG group after PG. The nutritional status was balanced within the EG group and the DTR group. The operation time was longer in the DTR group than in the EG group (191 min vs. 221 min, P=0.001), while surgical safety was similar in the two groups. Our research demonstrated that DTR is superior to EG after PG in terms of the incidence of reflux esophagitis and provides a more satisfactory QOL without increasing surgical complications or sacrificing nutritional status.

Changing from NAFLD to MASLD: Similar cumulative incidence of reflux esophagitis between NAFLD and MASLD.

Changing from NAFLD to MASLD: Similar cumulative incidence of reflux esophagitis between NAFLD and MASLD.

Cardia function-preserving surgery and anti-reflux anastomotic method after proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current status and future perspectives.

The incidence and mortality of gastric cancer ranked 5th and 3rd worldwide, respectively, in 2018, and the incidence of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma increased over the past 40 years. Radical resection and lymph node dissection is the preferred treatment for gastric cancer. Proximal gastrectomy or total gastrectomy is usually performed for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and upper gastric cancer. Owing to the resection of the cardia structures, the incidence of reflux esophagitis increases significantly after proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy, resulting in poor postoperative quality of life. To reduce the incidence of reflux esophagitis and improve patients' postoperative quality of life, various methods to preserve the function of the cardia or to perform anti-reflux reconstruction have emerged. In this manuscript, we systematically introduced the advantages and problems of various anti-reflux anastomotic method after proximal gastrectomy, and cardia-preserving gastrectomy including endoscopic resection (ER), local gastrectomy by gastroscopy combined with laparoscopy, segmental gastrectomy, subtotal gastrectomy, and cardia-preserving radical gastrectomy. Cardia-preserving radical gastrectomy has the advantage of more thorough lymph node dissection and wider indications than those for subtotal gastrectomy. However, the clinical efficacy of cardia-preserving radical gastrectomy requires verification in prospective and controlled clinical trials. Cardia-preserving radical gastrectomy is a promising approach as one of the more reasonable anti-reflux surgeries.

Uncut interposed jejunum pouch versus esophago-gastrostomy and double anastomoses of jejunum to the esophagus and residual stomach: An innovative method of digestive tract reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy

AimAn innovative method of digestive tract reconstruction following proximal gastrectomy, the uncut interposed jejunum pouch, esophagus and residual stomach double anastomosis(Uncut-D), was established in recent years. In order to fully clarify the superiority of the procedure, this study has conducted a systematic analysis and thorough discussion. Methods118 patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction who underwent proximal gastrectomy were enrolled in this study. According to the methods of digestive tract reconstruction, these patients were divided into three groups: Uncut-D(n = 43), esophagogastrostomy (EG, n = 36), jejunal interposition (JI, n = 39).The preoperative indicators, surgical complications and related indicators of postoperative quality of life were analyzed. ResultsThere were no significant differences in preoperative data among all groups (P > 0.05); The digestive tract reconstruction time in Uncut-D group was more than that in EG group, and less than that in JI group (P < 0.05). The incidence of esophageal anastomotic stenosis in Uncut-D group was significantly lower than that in EG group (P < 0.05); In Uncut-D group, the incidence of reflux esophagitis, postoperative nutrition index(PNI), weight recovery and Visick classification were significantly better than those in EG group (P < 0.05), furthermore, the incidence of delayed gastric emptying,PNI and weight recovery were better than those in JI group (P < 0.05). ConclusionsThe Uncut-D procedure gave full play to jejunal continuity and the advantages of pouch, and played a valuable role in gastric and cardiac replacement, which significantly reduced long-term complications, improved postoperative nutritional status of patients and long-term quality of life.

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery or PPIs in the management of reflux-related esophageal stricture

BackgroundGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is often associated with esophageal stricture, particularly benign esophageal stricture. We aimed to evaluate the effects of balloon catheter dilation (BD) combined with laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) surgery and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with reflux-induced esophageal strictures.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 116 patients with reflux-induced benign esophageal strictures who underwent balloon dilatation therapy combined with PPIs (BD-PPIs group, n = 58) and balloon dilatation combined with LF (BD-LF group, n = 58). Patients were followed up for 24 months. The outcomes of the patients were monitored, including clinical success, symptom improvement, adverse events, and the frequency of esophagitis.ResultsAt the latest follow-up, the rate of clinical success was higher in BD-LF group than in BD-PPIs group (80.4% vs. 57.7%, P = 0.011). The patients in the BD-PPIs group required more dilation sessions to achieve successful dilation, as compared to those in the BD-LF group (2.1 ± 1.2 vs. 0.7 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). The DeMeester score, number of reflux episodes for which pH was < 4, and lower esophageal sphincter pressure were significantly better in the BD-LF group than in the BD-PPIs group (all P < 0.001). The incidence of reflux esophagitis was higher in the BD-PPIs group than in the BD-LF group, at 24 months (58.8% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.003).ConclusionsBalloon dilatation with concomitant LF is effective and safe for esophageal stricture secondary to GERD. Moreover, antireflux surgery techniques, such as Nissen or Toupet procedure, should be added for reflux-induced benign esophageal stricture.

Clinical application of complete laparoscopic gastrectomy with function preservation of cardia in gastric carcinoma

To investigate the feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic cardia function preserving gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Clinical data of 10 patients undergoing total laparoscopic cardia function preserving gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma from November 2020 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected. There were 7 males and 3 females. The mean age was (66.1±12.9) years (ranged from 38 to 86 years). All of the 10 patients were successfully performed total laparoscopic cardia function preserving gastrectomy without conversion to laparotomy. The time of digestive tract reconstruction was (24.8±3.3) min (20-30 min), and the intraoperative blood loss was (35±24) ml(20-100 ml). The time of postoperative exhaust was (2.5±0.9) days(2-3 d), the time of postoperative liquid diet was (2.25±0.87) days(2-3 d), postoperative hospital stay was (9.5±2.1) days(6-13 d). No surgical complications such as bleeding, anastomotic fistula or anastomotic stenosis occurred. Postoperative pathology showed that the proximal and distal margins of resected specimens were negative. Patients were followed up for 2 to 15 months, respectively. No death or tumor recurrence and metastasis occurred during the follow-up period. There were no symptoms of reflux after operation. Compared with total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy, total laparoscopic cardia function preserving gastrectomy can theoretically reduce the incidence of reflux esophagitis. We used manual suture method for digestive tract reconstruction, which can reduce the application of 2-3 stapling studs and reduce the cost of surgical materials. Compared with subtotal gastrectomy, total laparoscopic cardia function preserving gastrectomy has the advantages of more thorough lymph node dissection, with little residual gastric tissue; therefore, the blood supply is relatively better. The incidence of reflux esophagitis of total laparoscopic cardia function preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer may was lower than total gastrectomy.

Lean/normal-weight metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease is a risk factor for reflux esophagitis.

Reflux esophagitis is associated with metabolic dysfunction. Recently, fatty liver has been redefined as metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). We investigated the impact of MAFLD and its subtypes on the incidence of reflux esophagitis. This multicenter, observational cohort study enrolled 9100 consecutive health-check examinees who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ultrasonography. All patients were classified into the MAFLD or non-MAFLD group. Based on the Asian cut-off value for body mass index (BMI), the MAFLD group was further classified into the lean/normal-weight (BMI <23kg/m2 ) and overweight/obese (BMI ≥23kg/m2 ) subgroups. The impact of MAFLD and its subtypes on the cumulative incidence of reflux esophagitis was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. MAFLD was diagnosed in 26.5% (2416/9100) of patients. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that MAFLD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.2183; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0954-1.3550; p=0.0003), hiatal hernia, and aging were independent risk factors for reflux esophagitis. Stratification analysis indicated that cumulative incidence of reflux esophagitis among patients with MAFLD was significantly higher in the lean/normal-weight than in the overweight/obese group (HR 1.3274; 95% CI 1.0043-1.7547; p=0.0466). Among various metabolic factors, visceral adiposity was the only independent metabolic risk factor for reflux esophagitis (HR 2.8331; 95% CI 1.0201-7.8691; p=0.0457) in the lean/normal-weight MAFLD group. MAFLD, in particular lean/normal-weight MAFLD, is independent risk factor for reflux esophagitis. Furthermore, visceral adiposity was identified as the most strong metabolic risk factor for reflux esophagitis in lean/normal-weight patients with MAFLD.

Laparoscopic Esophagogastric Anastomosis With Stapled Pseudo-Fornix for Reflux Esophagitis Prevention After Proximal Gastrectomy.

Laparoscopic esophagogastric anastomosis is not commonly performed after proximal gastrectomy (PG) because of its technical complexity and the lack of a gold standard for reconstruction. We describe a simple and convenient technique of laparoscopic esophagogastrostomy with stapled pseudo-fornix for reflux esophagitis (RE) prevention after PG.Laparoscopic PG (LPG) was performed in four patients with gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach, and the remnant stomach was prepared for reconstruction. After making a small hole on the anterior wall of the remnant stomach 45 mm distal to the proximal stump and on the dorsal side of the esophageal stump, a 45 mm no-knife linear stapler was applied. To create a "pseudo-fornix," a common lumen was made by cutting the center of the four staple rows at a length of 15 mm. The entry hole was closed using the laparoscopic hand-sewn suturing technique.The mean operation time was 240 min, with an estimated blood loss of <10 ml. No intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery were observed. One patient developed stenosis of the esophagogastrostomy successfully treated by endoscopic balloon dilatation. Endoscopic surveillance three months after surgery revealed no incidence of RE in any of the patients.Laparoscopic esophagogastric anastomosis with stapled pseudo-fornix is convenient and beneficial in preventing RE after PG and should be considered the treatment of choice for reconstruction after LPG in selected patients with proximal gastric cancer.

Protocol for Comparing the Efficacy of Three Reconstruction Methods of the Digestive Tract (Kamikawa Versus Double-Tract Reconstruction Versus Tube-Like Stomach) After Proximal Gastrectomy.

BackgroundAppropriate gastrointestinal reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with proximal early gastric cancer. However, there is still great controversy about the choice of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy, and there is no clinical consensus on the choice of digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy. Currently, there is a lack of large-sample, prospective, randomized controlled studies to compare the efficacy of Kamikawa, double-tract reconstruction, and tube-like stomach reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy.Methods/designThis study will investigate the efficacy of three reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy in a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, which will enroll 180 patients with proximal early gastric cancer. Patients will be randomly divided into three groups: Group A (Kamikawa, n = 60), Group B (double-tract reconstruction, n = 60), and Group C (tube-like stomach, n = 60). The general information, past medical history, laboratory findings, imaging findings, and surgical procedures of the patients will be recorded and analyzed. The incidence of reflux esophagitis will be recorded as the primary endpoint. The incidence of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, operative time and intraoperative blood loss will be recorded as secondary endpoints.DiscussionThis study will establish a large-sample, prospective, randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of Kamikawa, double-tract reconstruction, and tube-like stomach reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy.Trial registrationThis study was approved by the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and registered on April 30, 2021. The registration number is ChiCTR2100045975.