Incidence Of Posthepatectomy Liver Failure Research Articles

Does the Surgical Approach Affect the Incidence of Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure in Cirrhotic Patients? An Analysis of the NSQIP Database.

Background: The association between surgical approach and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in cirrhotic patients is poorly understood. We hypothesize that patients will have similar rates of liver failure regardless of whether they undergo minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) or open liver resection (OLR) in major liver resections. In contrast, there will be lower rates of PHLF in patients undergoing minor hepatectomy via the MILR approach.Methods: Propensity score matching was used to analyze regression by matching the MILR to the OLR cohort. Patient demographics from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including race, age, gender, and ethnicity, were matched. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, renal failure, dyspnea, dialysis dependence, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (>ASA III) were among the preoperative patient characteristics subject to matching. PHLF (Grade A vs B. vs C) was our primary outcome measure.Results: A total of 2129 cirrhotic patients were included in the study. In the minor hepatectomy group, patients undergoing an OLR were more likely to get discharged to a facility (7.0% vs 4.4%; P = .03), had greater hospital length of stay (5 vs 3 days; P = .02), and had a greater need for invasive postoperative interventions (10.7% vs 4.6%; P < .01). They were also noted to have higher rates of organ space superficial surgical infections (SSIs) (7.3% vs 3.7%; P = .003), Clostridium difficile infection (.9% vs .1%; P = .05), renal insufficiency (2.1% vs .1%; P < .01), unplanned intubations (3.1% vs 1.4%; P = .03), and Grade C liver failure (2.3% vs .9%; P = .03).Conclusion: A higher incidence of PHLF grade C was found in patients undergoing OLR in the minor hepatectomy group. Therefore, in cirrhotic patients who can tolerate minimally invasive approaches, MILR should be offered to prevent postoperative complications as part of their optimization plan.

Significance of Prediction Models for Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure Based on Type IV Collagen 7s Domain in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Background: Previous studies have attempted to establish predictive models for post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing liver resection. However, a versatile and useful predictive model for PHLF remains to be developed. Therefore, we aimed to develop predictive models for PHLF based on type IV collagen 7s domain (7s collagen) in patients with HCC. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 972 patients with HCC who had undergone initial curative liver resection between February 2000 and December 2020 at our hospital. Multivariate logistic regression analysis using a restricted cubic spline was performed to evaluate the effect of 7s collagen on the incidence of PHLF. A nomogram was developed based on 7s collagen. Results: PHLF grades B or C were identified in 104 patients (11%): 98 (10%) and 6 (1%) PHLF grades B and C, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the preoperative serum level of 7s collagen was significantly associated with a proportional increase in the risk of PHLF, which was confirmed in both laparoscopic and open liver resections. A nomogram was developed based on 7s collagen, with a concordance index of 0.768. The inclusion of 7s collagen values in the predictive model increased the predictive accuracy. Conclusion: The findings highlight the efficacy of the serum level of 7s collagen as a predictive factor for PHLF. Our novel nomogram using 7s collagen may be useful for predicting the risk of PHLF.

Safety and benefit of modified mesohepatectomy in the treatment of bilobar involvement congenital biliary dilatation.

The diseased bile duct in bilobar congenital biliary dilatation is extensive and often requires major hepatectomy or liver transplantation associated with a higher risk. We aimed to evaluate the safety and benefit of modified mesohepatectomy, in comparison with trisectionectomy, to treat bilobar congenital biliary dilatation. This study included 28 patients with type IV and V bilobar congenital biliary dilatation. An innovative mesohepatectomy comprising the hepatectomy technique beyond the P/U point and bile duct shaping was applied to 14 patients to address the extensively diseased bile duct and difficulty in hepaticojejunostomy. Another 14 patients received trisectionectomy. The perioperative and long-term outcomes of these patients were compared. The ratio of residual liver volume to standard liver volume in the mesohepatectomy group was higher (78.68% vs. 40.90%, p=0.005), while the resection rate of the liver parenchyma was lower (28.25% vs. 63.97%, p=0.000), than that in trisectionectomy group. The mesohepatectomy group had a lower severe complication (>Clavein III, 0% vs. 57.70%, p=0.019) and incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure (7.14% vs. 42.86%, p=0.038). No significant difference was observed in blood loss and bile leakage (p>0.05). All the patients in the mesohepatectomy group achieved optimal results in the long-term follow-up. mesohepatectomy provides an efficient treatment option for bilobar congenital biliary dilatation and can achieve radical resection, retain more liver parenchyma, and reduce the difficulty of hepaticojejunostomy, especially for patients that are not eligible for major hepatectomy and liver transplantation.

Spleen volume is a predictor of posthepatectomy liver failure and short-term mortality for hepatocellular carcinoma.

The study aimed at retrospectively assessing the impact of spleen volume (SpV) on the development of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). 152 patients with primary HCC who underwent hepatectomy (sectionectomy or more) were classified into PHLF and non-PHLF groups, and then the relationship between PHLF and SpV was assessed. SpV (cm3) was obtained from preoperative CT and standardized based on the patient's body surface area (BSA, m2). PHLF was observed in 39 (26%) of the 152 cases. SpV/BSA was significantly higher in the PHLF group, and the postoperative 1-year survival rate was significantly worse in the PHLF group than that in the non-PHLF group (p = 0.044). Multivariable analysis revealed SpV/BSA as a significant independent risk factor for PHLF. Using the cut-off value (160 cm3/m2), the 152 cases were divided into small SpV and large SpV groups. The incidence of PHLF was significantly higher in the large SpV group (p = 0.002), the liver failure-related mortality rate was also significantly higher in the large SpV group (p = 0.007), and the 1-year survival rate was significantly worse in the large SpV group (p = 0.035). These results suggest SpV as a predictor of PHLF and short-term mortality in patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC. Moreover, SpV measurement is a simple and potentially useful method for predicting PHLF in patients with HCC.

A novel nomogram based on preoperative parameters to predict posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundPosthepatectomy liver failure is one of the main causes of death in patients after hepatectomy. This study intends to establish a prediction model to predict the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure and provide a scientific basis for further reducing the incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 1,172 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing partial hepatectomy. Using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and stepwise regression, a prediction model for posthepatectomy liver failure was established based on the independent risk factors for posthepatectomy liver failure and validated by bootstrapping with 100 resamples, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of the prediction model. ResultsThe incidence rate of posthepatectomy liver failure was 22.7% (266/1172). The results showed that the indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes (odds ratio = 1.05, P = .002), alanine transaminase (odds ratio = 1.02, P < .001), albumin rate (odds ratio = 0.92, P < .001), total bilirubin (odds ratio = 1.04, P < .001), prothrombin time (odds ratio = 2.44, P < .001), aspartate aminotransferase-neutrophil ratio (odds ratio = 0.95, P < .001), and liver fibrosis index (odds ratio = 1.35, P < .001) were associated with posthepatectomy liver failure. These 7 independent risk factors for posthepatectomy liver failure were integrated into a nomogram prediction model, the predictive efficiency for posthepatectomy liver failure (area under the curve = 0.818, 95% confidence interval 0.789-0.848) was significantly higher than in other predictive models with a liver fibrosis index (area under the curve = 0.651), indocyanine green R15 (area under the curve = 0.669), albumin-bilirubin score (area under the curve = 0.709), albumin-indocyanine green evaluation score (area under the curve = 0.706), model for end-stage liver disease score (area under the curve = 0.636), and Child‒Pugh (area under the curve = 0.551) (all P < .001). The risk of posthepatectomy liver failure in the high-risk posthepatectomy liver failure group (score ≥152) was higher than that in the posthepatectomy liver failure low-risk group (score <152). ConclusionThis study developed and validated a nomogram model to predict the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure before surgery that can effectively predict the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Early Postoperative Serum Phosphate Drop Predicts Sufficient Hypertrophy After Liver Surgery.

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of postoperative hypophosphatemia on liver regeneration after major liver surgery in the scenario of Associating Liver Partition with Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and living liver donation (LLD). Hypophosphatemia has been described to reflect the metabolic demands of regenerating hepatocytes. Both ALPPS and LLD are characterized by an exceptionally strong liver regeneration and may be of particular interest in the context of posthepatectomy hypophosphatemia. Serum phosphate changes within the first 7 postoperative days after ALPPS (n=61) and LLD (n=54) were prospectively assessed and correlated with standardized volumetry after 1 week. In a translational approach, postoperative phosphate changes were investigated in mice and in vitro . After ALPPS stage 1 and LLD, serum phosphate levels significantly dropped from a preoperative median of 1.08mmol/L [interquartile range (IQR) 0.92-1.23] and 1.07mmol/L (IQR 0.91-1.21) to a postoperative median nadir of 0.68 and 0.52mmol/L, respectively. A pronounced phosphate drop correlated well with increased liver hypertrophy ( P <0.001). Patients with a low drop of phosphate showed a higher incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure after ALPPS (7% vs 31%, P =0.041). Like in humans, phosphate drop correlated significantly with degree of hypertrophy in murine ALPPS and hepatectomy models ( P <0.001). Blocking phosphate transporter (Slc20a1) inhibited cellular phosphate uptake and hepatocyte proliferation in vitro. Phosphate drop after hepatectomy is a direct surrogate marker for liver hypertrophy. Perioperative implementation of serum phosphate analysis has the potential to detect patients with insufficient regenerative capacity at an early stage.

Is the extent of functional liver remnant increase truly "functional"? A single-institution case series of patients with Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS).

Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) aims to induce rapid hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) to reduce the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). However, volumetric increase does not correspond to functional increase. This is a novel study which aims to compare the increase in standardized FLR (sFLR) vs. indocyanine green retention at 15 minutes (ICG-R15). This is a retrospective case series of patients who underwent ALPPS between May 2015 and January 2022. Primary outcomes were sFLR and ICG-R15. Secondary outcomes were incidence of PHLF, morbidity, recurrence, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). There were 10 patients with median age of 60.5 years (range 29-69). Most patients had adenocarcinoma secondary to colorectal origin (80%). There were 7 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy [median 6 cycles (range 5-9)]. Median size of the primary tumour was 5.0 cm (range 2.0-7.0 cm). There was a significant increase in median ICG-R15 after stage 1 ALPPS (8.8% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.024) and increase in median sFLR after stage 1 ALPPS (34.4% vs. 53.0%, p = 0.012). Linear regression showed no significant correlation between sFLR increase and ICG-R15 (B = 0.26, 95% CI: -0.82, 1.34, p = 0.565). One patient had PHLF. Median time to local recurrence and metastatic recurrence was 14.4 months (range 6.9-21.9) and 7.5 months (range 6.9-17.3) respectively. OS and DFS were 50% and 40% respectively. No significant relationship was observed between ICG-R15 and sFLR. Volume increase may overestimate the functional increase following ALPPS. Larger studies are needed to validate our findings.

Safety and Efficacy of Robotic vs Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic surgery remain a hotly debated topic in surgical oncology, but sparse data have been published thus far. To analyze short- and long-term outcomes of robotic liver resection (RLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from Western high-volume centers to assess the safety, reproducibility, and oncologic efficacy of this technique. This cohort study evaluated the outcomes of patients receiving RLR vs open liver resection (OLR) for HCC between 2010 and 2020 in 5 high-volume centers. After 1:1 propensity score matching, a group of patients who underwent RLR was compared with a validation cohort of OLR patients from a high-volume center that did not perform RLR. A retrospective analysis was performed of prospectively maintained databases at 2 European and 2 US institutions of patients who underwent RLR for HCC between January 1, 2010, and September 30, 2020. The main outcomes were safety and feasibility of RLR for HCC and its oncologic outcomes compared with a European OLR validation cohort. A 2-sided P < .05 was considered significant. The study included 398 patients (RLR group: 125 men, 33 women, median [IQR] age, 66 [58-71] years; OLR group: 315 men, 83 women; median [IQR] age, 70 [64-74] years), and 106 RLR patients were compared with 106 OLR patients after propensity score matching. The RLR patients had a significantly longer operative time (median [IQR], 295 [190-370] minutes vs 200 [165-255] minutes, including docking; P < .001) but a significantly shorter hospital length of stay (median [IQR], 4 [3-6] days vs 10 [7-13] days; P < .001) and a lower number of admissions to the intensive care unit (7 [6.6%] vs 21 [19.8%]; P = .002). Incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure was significantly lower in the RLR group (8 [7.5%] vs 30 [28.3%]; P = .001), with no cases of grade C failure. The 90-day overall survival rate was comparable between the 2 groups (RLR, 99.1% [95% CI, 93.5%-99.9%]; OLR, 97.1% [95% CI, 91.3%-99.1%]), as was the cumulative incidence of death related to tumor recurrence (RLR, 8.8% [95% CI, 3.1%-18.3%]; OLR, 10.2% [95% CI, 4.9%-17.7%]). This study represents the largest Western experience to date of full RLR for HCC. Compared with OLR, RLR performed in tertiary centers represents a safe treatment strategy for patients with HCC and those with compromised liver function while achieving oncologic efficacy.

The impact of minimally invasive surgery and frailty on post-hepatectomy outcomes.

The impact of patient frailty on post-hepatectomy outcomes is not well studied. We hypothesized that patient frailty is a strong predictor of 30-day post-hepatectomy complications. The liver-targeted National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for 2014-2019 was reviewed. A validated modified frailty index (mFI) was used. A total of 24,150 hepatectomies were reviewed. Worsening frailty was associated with increased incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications (mFI 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 was 3.9%, 6.3%, 10%, 8.1%, 50% respectively; p<0.001). Minimally invasive hepatectomies had a lower rate of Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications for non-frail (Laparoscopic: 1%, Robotic: 2.6%, Open: 4.6%; p<0.001) and frail patients (Laparoscopic: 3%, Robotic: 2.3%, Open: 7.7%; p<0.001). Frail patients experienced higher incidence of post-hepatectomy liver failure (5.4% vs 4.1% for non-frail; p<0.001) and grade C liver failure (28% vs 21.1% for non-frail; p=0.03). Incorporating mFI to Albumin-Bilirubin score (ALBI) improved its ability to predict Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications (AUC improved from 0.609 to 0.647; p<0.001) and 30-day mortality (AUC improved from 0.663 to 0.72; p<0.001). Worsening frailty correlates with increased incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications post-hepatectomy, whereas minimally invasive approaches decrease this risk. Incorporating frailty assessment to ALBI improves its ability to predict major postoperative complications and 30-day mortality.

Effect of postoperative administration of nafamostat mesilate on posthepatectomy liver failure

To investigate whether the administration of nafamostat mesilate (NM) reduces the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively reviewed the 1114 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC between 2004 and 2020. NM was selectively administered to patients undergoing major hepatectomy with an estimated blood loss of >500mL. NM group was administered via intravenous of 20mg of NM from immediately after surgery until postoperative day 4. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching and included 56 patients in each group. PHLF was defined according to the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). The incidence of PHLF was lower in the NM group than control group (P=0.018). The mean peak total bilirubin (P=0.006), aspartate transaminase (P=0.018), and alanine aminotransferase (P=0.018) levels postoperatively were significantly lower in the NM group. The mean hospital stays (P=0.012) and major complication rate (P=0.023) were also significantly lower in the NM group. Prophylactic administration of NM reduced the risks of complication and decreased the frequency of PHLF after hepatectomy. A further prospective study is needed to verify our findings.

P9.21: Future Liver Remnant Volume Ratio Less Than 30% Is Not A Contraindication to Living Donor Right Hepatectomy

Background: The evidence for defining a safe remnant/total volume ratio(RTVR) for in living donors undergoing right hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is still not clear yet. The current practice of arbitrarily requiring an RTVR of at least 30% is based on the experience of early studies to keep donor safety. Recently, some centers reported that extended resection with RTVR less than 30% for living donor right hepatectomy but there is no consensus has been established for future remnant liver volume (FRLV) ratio limit. Herein, we describe out center’s experience for living donor right hepatectomy with RTVR < 30% and evaluate the outcomes of living donors with RTVR < 30%. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 473 living donor right hepatectomy (LDRH) which performed at our institution from January 2010 to December 2020. We performed right hepatectomy for living donors with RTVR <30% under the following criteria; 1) Age ≤40 2) Preservation of MHV 3) No or Minimal fatty changes (<15%) 4) Flat fish shaped left hemiliver 5) RTVR > 25% and FRLV/ BW ≥ 0.45. The outcomes in these extended living donors were compared with those in living donors under conventional criteria. Results: The mean RTVR in extended group was 27.1 ± 1.2 % (range, 25.1-28.9). Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) occurred in 50 donors (10.6%) and most cases were grade A except one case in conventional group and no clinically significant PHLF was not evident for these extended donor group. PHLF and major complications were not more frequent in living donor group with RTVR <30%. In multivariate only the event for major complications was associated with PHLF but RTVR less than 30% was related to PHLF. To adjust for between-group differences, donors with FLR ≤30% and >30% were matched based on baseline characteristics and overall complication rates and the incidence of PHLF were not different between the two groups. Conclusion: DRH under our extended criteria could be performed safely in donors with RTVR ratio <30% under our strict criteria when no other donors are available and our extended criteria might be helpful to expand donor pools without adverse effects on donor safety.

SoftALPPS - A novel, individual procedure for patients with advanced liver tumors

The first-line therapy for liver malignancies is a radical extended liver resection. This high-risk operation has a high incidence of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) due to a small future liver remnant (FLR). One of the procedures to increase the FLR is the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) which is still associated with high morbidity and mortality. Here, we present a new, less invasive ALPPS variant that may be associated with lower morbidity. SoftALPPS is characterized by reduced trauma to the liver tissue and individual adaptation to the patient's health constitution. In softALPPS, portal vein embolization (PVE) is performed instead of portal vein ligation (PVL) after complete recovery of liver function. In addition, a non-absorbable foil was avoided in order to be able to extend the interval to step two or skip step two when required. Four patients successfully underwent softALPPS. Two of these patients have been followed-up for over a year (one patient with Klatskin tumor, one patient with extensive HCC). Both patients show no evidence of recurrence after 12 months and are in good medical condition. The other two patients who recently had surgery are also doing well. SoftALPPS offers the chance to curatively resect patients with high tumor burden of the liver even when the FLR is inadequate. This individual therapy method can give patients the possibility of complete tumor resection and can help to reduce perioperative morbidity.

Portal vein embolization with absolute ethanol to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant

BackgroundPreoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is widely used prior to major liver resection to reduce the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of PVE using absolute ethanol.MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing preoperative PVE between February 2003 and February 2020 at a high-volume tertiary institution were retrospectively reviewed. Hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) was determined by comparing volumetric data using semi-automated software on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging before and after PVE. Efficacy of absolute ethanol was evaluated by the percentage increase in the FLR volume and the ratio of the FLR to the total liver volume (TLV). Technical success and complications following PVE were evaluated. Feasibility of hepatectomy following PVE and the incidence of PHLF were determined.ResultsSixty-two patients underwent preoperative PVE using absolute ethanol. The technical success rate was 95.2%. Median time interval between PVE and follow-up imaging was 34 days (range 6–144 days). The mean increase in FLR volume and ratio of the FLR to TLV were 43.6 ± 34.4% and 12.3 ± 7.7% respectively. Major adverse events occurred in 3 cases (4.8%) and did not preclude consideration of surgery. Forty-two patients (67.8%) proceeded to surgery for intended hepatectomy of which 36 patients (58.1%) underwent liver resection. Major post-operative complications occurred in 4 patients (11.1%) and there were no cases of PHLF.ConclusionPreoperative PVE with absolute ethanol is effective and safe in inducing hypertrophy of the FLR before partial hepatectomy to prevent PHLF.

The value of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced biliary imaging from the hepatobiliary phase for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in HCC patients.

To determine the value of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced biliary imaging from the hepatobiliary phase for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with HCC who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced hepatobiliary magnetic resonance imaging prior to hepatectomy were collected in two centers. The relative enhancement ratio of the biliary system (REB) and the liver to muscle ratio (LMR) were measured at the hepatobiliary phase. Potential risk factors for PHLF were analyzed by logistic regression. The capacity of the REB and LMR to predict PHLF was analyzed via receiver operating characteristic curve. Of the 221 patients, post-hepatectomy liver failure occurred in 60 patients (27.1%). The REB was an independent risk factor for PHLF (odds ratio [OR] = 0.127 [0.047-0.348], p < 0.001). Although the LMR tended to be associated with PHLF (p = 0.063), it was not an independent risk factor in the multivariable analysis (OR = 0.624 [0.023-16.709], p = 0.779). Moreover, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the REB and LMR was 0.87 and 0.60. The most appropriate cutoff value for the REB was 2.21. The HCC patients with the REB ≤ 2.21 had a higher incidence of post-hepatectomy liver failure than those with the REB > 2.21 (60.0% versus 8.5%, p < 0.001). Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced biliary imaging from the hepatobiliary phase was valuable in predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure in HCC patients. • The relative enhancement ratio of the biliary system (REB) was an independent risk factor for post-hepatectomy liver failure in HCC patients. • HCC patients with the REB ≤ 2.21 had significantly higher incidence of post-hepatectomy liver failure than those with the REB > 2.21 (60.0% versus 8.5%).

Sarcopenia influences the kinetic growth rate after ALPPS

BackgroundAssociating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy induces rapid and effective hypertrophy of the future liver remnant to prevent postoperative liver failure. The aim of this study was to determine cofactors, including sarcopenia, influencing the kinetic growth rate, and subsequently future liver remnant, in terms of safety, complications, and posthepatectomy liver failure. MethodPatients undergoing associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy between 2010 and 2020 were included in this study. Kinetic growth rate was defined as the quotient of the degree of hypertrophy and the time interval between the 2 steps. The sarcopenia muscle index was defined as the skeletal muscle area of both psoas major muscles normalized to the patient’s height. ResultsDuring the study period, 90 patients underwent associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. The association between kinetic growth rate and posthepatectomy liver failure indicates a significant nonlinear effect (P = .02). The incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure significantly increased at a kinetic growth rate below 7% per week (31%) compared to patients with a kinetic growth rate >7%/wk (7%, P = .02). In patients with a low kinetic growth rate (<7%/wk), the sarcopenia muscle index was significantly lower compared to patients with a high kinetic growth rate (>7%/wk). Furthermore, a low sarcopenia muscle index and a high body mass index turned out to be independent risk factors for a low kinetic growth rate. ConclusionAfter the first step of the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy procedure, a low kinetic growth rate (<7%/wk) increases the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure. The presence of a low sarcopenia muscle index and a high body mass index are profoundly correlated with clinically substantial impaired liver regeneration, which can result in increased liver dysfunction after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy.

Future liver volume combined with platelet count predicts liver failure after major hepatectomy

BackgroundMajor hepatectomy is associated with high incidence of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of future remnant liver volume combined with liver function tests on predicting PHLF. MethodsPatients who underwent major hepatectomy from April 2009 to May 2017 were enrolled in the training cohort. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors of PHLF and generate a logistic regression model for the prediction of PHLF. A conditional inference tree was generated based on the optimal cutoff value of independent predictive factors of PHLF. The precedent results were validated in an independent cohort from June 2017 to March 2018. ResultsOne hundred and eighteen patients were included in the training cohort, while another 34 in the validation cohort. Future remnant liver volume/estimated standard total liver volume (FLV/eTV) and preoperative platelet count were independent predictive factors of PHLF (P = 0.0021 and P = 0.012, respectively). The conditional inference tree showed that patients with FLV/eTV ≤0.56 and PLT count ≤145 × 109/L were at high risk of developing PHLF. ConclusionFLV/eTV combined with preoperative PLT count is effective in predicting PHLF after major hepatectomy.

Extensive liver resection in a child with an extremely low future liver remnant volume

The incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure in adult patients and a large number of complications of two-stage liver resections require a search for criteria that allow highly accurate assessment of the risk of liver failure. For this purpose, the study of the future liver remnant volume and function have been widely introduced among adult patients, and the future liver remnant function measurement reflects the greater sensitivity. The absence of references to posthepatectomy liver failure, as well as the experience of determining the functional reserve of the future liver remnant in children, let us to suggest the possibility of a wider using one-stage liver resections when the future liver remnant volume is below the generally accepted threshold (25% of the healthy liver parenchyma volume) in the case of the functional reserve sufficient value. This clinical case describes the successful extended right hemihepatectomy and segmentectomy 1 in a 3-year patient with a future liver remnant volume of 16.5% without clinical signs of postresection hepatic failure, which confirms the thesis of the need to assess the functional liver reserve in pediatric oncology to reduce the frequency of two-stage resections and liver transplants. The patient’s parents gave consent to the use of their child’s data, including photographs, for research purposes and in publications.

Muscularity Defined by the Combination of Muscle Quantity and Quality is Closely Related to Both Liver Hypertrophy and Postoperative Outcomes Following Portal Vein Embolization in Cancer Patients

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is a common procedure for preventing hepatic insufficiency after major hepatectomy. While evaluating the body composition of surgical patients is common, the impact of muscularity defined by both muscle quantity and quality on liver hypertrophy after PVE and associated outcomes after major hepatectomy in patients with hepatobiliary cancer remain unclear. This retrospective review included 126 patients who had undergone hepatobiliary cancer resection after PVE. Muscularity was measured on preoperative computed tomography images by combining the skeletal mass index and intramuscular adipose content. Various factors including the degree of hypertrophy (DH) of the future liver remnant and post-hepatectomy outcomes were compared according to muscularity. DH did not differ by malignancy type. Patients with high muscularity had better DH after PVE (P = 0.028), and low muscularity was an independent predictor for poor liver hypertrophy after PVE [odds ratio (OR), 3.418; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.129-10.352; P = 0.030]. In subgroup analyses in which patients were stratified into groups based on primary hepatobiliary tumors and metastases, low muscularity was associated with higher incidence of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) ≥ grade B (P = 0.018) and was identified as an independent predictor for high-grade PHLF (OR 3.931; 95% CI 1.113-13.885; P = 0.034) among the primary tumor group. In contrast, muscularity did not affect surgical outcomes in patients with metastases. Low muscularity leads to poor liver hypertrophy after PVE and is also a predictor of PHLF, particularly in primary hepatobiliary cancer.

Hepatic Arterioportal Fistula Is Associated with Decreased Future Liver Remnant Regeneration after Stage-I ALPPS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients often developed hepatic arterioportal fistula (APF). The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of APF on future liver remnant (FLR) regeneration and surgical outcomes after the first stage of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (stage-I ALPPS). MethodsConsecutive HCC patients who underwent ALPPS at our center between March 2017 and May 2019 were retrospectively studied. Data for the association between APF and clinicopathological details, liver volume, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. ResultsThe enrolled 35 HCC patients were divided into three groups: 15 patients with preoperative APF were classified as the APF I group, 10 patients developed APF after stage-I ALPPS as the APF II group, whereas the other 10 patients without APF before and after stage-I ALPPS as the control group. After stage-I ALPPS, patients in the APF I and APF II groups had lower kinetic growth rate (KGR) of FLR volume (6.1±3.2%, 11.4±8.4%, 25.0±8.8% per week, respectively, P<0.001) and took longer median time to reach the sufficient FLR volume for stage-II ALPPS (17.5 days, 12 days, 6 days, respectively, P<0.001) than those in the control group. Meanwhile, the incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in the APF I and APF II groups was significantly higher than that of the control group (P=0.007). There are 27 (77.1%) patients who completed stage-II ALPPS. The overall survival (OS) rates at 1 and 3 years were 59.3% and 35.1%, whereas the disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 1 and 3 years were 44.4% and 22.9%, respectively. ConclusionsHepatic APF is significantly associated with decreased FLR regeneration and a higher risk of PHLF after stage-I ALPPS. HCC patients who are to undergo ALPPS may benefit from the timely perioperative intervention of APF.

A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing administration of antithrombin III after liver resection (HiSCO-05 trial)

BackgroundPosthepatectomy liver failure is a poor prognostic factor after hepatectomy. Various preventive treatments have been tried; however, there are no clinical trials that use posthepatectomy liver failure as the primary endpoint, and the clinical effects of posthepatectomy liver failure have not been fully verified. The aim of this study was to investigate whether administration of antithrombin III can prevent posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with coagulopathy after hepatectomy. This study also evaluated the safety of AT-III administration after hepatectomy. MethodsThe current study enrolled 141 patients diagnosed with coagulopathy after hepatectomy between October 2015 and September 2018 at 7 hospitals in Hiroshima, Japan (HiSCO group). Patients were randomized to undergo either administration of antithrombin III (n = 64) or non-administration (n = 77). The primary endpoint was the incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure. This randomized controlled trial was registered with the University Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000018852). ResultsTreatment for postoperative coagulopathy was performed safely without adverse events. The incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure was similar in both treatment groups (nonadministration of antithrombin III group, 28.5%, versus administration of antithrombin III group, 28.1%; P = .953) The rate of morbidity was higher in the administration group than the non-administrated group (17.2% vs 11.7%, P = .351). Following the multivariate analysis of the whole study group, body mass index ≥25, total bilirubin ≥1.5 mg/dL, and the disseminated intravascular coagulation score ≥5 postoperatively were the independent risk factors for posthepatectomy liver failure. ConclusionThis study showed that the administration of antithrombin III resulted in no significant difference in preventing posthepatectomy liver failure, possibly through suppressing coagulopathy.